Greta Thunberg from Sweden. Jonne Sippola / Greenpeace
By Rex Weyler
The world's youth have finally seen and heard enough from the deplorable political process, from compromised delegates, corrupted political appointees, and criminal corporations who sabotage these critical international discussions.
<p>The truth of our ecological crisis is not difficult to see. Fragile ecosystems are unraveling all around us. We have been warned by scientists for two centuries: by the 1972 "Limits to Growth" study, William Catton's 1980 book <em>Overshoot,</em> by reliable scientists, and by millions of ecology activists. We were warned by the 2009<em> Nature</em> article, "Planetary Boundaries" showing that humanity has breached seven critical tipping points; and by the 2012, <em>Nature</em> article, "<a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v486/n7401/full/nature11018.html" target="_blank">Approaching a State Shift in Earth's Biosphere</a>," by 22 international scientists warning of an "irreversible" planetary-scale transition, "unknown in human experience."</p><p>And yet, politicians and delegates travel around the world, stay in luxury hotels and dither about our children's future, as carbon emissions rise, species blink from existence, rivers run dry and ancient forests burn. It is no wonder, and a welcome sight, that the world's youth have seen enough and are not impressed.</p><h2>Thirty Years of Pep Talks</h2><p>On Dec. 12 2018, at the COP 24 UN climate conference in Katowice, Poland, Swedish student Greta Thunberg finally said what the politicized delegates have failed to say. Thunberg is a direct descendant of Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius, who predicted global heating from carbon emissions in 1896.</p><p>During this year's heat wave and wildfires in Sweden, Thunberg gained world attention by staging a school strike outside the Swedish Riksdag, holding a sign that read, "Skolstrejk för klimatet" (school strike for climate). She demanded that the Swedish government reduce carbon emissions. Her actions inspired student strikes in over 270 cities around the world.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube">
<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="c6b1420fb1372a1a5c7df18a0437dc02"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/VFkQSGyeCWg?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
<small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="add caption...">Greta Thunberg full speech at UN Climate Change COP24 Conference</small>
<small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="add photo credit...">
<a href="https://youtu.be/VFkQSGyeCWg" target="_blank">youtu.be</a>
</small>
</p><p>Speaking on behalf of Climate Justice Now, Thunberg chastised the delegates and member nations for failing to take action appropriate to the climate crisis: "Until you start focusing on what needs to be done rather than what is politically possible, there is no hope. We can't solve a crisis without treating it as a crisis. We need to keep the <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/fossil-fuels">fossil fuels</a> in the ground."<br></p><p>Thunberg pointed out that "if solutions within the system are so impossible to find, maybe we should change the system itself," and she spoke directly to the errors and injustice of our economic system. "Our biosphere is being sacrificed so that rich people in countries like mine can live in luxury. It is the sufferings of the many which pay for the luxuries of the few."</p><p>She exposed the errors of convenient but false solutions that have displaced the genuine solutions to <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/climate-change">climate change</a> and ecological collapse. "You only speak of green eternal economic growth because you are too scared of being unpopular," she said. "You only talk about moving forward with the same bad ideas that got us into this mess, even when the only sensible thing to do is pull the emergency brake."</p><p>"We've had thirty years of pep-talking and selling positive ideas," she said in Stockholm prior to departing for Poland, "And I'm sorry, but it doesn't work. Because if it would have, the emissions would have gone down by now—they haven't."</p><p>Meanwhile, outside the conference, 330 organizations from 129 countries presented six "People's Demands for Climate Justice," beginning with "Keep fossil fuels in the ground and end subsidies to fossil fuel industry."</p><p>The youth leaders urged nations to "reject false solutions"—techno-fixes and offsetting schemes—in favor of "real solutions that are just, feasible, and essential." They particularly called out corporations and rich nations, who use the excuse of carbon sinks to seize indigenous land.</p><p>They called on the rich nations, whose historical carbon emissions have caused the climate crisis, to accept their fair share of climate reparation costs by honoring their Green Climate Fund obligations.</p><p>Finally, the coalition demanded that UN conferences end "corporate interference" and sabotage of the climate talks. Extraction corporations "have been getting massively wealthy," said Sriram Madhusoodanan from Corporate Accountability. "They're in these talks, blocking real solutions and advancing false solutions that will continue to propagate their business model."</p><h2></h2><h2>Why Thunberg Is Correct<br></h2><p>Thunberg is correct about years, decades, of pep-talks and positive ideas that have failed to reduce carbon emissions. Scientists have known about the threat of global heating since Thunberg's ancestor, Arrhenius calculated the impact in the nineteenth century. The modern world has been meeting about the crisis for almost forty years, since the first World Climate Conference in Geneva in 1979. Since then, human carbon emissions have doubled from about 5 gigatonnes of carbon per year (GtC/yr) to 2018's record-breaking 10.88 GtC/yr. Meanwhile, CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has grown by 22 percent, from 337 parts per million (ppm) in 1979 to over 412 ppm today. These results represent an enormous failure on the part of world governments.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image">
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8xOTA3ODI2Mi9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYzNjUxMjc2Nn0.vsigDclJnqNjWCwctuwKlQQnZXp55Y3z9r1XHRrRm68/img.jpg?width=980" id="f31d2" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="fc8860c81e1b496acd0f1c625511cd6b" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image">
<small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="add caption...">Laser Projection on the COP24 Venue in Poland</small>
</p><p>She is also correct about the unfulfilled promise of "green growth," a notion made popular in 2012, at the UN Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro, by the World Bank and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, both dedicated to industrial growth.<br></p><p>However, recent studies show that "green" or "sustainable" growth are delusions. In 2018, anthropologist Jason Hickel reviewed recent data and wrote in <a href="https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/09/12/why-growth-cant-be-green/" target="_blank">Foreign Policy</a> that "green growth ... is based more on wishful thinking than on evidence." A 2012 study by German resource economist Monika Dittrich and colleagues showed that even under optimum conditions, decoupling economic growth from resource use has not occurred. The United Nations Environment Programme came to similar conclusions in <a href="http://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/global-material-flows-and-resource-productivity-database-link" target="_blank">2016</a> and<a href="https://www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/press-release/resource-use-expected-double-2050-better-natural-resource-use" target="_blank"> 2017</a> studies. They predicted that by 2050, with continued growth, resource use would double to 180 billion metric tons per year (Gt/y). Ecological footprint data shows that a sustainable level of resource use is about 50 Gt/y, a limit breached in 2000.</p><p>Studies have consistently and rigidly linked economic growth to energy. In a 2012 <a href="http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/3/1/2012/esd-3-1-2012.pdf" target="_blank">paper</a>, "No way out? The double-bind in seeking global prosperity alongside mitigated climate change," T. J. Garrett, at the University of Utah, performed the calculations and determined that every single dollar (U.S. dollar, 1990) of global economic growth in recent decades required approximately 9.7 milliwatts of energy. "Global CO2 emission rates," wrote Garrett, "cannot be decoupled from wealth through efficiency gains."</p><p>Wealthy nations, such as the UK and U.S., have claimed to "decouple" energy use from GDP, but only because they have exported energy-intensive industries and now import finished goods—cars, computers, trinkets—which represent massive embedded energy.</p><p>Based on recent data, Thunberg is entirely correct that "green growth" is a delusion.</p><h2>Pull the Break</h2><p>Finally, Thunberg is correct that the only paths out of our predicament require that we "change the system itself." Global heating, <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/biodiversity">biodiversity</a> loss, environmental toxins, nutrient cycle disruption and all other ecological challenges arise as symptoms of a single, larger biophysical reality. Humanity is in a state of ecological overshoot. There is no way to grow out of overshoot. All genuine solutions to overshoot require that the species contract, not grow. As Thunberg says, it is time to face these facts, to slow down, and to "pull the emergency brake" on economic growth.</p><p>This is the reality that the climate conference delegates are too scared to voice. Our status quo economic system—industrial capitalism—requires growth to survive. Without endless economic growth, the $250 trillion global debt to bankers and investors cannot be paid. As Thunberg says, "Our biosphere is being sacrificed so that rich people .. can live in luxury." The biosphere is being sacrificed so bankers can receive their interest payments, to keep stock prices up and to avoid facing reality.</p><p>The current system is biased for the rich to get richer, as multitudes suffer, as the ecosystem collapses, and as other species disappear. Economist Jeremy Grantham concurs in "<a href="https://www.gmo.com/docs/default-source/research-and-commentary/strategies/asset-allocation/the-race-of-our-lives-revisited.pdf?sfvrsn=4" target="_blank">The Race for our Lives</a>," when he states that "capitalism and mainstream economics simply cannot deal with these problems." Corporate sabotage of the climate talks is not new. In the 1920s and 30s, Standard Oil, General Motors and Firestone Tires acquired and <a href="https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/186/562/162881/" target="_blank">sabotaged public transportation</a> throughout North America for the purpose of replacing efficient public transport with gas-guzzling cars. Today in Nigeria, Ecuador, Canada, in the <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/arctic">Arctic</a>, around the world and at these UN conferences, oil companies are still sabotaging the public interest for profits.</p><p>It gives us some measure of hope that young leaders appear to be among the few who have the courage and insight to speak the truth. Greta Thunberg closed her short talk by announcing, "We have not come here to beg world leaders to care … We have come here to let you know that change is coming, whether you like it or not."</p><p>Her speech stands as one of the most hopeful moments for ecological realism in recent years.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="16978" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="8JW5R41576662434"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1074374388424806406" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">'We Need to Act Now': 15-Year-Old Greta Thunberg Calls for Global Climate Strike https://t.co/Gv5guD43D3</div> — EcoWatch (@EcoWatch)<a href="https://twitter.com/EcoWatch/statuses/1074374388424806406">1544985789.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p><em>Rex Weyler was a director of the original Greenpeace Foundation, the editor of the organization's first newsletter, and a co-founder of <a href="https://www.greenpeace.org/international/" target="_blank">Greenpeace</a> International in 1979.</em><br></p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
COP24 Wraps Up With Last-Minute Compromise to Save Paris Agreement, But Is It Enough?
