Quantcast
Environmental News for a Healthier Planet and Life

Help Support EcoWatch

John Kerry: Ignoring Climate Would Be 'Massive Moral Failure of Historic Consequence'

Climate
John Kerry: Ignoring Climate Would Be 'Massive Moral Failure of Historic Consequence'

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry made a quick trip to Peru Thursday to address the UN climate talks in Lima. Known as a passionate advocate for the climate both as secretary of state and during his time in the Senate, Kerry forcefully called out climate deniers and said that their path leads to "catastrophe," while calling on every nation, every leader and every person to do their part to address climate change.

He called climate change "not just another policy issue" but a global threat equal to terrorism, extremism, epidemics, poverty and nuclear proliferation  and contrasted "the amazing amount of evidence that has been tallied up [supporting global warming] versus the paucity of a few usually industry-paid-for false analyses that try to suggest otherwise."

Praising the work of his former Senate colleague Al Gore, who spoke earlier in the day and was sitting in the front row during the speech, Kerry recalled when they held the first hearing on climate change in the Senate—in 1988. He emphasized how much more essential taking action is now "at this moment there still is a window—but the window is closing quickly." 

"I’m privileged to be here as President Obama’s lead international advocate that this issue should be personal for absolutely everybody—man, woman, child, businessperson, student, grandparent," said Kerry. "Wherever we live, whatever our calling, whatever our personal background might be, this issue affects every human on the planet, and if any challenge requires global cooperation and effective diplomacy, this is it."

"Rest assured, if we fail, future generations will not and should not forgive those who ignore this moment, no matter their reasoning," he said. "Future generations will judge our effort not just as a policy failure, but as a massive, collective moral failure of historic consequence, particularly if we’re just bogged down in abstract debates. They will want to know how we together could possibly have been so blind, so ideological, so dysfunctional and frankly so stubborn that we failed to act on knowledge that was confirmed by so many scientists in so many studies over such a long period of time and documented by so much evidence."

Kerry reiterated the familiar markers of climate change—droughts, rainstorms, typhoons, heat waves—and said, "You don’t need a Ph.D. to be able to see for yourself that the world is already changing. You just need to pay attention." He pointed to the solution: an energy policy that all nations big and small, wealthy and poor commit to."

He said that the biggest emitters, including the U.S. China and the UK, have a major role to play in cutting their emissions and he ran down some of the ways the Obama administration is doing its part.

"But ultimately," he said, "every nation on Earth has to apply current science and make state-of-the-art energy choices if we’re going to have any hope of leaving our future to the next generation to the safe and healthy planet that they deserve. No single country, not even the United States, can solve this problem or foot this bill alone."

He wrapped up by addressing the economic impacts of fossil fuels vs. clean energy policies, saying that while coal and oil may be cheap in the short run, the costs in the long run from such climate change impacts as food insecurity, cleaning up after weather-related disasters and health issues will be far more expensive in the long run.

"Bottom line, in economic terms, this is not a choice between bad and worse, not at all," he said. "This is a choice between growing or shrinking your economy. Climate change presents one of the greatest economic opportunities of all time on earth. The global energy market of the future is poised to be the largest market the world has ever known. Between now and 2035, investment in the energy sector is expected to reach nearly $17 trillion. Imagine the opportunities for clean energy innovation. Imagine the businesses that could be launched, the jobs that’d be created, in every corner of the globe. The technology is out there. None of this is beyond our capacity. And the question—and it really is still open to question—is whether or not it’s beyond our collective resolve."

He got one more shot at the climate deniers before he wrapped up. He said, "Ask yourself, if all the people who’ve been putting the science out there for years are wrong about this and we make these choices to do the things I’m talking about, what’s the worst thing that can happen to us for making these choices? Create a whole lot of new jobs. Kick our economies into gear. Have healthier people, reduce the cost of healthcare. Live up to our environmental responsibilities. Have a world that’s more secure because we have energy that isn’t dependent on one part of the world or another."

"But what happens if the climate skeptics are wrong? Catastrophe."

Jennifer Morgan, global director of the World Resources Institute, greeted Kerry's remarks with enthusiasm.

“Secretary Kerry delivered a powerful message at Lima: by this time next year, countries need to deliver a global climate agreement," she said. "Without strong and coordinated global action, the risks of climate change are far too great. Thankfully, the dynamics around international climate action have shifted. The landmark U.S.-China joint announcements bolstered international ambition, while new standards for power plants set the stage for the United States to reach its new emission reduction target. Secretary Kerry, a longtime climate champion, has shown that the U.S. will not back down from its global obligation to respond to the climate crisis."

"The world is waking up to the fact that action on climate change can deliver economic benefits," she said. "Smart climate policies will drive innovation and new technologies, open new markets, and create lasting economic growth. It will bring new opportunities for developed and developing countries alike.”

Kyle Ash, Greenpeace U.S. senior legislative representative, also welcomed Kerry's comments, while expressing some reservations.

"We are happy that Secretary Kerry has come to Lima, delivering a powerful call for unity on climate action today, and we hope his time here moves the process toward a strong climate treaty in Paris next year," he said. "We appreciate his comments on the urgency of creating a clean energy economy, noting in his speech that 'the only question is are we going to do it fast enough to make a difference."

