Environmental News for a Healthier Planet and Life

Help Support EcoWatch

The Global Fresh Water Crisis: Algae Blooms, Privatization and Scarcity

I live on a lakeshore. It’s face changes not only day-to-day, but moment to moment, menacing and dark, then ethereal with silver light dancing everywhere, then solemn again like glass, then lively with trout feeding at the surface. This spring, I saw a new face.

In April, we experienced a very unpleasant smell and taste in the lake water. For days, no trout hit the surface. I paddled out in the canoe and ran my fingers through the algae bloom. I had not witnessed this face before, and it startled me. A biologist friend and I collected water samples, looked at droplets under our microscopes, and began to identify the organisms living in our lake.

If you have not seen this sort of thing, imagine: a fraction of a drop of water, pressed flat between two pieces of glass, a tiny damp smudge, and within this world, little bacteria, diatoms and dinoflagellates swim around as if alien sea monsters in the mid-Pacific.

Algal bloom in Lake Binder, IA. Photo credit:
Flickr/ eutrophication&hypoxia

We found primarily Volvox algae, which is non-toxic, but which depletes lake oxygen as it dies off. Repeated algae blooms can kill lakes or transform them to swamp conditions. We found smaller traces of toxic cyano-bacteria, Nostoc sp., which can kill other lake species. These clues all indicate a lake going through an ecological transition.

The Volvox bloom tells us that our lake is processing a load of nutrients, typically phosphates and nitrates, which typically flow from human settlements. The annoying smell and taste indicate the decomposing, low-oxygen conditions. This is a rural lake with forested park on about half the shoreline, a few small farms and less than a hundred homes in the 6-square-kilometer watershed. Yet, here we witness the human impact, even in modest numbers, on Earth’s delicately balanced ecosystems.

Similar fresh water crises play out globally in virtually every inhabited watershed on Earth.

Peak Water

You probably know the sobering statistics: About three-thousandths, 0.3 percent, of all fresh water on Earth exists in lakes and rivers; 30 percent exists in soil moisture and ground water; and 70 percent remains locked up in ice. The ice, we know, is receding, transforming into saline ocean water or fresh groundwater. Meanwhile, human usage depletes the groundwater, the lakes, rivers and aquifers.

Today, on Earth, more than one billion people have no access to clean, fresh water. In wealthy industrial and post-industrial nations, consumers unwittingly use massive water resources with every purchase they make, such as the 650 gallons necessary to produce a typical cotton t-shirt, or the 139 gallons of water to prepare a single 16-ounce cup of fancy logo coffee. Producing a pound of beef in industrial ranching requires more than two thousand gallons of water.

North Americans use some 100 gallons of water per person each day (more than 120 gallons in Los Angeles), while in Chad, Niger, Ghana and Gambia, the average person uses as little as one gallon, and are fortunate if their water is clean and safe. 

Industrial projects such as the Canadian tar sands, shale oil fracking and pesticide-based agriculture pollute the water tables, rivers and lakes. About half the world’s fresh water is polluted. Furthermore, increasing global temperatures transform water to vapor at a faster rate, drying lakes and aggravating the water crisis.

The Aral Sea, in Kazakhstan, drained for cotton production and drying under increased heat, has dropped 16 meters and shrunk in size by 70 percent. Lake Urmia in Iran has dropped more than 10 meters and shrunk to about half its size. Poyang, once the largest freshwater lake in China, has virtually dried up due to drought and water diversion. Lake Chad, between Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon and Chad, has dropped 10 meters and lost 95 percent of its area, as regional governments fight over the remnants.

In the U.S., the 450,000 km² Ogallala Aquifer, providing irrigation in the U.S. for a century, but depleting faster than it is replenished for decades, is now dry in some regions, and would take tens of thousands of years to replenish by natural rain cycles. The Colorado River now runs dry long before it reaches the sea. Owens Lake in Southern California, once covering 280-square-kilometers, up to 18 meters deep, is now nearly dry, diverted to supply water to Los Angles. The California drought this summer shut down power systems, left communities without local water and set in motion a warming feedback cycle when those communities began to truck water in from far away, burning hydrocarbons to move water.