17 December 2018
Climate
COP24 President Michal Kurtyka gives the thumbs up to the agreement finalized by negotiators Saturday night. Monika Skolimowska / picture alliance via Getty Images
<p>Negotiators from more than 190 countries reached an 11th-hour deal at <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/cop24" target="_self">COP24</a> in Katowice, Poland Saturday to keep the <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/paris-agreement" target="_self">Paris agreement</a> alive, but scientists and negotiators say it does not go far enough to put <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/climate-change" target="_self">climate change</a> on hold, <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/15/health/cop24-climate-change-talks-agreement/index.html" target="_blank">CNN reported Sunday</a>.</p><p>However, participants celebrated the fact that they had reached an agreement at all after a tense two weeks of negotiations.</p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Like many other plant-based foods and products, CBD oil is one dietary supplement where "organic" labels are very important to consumers. However, there are little to no regulations within the hemp industry when it comes to deeming a product as organic, which makes it increasingly difficult for shoppers to find the best CBD oil products available on the market.
<p>Here you can learn about the importance of organic hemp oil, why it's better for the environment, and which CBD companies actually make trustworthy products with sustainable farming processes. origins which weigh heavily on many consumers who want to buy a product that's produced in the best way possible for not only themselves to ingest, but for the environment as well through sustainable farming methods. </p><h2>What Is CBD Oil?</h2><p>First things first, CBD stands for cannabidiol, and it's a cannabinoid found within cannabis sativa plants. This plant compound is believed to have many potential benefits, and it is primarily derived from hemp plants via a CO2 extraction process. </p><p>Since CBD is extracted from industrial hemp, which contains only trace amounts of THC (the psychoactive component in cannabis plants), this means that CBD won't make you feel high like marijuana, which has much higher levels of THC that causes psychoactive effects. Instead, the effects of CBD are much more subtle and promote a general sense of calm and relaxation in most users.</p><h2>What Makes a CBD Oil Organic?</h2><p>In terms of organic labels, perhaps the most important (and prominent) certification comes from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). This government organization has been labeling foods as "organic" for many years, but what exactly does this certification entail? Essentially, a label indicating that a product is "USDA Organic" or "Certified Organic" means that at least 95% of the ingredients are obtained from organic sources.</p><p>For a crop to be considered organic by the USDA, it must be grown without the use of industrial solvents, irradiation, genetic engineering (GMOs), synthetic pesticides, or chemical fertilizer. Instead, farmers rely on natural substances and <a href="https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2012/03/22/organic-101-what-usda-organic-label-means" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">mechanical, physical, or biologically based farming</a> techniques to cultivate healthy and organic crops.</p><p>Before the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, no hemp-derived products could be dubbed as "certified organic" since the hemp plant and its extracts were still categorized as a Schedule I Controlled Substance. However, it's still difficult for CBD companies to obtain a USDA certified organic label for their products due to the legal grey area that still surrounds CBD extracts. </p><p>Because of these challenges, and due to the fact that industrial hemp has only recently become an agricultural crop, very few CBD oils are USDA certified organic. Rather, many CBD products contain hemp extracts from plants that were grown in organic conditions but may not be federally certified.</p><h2>What are the Best Organic CBD Oil Brands?</h2><p><em>Each product featured here has been independently selected by the writer. If you make a purchase using the links included, we may earn commission.</em></p><em><br></em>
<h2>Why Organic Hemp Oil Matters</h2><p>Hemp is a unique plant, not only for its rich cannabinoid content, but also for its ability to absorb a wide variety of components in soil. But this trait poses great risks when it comes to the creation of CBD products derived from hemp.</p><p>Because hemp has a high capacity for compound uptake, this means that the plants can retain <a href="https://www.remedyreview.com/industry/lab-test-results/" target="_blank">harmful chemicals like pesticides</a>, heavy metals, and other residual solvents. This is especially true when it comes to synthetic chemicals that are more toxic to humans, and difficult to remove once they have been absorbed by the hemp plant.</p><p>Organic farming practices help reduce the risk of hemp crops absorbing harsh chemicals that may later end up in CBD oil after extraction. When you're taking CBD as a wellness supplement to help alleviate your symptoms or improve your overall well-being, the last thing you want is to ingest compounds that might negatively outweigh the benefits of CBD. This is an important reason to look for third party lab test results when shopping for CBD products since these certificates of analysis can show the full cannabinoid and terpene profile of a hemp extract, as well as test results that search for the presence of any residual solvents.</p><p>In addition to creating a better end product, organic farming practices are also better for the environment. Sustainable and organic farming methods may <a href="https://www.helpguide.org/articles/healthy-eating/organic-foods.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">reduce pollution, conserve water, reduce soil erosion, increase soil fertility, and use less energy</a>. The use of natural pest deterrents as opposed to chemical pesticides is also better for nearby animal populations and ecosystems.</p><h3>Organic vs. Natural</h3><p>While there are only a select few companies offering certified organic ingredients in their products, almost every brand in the CBD market creates "natural" products. The term "all-natural" or "plant-based" does not mean that a product is organic, and since hemp oil is a natural derivative of hemp plants, these products are often referred to as all-natural. However, there are some synthetic CBD oils that should be avoided because they are chemically constructed and may produce unwanted side effects that are not caused by naturally derived CBD extracts.</p><h2>What are the Benefits of Organic CBD Oil?</h2><p>There's a long list of potential CBD oil health benefits, and some of the most common wellness advantages include:</p><ul class="ee-ul"><li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2503660/" target="_blank">Chronic pain relief</a></li><li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604171/" target="_blank">Anti-anxiety effects</a></li><li>Better sleep</li><li><a href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/inner-source/201901/cbd-oil-mental-health-should-you-take-it-too" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Improvements in mood</a></li><li>Internal balance and regulation</li></ul><p>When dealing with pain, inflammation, sleep issues, and mental health struggles, it can be hard to find sufficient treatment options. The use of certain prescriptions can cause unwanted side effects, yet they are often the only solution for patients with these medical conditions. In search of other therapies, people have started to flock towards CBD oil as an alternative remedy for a variety of conditions. However, it should be noted that CBD products are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and you should seek your doctor's advice before using CBD if you have a serious medical condition.</p><h2>Look at the Labels Before You Buy CBD Oil</h2><p>When you go online to buy CBD oil, you'll quickly realize there is an overwhelming number of brands that are saturating the market. It can be difficult to determine which products are truly as good as they make themselves out to be. Always look for up-to-date third-party lab tests so you know you are getting a great product, and don't hesitate to contact the brand if you have any additional questions. And if you're intent on purchasing 100% organic CBD oil, it's best to look for certified products or brands that are held to strict regulatory standards.</p><p><strong>Melena Gurganus </strong>is the Reviews Editor at EcoWatch. She is passionate health and wellness and her writing aims to help others find products they can trust. Her work has been featured in publications such as Health, Shape, Huffington Post, Cannabis Business Times, and Bustle.<br></p>
Spruce
