I love documentaries. They are so informative, engaging and inspiring. But I find it's hard to keep those emotions alive days and weeks after watching a film. It would be great if everyone remained as energized by a film months later, as they felt walking out of the theatre. But fortunately there are films like GASLAND that have an everlasting effect and ability to grow an entire movement.
Josh Fox's GASLAND and GASLAND PART II revolutionized the anti-fracking movement and gave people the tools to get educated and fight back.
Now, with the tipping point of the People's Climate March and Fox's Solutions Grassroots Tour, I thought it a perfect time to feature a Q&A with the the NY Yankee hat-wearing-playwright-turned activist.
SP: What is your biggest hope for the outcome of the People's Climate March?
JF: First of all, I hope that there are a lot of people. I hope that there are a lot of fracking activists there because it’s clear from the science right now, as it’s been pointed out by many people, and most recently by Bill McKibben in Mother Jones, that fracked gas is just as bad for the climate or worse than any other fossil fuel because of all the methane that leaks. So I hope there’s a strong fractivist contingent at the climate march. And I also hope that it makes an impression on people in New York City because New York City is the third most vulnerable city in the world to climate change. After Hurricane Sandy we really saw what kind of damage can happen in New York City so I really hope that it gets people involved.
And of course, our part in all of this is about getting people to switch to renewable energy. In New York State you can switch your power provider very easily and all of a sudden the electricity that is going into your apartment or your home is no loner from natural gas or coal or oil, it’s from renewable energy sources.
Visit solutionsgrassroots.com and click on New York State and there are three different energy companies you can buy renewable energy from right now—Ethical Electric, Pear Energy and Community Energy. We’re not advocating any one company because we don’t want to work for just one company, but we are advocating companies that we think are strong and ethical that we've vetted. So visit SolutionsGrassroots.com today and switch to renewable energy.
SP: Tell me about Solutions Grassroots and your work to get people powered by renewable energy.
JF: Solutions Grassroots started because while doing our GASLAND tour throughout the U.S. with GASLAND PART II, we met face to face with thousands of people and the most prevalent question they had was how can we go renewable? They asked, how can we implement a renewable energy strategy because we’re fighting fracking here, at home, and we want to get out of the fossil fuel cycle? So we researched that question, and what we decided to develop was a new organization that gives people real simple choices and easy information on how to go renewable.
Read page 1
There are a lot of renewable energy companies that are actually the fossil fuel industry in disguise, but at our website we only have the ones that are real renewable energy companies. So if you go there, you’ll see a map of the U.S. and there are options in many states to immediately start to go renewable. If there aren’t options in your state then Solutions Grassroots offers you a grassroots organizing structure so you can start a community team and campaign in your area for renewable energy legislation and progress towards greater renewable energy availability. But right now in New York State, Pennsylvania, all over the East Coast, California, Colorado, Illinois, there are a lot of options to go renewable today. Our goal is to make that information accessible to people.
Solutions Grassroots is a reaction to how often people asked the renewable energy question on our tour. So it was a response to our audience, a response to our fans, a response to the people who are fighting fracking.
SP: You provided a great overview about your Solutions Grassroots tour in your recent EcoWatch Insights article, what else can you share that people who can't make the tour might want to know?
JF: Solution Grassroots is starting in New York as a tour with a theatre piece and a music piece, but Solutions Grassroots plans to interact with all sorts of cultural products. So when we do our film on climate change, Solutions Grassroots will be an engagement program you can follow in 50 states. When we work, for example, with other people’s climate films, and we’re talking right now with a number of different people who are making films on climate change, Solutions Grassroots can be an add-on as a way for people to understand how to go renewable and how to buy their power from renewable energy. Solutions Grassroots is really a triangle that is the nexus that shows people how they can switch to renewable energy and how culture can drive this economic transformation in our society.
It’s also a lot of fun because we’ve been doing things that are positive. And when you fight the fossil fuel industry, fight fracking, fight pipelines, fight Keystone XL, fight mountaintop removal, those fights are very very difficult, long drawn out and negative. Working for renewable energy is a positive community builder, positive economic force, so it really feels good to do it.
SP: The fight against fracking has become a fight for democracy. What advice do you have for the communities that have voted to ban fracking in their communities and then get trumped by state law favoring the interests of the oil and gas industry?
