The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Residents of America’s 54 largest cities collected more than $24 million in Direct Payment farm subsidies in 2012, according to new research by the Environmental Working Group (EWG).
A total of 18,276 city dwellers cashed in on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Direct Payment program, which was created in 1996 to wean farmers off subsidies but instead was continued in the 2002 and 2008 farm bills, EWG’s study shows.
Congress must decide this month whether to extend the Direct Payment program, which cost taxpayers nearly $5 billion a year. Both the House and Senate versions of the proposed new farm bill would end these payments, but it looks more likely that Congress will vote to extend the current farm bill once again.
Unlike subsidies tied to current farm production and prices, direct payments are based on a farm’s historical production. As a result, the checks go out regardless of need or even whether a farm has produced a crop. Land that has been converted to non-farm uses is legally not eligible for direct payment subsidies, but the Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently found that USDA does a poor job of tracking land use changes.
Many of the city dwellers who receive direct payments have an ownership interest in a farm, but are only marginally involved in its operation and may not even visit it.
From 2003 to 2011, about one-quarter of all direct payments—$10.6 billion—went to landowners whose farm did not grow the crop associated with its historic production, and many landowners reported their land as fallow—with no crop at all—the GAO found.
Here is how the Direct Payment program works: landowners annually enroll based on a farm’s historical production and the payment rates set in the 2008 farm bill. A payment is calculated by multiplying the payment rate by the farm’s historic acres and yields, as specified in the 2002 farm bill. If the farm also participates in the separate Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) subsidy program, the direct payments are cut by 20 percent.
This table shows the payment rates for 11 eligible commodity crops:
Direct payment rates
Direct payment rate
Direct payment rate if enrolled in ACRE
There are some limits on direct payments. Landowners can grow many crops on eligible lands, but they are prohibited from growing fruits, vegetables and wild rice. An individual landowner is supposed to be limited to no more than $40,000 a year in all, but this limit does little to level the playing field for family farmers. According to the GAO, recipients of the top 25 percent of direct payment checks pulled in 73 percent of the total in 2011.
Because the current farm bill expires at the end of September, Congress must decide soon how to extend the current programs—including whether or not to extend direct payments. Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) got it right when she concluded during a recent colloquy that extending direct payments “is indefensible in the current budget climate. It makes no sense to pay farmers when they haven't suffered a loss.”
Any farm bill extension—including a short-term extension—should finally end direct payments and use some of the savings to finance other small but important programs, including those that help organic farmers, beginning farmers and local food initiatives.
Visit EcoWatch’s FARM BILL page for more related news on this topic.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Preliminary data from the Centers for Disease Control showed a larger number of young people coming down with COVID-19 than first expected, with patients under the age of 45 comprising more than a third of all cases, and one in five of those patients requiring hospitalization. That also tends to be the group most likely to use e-cigarettes.
By Dave Cooke
So, they finally went and did it — the Trump administration just finalized a rule to undo requirements on manufacturers to improve fuel economy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from new passenger cars and trucks. Even with the economy at the brink of a recession, they went forward with a policy they know is bad for consumers — their own analysis shows that American drivers are going to spend hundreds of dollars more in fuel as a result of this stupid policy — but they went ahead and did it anyway.
By Richard Connor
A blood test that screens for more than 50 types of cancer could help doctors treat patients at an earlier stage than previously possible, a new study shows. The method was used to screen for more than 50 types of cancer — including particularly deadly variants such as pancreatic, ovarian, bowel and brain.
By Raya A. Al-Masri
Different strategies for resisting the spread of the new coronavirus have emerged in different countries. But the one that has cut through everywhere is simple and, supposedly, can be done by anyone: "Wash your hands with water and soap for at least 20 seconds."