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDY4NjI3OC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyOTM2NzgzOX0.axY0HjeqRctJsR_KmDLctzDpUBLBN-oNIdqaXDb4caQ/img.jpg?width=980" id="774be" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="8379f35b1ca8a86d0e61b7d4bfc8b46e" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="spruce organic cbd oil" data-width="710" data-height="959" /><p>As one of the best brands in the business, Spruce CBD is well-known for its potent CBD oils that feature many additional beneficial phytocannabinoids. This brand works with two family-owned, sustainably focused farms in the USA (one located in Kentucky and one in North Carolina) to create its organic, small product batches. The max potency Spruce CBD oil contains 2400mg of full-spectrum CBD extract, but the brand also offers a lower strength tincture with 750mg of CBD in total.</p>
$89
CBDistillery
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDcwMjkzNC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyMTU4OTM4Nn0.ypRdeDSBcE87slYrFfVrRwtJ2qGIK6FD5jBB4pndTMo/img.jpg?width=980" id="b473b" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9930b53c9d58cb49774640a61c3e3e75" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="cbdistillery cbd oil" data-width="1244" data-height="1244" /><p>All of the products from CBDistillery are <a href="https://ushempauthority.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">U.S. Hemp Authority Certified</a>, and for good reason. The company only uses non-GMO and pesticide-free industrial hemp that's grown organically on Colorado farms. Its hemp oils are some of the most affordable CBD products on the market, yet they still maintain a high standard of quality. CBDistillery has a wide variety of CBD potencies across its product line (ranging from 500mg to 5000mg per bottle) and offers both full-spectrum and broad-spectrum CBD oils to give customers a completely thc-free option.</p>
$35
FAB CBD
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDY4NjIyNS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY2NDIwOTEyMn0.MlTjz096FJ0ev_-soK7_Z-FeQeJczWoeh9Qi9SSkHsY/img.jpg?width=980" id="04b26" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="76aa4862f44603242e318982acea6646" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="fab cbd oil" data-width="800" data-height="800" /><p>For an organic CBD oil that has it all, FAB CBD offers plenty of variety for any type of consumer. All of its products are made with zero pesticides and extracted from organically grown Colorado industrial hemp. FAB CBD oil comes in five all-natural flavors (mint, vanilla, berry, citrus, and natural) and is also available in four strengths (300, 600, 1200, and 2400mg per bottle).</p>
$39
NuLeaf Naturals
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDY4NjIxOS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY1NzExNTgyMX0.D6qMGYllKTsVhEkQ-L_GzpDHVu60a-tJKcio7M1Ssmc/img.jpg?width=980" id="94e4a" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="3609a52479675730893a45a82a03c71d" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="nuleaf naturals organic cbd oil" data-width="600" data-height="600" /><p>As an industry-leading brand, it comes as no surprise that NuLeaf Naturals sources its CBD extract from organic hemp plants grown on licensed farms in Colorado. The comany's CBD oils only contain two ingredients: USDA certified organic hemp seed oil and full spectrum hemp extract.</p><p>NuLeaf Naturals uses one proprietary CBD oil formula for all of its products, so you will get the same CBD potency in each tincture (60mg per mL), but can purchase different bottle sizes depending on how much you intend to use.</p>
$38.50
Charlotte's Web
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDcwMjk3NS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0MzQ0NjM4N30.SaQ85SK10-MWjN3PwHo2RqpiUBdjhD0IRnHKTqKaU7Q/img.jpg?width=980" id="84700" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="a2174067dcc0c4094be25b3472ce08c8" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="charlottes web cbd oil" data-width="1244" data-height="1244" /><p>Perhaps one of the most well-known brands in the CBD landscape, Charlotte's Web has been growing sustainable hemp plants for several years. The company is currently in the process of achieving official USDA Organic Certification, but it already practices organic and sustainable cultivation techniques to enhance the overall health of the soil and the hemp plants themselves, which creates some of the highest quality CBD extracts. Charlotte's Web offers CBD oils in a range of different concentration options, and some even come in a few flavor options such as chocolate mint, orange blossom, and lemon twist.</p>
$60
From Your Site Articles
- Best CBD Oils of 2020: Reviews & Buying Guide - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD Oil for Pain Management - Top 10 CBD Oil Review 2020 ... ›
- Best CBD for Dogs 2020 - Organic CBD Oil for Pets - EcoWatch ›
- Full Spectrum CBD Oil: What To Know - EcoWatch ›
- Charlotte's Web: A Review of the Certified B Corp CBD Brand ›
- Best CBD Waters: Plus All You Need to Know - EcoWatch ›
- The Best Water Soluble CBD Available Online - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD for Sleep (Lab-Tested, Person-Tested Oils) - EcoWatch ›
- CBD Oil for Dogs: 7 Benefits & Treatment Guide - EcoWatch ›
- NuLeaf Naturals CBD Review | Are They Worth The Cost? - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD Capsules & Pills - Buyer's Guide (Update for 2021) - EcoWatch ›
- Because Price Matters: Most Affordable CBD Oils of 2021 - EcoWatch ›
- Strongest CBD Oils to Buy in 2021? - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD Oils For Pain: Top 3 Brands of 2021 - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD Vape Pen: Top Brands of 2020 - EcoWatch ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Poll: Most Americans Believe in Human-Made Climate Change, But a Shocking Number Still Don't
13 December 2018
Climate
Fire in Yellowstone National Park. Mike Lewelling / NPS Climate Change Response
First the good news. A new Reuters/Ipsos poll out Thursday found that 57 percent of U.S. adults think climate change is caused by "human activity" or "mostly human activity"—a stance held by 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists. That's up from the 47 percent in 2012.
The bad news? That implies 43 percent of U.S. adults still have doubts about the global phenomenon, similar to President Donald Trump.
<p>
The survey of 4,660 American adults was conducted shortly after the U.S. government released a
<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/us-climate-report-black-friday-2621301116.html">damning climate report</a> last month warning that human-caused global warming could have dire consequences for American lives and livelihoods.
</p><p>
"Earth's climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities," the report compiled by 300 top scientists and 13 federal agencies
<a href="https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/chapter/1/" target="_blank">begins</a>. "The impacts of global climate change are already being felt in the United States and are projected to intensify in the future—but the severity of future impacts will depend largely on actions taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adapt to the changes that will occur."
</p><p>
The reason the climate has changed so rapidly in the past half century is due to increases in heat-trapping greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide from the burning of <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-rejects-us-climate-report-2621629346.html">fossil fuels</a>.
</p><p>
Trump, who has
<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-epa-coal-plants-2622480143.html">rolled back climate protections</a> to push for fossil fuels, rejected his own government report and notoriously said, "<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-rejects-us-climate-report-2621629346.html">I don't believe it</a>."
</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="c8a5e" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="3UM2WR1576662605"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1073169453385424896" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Unacceptable. The Trump administration offered more than 150,000 acres of public lands for fossil-fuel extraction n… https://t.co/ojy4tVSyta</div> — EcoWatch (@EcoWatch)<a href="https://twitter.com/EcoWatch/statuses/1073169453385424896">1544698510.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p>
The Reuters/Ipsos poll, taken from Nov. 29 to Dec. 10, also comes after a year of record-breaking and climate-fueled
<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wildfires" target="_self">wildfires</a>, <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/hurricanes" target="_self">hurricanes</a>, <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/flooding" target="_self">floods</a> and toxic <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/algae-bloom" target="_self">algal blooms</a> that devastated many parts of the country.
</p><p>
But according to the poll results, only 35 percent of U.S. adults view climate change as an "imminent" threat driven mainly by human activity (up slightly from 32 percent in 2017 and 24 percent in 2015).
