Gold Mine Planned for Southwest Alaska Threatens Environment and Local Communities
By Rebecca Siegel
From headwaters at the foot of the Alaska Range, the Kuskokwim River flows through a remote region in southwest Alaska. After leaving the mountains, the river meanders through the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta, a broad expanse of wetlands and tundra the size of Oregon, and enters Kuskokwim Bay on the Bering Sea. This is the longest free-flowing river located entirely in the U.S. Some 25,000 people, the majority of whom are Alaska Native, live along its banks, harvesting the salmon that make their way upstream every year, as well as sheefish, northern pike and other species.
Subsistence fishing is a way of life for many of the people living on the Kuskokwim, where supermarkets—and roads—don't really exist. While the average American ate 15.8 lbs of fish in 2009, residents of Crooked Creek, a village on the north bank of the Kuskokwim, ate more than more than 190 pounds of fish per person. And in Aniak, sixty miles downstream, people ate more than 240 lbs of fish each.
Aside from their nutritional and economic value, traditional foods anchor native culture in the Kuskokwim region, providing the basis for cultural and spiritual well-being. Using and passing down the skills and knowledge required for subsistence preserves and strengthens community and cultural identity. Procuring and processing subsistence food is a community endeavor, and foods are shared among community members.
The Kuskokwim region is at a crossroads. A massive gold mine is planned at Crooked Creek, a tributary of the Kuskokwim. With an estimated 27 year production run churning out more than one million ounces of gold per year, the Donlin Gold mine would require an open pit two miles long, one mile wide and 1,800 feet deep, plus the largest pipeline built in Alaska since the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System.While it promises jobs in a region with few employment opportunities, the mine as currently proposed could have serious consequences for subsistence livelihoods.
Mercury emissions pose one of Donlin Gold's greatest threats to the health of local communities. Mercury, a potent neurotoxin, is harmful to neurodevelopment and has been linked to diseases including cerebral palsy and bronchitis. Children are especially vulnerable because their nervous systems are still developing. During mine operations, mercury vaporized during ore processing could pose a danger to mine workers and could enter the atmosphere as so called “fugitive" emissions, potentially affecting the health of the entire region as it enters the food chain, building up in the fish people eat.
But the risk for contamination would not end when the mine closes. Donlin Gold would likely store mercury, arsenic and selenium-laden tailings behind a 475 foot tall earthen dam forever, with consequences no one seems able to predict or even understand. The abandoned mine pit will fill with water so contaminated it will require water treatment “in perpetuity" to prevent polluting nearby streams, wetlands and, ultimately, the Kuskokwim River itself. Should Donlin's surety bond fail due to global economic problems, which are quite likely over the long haul, governments and local communities are left with the burden of cleanup and water treatment, as has already happened at other abandoned mines on the Kuskokwim River and throughout the world.
Already, mercury levels are of serious concern in the region; any additional pollution could mean problems on a scale roughly a thousand times bigger than any of the historic mine sites. No permits should be issued for the mine until there is a comprehensive plan to address all of these concerns and the need for perpetual water treatment is eliminated. No mine is worth placing such a burden on future generations. If Donlin can't prove that it can fully clean up after itself within 10 years of closing, the mine should not be allowed to proceed.
Increased barge traffic on the river poses yet another threat to the subsistence livelihood of local communities. Two or more barges a day would travel up and down the Kuskokwim, transporting supplies and fuel to the mine. In a recent hearing, residents of Aniak wondered if increased barge traffic would crowd their fishing nets out of the river's narrow, shifting channels. Bank erosion from the barges' wake also raises concerns. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether climate change will ultimately render the river impassable by large industrial barges, just as is occurring today on the Mississippi River.