This story is replicated, with variations, on thousands of lakes, rivers and aquifers around the world. Hotter global temperatures increase droughts, while the world’s human population consumes fresh water faster than Earth’s natural hydrological systems can replenish it. Every day, we deplete Earth’s shrinking water reserves, and some regions have already reached what Lester Brown identifies as “peak water.”

The Capitalist, Industrial Response: Sell It!

In 2006, Europe’s largest bank, Swiss UBS, wrote, “Water scarcity: The defining crisis of the 21st century?” The following year they bought UK’s Southern Water with JP Morgan and Australia’s Challenger Fund. In 2008, Credit Suisse warned investors of the “depletion of freshwater reserves [due to] “pollution, disappearance of glaciers and population growth,” and advised: “One way to take advantage of this trend is to invest in companies geared to water generation.”

We know that companies do not actually “generate” any water, but rather lay claim to it. They see water shortages as an opportunity to privatize water and sell it to those who can afford it. “Water is the oil of the twenty-first century,” DOW Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris told The Economist in 2008.

According to a report by Global Research, water is now a $425 billion annual industry. Five food and beverage giants —Nestlé, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Anheuser Busch and Danone—consume almost 575 billion liters of water per year. In a pattern we have come to recognize, the industrial solution makes the core problem worse. A single liter of bottled water requires three liters of water to produce and leaves a trail of plastic throughout the world.

Multinational banks and investment firms—Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse, Citigroup, Barclays, HSBC and others—are buying water rights. Meanwhile, industry-friendly governments support their claims by outlawing common acts such as collecting rainwater.

In Bolivia, in the 1990s, the World Bank, the U.S. firm Bechtel and the Bolivian government teamed up to privatize water, raise water rates and outlaw citizen water collection. These actions led to an uprising in 2000, an all-out revolution and ultimately a change of government.

In 2003, Goldman Sachs and partners acquired the former French water-treatment and chemical company Ondeo Nalco for $4.2 billion, and in 2008, a Goldman Sachs report called water “the petroleum for the next century” an opportunity for investment and profit. In 2008, Goldman Sachs bought a $50 million USD share of China Water and Drinks Inc., which supplies allegedly purified water to Coca-Cola.

In 2007, Citigroup, HSBC and partners bought Yorkshire Water in the UK, and Citi is now investing in India’s water infrastructure market. “Water,” said Citigroup economist Willem Buitler in 2011, “will, in my view, become … the single most important physical-commodity based asset class, dwarfing oil, copper, agricultural commodities and precious metals.” Among the profitable uses of water, Citigroup includes hydraulic fracking. A typical fracked oil well requires 3 to 5 million gallons of water, 80 percent of which becomes too polluted to reuse. Fracking companies now outbid farmers—and thirsty communities—for water rights.

Preserving Earth’s Water

The alternative to turning water into a commodity is for communities to protect and preserve their scarce water cycles. Turning water into a commodity, the corporate response, is not going to save lakes, replenish drained aquifers, or reverse global warming. Communities will have to limit their own water use and protect water sources. Meanwhile, to stabilize Earth’s climate we need to phase out fossil fuels quickly.

In our community, the algae bloom alerted us to collect data and begin the long process of mitigating and reversing our impact on the lake. Perhaps, if the residents in our watershed can reduce our phosphate and nitrogen flow, we can save our lake from becoming an algae swamp. Others have not been so successful. Algae blooms killed Lake Erie, between Canada and the U.S., and likewise Green Lake in Washington State, Blue Lake and Fern Ridge Lake in Oregon, Lough Neagh in the UK, Lake Taihu in Jiangsu China, and so forth around the world: thousands of dead or swampy former lakes.

As I write this, I’m watching cutthroat trout hit the lake surface, and this gives me some comfort. Fortunately for our community, we can take actions to reduce the nutrient flow from our homes and help restabilize our lake. We can avoid phosphate soaps and nitrate fertilizers, allow manure to compost well before spreading on gardens, isolate manure from the water run-off, upgrade and maintain septic fields, and so forth.

The wind has picked up, and the lake’s face changes once again, all rippley and grey now. The trout have gone back to their cool holes. "Show me!", the lake seems to say. Talk is cheap.


EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

New research shows that there's actually a larger quantity of plastic in the ocean than previously thought. Susan White / USFWS / Flickr / CC by 2.0

By Elizabeth Claire Alberts

In 1997, Charles Moore was sailing a catamaran from Hawaii to California when he and his crew got stuck in windless waters in the North Pacific Ocean. As they motored along, searching for a breeze to fill their sails, Moore noticed that the ocean was speckled with "odd bits and flakes," as he describes it in his book, Plastic Ocean. It was plastic: drinking bottles, fishing nets, and countless pieces of broken-down objects.

"It wasn't an eureka moment … I didn't come across a mountain of trash," Moore told Mongabay. "But there was this feeling of unease that this material had got [as] far from human civilization as it possibly could."

Captain Charles Moore looking at a piece of floating plastic in the ocean. Algalita Marine Research and Education

Moore, credited as the person who discovered what's now known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, returned to the same spot two years later on a citizen science mission. When he and his crew collected water samples, they found that, along with larger "macroplastics," the seawater was swirling with tiny plastic particles: microplastics, which are defined as anything smaller than 5 millimeters but bigger than 1 micron, which is 1/1000th of a millimeter. Microplastics can form when larger pieces of plastics break down into small particles, or when tiny, microscopic fibers detach from polyester clothing or synthetic fishing gear. Other microplastics are deliberately manufactured, such as the tiny plastic beads in exfoliating cleaners.

"That's when we really had the eureka moment," Moore said. "When we pulled in that first trawl, which was outside of what we thought was going to be the center [of the gyre], and found it was full of plastic. Then we realized, 'Wow, this is a serious situation.'"

Captain Charles Moore holding up a jar of plastic-filled seawater from a research expedition in 2009. Algalita Marine Research and Education

Since Moore's discovery of the plastic-swirling gyres, there's been a growing amount of research to try and understand the scale of the plastic pollution issue, including several studies from 2020. This new research shows that there's actually a larger quantity of plastic in the ocean than previously thought, and that the plastic even enters the atmosphere and blows back onto land with the sea breeze. Recent studies also indicate that plastic is infiltrating our bodies through food and drinking water. The upshot is that plastic is ubiquitous in the ocean, air, food supply, and even in our own bodies. The new picture that is emerging, scientists say, is of a biosphere permeated with plastic particles right down to the very tissues of humans and other living things, with consequences both known and unknown for the lifeforms on our planet.

How Much Is Really in the Ocean?

In the past 70 years, virgin plastic production has increased 200-fold, and has grown at a rate of 4% each year since 2000, according to a 2017 study in Science Advances. Only a small portion of plastics are recycled, and about a third of all plastic waste ends up in nature, another study suggests.

While new research indicates that plastic is leaking into every part of the natural world, the ocean has long been a focal point of the plastic pollution issue. But how much is actually in the sea?

Moore says it's "virtually impossible" to get an accurate estimate because of the ongoing production of plastic, and the tendency for plastic to break down into microplastics.

"This count is constantly increasing, and it's increasing at a very rapid rate," he said. "It's a moving target."

One commonly cited study, for which Moore acted as a co-author, estimated that there are more than 5.25 trillion plastic pieces floating in the ocean, weighing more than 250,000 tons, based on water samples and visual surveys conducted on 24 expeditions in five subtropical gyres. But even at the time of publication in 2014, Moore said he knew "that was an underestimate."

A more recent study published this year, led by researchers at Plymouth Marine Laboratory, indicates that there's a lot more microplastic in the ocean than we previously thought. When taking samples from the ocean, most researchers use nets with a mesh size of 333 microns, which is small enough to catch microplastics, but big enough to avoid clogging. But the team from Plymouth Marine Laboratory used much finer 100-micron nets to sample the surface waters in the Gulf of Mexico and the English Channel.

"Our nets clogged too, so we used shorter trawls and a specialized technique for removing all the plankton — microscopic plants and biota — from the sample to reveal the microplastics," Matthew Cole, a marine ecologist at Plymouth Marine Laboratory and author of the study, told Mongabay in an email. "This process is quite time-consuming, so it'd be challenging for all samples collected to be treated this way."