</p><p>
<span></span><a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/hottest-years-recorded-nasa-noaa-2613299539.html" target="_self">Scientists have determined</a> that 2018 is "almost guaranteed" to be the fourth warmest year in the record. The only years hotter? <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/2016-record-heat-2199419976.html" target="_self">2016</a>, <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/why-2015-was-the-hottest-year-on-record-1882155607.html" target="_self">2015</a>, <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/warmest-years-recorded-2017-2507047763.html" target="_self">2017</a>, respectively. Meanwhile, 2018 greenhouse gas emissions are on pace to hit a "<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/2018-greenhouse-gas-emissions-record-2622562503.html">record high</a>" and 2019 could be <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/el-nino-2019-wmo-2621655246.html" target="_self">another unusually hot year</a> due to a possible El Niño.
</p><p>
<span></span>El Niños, which have a major effect on global weather patterns, including spikes in temperatures, are not caused by climate change. However, <a href="http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n2/full/nclimate2100.html" target="_blank">researchers have previously suggested</a> that we could experience extreme El Niños more frequently as our planet continues to warm.
</p><p>
<span></span>Interestingly, the new poll found that the majority of Americans—69 percent—want the U.S. government to work with other countries to combat global warming. That number included 64 percent of Republicans and 80 percent of Democrats.
</p><p>
<span></span>The poll comes as representatives from around the world meet at the <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/cop24">COP24</a> talks in Katowice, Poland to hammer out a rulebook to implement the <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/paris-agreement">2015 Paris agreement</a> of limiting global temperature increase.
</p><p>
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said Wednesday that the climate summit, now in its last days, is "our last best chance to stop runaway climate change." </p><p>Failure to reach an agreement, he added, "would not only be immoral, it would be suicidal."
</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="de316" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="Q6GSU41576662605"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1072924852238065669" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">LISTEN: UN chief tells climate conference that failure to reach agreement "would not only be immoral, it would be s… https://t.co/We8xp8rd5A</div> — AP Europe (@AP Europe)<a href="https://twitter.com/AP_Europe/statuses/1072924852238065669">1544640193.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Trending
'We Need to Act Now': 15-Year-Old Greta Thunberg Calls for Global Climate Strike
13 December 2018
Climate
Greta Thunberg and her father Svante at a press conference during COP24 on Dec. 4. JANEK SKARZYNSKI / AFP / Getty Images
By Andrea Germanos
Greta Thunberg, the 15-year-old Swedish activist, on Wednesday called for a global climate strike. The day of action is set for Friday at "your school" or "anywhere you feel called."
Thunberg, who's made headlines for her now-weekly school strikes to urge her home country to take bold climate action, made the call from Katowice, Poland, where she's attending the COP24 climate talks, now in their second week.
<p>Unfortunately, she said in her video announcing the strike, "as of now, there are no signs of commitment to climate action."</p><p>"Our emissions are still increasing. At the same time ... the science has clearly told us that we need to act now to keep the planet within 1.5 degrees of warming," she continued. "Whoever you are, wherever you are, we need you now to stand outside your parliament or local government office to let them know that we demand climate action."</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="e5171" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="711R1Y1576663233"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1072879958446481408" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Climate leaders don’t just talk.
They act.
Join us!!
Global climate strike 14 December.
Spread the word!!… https://t.co/p4hK9Zoo5v</div> — Greta Thunberg (@Greta Thunberg)<a href="https://twitter.com/GretaThunberg/statuses/1072879958446481408">1544629489.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
<p>Her call has already gotten support from noted author and climate activist Bill McKibben. Praising her "terrific idea," McKibben said that while it's no small ask to urge young people to walk out of their classrooms, "kids who are in school today are going to spend the next 70 or 80 years dealing with an overheated world."<br></p><p>"The most important thing right now," he said, "is to start taking care of that. I am glad that we are seeing leadership from the youngest people."</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="db363" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="RBOR4T1576663233"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1072920707007422466" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">The nifty @GretaThunberg asked me to make a video supporting her call for a #climatestrike from school on Friday so… https://t.co/9HJ0EnYJwf</div> — Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben)<a href="https://twitter.com/billmckibben/statuses/1072920707007422466">1544639205.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
<p>As a #ClimateStrike 2018 call-to-action <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vzhamVa5k1dYnUAvcxO6hF9MbtxHGVtnY2he5rkOSA4/edit?ts=5c0f74f9#heading=h.maqj0yryn4qq" target="_blank">explains</a>:<br></p><blockquote>Heat waves, <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/flooding">floods</a>, and <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/hurricanes">hurricanes</a> are killing hundreds and devastating communities across the world. Climate change is already a deadly reality. Governments are meeting for the U.N. climate talks right now in Poland, and despite the latest stark warning from climate scientists that we have only 12 years to reverse course, politicians are ignoring their call. What use is it learning facts if adults ignore them? That's why Greta and her fellow students are walking out of school to teach politicians a lesson in leadership.</blockquote><p>Addressing world leaders as the climate conference kicked off, Thunberg <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/12/04/we-have-not-come-here-beg-world-leaders-care-15-year-old-greta-thunberg-tells-cop24" target="_blank">said</a>, "We have not come here to beg the world leaders to care for our future. They have ignored us in the past and they will ignore us again. We have come here to let them know that change is coming whether they like it or not. The people will rise to the challenge."</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="43dc4" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="S34HPQ1576663233"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1055453475205775361" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Teen Climate Activist to Crowd of Thousands: 'We Can't Save the World by Playing by the Rules' @youthvgov… https://t.co/hGdQcKFcuJ</div> — EcoWatch (@EcoWatch)<a href="https://twitter.com/EcoWatch/statuses/1055453475205775361">1540474692.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p><em>Reposted with permission from our media associate <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/12/12/whoever-you-are-wherever-you-are-we-need-you-15-year-old-greta-thunberg-calls-global" target="_blank">Common Dreams</a>.</em><br></p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
The Lesson From a Burning Paris: We Can’t Tax Our Way Out of the Climate Crisis
11 December 2018
Insights + Opinion
Protesters clash with riot police on Foch avenue next to the Place de l'Etoile, setting cars ablaze during a Yellow Vest protest on Dec. 1 in Paris. Etienne De Malglaive / Getty Images
By Wenonah Hauter
The images from the streets of Paris over the past weeks are stark and poignant: thousands of angry protesters, largely representing the struggling French working class, resorting to mass civil unrest to express fear and frustration over a proposed new gas tax. For the moment, the protests have been successful. French President Emmanuel Macron backed off the new tax proposal, at least for six months. The popular uprising won, seemingly at the expense of the global fight against climate change and the future wellbeing of our planet.