"His record as a climate champion, however, contrasts with many of the U.S. positions in the Lima COP negotiations," he added. "President Obama's team continues to insist that presidential authority is insufficient to sign onto legally binding obligations to reduce climate pollution. At the same time, they claim that making pollution targets binding will reduce ambition. Neither is correct. Rather than portray U.S. presidential legal powers as weak in the face of a politically stunted, soon-to-be climate denier controlled Congress, Secretary Kerry should ask his boss to use every tool he can to fight the climate catastrophe we are facing.”

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

John Kerry: Climate Change Most Serious Threat We Face on the Planet

Watch Live: UN Climate Summit in Lima, Peru

U.S. and China Strike Historic Climate Change Deal

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

This image of the Santa Monica Mountains in California shows how a north-facing slope (left) can be covered in white-blooming hoaryleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus crassifolius), while the south-facing slope (right) is much less sparsely covered in a completely different plant. Noah Elhardt / Wikimedia Commons / CC by 2.5

By Mark Mancini

If weather is your mood, climate is your personality. That's an analogy some scientists use to help explain the difference between two words people often get mixed up.

Read More Show Less
Flames from the Lake Fire burn on a hillside near a fire truck and other vehicles on Aug. 12, 2020 in Lake Hughes, California. Mario Tama / Getty Images

An "explosive" wildfire ignited in Los Angeles county Wednesday, growing to 10,000 acres in a little less than three hours.

Read More Show Less
Although heat waves rarely get the attention that hurricanes do, they kill far more people per year in the U.S. and abroad. greenaperture / Getty Images

By Jeff Berardelli

Note: This story was originally published on August 6, 2020

If asked to recall a hurricane, odds are you'd immediately invoke memorable names like Sandy, Katrina or Harvey. You'd probably even remember something specific about the impact of the storm. But if asked to recall a heat wave, a vague recollection that it was hot during your last summer vacation may be about as specific as you can get.

Read More Show Less

A film by Felix Nuhr.

Thailand has a total population of 5,000 elephants. But of that number, 3,000 live in captivity, carrying tourists on their backs and offering photo opportunities made for social media.

Read More Show Less
Scientists have found a way to use bricks as batteries, meaning that buildings may one day be used to store and generate power. Public Domain Pictures

One of the challenges of renewable power is how to store clean energy from the sun, wind and geothermal sources. Now, a new study and advances in nanotechnology have found a method that may relieve the burden on supercapacitor storage. This method turns bricks into batteries, meaning that buildings themselves may one day be used to store and generate power, Science Times reported.

Bricks are a preferred building tool for their durability and resilience against heat and frost since they do not shrink, expand or warp in a way that compromises infrastructure. They are also reusable. What was unknown, until now, is that they can be altered to store electrical energy, according to a new study published in Nature Communications.

The scientists behind the study figured out a way to modify bricks in order to use their iconic red hue, which comes from hematite, an iron oxide, to store enough electricity to power devices, Gizmodo reported. To do that, the researchers filled bricks' pores with a nanofiber made from a conducting plastic that can store an electrical charge.

The first bricks they modified stored enough of a charge to power a small light. They can be charged in just 13 minutes and hold 10,000 charges, but the challenge is getting them to hold a much larger charge, making the technology a distant proposition.

If the capacity can be increased, researchers believe bricks can be used as a cheap alternative to lithium ion batteries — the same batteries used in laptops, phones and tablets.

The first power bricks are only one percent of a lithium-ion battery, but storage capacity can be increased tenfold by adding materials like metal oxides, Julio D'Arcy, a researcher at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, who contributed to the paper and was part of the research team, told The Guardian. But only when the storage capacity is scaled up would bricks become commercially viable.

"A solar cell on the roof of your house has to store electricity somewhere and typically we use batteries," D'Arcy told The Guardian. "What we have done is provide a new 'food-for-thought' option, but we're not there yet.

"If [that can happen], this technology is way cheaper than lithium ion batteries," D'Arcy added. "It would be a different world and you would not hear the words 'lithium ion battery' again."

Aerial view of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Gamboa, Panama, where a new soil study was held, on Sept. 11, 2019. LUIS ACOSTA / AFP via Getty Images

One of the concerns about a warming planet is the feedback loop that will emerge. That is, as the planet warms, it will melt permafrost, which will release trapped carbon and lead to more warming and more melting. Now, a new study has shown that the feedback loop won't only happen in the nether regions of the north and south, but in the tropics as well, according to a new paper in Nature.

Read More Show Less

Trending

Marion County Sheriff Billy Woods speaks during a press conference after a shooting at Forest High School on April 20, 2018 in Ocala, Florida. Gerardo Mora / Getty Images

By Jessica Corbett

A sheriff in Florida is under fire for deciding Tuesday to ban his deputies from wearing face masks while on the job—ignoring the advice of public health experts about the safety measures that everyone should take during the coronavirus pandemic as well as the rising Covid-19 death toll in his county and state.

Read More Show Less