The research team at Plymouth Marine Laboratory collecting water samples. Matthew Cole

The researchers found there were 2.5 to 10 times more microplastics in their samples compared to samples that used 333-micron nets.

"If this relationship held true throughout the global ocean, we can multiply existing global microplastic concentrations ascertained using 333-micron nets, to predict that globally there are 125 trillion plastics floating in the ocean," Cole said. "However, we know these plastics keep on degrading, and these smaller plastics would be missed by our smaller 100 micron net — so the true number will be far greater."

Another team of researchers delved down to the seafloor in the Tyrrhenian Sea in the Mediterranean to take sediment samples. They found that microplastic accumulated at depths of 600 to 900 meters (about 2,000 to 3,000 feet), and that certain spots in the ocean, termed "microplastic hotspots," could hold up to 1.9 million pieces per square meter — the highest level ever to be recorded on the seafloor. The results of this study were published in Science in June 2020.

"We were shocked by the sheer number of [microplastics]," Ian Kane, the study's lead author, told Mongabay in May. "1.9 million is enormous. Previous studies have documented much smaller numbers, and … just talked about plastic fragments, but it's fibers that are really the more insidious of the microplastics. These are the things that are more readily consumed and absorbed into organisms' flesh."

A water sample containing plastic. Algalita Marine Research and Education

While these studies shine light on the fact that there's definitely more plastic in the ocean than we think, it still doesn't complete the picture, says Steve Allen, a microplastic expert and doctoral candidate at the University of Strathclyde in the U.K. Large quantities of microplastics still appear to be "missing" from the ocean, he said. For instance, one study suggested that 99.8% of oceanic plastic sinks below the ocean surface layer, making it difficult to detect, but Allen says this doesn't fully explain what's happening to all of the plastic that enters the ocean.

"We're finding some of it," Allen told Mongabay. "But we're … trying to explain where the rest of it went."

Allen and his wife, fellow scientist Deonie Allen, also from the University of Strathclyde, have been working to find their answer, or at least part of it, in an unlikely place: up in the sky.

‘Microplastics Are in Our Air’

As the ocean churns and breaks waves, air is trapped in tiny bubbles. When those bubbles break at the sea's surface, water rushes to fill the void, and this causes tiny, micro-sized particles, like flecks of sea salt or bacteria, to burst into the atmosphere. A new study, published in PLOS ONE, suggests that microplastics are entering the air in the same way.

"[Bubbles] act a little bit like velcro," Deonie Allen told Mongabay. "Rather than the bubble going through the plastic soup and coming to the surface and not bringing any of the plastics with it, it actually collects [the plastic] and hangs on to it as it comes up. And when it bursts, the energy from the creation of the jet to fill the hole that's left in the sea … is what gives it the force to eject the plastic up into the atmosphere."

A lot of previous research on plastic pollution in the ocean has assumed that plastic remains in the seawater and sediment, or gets washed ashore. But this study takes a pioneering step to suggest that ocean plastic is entering the atmosphere through the sea breeze.

"This was just the next logical step to see whether what we're putting into the ocean was actually going to stay there, or whether it would come back," Steve Allen said.

A device used to collect air and mist samples to test for microplastics. Steve Allen

To obtain the necessary data for this study, the research team collected air and sea spray samples on the French Atlantic coast, both onshore and offshore. They found that there was a high potential for ocean microplastics to be released into the air, and suggested that each year, 136,000 tons of microplastics were blowing ashore across the world, although Steve Allen said this number was "extremely conservative."

This study specifically looked at microplastics, but the much smaller nanoplastics are likely going into air by the same means, according to the Allens. But detecting nanoplastics in the water or air can be challenging.

While this is the first study to look at the ocean as a source of atmospheric plastics, other research has examined the capacity of land-based plastics to leach into the air. One study, authored by the Allens and other researchers, found that microplastics were present in the air in the Pyrenees Mountains between France and Spain, even though the testing site was at least 90 kilometers (56 miles) from any land-based source of plastic, such as a landfill. This suggests that the wind can carry microplastics over long distances.