JF: Well you got to keep fighting. Right now we know that we are not living in a democracy for the most part. We are living in an oligarchy, where oligarchs and the rich and powerful make the rules. Now that’s depressing, but there are many other times in U.S. history when we were living in even less of a democracy, when black people didn’t have the right to vote, we were not in a democracy, when women didn’t have the right to vote, we were not in a democracy. Right now, the level of economic inequality, social inequality and human rights inequality is huge and we have to keep moving forward to expose these deficiencies within the political system and to also regain rights, to regain our rights.
And one of the ways I think we can try to do that is through distributed generation of renewable energy. When you control your own power, when some of your own power is coming from your own backyard, when your power is coming from ethical companies that want to get out of the fossil fuel cycle, or when you can actually go out there and get your friends and neighbors to sign up in ways that support local democracy, as you can do through the Solutions Grassroots website, that’s one way I think to take on the fossil fuel industry, one way to lessen their power within our democracy, make sure they have less money to pollute the political system. Right now there are more than 700 lobbyists working for the fossil fuel industry. That’s more than all of congress. We have to start to tilt the scales and one of the ways that we can do that is stop giving them our money.
Read page 1
But definitely, the fight against fracking is the fight for democracy. Energy independence is really about people having the power and not about any one company or any one fuel, or any one nation, it’s really about people having control, local control over their power sources. And of course that means distributed generation of renewable energy.
[Editor's note: Distributed energy or decentralized energy is energy generated or stored by small, grid-connected (behind the meter) systems with the power generation located very close to the load it serves. Distributed energy systems can be owned by the homeowner or business owner. Conventional power stations, such as coal-fired, gas and nuclear powered plants, as well as hydroelectric dams and large-scale solar power stations, are centralized and require electricity for the energy to be transmitted over long distances Centralized systems are typically owned by large utilities.]
SP: I've been publishing environmental news for more than 25 years and I'm still waiting for us to hit a tipping point where the majority of people in the world are conscious of their impact on the Earth and act each day accordingly. Do you think we're close, and if so, what do you think will get us there?
JF: I’m watching the fracking movement and the climate movement and the movement on mountaintop removal and the movement against the Keystone XL and the movement against offshore drilling and the movement against GMOs and the movement for economic justice and the movement for economic and social inequality, I’m watching these things come together so I’m really excited about the possibilities, and I think that the fracking problem has been a game changer.
Now you have people in central Pennsylvania fighting the frackers who are talking about climate change. That was not the case before fracking. So things have changed. And I’m always optimistic, but what I’m really interested in seeing is community democracy, local democracy, community building. I think in my community we definitely hit a tipping point, there’s no question. And I think a lot of that has to do with a response to a threat and community members getting informed on the issues. So I think you have to just keep building and keep getting the word out.
SP: I know you don't have a crystal ball, but I think a lot of people would want me to ask you this: How long do you think the moratorium on fracking will last in New York state?
JF: I think that the people are in control in New York State on fracking. I think that as long as people insist on no fracking in the state, there will be a moratorium. I think it would be politically unwise for any politician in New York, whether that’s Andre Cuomo or the next governor, to decide that fracking is viable in New York because the citizenship has already reached that crucial, critical mass and there will be grave political consequences for any politician who would decide that it’s okay to frack New York.
The moratorium will last as long as our coalition of hundreds of groups and hundred of thousands of people remain strong in fighting fracking. I’m confident that the moratorium will stay intact because the people in New York have built a very strong movement. It’s not a movement of negativity, it’s not just a movement of fighting fracking, it’s also a movement of building renewable energy, of building positive energy, of building democracy. It’s a movement of building communities.
And even in the moments when it seems like we don’t have a fracking threat, people are still coming together. They came together to vote for Zephyr Teachout in record numbers. They came together in the places where we brought the Solutions Grassroots Tour. So that’s a permanent state of being in New York and I believe those bonds will last a long time and I believe a moratorium or a ban on fracking is a big part of that bond and I believe that advancing the renewable energy economy is a big part of that bond and I believe in making strides in true progressive politics is also part of that bond.
YOU ALSO MIGHT LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
The Washington Redskins will retire their controversial name and logo, the National Football League (NFL) team announced Monday.