<p>Yet this simple analysis is grossly incomplete and fatally flawed. A more thorough and accurate analysis of the latest failure to implement a new carbon emissions tax would be this: Real solutions to our dire climate crisis can't come in the form of regressive taxes that pit working families against the cause of climate stability. We won't avoid deepening climate chaos by pursuing strategies that unduly target the working class.</p><p>From here in the States to Europe and elsewhere, various carbon tax plans have been proposed or enacted in recent years as a "viable" solution to climate change. Economists of many stripes are quick to assert that putting a price on carbon emissions—as opposed to regulating them out of existence, for example—is the key to reducing fossil fuel pollution.</p><p>Yet little evidence exists of the virtues of taxing carbon from a climate standpoint. Many carbon tax advocates point to a recent plan enacted by British Columbia as evidence of the approach's worth. Yet an <a href="https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/insight/british-columbia-carbon-tax-failed-experiment-market-based-solutions-climate-change" target="_blank">analysis of the plan</a> conducted by Food & Water Watch found that greenhouse gas emissions from taxed sources actually increased by more than 4 percent, while non-taxed emissions fell during the same period.</p><p>Meanwhile, the inherently regressive nature of consumer-based carbon tax schemes places an undue financial burden on those working families least able to afford it. "Progressive" carbon pricing advocates often point to fine-print details in some models that would apparently mitigate the burden on lower- and working class families by returning revenues to consumers in rebate structures meant to favor those in lower income brackets. Additionally, so-called "revenue neutral" plans claim to put no new financial burden anywhere in the economy—which would call into question what their point is in the first place.</p><p>Details aside, three key facts on carbon pricing are unavoidable: First, there is little evidence to indicate that existing plans have resulted in any significant cut in carbon emissions, anywhere. Second, in order to generate significant emissions cuts, the price-per-ton on carbon would need to be so high as to truly dismantle life for great swaths of society, not just the working class. You think the protests in Paris this week were bad? The small costs associated with the new French gas tax wouldn't have made dent in emissions. Imagine if the tax was so immensely large as to actually reduce emissions. Talk about a protest!</p><p>And third, ExxonMobil and many of its fellow global fossil fuel pushers support carbon taxes. Why? Because they know that attaching a new public revenue stream on fossil fuels will only serve to condone and entrench the continued existence and expansion of the industry. To Exxon, a carbon tax means polluting, poisoning business-as-usual.</p><p>The real path to justly and aggressively moving off fossil fuels is simple: We must move off fossil fuels—justly and aggressively. This means new investment in the ever-expanding realm of clean energy production and transmission, which will create countless well-paying jobs. This means new investment in energy efficiency across all segments of society, which again will create many jobs. And this also means enacting a moratorium on new fossil fuel extraction and infrastructure. So long as we are continuing to drill and frack new wells, and build new interstate pipelines to carry new fossil fuel supplies to overseas markets, we will never truly begin the transition to a clean energy future our planet so desperately requires.</p><p>Call this a Green New Deal if you like, but be advised: Any Green New Deal that includes carbon pricing isn't green, isn't new and isn't much of a deal.</p><p><em><a href="https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/bio/wenonah-hauter" target="_blank">Wenonah Hauter</a> is the executive director <a href="https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/" target="_blank">Food & Water Watch</a>, a national advocacy organization.</em></p>
Read More
Show Less
COP24: U.S. Joins Saudi Arabia, Russia and Kuwait in Blocking Crucial Climate Report
10 December 2018
Climate
The Russia pavilion at the COP24 conference in Katowice, Poland. Beata Zawrzel / NurPhoto via Getty Images
The U.S. has thrown its hat in the ring with three other fossil-fuel friendly nations to block the COP24 talks from "welcoming" the landmark Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report that warned that we must reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 45 percent of 2010 levels by 2030 in order to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, BBC News reported.
<p>The report, released in October, was commissioned by a 2015 Conference of the Parties to the <a href="https://unfccc.int/" target="_blank">United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change</a>, but now the roughly 200 countries gathered for the 24th conference in Katowice, Poland have failed to formally acknowledge it. </p><p>The failure hinged on language. The majority of delegates wanted to "welcome" the report, but the U.S. joined with other oil-producing countries—Russia, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait—Saturday night to insist the report be only "noted," <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/09/us-russia-ally-saudi-arabia-water-down-climate-pledges-un" target="_blank">The Guardian reported</a>. Because UN rules insist on consensus, delegates were therefore not able to publish any text relating to the report.</p><p>"It's not about one word or another, it is us being in a position to welcome a report we commissioned in the first place," Ruenna Haynes from St. Kitts and Nevis said, BBC News reported. "If there is anything ludicrous about the discussion it's that we can't welcome the report."</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="681bb" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="I5UNXQ1576663234"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1071562955517542400" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">UN: Could you write us a report on global warming of 1.5C?
IPCC: It will take years of volunteer effort from scient… https://t.co/Yo7m4Z3wuH</div> — Simon Donner (@Simon Donner)<a href="https://twitter.com/simondonner/statuses/1071562955517542400">1544315491.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p>The move tenses the atmosphere for the last five days of talks at COP24, during which ministers, who arrive Monday, will work to establish a rulebook for implementing the <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/paris-agreement" target="_self">Paris agreement</a> to limit global warming to "well below" two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. It also raises concerns that the <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/donald-trump" target="_self">Trump</a> administration is evolving from simply withdrawing the U.S. from international efforts to fight <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/climate-change" target="_self">climate change</a> to actively disrupting those efforts.<br></p><p>"It is troubling. Saudi Arabia has always had bad behavior in climate talks, but it could be overruled when it was alone or just with Kuwait. That it has now been joined by the U.S. and Russia is much more dangerous," <a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/" target="_blank">Union of Concerned Scientists</a> director of strategy and policy Alden Meyer told The Guardian.</p><p>Indeed, Saudi Arabia had fought to limit the conclusions of the IPCC report when it was released in Korea earlier in the fall, but eventually agreed to let it be released as is, BBC News reported.</p><p>The scientists who worked hard on the report also expressed dismay at Saturday's failure.</p><p>"What is so disturbing in our [report] ... that four governments cannot even 'welcome' its findings?" French climate scientist Val. Masson-Delmotte asked in a Twitter thread. "A 1.5°C and a 2°C worlds are VERY different in terms of mean climate, extremes, sea level rise, and climate-related risks, with the emergence of climate change hotspots challenging basic water, food, economic security and the risk of irreversible loss of wildlife," she continued, hinting at the real-world stakes of ignoring the report.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="d8f64" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="4AP3521576663234"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1071722668834123778" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">A 1.5°C and a 2°C worlds are VERY different in terms of mean climate, extremes, sea level rise, and climate-related… https://t.co/xXZX43vlX5</div> — Val. Masson-Delmotte (@Val. Masson-Delmotte)<a href="https://twitter.com/valmasdel/statuses/1071722668834123778">1544353570.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p>Former UK climate negotiator Yamide Dagnet of the <a href="https://www.wri.org/" target="_blank">World Resources Institute</a> expressed hope that the arrival of the ministers Monday would turn the tide and persuade COP24 to acknowledge the report after all.<br></p><p>"We hope that the rest of the world will rally and we get a decisive response to the report," Dagnet said. "I sincerely hope that all countries will fight that we don't leave COP24 having missed a moment of history."</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="b94ce" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="S53VNP1576663234"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1069663865007431680" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">"We are clearly the last generation that can change the course of climate change." #COP24 #climatechange… https://t.co/9qO31AtGa6</div> — EcoWatch (@EcoWatch)<a href="https://twitter.com/EcoWatch/statuses/1069663865007431680">1543862713.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
A newly built Chinese state-owned coal fired power plant on Feb. 7, 2017. Kevin Frayer / Getty Images AsiaPac
As representatives from around 200 countries approach the end of first week negotiations on implementing the Paris agreement, a major new report underscores the urgency of their work.
The Global Carbon Budget 2018 was published in the journal Earth System Science Data Wednesday with the help of more than 70 authors from 53 research institutions, and the news is not good. After a three year lull in the rise of greenhouse gas emissions, emissions in 2018 are projected to shoot up by more than 2 percent, "a new record high," the report highlights from The Global Carbon Project said.