"We know that microplastics are in our air everywhere, from the looks of it," Deonie Allen said.

More research needs to be done to understand the implications of atmospheric microplastics on human health, but according to the Allens, it can't be good for us.

A "cloud catcher" used to collect data for research on microplastics in the atmosphere. Steve Allen

"Microplastics are really good at picking up the contaminants in the surrounding environment — phthalates, flame retardants, heavy metals," Deonie Allen said. "That will get released into the body, relatively effectively."

Enrique Ortiz, a Washington, D.C.-based ecologist and journalist who writes on the plastic pollution issue, says that this evidence should be a "wake up" call to humanity.

"The oceans are picking up the plastic that we throw in it, and that's what we're breathing," Ortiz told Mongabay "And that's the part that really … amazes me."

"But it's not just happening in coastal cities," he added. "No matter where you go, [even] in the middle of the Arctic … the human imprint is already there."

We're not just inhaling microplastics through the air we breathe — we're also getting it through the water we drink and the food we eat.

‘Our Life Is Plasticized’

Plastic waste isn't just leaking into the ocean; it's also polluting freshwater systems and even raining or snowing down from the sky after getting absorbed into the atmosphere, according to another study led by Steve and Deonie Allen. With microplastics being so ubiquitous, it should come as no surprise that they are also present in the food and water we drink.

Drinking water, including tap and bottled water, is the largest source of plastic in our diet, with the average person consuming about 1,769 tiny microplastic particles each week, according to a 2019 report supported by WWF. Other primary sources of microplastics include shellfish, beer and salt.

A new study published this year in Environmental Research found that microplastics were even present in common fruits and vegetables. Apples had one of the highest microplastic counts, with an average of 195,500 plastic particles per gram, while broccoli and carrots averaged more than 100,000 particles per gram.

"The possibility of plastics in our fruit and vegetables is extremely alarming," John Hocevar, ocean campaign director for Greenpeace USA, said in a statement. "This should prompt additional studies to assess how much plastic we are consuming through our produce each day and examine how it is impacting our health."

"Decades of plastic use have contaminated our air, water, and soil," Hocevar added. "Eating just a bite of an apple could now mean eating hundreds of thousands of bits of plastic at the same time."

Through normal water and food consumption, it's estimated that the average person consumes about 5 grams of plastic each week, equivalent to the size of a credit card, according to the WWF report.

"Plastic is everywhere," Thava Palanisami, a microplastics researcher at the University of Newcastle, Australia, and contributor to the WWF report, told Mongabay. "We live with plastic and our life is plasticized — that we know. But we don't know what it does to human health. That's the biggest question mark."

While it's not entirely clear how plastic affects human health, research suggests that the inhalation of fibrous microplastics can lead to respiratory tract inflammation. And another study, referenced in the WWF report, shows that fish and other marine animals with high concentrations of microplastics in their respiratory and digestive tracts have much higher mortality rates. Another study, published in 2020, indicates that plastic accumulates in the muscle tissue of fish.

"If you look at what happens, for example, in fish — it [plastic] stays in their muscles," Ortiz said. "It's scary. If you look at the numbers, you're eating something in the order of one kilo of plastic every three years. I wonder, in our lifetime … if a percentage of our weight will be plastic that is still in our muscles."

"The problem is serious," Palanisami said. "We've got to stop using unwanted plastic and manage plastic waste properly, and … work on new plastic alternates."

Stemming the Tide  

Erin Simon, head of plastic waste and business at WWF, and leader of the organization's packaging and material science program, says the key to curbing the plastic pollution issue is making sure that plastic doesn't leak into nature in the first place.

"If you had a leaky faucet, would you bring out the mop first, or would you turn off the water?" Simon told Mongabay. "We're trying to stem that tide of plastic flowing into the ocean and into nature in general … but at the same time, trying to identify the different root causes of that leakage."

While Simon says there are various ways to try and stop plastic from entering the natural world, such as well-managed recycling and composting programs, she also said that large companies can play a critical role in helping to reduce plastic waste. WWF is currently spearheading a new program called ReSource, launched in 2019, that helps analyze companies' plastic footprints in order to work toward sustainable solutions. The program's website says 100 companies could prevent 50 million tons of plastic waste.