By Alyssa Murdoch, Chrystal Mantyka-Pringle and Sapna Sharma
Summer has finally arrived in the northern reaches of Canada and Alaska, liberating hundreds of thousands of northern stream fish from their wintering habitats.
A Good News Story?<p>On the surface, the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13569" target="_blank">results from our study</a> appear to provide a "good news" story. Warming temperatures were linked to higher numbers of fish, more species overall and, therefore, potentially more fishing opportunities for northerners.</p><p>Initially, we were surprised to learn that warming was increasing the distribution of cold-adapted fish. We reasoned that modest amounts of warming could lead to benefits such as increased food and winter habitat availability without reaching stressful levels for many species.</p>
Photo of Arctic grayling (left) and Dolly Varden trout (right). Alyssa Murdoch / Lilian Tran / Nunavik Research Centre and Tracey Loewen / Fisheries and Oceans Canada<p>Yet, not all fish species fared equally well. Ecologically unique northern species — those that have evolved in colder, more nutrient-poor environments, such as Arctic grayling and Dolly Varden trout — were showing declines with warming.</p>
Fish Strandings and Buried Eggs<p>Recent news headlines run the gamut for Pacific salmon — from their increased escapades <a href="https://nunatsiaq.com/stories/article/more-pacific-salmon-showing-up-in-western-arctic-waters/" target="_blank">into the Arctic</a> to <a href="https://www.juneauempire.com/news/warm-waters-across-alaska-cause-salmon-die-offs/" target="_blank">massive pre-spawning die-offs</a> in central Alaska. Similarly, results from our study revealed different outcomes for fish depending on local climatic conditions, including Pacific salmon.</p><p>We found that warmer spring and fall temperatures may be helping juvenile salmon by providing a longer and more plentiful growing season, and by supporting early egg development in northern regions that were previously too cold for survival.</p><p>In contrast, salmon declined in regions that were experiencing wetter fall conditions, pointing to an increased risk of flooding and sedimentation that could bury or dislodge incubating eggs.</p>
Headwaters of the Wind River within the largely intact Peel River watershed in northern Canada. Don Reid / Wildlife Conservation Society Canada / Author provided<p>Interestingly, we found that certain climatic combinations, such as warmer summer water temperatures with decreased summer rainfall, were important in determining where Pacific salmon could survive. Summer warming in drier watersheds led to declines, suggesting that lowered streamflows may have increased the risk of fish becoming stranded in subpar habitats that were too warm and crowded.</p>
The Fate of Northern Fisheries<p>The promise of a warmer and more accessible Arctic has attracted mounting interest in new economic opportunities, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103637" target="_blank">including fisheries</a>. As warming rates at higher latitudes are already <a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/" target="_blank">two to three times global levels</a>, it seems probable that northern biodiversity will experience dramatic shifts in the coming decades.</p><p>Despite the many unknowns surrounding the future of Pacific salmon, many fisheries are currently <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2017.1374251" target="_blank">thriving following warmer and more productive northern oceans</a>, and some <a href="https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic68876" target="_blank">Arctic Indigenous communities are developing new salmon fisheries</a>.</p><p>As warming continues, the commercial salmon fishing industry is poised to expand northwards, but its success will largely depend on extenuating factors such as <a href="https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060023067" target="_blank">changes to marine habitat and food sources</a> and <a href="https://www.yukon-news.com/news/promising-chinook-salmon-run-failed-to-materialize-in-the-yukon-river-panel-hears/" target="_blank">how many fish are caught during the freshwater stages of their journey</a>.</p><p>Even with the potential for increased northern biodiversity, it is important to recognize that some northern communities may be unable to adapt or may <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/searching-for-the-yukon-rivers-missing-chinook/" target="_blank">lose individual species that are associated with important cultural values</a>.</p>
- New England Fishing Communities Being Destroyed by 'Climate ... ›
- Shrimp Fishing Banned in Gulf of Maine Due to Ocean Warming ... ›
- Atlantic Salmon Is All But Extinct as a Genetically Eroded Version of ... ›
A heat wave that set in over the South and Southwest left much of the U.S. blanketed in record-breaking triple digit temperatures over the weekend. The widespread and intense heat wave will last for weeks, making the magnitude and duration of its heat impressive, according to The Washington Post.