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="1d84b" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="GQJZ701576663172"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1070382504958251008" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">The big paper is out: Global Carbon Budget 2018 just published at @ESSD_journal
https://t.co/UOLaAh8lLk
More than… https://t.co/eXXB7gGBFp</div> — GlobalCarbonProject (@GlobalCarbonProject)<a href="https://twitter.com/gcarbonproject/statuses/1070382504958251008">1544034050.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p>"The global rise in carbon emissions is worrying, because to deal with <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/climate-change" target="_self">climate change</a> they have to turn around and go to zero eventually," lead paper author and University of East Anglia Professor Corinne Le Quéré, told <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/05/brutal-news-global-carbon-emissions-jump-to-all-time-high-in-2018" target="_blank">The Guardian</a>. "We are not seeing action in the way we really need to. This needs to change quickly."<br></p><p>Global greenhouse gas emissions stalled from 2014 to 2016, leading to hopes that increased climate action was making a difference. But in 2017, emissions rose 1.6 percent, and the report projects they will rise a further 2.7 percent this year, which would bring global emissions to a record high of 37.1 billion tons of carbon dioxide a year, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/energy-environment/2018/12/05/we-are-trouble-global-carbon-emissions-reached-new-record-high/?utm_term=.8d654ad344d3" target="_blank">The Washington Post reported</a>.</p><p>Emissions hikes in 2018 are expected from almost all of the major players: <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/india" target="_self">India</a>'s will rise 6.3 percent, <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/china" target="_self">China</a>'s 4.7 percent, and in the U.S. 2.5 percent. Only the EU is expected to see its emissions fall, by 0.7 percent. These four countries contributed the most to 2017's global emissions, with China contributing 27 percent, the U.S. contributing 15 percent, the EU contributing 10 percent and India contributing seven percent.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="34c1f" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="UFGHLL1576663172"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1070569779457609728" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Check the new country level CO2 emissions data in the Global Carbon Atlas
https://t.co/3vjErV0Kuc
@FondationBNPP… https://t.co/mwoO9c2Sqn</div> — GlobalCarbonProject (@GlobalCarbonProject)<a href="https://twitter.com/gcarbonproject/statuses/1070569779457609728">1544078700.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p>Overall, the rise in emissions was driven, literally, by an increase in car use, as well as the resurgence of <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/coal" target="_self">coal</a> as a fuel, The Guardian reported.<br></p><p>Part of the uptick in coal use was due to an economic push in China, Le Quéré told CNN.</p><p>"Coal use in China started to increase again last year and this year," Le Quéré said. "It is mostly related to China's economic stimulus in construction, and it probably won't return to the very steady growth that China had in the 2000s."</p><p>Study author Glen Peters explained on Twitter that, while <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/renewable-energy/" target="_self">renewable energy</a> was growing exponentially, it was not yet doing so fast enough to offset the use of <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/fossil-fuels" target="_self">fossil fuels</a>.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="21151" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="8JJVBA1576663172"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1070378966278656002" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Renewable energies (particularly solar & wind) are growing exponentially, but the growth has been too low to offset… https://t.co/rh64mNPBLd</div> — Glen Peters (@Glen Peters)<a href="https://twitter.com/Peters_Glen/statuses/1070378966278656002">1544033206.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p>Le Quéré also told CNN it was important that governments invest in <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/electric-vehicles" target="_self">electric vehicles</a> as they have in renewable energy in recent years so that the transport sector can move more quickly towards decarbonization.<br></p><p>The research caught the attention of participants at the ongoing <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/cop24" target="_self">COP24</a> summit in Katowice, Poland. Greta Thunberg, a Swedish youth climate activist who spoke at the conference Wednesday, tweeted the news with a renewed call to action.</p><p>"Whatever our world leaders are 'doing' to reduce emissions, they are doing it wrong," she wrote.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="9d970" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="MQ5GHO1576663172"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1070383696732139520" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">”Fossil fuel emissions rose by 1.7% in 2017 and are set to rise 2.7% this year..”
Whatever our world leaders are “… https://t.co/n1S2OjDi0Y</div> — Greta Thunberg (@Greta Thunberg)<a href="https://twitter.com/GretaThunberg/statuses/1070383696732139520">1544034334.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p>The report authors said it was possible for emissions to fall again by 2020 if emissions from transportation, agriculture and industry are reduced, The Guardian reported. But if that doesn't happen, emissions will continue to rise until 2030.<br></p><p>"Unless the commitments are revised, the trajectory for the moment is for gentle emissions growth," Le Quéré told CNN. "At the moment the drivers are not for decreasing emissions globally."</p>
Read More
Show Less
Trending
A burnt-out car on avenue de la Grande Armée after protests against higher diesel taxes on Dec. 2 in Paris, France. Etienne De Malglaive / Getty Images
French President Emmanuel Macron announced plans Tuesday to suspend an increase in fuel tax in response to growing pressure from protestors. Over the weekend, Macron canceled plans to attend COP24 amidst increasing tension in France.
<p> President Donald <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/trump-watch/">Trump</a> on Twitter Tuesday evening conflated Macron's decision with a rejection of the <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/paris-agreement">Paris agreement</a>, calling the accord "fatally flawed" while also retweeting a demonstrably false tweet from a right-wing pundit claiming that "radical leftist fuel taxes" are prompting the French to chant "'we want Trump'... through the streets of Paris." </p><p>"There's no viable solution to reducing emissions on the scale needed in France without a price on carbon pollution as well as complementary policies, but a process that is not developed in an inclusive manner is destined to fail," said Pierre Cannet, head of climate and energy at WWF-France. "[The] announcement that the French government is freezing <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/carbon-tax">carbon tax</a> shows that they put the cart before the horse by not addressing the social measures necessary for a just transition."</p><p>As reported by Vox:</p><blockquote>While the protests may have started over the fuel tax, they have since morphed into a broader indictment of Macron's handling of the French economy and his perceived elitist disregard for the effects his policies are having on France's working class.</blockquote><blockquote>...</blockquote><blockquote>Trump's <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/10/31/18048424/journalists-stop-repeating-trump-lies" target="_blank">disregard for the truth</a> and <a href="https://www.vox.com/2018/11/15/18096781/trump-tweet-democrats-collusion-russia-lie" target="_blank">active attempts to create his own reality</a>—and to convince his supporters of that imagined reality—are nothing new.</blockquote><blockquote>But the fact that the sitting president of the United States either does not understand or is deliberately misrepresenting the basic dynamics of a massive political crisis roiling one of America's closest allies is deeply disturbing.</blockquote>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="ecdc0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="33IHNU1576663039"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1069601233063878661" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">My second @EcoWatch piece today looks at the #GiletsJaunes protests in France and why it is important to factor inc… https://t.co/SkZyZOdNig</div> — Olivia Rosane (@Olivia Rosane)<a href="https://twitter.com/orosane/statuses/1069601233063878661">1543847780.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
<p><strong>For a deeper dive:</strong><br></p><p>Fuel tax: <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-04/french-govt-to-suspend-fuel-tax-to-end-yellow-vests-protest" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a>, <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46437904" target="_blank">BBC</a>, <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/france-to-delay-fuel-tax-increase-after-violent-protests-1543925246" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>, <a href="https://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-france-fuel-tax-delayed-20181204-story.html" target="_blank">LA Times</a>, <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/04/world/europe/france-fuel-tax-yellow-vests.html" target="_blank">New York Times</a>, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/france-suspends-controversial-fuel-tax-after-weeks-of-unrest/2018/12/04/d32577a6-f7b6-11e8-8d64-4e79db33382f_story.html?utm_term=.662fe0b1adb9" target="_blank">Washington Post</a>, <a href="https://www.npr.org/2018/12/04/673195387/france-freezes-fuel-tax-hike-in-face-of-yellow-vest-protests" target="_blank">NPR</a>. Trump: <a href="https://www.vox.com/world/2018/12/4/18125666/paris-riots-we-want-trump-tweet-france-protests" target="_blank">Vox</a>, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-protests/trump-mocks-macron-again-over-french-fuel-tax-protests-idUSKBN1O40M5" target="_blank">Reuters</a>, <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-conflates-macron-suspending-fuel-tax-amid-riots-with-paris-climate-agreement" target="_blank">Washington Examiner</a>, <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/12/trump-mocks-macron-blames-french-riots-paris-climate-accord-181205091606078.html" target="_blank">Al Jazeera</a></p><p> <em>For more </em><a href="http://ecowatch.com/climate-change-news/" target="_blank"><em>climate change</em></a><em> and </em><a href="http://ecowatch.com/business/renewables/" target="_blank"><em>clean energy</em></a><em> news, you can follow Climate Nexus on </em><a href="https://twitter.com/ClimateNexus" target="_blank"><em>Twitter</em></a><em> and </em><a href="https://www.facebook.com/ClimateNexus/" target="_blank"><em>Facebook</em></a><em>, and sign up for daily </em><a href="http://climatenexus.us4.list-manage1.com/subscribe?u=d1f5797e59060083034310930&id=7c84c08aaa" target="_blank"><em>Hot News</em></a><em>.</em></p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Donald Trump announces his decision to withdraw from the Paris agreement on June 1, 2017. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images
As representatives of around 200 countries kicked off the COP24 meeting in Katowice, Poland this week to develop a rulebook for implementing the Paris agreement, a new study looked at how U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw has affected the landmark climate accord. The verdict? The so-called 'Trump Effect' has significantly slowed the momentum of global climate action.
