Quantcast

Is Outrage Over Monsanto Protection Act a Turning Point for the Food Movement?

Health + Wellness

Eat Drink Politics

By Michele Simon

When I first wrote about how the biotech rider—called the Monsanto Protection Act by its vocal opponents—undercut the constitutional concept of separation of powers, it seemed hardly anyone was paying attention. But then a lot of people got mad, really mad.

Within a few short weeks the issue exploded in the mainstream media, with the surest sign the issue had hit the big time being coverage by The Daily Show. Another indication was outrage even from a Tea Party blogger.

Biotech companies have to get permission from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to plant new genetically engineered (GE) crops. In recent years, groups such as the Center for Food Safety have been gaining traction by filing lawsuits challenging federal approval, thereby stopping some novel crops from being planted when courts agreed that the USDA failed to conduct proper environmental oversight.

Enter the biotech rider, an unprecedented end-run around such court decisions. The law—conveniently snuck into the must-pass budget bill—requires the USDA to ignore a court order and allow the planting of new GE crops while the agency conducts further review, after which time it’s likely too late to undo any harm. It would be like the Food and Drug Administration saying to food makers: go ahead and put those potentially dangerous food additives on the market while we keep studying them to see if they make people sick.

Despite political cynicism running at sky-high levels, this corporate power grab sent many people over the edge. But it didn’t happen by accident. It took hard grassroots efforts of groups like Food Democracy Now! to take this issue to its constituents, raise bloody hell over it, and demand accountability from our elected representatives, that got this story to break through.

The Iowa-based group—comprised of two staff—delivered more than 300,000 petitions of outrage to Washington, DC. They also started calling the measure the “Monsanto Protection Act”—a smart use of framing to get attention. Dave Murphy, executive director of Food Democracy Now! explains:

Republicans understand the importance of language—that’s why they say Obamacare and Clear Skies Initiative—but Democrats, not so much. I nicknamed the rider The Monsanto Protection Act as soon as I saw Congress calling it the Farmer Assurance Provision. As a former conservative, I know it’s important to tell the truth about what you’re really fighting.

In the noisy aftermath, even Monsanto’s hometown newspaper, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, published a scathing editorial blaming Sen. Blount (R-MO) for “a sleazy bit of business” that “undermines the legislative process.”

That’s the good news: that when food industry lobbyists do something so over the top, we can marshal our resources to respond effectively. Even though we didn’t win that particular battle, the outrage over Monsanto’s colossal overreach did bring massive attention to the issue. And that message came through loud and clear both in the media and to some members of Congress.

Sen. Mikulski (D-MD), the Democrat chair of the Senate appropriations committee—where the rider was slipped in—put out a defensive apology in the wake of the uproar, a move unheard of by politicians. Her spokesperson tried to explain, “Senator Mikulski understands the anger over this provision. She didn’t put the language in the bill and doesn’t support it either.”

What classic politician-speak: defending her vote by saying she doesn’t support what she voted for. No matter, the statement alone points to the success of the backlash.

We’ve been hearing for some time now that the food movement needs to demonstrate some chops to gain more credibility, and I agree. We can’t just be a small collection of writers and polite foodies talking to each other. The only way to beat back a powerful industry is to prove we have enough people outraged over our broken food system to hold our politicians accountable. During his 2008 campaign, President Obama promised to fight for labeling of genetically-modified foods. But now—according to close sources—his attitude is: “show me the movement.”

With more than six million votes to label GE food in California for Prop 37, the ballot initiative that lost narrowly (48.6 to 51.4 percent) leading to the rise of at least 20 states considering labeling bills, combined with the recent outrage over the Monsanto Protection Act, it appears that movement has arrived.

Now it’s time for the next steps, and we have a critical opportunity with the farm bill, once again, making its way through Congress. Sen. Merkley (D-OR) has introduced with several co-sponsors an amendment to the farm bill that would completely repeal the biotech rider. From Sen. Merkley’s statement on his proposal:

The Monsanto Protection Act is an outrageous example of a special interest loophole. This provision nullifies the actions of a court that is enforcing the law to protect farmers, the environment and public health. That is unacceptable.

Unacceptable is right, to an outraged senator and hopefully millions of other Americans. Now is the time to demonstrate our strength. Enough is enough.

Visit EcoWatch’s GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM page for more related news on this topic.

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

A timelapse video shows synthetic material and baby fish collected from a plankton sample from a surface slick taken off Hawaii island. Honolulu Star-Advertiser / YouTube screenshot

A team of researchers led by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration didn't intend to study plastic pollution when they towed a tiny mesh net through the waters off Hawaii's West Coast. Instead, they wanted to learn more about the habits of larval fish.

Read More Show Less
Two silver-backed chevrotain caught on camera trap. The species has only recently been rediscovered after being last seen in 1990. GWC / Mongabay

By Jeremy Hance

VIETNAM, July 2019 – I'm chasing a ghost, I think not for the first time, as night falls and I gather up my gear in a hotel in a village in southern Vietnam. I pack my camera, a bottle of water, and a poncho; outside the window I can see a light rain.

Read More Show Less
Sponsored
Flooding in New Orleans from Hurricane Katrina on Sept. 11, 2005. NOAA Photo Library / Lieut. Commander Mark Moran

The most destructive hurricanes are three times more frequent than they were a century ago, new research has found, and this can be "unequivocally" linked to the climate crisis.

Read More Show Less

By George Citroner

The Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion and the World Health Organization currently recommend either 150 minutes of moderate intensity exercise (walking, gardening, doing household chores) or 75 minutes of vigorous aerobic exercise (running, cycling, swimming) every week.

But there's little research looking at the benefits, if any, of exercising less than the 75 minute minimum.

Read More Show Less
Mary Daly, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank, poses for a photograph. Nick Otto / Washington Post / Getty Images

It seems the reality of the climate crisis is too much for the Federal Reserve to ignore anymore.

Read More Show Less
Sponsored

Passengers trying to reach Berlin's Tegel Airport on Sunday were hit with delays after police blocked roads and enacted tighter security controls in response to a climate protest.

Read More Show Less
A military police officer in Charlotte, North Carolina, pets Rosco, a post-traumatic stress disorder companion animal certified to accompany him, on Jan. 11, 2014. North Carolina National Guard

For 21 years, Doug Distaso served his country in the United States Air Force.

He commanded joint aviation, maintenance, and support personnel globally and served as a primary legislative affairs lead for two U.S. Special Operations Command leaders.

But after an Air Force plane accident left him with a traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and chronic pain, Distaso was placed on more than a dozen prescription medications by doctors at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Read More Show Less
(L) Selma Three Stone Engagement Ring. (R) The Greener Diamond Farm Project. MiaDonna

By Bailey Hopp

If you had to choose a diamond for your engagement ring from below or above the ground, which would you pick … and why would you pick it? This is the main question consumers are facing when picking out their diamond engagement ring today. With a dramatic increase in demand for conflict-free lab-grown diamonds, the diamond industry is shifting right before our eyes.

Read More Show Less