Operating the mine will require vast quantities of energy. The mine plan calls for an average load of 153 megawatts of electricity, roughly the same amount consumed by Fairbanks, Alaska's second largest city. To generate this power, Donlin Gold will build a buried natural gas pipeline running from Beluga, on the west side of Cook Inlet, to the mine—a distance of 313 miles. The pipeline will run through Iditarod Country and along 75 miles of the Iditarod National Historic Trail. The mine plan estimates an annual consumption of 307 million cubic meters of natural gas, and 40 million gallons of diesel fuel. This would emit 597,675 tons of CO2 each year, equivalent to the average annual emissions of 112,959 passenger vehicles and exceeding the nation of Belize's total emissions in 2008, making the mine a major contributor to global warming. Melting permafrost, drying lakes and changing water temperature in the rivers mean that residents of the Kuskokwim are already disproportionately impacted by global warming. Interestingly, Donlin had initially looked at wind generation for a portion of its needs, but abandoned the idea over cost and reliability concerns, moving away from the concept of sustainability so utterly important today.
Gold mining is not the only way to create jobs in the region. We can use human capital and ingenuity in ways inherently more useful and less risky than gold mining. The Kuskokwim Region has opportunities for job creation in renewable energy, small scale agriculture (yes, even in Alaska), sustainable forestry projects and more.
Toxins entering the air and river, barges crowding the channels and competing for space with fishing nets, an industrial pipeline buried beneath countless wild streams along one of the most famous trails in the world, and the mine's contribution to climate change all paint the picture of a changing Alaska, a changing culture and a future of great uncertainty. And it's all driven by gold—a substance that no longer carries much real practical value and utility—and largely financed by foreign investors whose main mission is to maximize profit any way they can.
Ultimately, the choice to build a mega-mine should rest on the shoulders of those who have the most to lose from it, not the most to gain. So far, there have been no attempts to create the free, prior, and informed consent process which is now considered industry best practice. Instead, public meetings have been organized and run by the corporations themselves, who cater events, speak at schools about the benefits of mining and sponsor civic activities. No public polling has been conducted; no municipal votes have been cast. Indeed, with so much money to be made, it appears none of the decision makers really want to know what the average person on the river really thinks after all.
If communities of the Kuskokwim are genuinely supportive of the mine, will Donlin Gold take the easy path, building a dirty mine that maximizes short-term profits but causes long-term harm to the region? Or will they build a cleaner, more sustainable mine, one with protections in place to maintain clean water and healthy fish not just during operations, but after the mine closes? Left to their own devices, they will probably take the cheaper option, but with public pressure, perhaps we can push Donlin to do the right thing.
Permitting has begun for Donlin Gold. The scoping period, an opportunity for the public to give input on the mine, is open until March 29. To learn more about the permitting process, visit www.donlingoldeis.com. To read the scoping comments prepared by the Donlin Gold Working Group, contact Pete Dronkers at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Many people shop online for everything from clothes to appliances. If they do not like the product, they simply return it. But there's an environmental cost to returns.
- Are We Doomed If We Don't Curb Carbon Emissions by 2030 ... ›
- California Winery Cuts Carbon Emissions With Lighter Bottles ... ›
- Wealthy One Percent Are Producing More Carbon Emissions Than ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Dolf Gielen and Morgan Bazilian
John Kerry helped bring the world into the Paris climate agreement and expanded America's reputation as a climate leader. That reputation is now in tatters, and President-elect Joe Biden is asking Kerry to rebuild it again – this time as U.S. climate envoy.