<p>The study, <a href="https://www.iiea.com/energy/the-paris-climate-agreement-versus-the-trump-effect-countervailing-forces-for-decarbonisation/" target="_blank">published Monday</a> by Joseph Curtin of the <a href="https://www.iiea.com/" target="_blank">Institute of International & European Affairs </a>(IIEA), examined the fate of the 2015 agreement to limit global warming to "well below" two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels in the context of Trump's <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/trumps-withdraws-paris-climate-agreement-2429436831.html" target="_self">announcement</a> in June 2017 that the U.S. would pull out. </p><p> "[T]he 'Trump Effect' has created a powerful countervailing force acting against the momentum [the agreement] hoped to generate," Curtin wrote.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="5042b" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="4N3G8S1576662849"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1069497507678429184" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">As #COP24 gets underway in #Katowice our latest analysis by #ClimateChange Senior Fellow @jmcurtin argues that the… https://t.co/xakF8PtSGn</div> — IIEA (@IIEA)<a href="https://twitter.com/iiea/statuses/1069497507678429184">1543823050.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p><p>Trump's decision has slowed the pace of change in three key ways, Curtin found.<br></p><ol class="ee-ol"><li><strong>"U.S. Federal rollbacks have increased the attractiveness of fossil fuel investments globally":</strong> The signing of the Paris agreement led investors to flee assets like <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/coal" target="_self">coal</a> and tar sands out of fear that they would lose money if the world really moved away from <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/fossil-fuels">fossil fuels</a>. However, Trump's decision to withdraw, as well as his moves to reverse Obama-era climate policy domestically, led those investments to rise again in 2017. In that year, JPMorgan Chase upped its tar sands investments by a factor of four, 36 banks increased their <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/coal" target="_self">coal</a> investments by six percent after decreasing them 38 percent the year before and investment in <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/renewable-energy/" target="_self">renewable energy</a> decreased by seven percent.</li><li><strong>"The US decision to withdraw from the Agreement has created moral and political cover for others to follow suit"</strong>: While key players like the EU, <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/india" target="_self">India</a> and <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/china" target="_self">China</a> have remained committed to the agreement, a few countries have slowed or reversed action and used Trump's decision as an excuse. Australia justified dumping legislation designed to help it meet its Paris pledges with Trump's actions and Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said he would not ratify the agreement "after that step taken by America." <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/brazil">Brazil</a>'s <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/brazil-bolsonaro-amazon-climate-2616170023.html" target="_self">newly elected</a> right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro tweeted support of Trump's withdrawal decision at the time, and did at one point threaten to withdraw as well. Most recently, he said Brazil would not host a major climate conference next year, <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46384828" target="_blank">BBC News</a> reported.</li><li><strong>"Goodwill at international negotiations has been damaged</strong><strong>"</strong>: Obama had promised $3 billion to a Green Climate Fund created in 2009, a decision Trump reversed, leaving the fund with a $2 billion shortfall, which has increased tensions in the negotiations surrounding it. Further, one of the trickiest points in Paris negotiations is the pledge made by developed countries to help developing countries decarbonize to the tune of $100 billion a year. Developed countries, including the U.S., don't want to report their financial commitments as part of their pledge updates and want more private finance to pick up the tab. The Trump administration's rigid position on this may be influencing other developed countries, working to "sour negotiations," the report found. Finally, the report predicted it was unlikely that other countries would offer more ambitious Paris pledges without a similar move from the U.S. </li></ol><p>Curtin ended the report with a sly call to action to U.S. voters who care about <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/climate-change" target="_self">climate change</a>.</p><p>"[T]he Paris Agreement will resist the Trump Effect in the short-run," he wrote. "But in the medium- and longer-term, it will continue to be assailed by instability and uncertainty, unless these underlying structural factors can be finally addressed; and this is a job that can only be performed by the American electorate. Meanwhile, the window of opportunity for achieving the 2° C temperature target is rapidly closing."</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="9d889" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="SS13251576662849"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="963474947417964545" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">The Trump Effect on Climate News https://t.co/7Y9IKKO2eS @NRDC @ClimateReality @350 @truthout @ClimateNexus</div> — EcoWatch (@EcoWatch)<a href="https://twitter.com/EcoWatch/statuses/963474947417964545">1518545302.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Trending
Lunch in the COP24 food court on Dec. 3. Walker Institute / @WalkerInst
New analysis from the Center for Biological Diversity, Farm Forward and Brighter Green Sunday finds that the meat-heavy menu at the United Nations' Framework Convention on Climate Change conference COP24 could contribute more than 4,000 metric tons of greenhouse gases to the climate crisis.
<p>The data found that if all 30,000 visitors choose meat-based dishes at the conference's largest food court during the 12-day conference, they would contribute the equivalent of burning more than 500,000 gallons of gasoline or the greenhouse gas emissions attributed to 3,000 people flying from New York to Katowice.</p><p>The groups that compiled the research called on the United Nations to create a framework for host countries to prioritize climate-friendly menus at future climate meetings.</p><p>"The meat-laden menu at COP24 is an insult to the work of the conference," said Stephanie Feldstein, director of the Population and Sustainability program at the Center for Biological Diversity. "If the world leaders gathering in Poland hope to address the climate crisis, they need to tackle overconsumption of meat and dairy, starting with what's on their own plates. That means transitioning the food served at international climate conferences to more plant-based options with smaller carbon footprints."</p><p>The menu features twice as many meat-based options as plant-based ones. These meat dishes generate average greenhouse gas emissions four times higher than the plant-based meals. The two dairy-free, plant-based options generate one-tenth of the emissions.</p><p>In addition to higher greenhouse gas emissions, the meat-based dishes on the menu require nine times more land and nearly twice as much water as the plant-based dishes.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image">
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8xODk2MjA2NC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYxNjM1MjI2NH0.VqOLlBBZAWIfk8Tv7YWvGbFhmXJBD6MXxSO4u2IBFiM/img.jpg?width=980" id="48a46" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="a454f6d6e35acad0ee6104e6c43a1778" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image">
<small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="add photo credit...">Melissa Amarello / Center for Biological Diversity</small></p><p>"What people eat at a conference may seem like small potatoes when it comes to curbing global emissions," added Farm Forward's Claire Fitch. "But if those at the forefront of global climate negotiations aren't going to 'walk the talk' at the highest-level climate conference, how can we expect the rest of the world to get on board?"<br></p><p>Studies have shown that it will not be possible to meet global climate targets without reducing meat and dairy consumption and production. Yet the need to tackle the overconsumption of animal-based foods has been largely absent from international climate negotiations and commitments. The majority of food-related efforts focus on improving production practices with few or no significant targets for shifting to less climate-intensive diets.</p><p>"We know that we cannot meet the Paris Agreement goals, or the 1.5C target, with business as usual," said Caroline Wimberly of Brighter Green, who will be in Katowice for COP24. "Food is not a matter only of personal choice, but an essential factor in solving the climate crisis. Demand-side policies and efforts, including food waste reductions and shifting diets—prioritizing populations with the highest consumption of animal-based foods—are critical in achieving a climate compatible food system and curtailing emissions."</p>
From Your Site Articles
Read More
Show Less
'The World Is at a Crossroads’: Urgent Climate Talks Begin in Poland as Negotiators Meet a Day Early
03 December 2018
Climate
The inaugural session of the COP24 climate talks in Katowice, Poland Sunday. JANEK SKARZYNSKI / AFP / Getty Images
Negotiators in the climate talks that will decide the future of the Paris agreement began meeting a day early in Katowice, Poland on Sunday as pressure builds to take meaningful global action against climate change, BBC News reported.