- Hot Weather and COVID-19: Added Threats of Reopening States in ... ›
- 50 Million Americans Are Currently Living Under Some Type of Heat ... ›
- Second Major Heat Wave This Summer Smashes Records Across ... ›
By Joni Sweet
If you get a call from a number you don't recognize, don't hit decline — it might be a contact tracer calling to let you know that someone you've been near has tested positive for the coronavirus.
Interviews With Contact Tracers<p>Contact tracing is a public health strategy that involves identifying everyone who may have been in contact with a person who has the coronavirus. Contact tracers collect information and provide guidance to help contain the transmission of disease.</p><p>It's been used during outbreaks of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), Ebola, measles, and now the coronavirus that causes COVID-19.</p><p>It starts when the local department of health gets a report of a confirmed case of the coronavirus in its community and gives that person a call. The contact tracer usually provides information on how to isolate and when to get treatment, then tries to figure out who else the person may have exposed.</p><p>"We ask who they've been in contact with in the 48 hours prior to symptom onset, or 2 days before the date of their positive test if they don't have symptoms," said <a href="https://case.edu/medicine/healthintegration/people/heidi-gullett" target="_blank">Dr. Heidi Gullett</a>, associate director of the Center for Community Health Integration at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and medical director of the Cuyahoga County Board of Health in Ohio.</p>
“You’ve Been Exposed”<p>After the case interview, contact tracers will get to work calling the folks who may have been exposed to the coronavirus by the person who tested positive.</p><p>"We give them recommendations about quarantining or isolating, getting tested, and what to do if they become sick. If they're not already sick, we still want them to self-quarantine so that they don't spread the disease to anyone else if they were to become sick," said Labus.</p><p>Generally, the contact tracer won't ask for additional contacts unless they happen to call someone who is sick or has a confirmed case of the virus. They will help ensure the contact has the resources they need to isolate themselves, if necessary. The contact tracer may continue to stay in touch with that person over the next 14 days.</p><p>"We follow the percentage of people that were contacts, then converted into being actual cases of the virus. It's an important marker to help us understand what kind of transmission happens in our community and how to control the virus," said Gullett.</p>
Why You Should Participate (and What Happens If You Don’t)<p>A <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30457-6/fulltext" target="_blank">Lancet study</a> from June 16, which looked at data from more than 40,000 people, found that COVID-19 transmission could be reduced by 64 percent through isolating those who have the coronavirus, quarantining their household, and contacting the people they may have exposed.</p><p>The combination strategy was significantly more effective than mass random testing or just isolating the sick person and members of their household.</p><p>However, contact tracing is only as effective as people's willingness to participate, and a small number of people who've contracted the coronavirus or were potentially exposed are reluctant to talk.</p><p>"Contact tracers have all been hung up on, cussed at, yelled at," said Gullet.</p><p>The hesitation to talk to contact tracers often stems from concerns over privacy — a serious issue in healthcare.</p>
- Anti-Racism Protests Are Not Driving Coronavirus Spikes, Data ... ›
- Cell Phone Tracking Analysis Shows Where Florida Springbreakers ... ›
NASA scientists say that warmer than average surface sea temperatures in the North Atlantic raise the concern for a more active hurricane season, as well as for wildfires in the Amazon thousands of miles away, according to Newsweek.
By Andrea Germanos
Oxfam International warned Thursday that up to 12,000 people could die each day by the end of the year as a result of hunger linked to the coronavirus pandemic—a daily death toll surpassing the daily mortality rate from Covid-19 itself.
- These 6 Men Have as Much Wealth as Half the World's Population ... ›
- Climate Change Forces 20 Million People to Flee Each Year, Oxfam ... ›
By Jun N. Aguirre
An oil spill on July 3 threatens a mangrove forest on the Philippine island of Guimaras, an area only just recovering from the country's largest spill in 2006.
- 15,000 Gallon Oil Spill Threatens River and Drinking Water in Native ... ›
- Mysterious Oil Spill on Massachusetts' Charles River Spurs Major ... ›
- Disastrous Russian Oil Spill Reaches Pristine Arctic Lake - EcoWatch ›