Energy Is at the Center of the Climate Challenge<p>The <a href="https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/1/" target="_blank">effects of climate change</a> are already evident across the globe, from <a href="https://theconversation.com/100-degrees-in-siberia-5-ways-the-extreme-arctic-heat-wave-follows-a-disturbing-pattern-141442" target="_blank">extreme heat waves</a> to <a href="https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/12/" target="_blank">sea level rise</a>. But while the challenge is daunting, there is hope. Solar and wind power have become the <a href="https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2019" target="_blank">cheapest forms of power generation globally</a>, and technology progress and innovation continue apace to support a transition to clean energy.</p><p>In the U.S. under a Biden administration, long-term national climate legislation will depend on who controls the Senate, and that won't be clear until after two run-off elections in Georgia in January.</p><p>But there is no shortage of <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2020-biden-climate-change-advice/" target="_blank">ideas for ways Biden</a> could still take action even if his proposals are blocked in Congress. For example, he could use executive orders and direct government agencies to tighten regulations on greenhouse gas emissions; increase research and development in clean energy technologies; and empower states to exceed national standards, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autos-emissions-california/defying-trump-california-locks-in-vehicle-emission-deals-with-major-automakers-idUSKCN25D2CH" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">as California did in the past with auto emission standards</a>. A focus on a just and equitable transition for communities and people affected by the decline of fossil fuels will also be key to creating a sustainable transition.</p><p>The U.S. position as the world's largest oil and gas producer and consumer creates political challenges for any administration. U.S. forays into European energy security are often treated with suspicion. Recently, France blocked <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/frances-engie-backs-out-of-u-s-lng-deal-11604435609" target="_blank">a multi-billion dollar contract</a> to buy U.S. liquefied natural gas because of concerns about limited emissions regulations in Texas.</p><p>Strengthening cooperation and partnerships with like-minded countries will be critical to bring about a transition to cleaner energy as well as sustainability in agriculture, forestry, water and other sectors of the global economy.</p>
Creating a Global Sustainable Transition<p>How the world recovers from COVID-19's economic damage could help drive a lasting shift in the global energy mix.</p><p>Nearly one-third of Europe's US$2 trillion economic relief package <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-21/eu-approves-biggest-green-stimulus-in-history-with-572-billion-plan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">involves investments that are also good for the climate</a>. The European Union is also strengthening its 2030 climate targets, though each country's energy and climate plans will be critical for successfully implementing them. The <a href="https://joebiden.com/clean-energy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Biden plan</a> – including a $2 trillion commitment to developing sustainable energy and infrastructure – is aligned with a global energy transition, but its implementation is also uncertain.</p><p>Once Biden takes office, Kerry will be joining ongoing <a href="https://www.un.org/en/conferences/energy2021/about#:%7E:text=The%20overarching%20goal%20of%20the,2030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development.&text=Accelerate%20delivery%20of%20United%20Nations,related%20issues%20at%20all%20levels." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">high-level discussions on the energy transition</a> at the U.N. General Assembly and other gatherings of international leaders. With the U.S. no longer obstructing work on climate issues, the G-7 and G-20 have more potential for progress on energy and climate.</p><p>Lots of technical details still need to be worked out, including international trade frameworks and standards that can help countries lower greenhouse gas emissions enough to keep global warming in check. <a href="https://www.carbonpricingleadership.org/what" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carbon pricing</a> and <a href="https://www.csis.org/analysis/how-can-europe-get-carbon-border-adjustment-right" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">carbon border adjustment taxes</a>, which create incentive for companies to reduce emissions, may be part of it. A consistent and comprehensive set of national energy transition plans will also be needed.</p><p>The global shift to <a href="https://www.irena.org/publications/2019/Jan/A-New-World-The-Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transformation" target="_blank">clean energy will also have geopolitical implications for countries and regions</a>, and this will have a profound impact on wider international relations. Kerry, with his experience as secretary of state in the Obama administration, and Biden's plan to make the climate envoy position part of the National Security Council, may help mend these relations. In doing so, the U.S. may again join the wider community of countries willing to lead.</p>
- 14 States On Track to Meet Paris Targets - EcoWatch ›
- Biden Vows to Ax Keystone XL if Elected - EcoWatch ›
- Biden Names John Kerry as First-Ever Climate Envoy - EcoWatch ›
By Maria Caffrey
As we approach the holidays I, like most people, have been reflecting on everything 2020 has given us (or taken away) while starting to look ahead to 2021.