<p>The 24th session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/cop24" target="_self">COP24</a>) is the first major international climate meeting since the UN's <a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/" target="_blank">Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</a> (IPCC) issued an<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/climate-change-ipcc-report-2610866229.html" target="_self"> urgent report</a> that world leaders have only 12 years to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 45 percent of 2010 levels if they want to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. The Paris agreement set a goal of limiting warming to "well below" two degrees Celsius, and talks over the next two weeks will determine how the countries involved will move towards that goal.</p><p>"The world is at a crossroads and decisive action in the next two years will be crucial to tackle these urgent threats," the presidents of the last four UN climate talks warned in a first-of-its kind <a href="http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/this_2018_12_01_cop24_call_of_former_cop_presidents.pdf" target="_blank">statement</a> Sunday. "The challenges are there, as are the solutions. We require deep transformations of our economies and societies to build a better world for all. This must be powered by multilateral cooperation."</p><p>In a move BBC News called "unprecedented," Fijian Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama, Moroccan politician Salaheddine Mezouar, former French Prime Minister Laurent Fabius and <a href="https://www.worldwildlife.org/" target="_blank">World Wildlife Fund</a> climate and energy leader Manuel Pulgar Vidal of Peru issued the statement calling on decision makers in Katowice to up ambitious climate action by 2020 in order to meet the goals of the Paris agreement.</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p>
<p>So far, the biggest commitment has come from the World Bank, which <a href="http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/12/03/world-bank-group-announces-200-billion-over-five-years-for-climate-action?CID=CCG_TT_climatechange_EN_EXT" target="_blank">announced Monday</a> it was doubling its investments in climate action to $200 billion for 2021 to 2025. The bank is for the first time earmarking $50 billion of that amount towards projects working to adapt to already occurring climate impacts such as <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/drought" target="_blank">drought</a> and <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/flooding" target="_blank">flooding</a>.<br></p><p>"We are clearly the last generation that can change the course of climate change, but we are also the first generation with its consequences," World Bank CEO Kristalina Georgieva told <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/03/we-are-last-generation-that-can-stop-climate-change-un-summit" target="_blank">The Guardian</a>.</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="f1dc0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="U6LIXD1576663235"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1069397617220689921" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">BREAKING NEWS⟶ @WorldBank releases a new action plan designed to boost climate adaptation and resilience to climate… https://t.co/rot7jbPtNJ</div> — World Bank Climate (@World Bank Climate)<a href="https://twitter.com/WBG_Climate/statuses/1069397617220689921">1543799235.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
<p>While negotiators met early to get down to brass tacks, the main festivities kicked off Sunday with the arrival of a team of 40 cyclists who biked from Vienna under the banner of "Moving for Climate NOW" to promote <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/renewable-energy/" target="_self">renewable energy</a>.<br></p><p>"I commend the cyclists involved in this bike tour for inspiring the world to move in the right direction to fulfil the promise of the Paris Agreement," UN Climate Change Deputy Executive Secretary Ovais Sarmad said in a <a href="https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/12/1027261" target="_blank">press release</a>. "This is the most important COP since the signing of the agreement, and we need initiatives like yours to testify that governments, the private sector and individuals can work together to tackle climate change by committing to multilateralism."</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="4137e" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="KIKA9N1576663235"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1069261566024081408" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Overcoming borders and below-zero temperatures, the #4ClimateNOW cycling team arrived today at #COP24 in #Katowice,… https://t.co/r04DkwVbYc</div> — UN Climate Change (@UN Climate Change)<a href="https://twitter.com/UNFCCC/statuses/1069261566024081408">1543766797.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
<p>Despite the urgent words of participants, however, there is concern from activists that the talks could be undermined by their location, a <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/coal" target="_self">coal</a>-mining town in a country that generates 80 percent of its energy from the <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/fossil-fuels" target="_self">fossil fuel</a> that the IPCC said must be phased out by 2050 to prevent catastrophic warming. Poland has even allowed two coal companies to sponsor the talks.<br></p><p>"Having major coal companies as climate summit sponsors sends the worst possible signal at the worst possible time," <a href="https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/" target="_blank">Greenpeace</a>'s director in Central and Eastern Europe Robert Cyglicki told The Guardian. "It would be like Philip Morris sponsoring a health summit where a cigarette ban is supposed to be agreed. We will know this was a successful summit if coal companies regret sponsoring it."</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
</p><div id="939a8" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="4AU52L1576663235"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1069486894923304960" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">At the global #ClimateChange convention our host, Poland, greets us with a shrine of ACTUAL coal 🔥💨🇵🇱
This year th… https://t.co/z7SCa4BRgL</div> — James Ellsmoor 🏝 (@James Ellsmoor 🏝)<a href="https://twitter.com/jellsmoor/statuses/1069486894923304960">1543820520.0</a></blockquote></div>
<p></p>
<p>Another concern is the role that the U.S. delegates will play. While President <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/donald-trump" target="_self">Donald Trump</a> has vowed to withdraw from the Paris agreement, he cannot actually do so until 2020, so the U.S. must still participate in talks. U.S. participants have not interfered with the process itself, BBC News reported. But at the last COP event, the White House was criticized for organizing a <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/protestors-cop23-bloomberg-2509352387.html" target="_self">side event promoting fossil fuels</a>, and <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-coal-un-katowice-cop24-2619873172.html" target="_self">reports indicate</a> they will do so again at the Katowice talks.<br></p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
‘Our Food Systems Are Failing Us’: 100+ Academies Call for Overhaul of Food Production
29 November 2018
Food
Alfredo Francisco Nunes Ribeiro / EyeEm / Getty Images
"Our food systems are failing us." That's the conclusion drawn by a peer-reviewed report that's the result of three years of work by 130 science and medical academies, in the words of Prof. Joachim von Braun, co-chair of the project behind the major new study.
<p>The <a href="http://www.interacademies.org/48898/Opportunities-for-future-research-and-innovation-on-food-and-nutrition-security-and-agriculture-The-InterAcademy-Partnerships-global-perspective" target="_blank">report</a> was released by the <a href="http://www.interacademies.org/" target="_blank">InterAcademy Partnership</a> (IAP) Wednesday in hopes of outlining both the scale of the problems facing global food production and some possible solutions ahead of the 24th session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/cop24" target="_self">COP24</a>) in Katowice, Poland <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/cop24-climate-2621562738.html" target="_self">next week</a>.</p><blockquote>"Next week at COP24, we need to see leaders take action on <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/climate-change" target="_blank">climate change</a> and go beyond political statements. It is not only the environment that is at stake, but health, nutrition, trade, jobs and the economy. <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/agriculture" target="_blank">Agriculture</a> and consumer choices are major factors driving disastrous climate change. We need a robust and ambitious policy response to address the climate impacts of agriculture and consumer choices – and scientists have a major role to play. Our new report is a wake-up call to leaders," Braun, who is the co-chair of the IAP project on Food and Nutrition Security and Agriculture, President of the Pontifical Academy of Science, and Director of the Center for Development Research (ZEF) at the University of Bonn, said in an <a href="http://www.interacademies.org/48945/Global-food-systems-are-failing-humanity-and-speeding-up-climate-change" target="_blank">IAP press release</a>.<br></blockquote><p>The report lays out two major problems with the world's food system, according to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/nov/28/global-food-system-is-broken-say-worlds-science-academies" target="_blank">The Guardian</a>. </p><p style="margin-left: 20px;"><strong>`1. Climate Change: </strong>The food system is responsible for one-third of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, more than the combined emissions of heating, air conditioning, transport and lighting. At the same time, food production is increasingly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, such as <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/flooding" target="_self">flooding</a> and <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/drought" target="_self">drought</a>.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;"><span></span><strong>2. Health: </strong>While the global food system drains resources, it also isn't doing its job of making sure everyone has enough nutritious food to eat. The number of chronically malnourished people rose to 815 million in 2016, according to the most recent <a href="http://www.fao.org/home/en/" target="_blank">UN Food and Agriculture Organization</a> data. On the other extreme, more than 600 million people are considered obese, while two billion are overweight. A third of all people don't get enough vitamins with their diet.</p><p>"This is no time for business as usual. In addition to climate change, our current food systems are negatively impacting people's health around the globe. High-calorie diets have become cheaper, and this has serious implications for public health, obesity, and malnutrition," IAP President Prof. Volker ter Meulen said in the press release.</p><p>The report also issued recommendations for making the global food system work.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;"><strong>1. Lower Emissions</strong>: The IAP recommended working to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions caused by agriculture, while also acknowledging that reducing emissions alone would not be enough to fix the problem.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;"><span></span><strong>2. Incentivize New Diets</strong>: The report suggested policy makers study how they could use incentives to convince consumers to pick healthier, more environmentally friendly foods.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;"><span></span><strong>3. Innovate</strong>: The report urged innovation when it comes to reducing meat consumption in wealthier regions, such as developing alternatives like "meat–mushroom mixes, lab-grown meat, algae and appealing insect-based foods."</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;"><span></span><strong>4. Interdisciplinary Research:</strong> The report encouraged natural and social scientists to collaborate more to develop both food systems and social policies that would be healthier for humans and the planet.</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;"><span></span><strong>5. International Advisory Panel</strong>: The report called for the establishment of a global panel of experts on food, nutrition and agriculture issues.</p>
From Your Site Articles
Read More
Show Less