The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Obama's Clean Power Plan Tips the Scales Toward Successful Paris Climate Talks
President Obama’s determination to reduce U.S. carbon emissions by 32 percent below 2005 levels by 2030 sends a message to the rest of the world’s leaders that the UN climate talks in Paris could succeed in saving the planet from overheating.
— BBC Breaking News (@BBCBreaking) August 3, 2015
Past talks have foundered on a range of political excuses, but now that the world’s two largest polluters, China and the U.S., have committed to far-reaching changes in their energy production to keep the world below the dangerous threshold of a 2°C temperature increase, the door is open for all the rest to follow.
The stumbling block to U.S. action so far has been the refusal of die-hard members of the Republican Party to accept that climate change is happening and the well-funded fossil fuel lobby’s legal and political campaign to block any legislation.
The law says that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency must regulate any pollutant that is deemed a danger to human health and wellbeing. And the Supreme Court upheld the agency’s finding that carbon dioxide in large amounts did qualify as a dangerous pollutant.
The fact that President Obama’s regulations are backed by a number of power companies that see the regulations as an opportunity to invest in renewables and by corporate giants such as Coca-Cola, Walmart and Google, shows there is increasing support for him across America.
Of course, the Republicans will continue to challenge the new regulations in the courts and they will be an issue in the next presidential elections. Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton has already endorsed the Obama proposals.
The Republican opponents who say it will cost jobs in the coal industry will also have to explain whether they are in favour of the asthma, the premature deaths and the danger to the planet that coal plants cause.
The U.S. political battle will come to a head long after the Paris talks have succeeded or failed. At the moment, the policy of both the U.S. and China is far more forward-thinking and their actions more far-reaching than even the optimistic could have hoped for two years ago.
China has been under huge pressure from its increasing middle class to take action on air pollution and so phasing out dirty coal power plants has become a national priority.
This will take a long time because the plants are so numerous and China needs more power, but a start has already been made and the country has a massive renewable energy program, where it is already the world leader.
In the World Resources Institute list of the top 10 polluter countries, the European Union's (EU) 28 member states—ranked third behind China and the U.S.—are classed together, since the EU has a joint reduction target.
However, this masks massive differences in government approaches. For example, Germany is going for renewables in a big way and is phasing out nuclear power, while the UK is intent on building nuclear and is no longer encouraging on-shore wind and solar energy.
Further down the list are India in fourth place, Russia fifth, Japan sixth and then Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico and Iran.
India is still trying to provide its vast population with access to regular electricity supplies, or in some cases any electricity at all, so its priority is still development, rather than curbing pollution.
That said, the Indian government, like China’s, is under heavy pressure because of the killer smogs that regularly envelop its major cities. The government is currently investing heavily in solar power, along with coal plants. It remains to be seen whether its targets to make a contribution to reducing emissions will improve in Paris.
The remainder of the top 10 are more difficult to assess. Russia remains an unknown quantity, Japan is still struggling with the closure of its nuclear power plants following the Fukushima accident in 2011 and the others are, like India, dominated by concerns for development more than environment.
The Obama intervention, four months before the Paris talks, does demonstrate to every world leader that, in the world’s largest economy, the future is renewables and that no new coal-powered plants will be built. If this is the way forward for the richest nation, then the rest of the world should at least take note.
Canada and Australia, at 11 and 13 in the table of top carbon polluters, will come under pressure to at least accept some targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Both at the moment have ditched reduction targets in favour of exploiting fossil fuel resources.
Australia seems intent on denying climate change and providing the world with coal, but it may now find its exports suffering.
Obama’s announcement certainly tilts the balance towards a good outcome in Paris.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
The Centers for Disease Control has emphasized that washing hands with soap and water is one of the most effective measures we can take in preventing the spread of COVID-19. However, millions of Americans in some of the most vulnerable communities face the prospect of having their water shut off during the lockdowns, according to The Guardian.
Aerial photos of the Sierra Nevada — the long mountain range stretching down the spine of California — showed rust-colored swathes following the state's record-breaking five-year drought that ended in 2016. The 100 million dead trees were one of the most visible examples of the ecological toll the drought had wrought.
Now, a few years later, we're starting to learn about how smaller, less noticeable species were affected.
Natthawat / Moment / Getty Images
Disinfectants and cleaners claiming to sanitize against the novel coronavirus have started to flood the market, raising concerns for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which threatened legal recourse against retailers selling unregistered products, according to The New York Times.
The global coronavirus pandemic has thrown our daily routine into disarray. Billions are housebound, social contact is off-limits and an invisible virus makes up look at the outside world with suspicion. No surprise, then, that sustainability and the climate movement aren't exactly a priority for many these days.
By Molly Matthews Multedo
Livestock farming contributes to global warming, so eating less meat can be better for the climate.