"We have three targets that we're looking at when we're partnering with companies," Simon said. "One, get rid of what you don't need. At the end of the day, we do need to reduce our demand for virgin nonrenewable plastic. Once you get rid of that, you think about the stuff that you do need — the things [for which] plastic is the right material choice. Where am I sourcing that from? Am I getting it from recycled content? Am I getting it from a sustainably-sourced bio base, or is it virgin non-renewable [plastic]? And then finally … how are you, as a company … making sure it comes back? Are you designing it in a way that it's technically recyclable into the places that it's ending up?"

Marine debris litters a beach on Laysan Island in the Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife Refuge, where it washed ashore. Susan White / USFWS

While recycled plastic may seem like a satisfactory alternative to virgin plastic, a new study, published in July 2020, showed that children's toys made out of recycled plastic contained high levels of toxic chemicals, comparable to levels found in hazardous waste.

Moore, who has been studying plastic pollution since his discovery of the floating debris in the North Pacific Ocean, says he doesn't believe there's an easy fix to this issue, especially when it comes to the businesses that are producing large amounts of plastic.

"There's no change that corporations can make under the current system that will successfully combat plastic pollution," Moore said. "There is no technical fix to the plastic problem. It's not in the corporate portfolio to reduce sales of your products — the corporate portfolio is about increasing sales. The idea that [corporations] can be convinced to reduce their production and sale of the products that they make is a fantasy."

However, Moore says a solution could be found in "radical change," and that this moment of time, with the Black Lives Matter movement spreading across the world, could provide the opportunity for that change.

"Now is the time when a world historical revolution would be possible, when the people of the world could unite to change the system as a whole," Moore said.

"There won't be a techno fix and science won't develop … a new product that will get us out of the problem of plastic pollution," he said. "It will only come with the world as a whole agreeing to charter a new course towards a non-polluting future."

Reposted with permission from Mongabay.

Scientists say that a record-breaking Arctic heat wave was made 600 times more likely by the man-made climate crisis. PBS NewsHour / YouTube

The record-breaking heat in the Arctic saw temperatures soar above 100 degrees for the first time in recorded history. Now, a new analysis has put to rest any notion that the heat was caused by natural temperature fluctuations.

Read More Show Less
Commuters arrive at Grand Central Station with Metro-North during morning rush hour on June 8, 2020 in New York City. Angela Weiss / AFP / Getty Images

By Taison Bell

"Hospital Capacity Crosses Tipping Point in U.S. Coronavirus Hot Spots" – Wall Street Journal

This is a headline I hoped to not see again after the number of coronavirus infections had finally started to decline in the Northeast and Pacific Northwest. However, the pandemic has now shifted to the South and the West – with Arizona, Florida, California and Texas as hot spots.

Read More Show Less
Trump first announces his proposed rollback of the National Environmental Policy Act in January. NICHOLAS KAMM / AFP via Getty Images

President Donald Trump announced the final rollback of the "Magna Carta" of U.S. environmental laws on Wednesday, The New York Times reported.

Read More Show Less
These seven cookbooks by Black chefs have inspired the author's family. LightFieldStudios / Getty Images

By Zahida Sherman

Cooking has always intimidated me. As a child, I would anxiously peer into the kitchen as my mother prepared Christmas dinner for our family.

Read More Show Less
Hand sanitizer is offered to students during summer school sessions at Happy Day School in Monterey Park, California on July 9, 2020. FREDERIC J. BROWN / AFP via Getty Images

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded its list of potentially toxic hand sanitizers to avoid because they could be contaminated with methanol.

Read More Show Less


Over the next couple of weeks, crews will fully remove the 125-foot-wide, 25-foot-tall dam, allowing the Middle Fork Nooksack to run free for the first time in 60 years. Ctyonahl / Wikimedia Commons / CC by 3.0

By Tara Lohan

The conclusion to decades of work to remove a dam on the Middle Fork Nooksack River east of Bellingham, Washington began with a bang yesterday as crews breached the dam with a carefully planned detonation. This explosive denouement is also a beginning.

Read More Show Less