An area of 3.2 million hectares (7.9 million acres) was engulfed by forest fires in remote regions of Russia on Monday. In comparison, the total surface of the nation of Belgium is 3.07 million hectares.
With fires raging for days, immense clouds of smoke reached large population centers, including Russia's third biggest city, Novosibirsk. Authorities declared emergencies in several regions.
- The Vicious Climate-Wildfire Cycle - EcoWatch ›
- The Arctic Is Burning: Wildfires Rage from Sweden to Alaska ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Beverage behemoths Coca-Cola and Pepsico have taken a stand against a trade association that actively works to restrict plastic bag bans. The two soft drink giants have announced that they will leave the Plastics Industry Association as a response to concerns that their membership in the group contradicted their commitment to reducing plastic waste and packaging, as Newsweek reported.
- World's Biggest Plastic Polluters Pledge to Cut Waste by 2025 ... ›
- Coca-Cola Produced More Than 110 Billion Plastic Bottles Last Year ›
- How Coca-Cola and Climate Change Created a Public Health Crisis ... ›
- Plastic Bottle Made From Plants Degrades in Just One Year - EcoWatch ›
By Willie Mackenzie
When it comes to being otherworldly, alien and bizarre, the ocean has plenty to fuel the imagination and make your jaw drop: giant scuttling bugs, jelly-like blobfish, slimy mucus-drenched hagfish, hairy armed lobsters and almost anything else you could imagine.
The spiral tube worm, or Sabella Spallanzanii, lives in membranous tubes, often reinforced by the inclusion of mud particles and has a feathery, filter-feeding crown that can be quickly withdrawn into the tube when danger threatens.
Gavin Newman / Greenpeace
Discovery of Hydrothermal Vents<p>One of the hottest candidates for creating the right conditions are deep sea "<a href="https://www.whoi.edu/know-your-ocean/ocean-topics/seafloor-below/hydrothermal-vents/" target="_blank">hydrothermal</a>" vents, where super-heated water and chemicals meet. These vents exist far below the reach of sunlight, in an area devoid of any oxygen. They're created at the places where giant tectonic plates meet, by the heat from the inner Earth pushing through the crust of the planet.</p><p>Hydrothermal vents were only discovered in 1977 – and astonished scientists with their towering chimneys and bizarre animals discovered around them. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QffkyLYB_PA" target="_blank">Giant tube worms</a>, bacteria-eating crabs and other surreal creatures somehow thriving at great depths, clustered around columns billowing out "<a href="https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/vents.html" target="_blank">smoking</a>" superheated, mineral-rich seawater. </p><p>This discovery challenged what people thought about life on Earth, and even more so when "alkaline" versions were discovered in 2000. <a href="https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/ph-scale-0" target="_blank">Caustic conditions</a>, similar to weak bleach, or bicarbonate of soda, seemed even more unlikely to support life. Yet they did. </p>
The Lost City: The Real Primordial Soup?<p>The Lost City is the best known of these hydrothermal vents — a collection of turrets, towers and chimneys that could be as much as 120,000 years old.</p><p>Research shows that these vents are <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080131151856.htm" target="_blank">creating hydrocarbons</a> — molecules that are essential for all life on Earth. Could it be that churning chemicals and minerals in superheated seawater in places like the Lost City were actually <a href="https://www.chemistryworld.com/features/hydrothermal-vents-and-the-origins-of-life/3007088.article" target="_blank">where life started</a>? Is this the real primordial soup?</p><p>The honest answer is — we still don't know. In the last couple of decades, scientists have struggled to survey and understand the mysteries of the Lost City.</p><p>But as research continues to try and answer these questions, the seabed has attracted attention from industry keen to exploit the minerals and metals down there too.</p>
Hydrothermal vents at Dom João De Castro.
Greenpeace / Gavin Newman
Monster Machines at the Ready<p>We don't know very much about the deep sea, and we know even less about remote, inhospitable deep sea vents. Though they exist in extreme chemical and physical conditions, they seem to be very fragile and precarious.</p><p>Yet even before scientists have started to scratch the surface of understanding these remarkable environments, they are at risk of being damaged or destroyed forever by industries keen to mine minerals from the deep sea. </p><p>Licenses have already been granted to explore for mining the seafloor with monster machines — which risk wrecking these places before they are even understood.</p>
Underwater footage of seamounts in the Azores, Princess Alice Banks.
