Quantcast
Environmental News for a Healthier Planet and Life

Help Support EcoWatch

Fracking California: Advocates Make Case for Ban at Senate Hearing

Energy

Center for Biological Diversity

Oil drilling in the Baldwin Hills in Los Angeles, CA. Photo: Natural Resources Defense Council

Today, as the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committees conduct a hearing on the regulation of fracking at the State Capitol, representatives from several environmental, health and consumer advocacy organizations call on Governor Jerry Brown and the California Division of Oil Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) to place a ban on fracking–the dangerous process of blasting water, chemicals and sand at extreme pressures into deep underground rock to release oil and gas. Combined, the organizations have collected more than 75,000 petition signatures urging Governor Brown to ban fracking in California.

“The Monterey Shale’s estimated 15 billion barrels of oil would only supply our nation’s energy needs for three to four years, but fracking and its resulting toxic waste would have a devastating impact on California’s air, water and communities for generations,” said Adam Scow, California campaigns director for Food & Water Watch. “It’s time for Governor Brown to ban fracking and focus on building California’s clean energy future.”

Last week, the  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reported that emissions from drilling, including fracking, and leaks from transmission pipes totaled 225 million metric tons of carbon-dioxide equivalents during 2011, second only to power plants for stationary sources. These findings demonstrate the threat that fracking poses to California’s already problematic air quality and climate change.

“Fracking threatens to pollute California’s environment and crush our efforts to fight climate change,” said Kassie Siegel, director of the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute. “Disclosing what fracking chemicals are used won’t mean much if those toxins contaminate our air and water. The best way for lawmakers to protect our state is by prohibiting this inherently dangerous form of oil and gas extraction.”

Nationwide, fracking and its resulting toxic wastewater, has developed an extensive track record of spills, accidents, leaks and pollution. The industry itself estimates that six percent of wells that have been fracked fail, putting our soil and waterways directly at risk.

“Fracking is an environmental nightmare for California,” said Dan Jacobsen, legislative director for Environment California. “It uses and pollutes millions of gallons of water, destroys beautiful places and keeps us addicted to dirty and dangerous fossil fuels. It’s time to ban fracking in California now.”

Evidence is also mounting about health problems in communities near fracking sites. Karuna Jaggar, executive director of the national breast cancer education and advocacy organization Breast Cancer Action (BC Action) based in San Francisco said, “Fracking involves a cocktail of toxic chemicals, many of which we know are harmful to our health and have been linked to breast cancer. We need Gov. Brown to take a stand against the inherently toxic process of fracking to protect all Californians from the known–and unknown–health risks, such as breast cancer.”

Advocates and experts will testify during the public comment period of today's hearing.

Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.

 

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

Refrigerated trucks function as temporary morgues at the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal on May 06, 2020 in New York City. As of July, the states where COVID-19 cases are rising are mostly in the West and South. Justin Heiman / Getty Images

The official number of people in the U.S. who have lost their lives to the new coronavirus has now passed 130,000, according to tallies from The New York Times, Reuters and Johns Hopkins University.

Read More Show Less
A man walks on pink snow at the Presena glacier near Pellizzano, Italy on July 4, 2020. MIGUEL MEDINA / AFP via Getty Images

In a troubling sign for the future of the Italian Alps, the snow and ice in a glacier is turning pink due to the growth of snow-melting algae, according to scientists studying the pink ice phenomenon, as CNN reported.

Read More Show Less
Climate activist Greta Thunberg discusses EU plans to tackle the climate emergency with Parliament's environment committee on March 4, 2020. CC-BY-4.0: © European Union 2020 – Source: EP

By Abdullahi Alim

The 2008 financial crisis spurred a number of youth movements including Occupy Wall Street and the Arab Spring. A decade later, this anger resurfaced in a new wave of global protests, from Hong Kong to Beirut to London, only this time driven by the children of the 2008 financial crisis.

Read More Show Less
A climate activist holds a victory sign in Washington, DC. after President Obama announced that he would reject the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal on November 6, 2015. Mark Wilson / Getty Images

By Jake Johnson

The Supreme Court late Monday upheld a federal judge's rejection of a crucial permit for Keystone XL and blocked the Trump administration's attempt to greenlight construction of the 1,200-mile crude oil project, the third such blow to the fossil fuel industry in a day—coming just hours after the cancellation of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and the court-ordered shutdown of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Read More Show Less
A forest fire in Yakutsk in eastern Siberia on June 2, 2020. Yevgeny Sofroneyev / TASS via Getty Images

Once thought too frozen to burn, Siberia is now on fire and spewing carbon after enduring its warmest June ever, according to CNN.

Read More Show Less
The Colima fir tree's distribution has been reduced to the area surrounding the Nevado de Colima volcano. Agustín del Castillo

By Agustín del Castillo

For 20 years, the Colima fir tree (Abies colimensis) has been at the heart of many disputes to conserve the temperate forests of southern Jalisco, a state in central Mexico. Today, the future of this tree rests upon whether the area's avocado crops will advance further and whether neighboring communities will unite to protect it.

Read More Show Less

Trending

Independent environmental certifications offer a better indicator of a product's eco credentials, including labor conditions for workers involved in production. Flickr / CC by 2.0

By Jeanette Cwienk

This summer's high street fashions have more in common than styles and colors. From the pink puff-sleeved dream going for just €19.99 ($22.52) at H&M, to Zara's elegant €12.95 ($14.63) halter-neck dress, clothing stores are alive with cheap organic cotton.

"Sustainable" collections with aspirational own-brand names like C&A's "Wear the change," Zara's "join life" or H&M's "CONSCIOUS" are offering cheap fashion and a clean environmental conscience. Such, at least, is the message. But is it really that simple?

Read More Show Less