We Need More Than Listening<p>By now we have all become sadly accustomed to the current administration sidelining scientists, most prominently Dr. Anthony Fauci, because the facts they provide do not fit with the political rhetoric of the moment.</p><p>I have <a href="https://www.csldf.org/2019/08/22/csldf-helps-climate-scientist-maria-caffrey-fight-for-scientific-integrity/" target="_blank">my own history</a> of filing a scientific integrity complaint with the National Park Service (which falls under the Department of the Interior) after senior ranking employees attempted to censor one of my scientific reports. I know all too well the damage and pain that these actions cause, not just for the individual scientist, but also because these <a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/attacks-on-science" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">attacks on science</a> over the last few years have undermined sound, evidence-based decision making.</p><p>President-elect Biden has repeatedly said that he will <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/521638-trump-biden-will-listen-to-the-scientists-if-elected" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">listen to the scientists</a>. While this is certainly a welcome change, listening can only take us so far. This past week Lauren Kurtz from the <a href="https://www.csldf.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Climate Science Legal Defense Fund</a> and my colleague <a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/about/people/gretchen-goldman" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gretchen Goldman</a> published <a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ten-steps-that-can-restore-scientific-integrity-in-government/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">an article</a> listing 10 actions the new administration should implement to show their commitment to strengthening government science:</p><ol><li>Clearly prohibit political interference and censorship.</li><li>Protect scientists' communication rights.</li><li>Acknowledge that attempts to violate scientific integrity, even if ultimately not fruitful, are still violations.</li><li>Protect federal scientists' right to provide information to Congress and other lawmakers.</li><li>Commit to incorporating the best science as part of agency decisions.</li><li>Elevate agency scientific integrity policies to have the full force of law.</li><li>Publicly release anonymized information about scientific integrity complaints and their resolutions at every agency.</li><li>Institute an intra-agency workforce, potentially under the White House <a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2020-09/strengthening-science-and-si-at-ostp.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Office of Science and Technology Policy</a>, to coordinate scientific integrity efforts across agencies, foster discussion of policy improvements, and standardize criteria for policies across agencies.</li><li>Strengthen whistleblower protections.</li><li>Ensure that policies cover all actors who will be dealing with science.</li></ol>
Time for Action<p>I have spoken to many scientists, particularly federal scientists, who are eager to turn the page so they can hurry back to the work they had been doing before this administration, but I urge caution in assuming that things can be "normal" again.</p><p>Before Trump, I naively thought the scientific integrity policies established during the <a href="https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/12/19/scientific-integrity-policies-update" target="_blank">Obama administration</a> would be sufficient. I never imagined that any administration could so willfully ignore and attack expert advice and evidence that is intended to protect us and our public lands.</p><p>I have personally witnessed how hard our federal scientists work. They put in long hours with minimal pay (far less that what they could get if they worked in private industry) to pursue one simple goal: to make things better for the nation.</p><p>We need stronger scientific integrity policies to protect these people and their work. But more than that, we need stronger scientific integrity laws because they also benefit society.</p>
By Andrea Germanos
Environmental campaigners stressed the need for the incoming Biden White House to put in place permanent protections for Alaska's Bristol Bay after the Trump administration on Wednesday denied a permit for the proposed Pebble Mine that threatened "lasting harm to this phenomenally productive ecosystem" and death to the area's Indigenous culture.
<div id="da98c" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="478a197b7c59c92787c92bec92f1ac39"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1331662923710693376" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Bristol Bay forever, Pebble mine never. #NoPebbleMine #SaveBristolBay https://t.co/CBQ9zuy8A5</div> — Save Bristol Bay (@Save Bristol Bay)<a href="https://twitter.com/SaveBristolBay/statuses/1331662923710693376">1606328156.0</a></blockquote></div>
- Pebble Mine Threatens One of the Last Great Salmon Rivers ... ›
- The Pebble Mine Is Too Toxic Even for the Trump Administration ... ›
- Trump Admin Reverses Obama-Era Restrictions on Pebble Mine ... ›
OlgaMiltsova / iStock / Getty Images Plus
By Gwen Ranniger
In the midst of a pandemic, sales of cleaning products have skyrocketed, and many feel a need to clean more often. Knowing what to look for when purchasing cleaning supplies can help prevent unwanted and dangerous toxics from entering your home.