A Wake-Up Call<p>The rush to exploit the deep ocean, before we even understand it, has to be a wake-up call.</p><p>It's not as if the public is clamoring for the seafloor to be ripped up for us to get a new gadget (especially when companies can't even get their act together to reclaim and recycle the materials we already have!). Not only are we threatening unique marine life, but we might destroy these places forever.</p><p>That's why Greenpeace's Pole to Pole expedition is sailing to the Lost City this summer with the scientist who discovered this wonder of the deep ocean, to learn more about its mysteries and make the case for protection, rather than exploitation.</p><p>Did life on Earth begin in the cauldron of chemical soup around deep sea hydrothermal vents? I don't know. But I do know that we're already harming enough species and habitats, and we have no justifiable reason to trash the fragile deep sea and all the wonderfully weird marine life that makes its home there.</p>
The Esperanza arriving to the Azores for the Lost City Leg of the Pole to Pole Ship Tour.
Barbara Sanchez Palomero / Greenpeace
By Paula Tejón Carbajal
Working in climate and environment, you hear this question a lot. On one hand, environmental groups — including Greenpeace — will tell you that every action you take can make a difference. Every action counts! On the other, editorials and experts will tell you that it doesn't matter what you do in your everyday life, because the problem can't be solved by individual action. They may claim that its a cop out and lets corporations off the hook, because the problem lies with the broken but deeply entrenched system we're caught in. After all, 70 percent of emissions are created by 100 companies, right?
By Eon Higgins
Its official name is the "Akademik Lomonosov," but critics call it a "floating Chernobyl."
- Former U.S. Nuclear Safety Chief: 'New Nuclear Is off the Table ... ›
- World's 250,000-Ton Nuclear Waste Stockpiles a 'Global Crisis ... ›
By Jeremiah Lowery
The climate crisis is comprised of many issues, which require many solutions. Now is the time for presidential candidates to discuss all these issues facing U.S. citizens and our international community.
A woman stands at the window of her home looking out at Shell refinery just a couple of yards away, in an area dubbed "Cancer Alley" in Louisiana.
People ride in the back of military trucks as they are evacuated through the flooded streets of Houston after Hurricane Harvey caused record flooding in southeast Texas.
A woman holds a jar of water from her well, which was contaminated after hydraulic fracturing drilling began near her Washington County farm.
- 4 Reasons Why We Need a Climate Debate - EcoWatch ›
- Youth-Led Petition Urges 2020 Democratic Candidates to Hold ... ›
Greenpeace Activists Stop BP Rig Bound for North Sea, Stalling Plan to Drill for 30 Million Barrels of Oil
By Julia Conley
The Washington Post / Contributor / Getty Images
Washington Governor Jay Inslee is at the top of the class, and former Vice President Joe Biden is struggling near the bottom with a D minus. Those are the results of Greenpeace USA's #Climate2020 Scorecard, the latest tool designed to rate the 2020 presidential candidates based on their plans for tackling the climate crisis.
The scorecard, released Thursday, graded the candidates on a 1 to 100 scale based on two main criteria: their support for a Green New Deal and their commitment to ending the use of fossil fuels, NBC News reported.
- 2020 Election ›
- Where Does 2020 Presidential Candidate Joe Biden Stand on the ... ›
- Climate Change Is a Top Concern in 2020 Election - EcoWatch ›
The far-right German party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is increasing its climate denying rhetoric as it prepares for the European elections later this month, singling out 16-year-old climate activist Greta Thunberg for particular attack.
- Environmentalists Celebrate First UK Coal Mine Rejected Over ... ›
- Britain Achieves the 'Unthinkable' as Renewables Leapfrog Fossil ... ›
By Kaitlin Grable
1. The media still isn’t addressing climate change in a way that matches the urgency of the problem.<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8xOTQzOTcyOS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYwOTM4NjQxMX0.PyxOtx5a7Ro5ulyu54cA1BbD8Xr_wBwACq2yvlqIliU/img.jpg?width=980" id="3c06b" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="e90e28785d09a9774f1d714aa4fc9627" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" /><p>Despite years of record-breaking extreme weather, the <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/climate-change/">climate crisis</a> usually gets minor mentions when mainstream news comments on climate-linked disasters or Trump's pro-fossil fuel rhetoric. Climate change shouldn't be a footnote — it should be center stage.</p><p>Holding a climate-focused debate will ensure that the climate crisis is treated as a serious issue to address, not an opinion to be questioned.</p><p>It would push the candidates to specifically address how they will tackle one of the biggest challenges of our lifetime, and give us all the ability to make an informed choice on who will lead us into an era of bold climate action that's accountable to communities.</p>
2. We need bold, visionary leaders to beat Trump in 2020.<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8xOTQzOTczMi9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY1NjU2ODM1Mn0.2I_SsMxFatSfeadFxw6jFjYNXFSejuqd8X0vyJi-YZE/img.jpg?width=980" id="f3bbe" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="d4ec7f2eab666878940d19338d661ea1" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" /><p>We've spent more than two years resisting a racist and destructive Trump agenda. With daily attacks on our values and freedoms, this administration has attempted to divide us and wear us down. But people power has given us a record number of women in Congress, voting rights restoration in Florida, and the beginnings of an ambitious Green New Deal. This is just the start. Now we need presidential candidates that will look beyond the status quo and reimagine what's possible.</p><p>The next president should have the guts and vision to move us toward a safer, healthier, and more prosperous future where we reject the politics of fear and exclusion — while directly confronting how corporate polluters tarnish our air, our water and our climate without repercussions.</p><p>It's not the time for half-measures if we want to beat Trump. For decades, the bar on climate policy has been incredibly low. If a politician says they believe in man-made climate change, they've been lauded as progressive on climate. Agreeing with nearly every climate scientist in the world isn't leadership.</p><p>We all deserve to know whether each Democratic candidate has a well-thought-out plan for the climate crisis and go toe-to-toe with the oil and gas industry.</p><p>Here's what a climate-focused debate could reveal:</p><ul> <li>Who supports the Green New Deal and who doesn't;</li></ul><ul> <li>How the candidates will stop the fossil fuel industry's influence on our democracy;</li></ul><ul> <li>Who will push our economy to be powered by 100 percent renewable energy;</li></ul><ul> <li>How candidates will support communities affected by climate disasters;</li></ul><ul><li>Who will make a responsible plan to phase-out fossil fuels while protecting workers.</li></ul>
3. Communities across the country are being badly hurt by the effects of climate change.<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8xOTQzOTczNC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY1NzgzMTg3Mn0.GrGbmeoj-0R31_62BrpTbFJHEtc9bElJfV44fs6SDNo/img.jpg?width=980" id="68142" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="01b6f982d855885c4e66b65f1afcff94" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" /><p>Politics has always been divisive. But recently the emphasis on "us versus them" has gone too far. Instead of creating common goals for thriving communities, with healthy air and water, and shared access to clean energy, the calls of "fake news" and "build a wall" put people in conflict with one another. We need to hear how candidates for president are going to bring us together — because we need everyone in this fight.</p><p>If we don't shift the way we produce energy in this country, the people who have contributed the least to the climate crisis will continue to suffer the most from devastating extreme weather events and environmental pollution.</p><p>The time for talk has passed. We need to move to a 100 percent renewable energy economy and hold corporate polluters accountable for the damage they've caused.</p>
4. We only have just over a decade to take drastic action on climate change.<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8xOTQzOTczNi9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYzOTkzNjM1MX0.SR3VHsqCtXssRJ81Vxtye6mC9b06fbhrQlgMyI-35bk/img.jpg?width=980" id="efa73" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="e79127556a184dde64c447a0c119330d" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" /><p>Scientists tell us we have until 2030 to cut carbon pollution in half to stave off the worst effects of climate change. You do the math. Our future rests on the shoulders of whoever we elect as the next president.</p><p>Every day we allow to pass without taking action is one day we come closer to an irreversible ecological tipping point.</p><p>Since we have just over 10 years to take major steps forward on climate, the coming years will be a critical time to make up for all the years of climate inaction on both sides of the aisle. The next president of the U.S. must take bolder, faster climate action than any leader has before.</p><p>We want to see who is going to claim the mantle of climate leadership, and the best way to do that is for the candidates to debate their plans face-to-face on the debate stage.</p>
- 'Call It a Crisis': Report Details Failure of Cable and Network Outlets ... ›
- 2020 election ›
- Beto O'Rourke Becomes Latest 2020 Contender to Pledge Climate ... ›
- Youth-Led Petition Urges 2020 Democratic Candidates to Hold ... ›
The UK parliament became the first national legislative body in the world to declare a climate change "emergency" Wednesday. The historic move closely follows Extinction Rebellion protests that blocked traffic in key parts of central London for a week in April.