In a time of tremendous disregard for the environment where corporations are controlling the government and rewriting environmental policy to suit their needs,the new documentary Who Bombed Judi Bari? shows how activists can take on the powers that be and win, though at a great cost.
On May 24, 1990, forest activists Judi Bari and Darryl Cherney were driving from Oakland to Santa Cruz, CA to promote Earth First!'s Redwood Summer—a mass mobilization of students and others from across the U.S. to protest the deforestation of the redwood region in Northern California—when a shrapnel-wrapped pipe bomb went off under Bari's driver's seat, nearly killing her and injuring fellow organizer Cherney. If the assassination attempt on Bari wasn't traumatic enough, immediately following the explosion the duo was arrested with possession and transportation of explosives, with the media reporting that they accidentally bombed themselves.
Seven years after the bombing, and just 30 days before Bari's death from breast cancer, Bari gave a deposition for the civil rights lawsuit that she and Cherney filed against the FBI and Oakland Police for illegal search and false arrest after the case was dropped against them due to lack of evidence. The deposition and raw video footage from rallies and protests throughout a decade provide a backdrop for the entire film in which Bari is narrator.
Though this very well put together film details the plight of activists trying to stop the destruction of the remaining old growth forests in the Pacific Northwest, the story is about Bari, an effective organizer who successfully exposed the truth about a powerful, corrupt industry that was breaking the law and showing complete disregard for their workers and the environment. In Bari's case the offender was the timber industry, including companies like Georgia Pacific and Charles Hurwitz's Pacific Lumber, that were liquidating old growth forests at an unprecedented rate.
In reference to Hurwitz and the practices of Pacific Lumber, Bari said, "This isn't just scenery we're talking about, this man is ripping out the lungs of the planet and no human being has the right to do that."
Bari, a 40-year-old single mother of two at the time of the bombing, was devoted to the practice of non-violent civil disobedience, making the allegations that she bombed herself even more ridiculous. Earlier in her career, she effectively organized with unions on the East Coast and understood the importance of aligning with the timber workers in the fight to protect the remaining virgin forests.
"Judi understood that you can not have a public organizing effort that espouses violence and expect to succeed. She was a student of history and knew that non-violence had a proven track record of success," said Cherney in an interview.
The film unveils the extreme harassment Bari endured prior to the bombing, a testament to her ability to effectively organize, including death threats and log truck rear-ending her car. The refusal of local law enforcement to investigate Bari's allegations gave a green light to anyone wanting to attack Earth First!ers.
Unfortunately, the corruption didn't stop there. The film touches on former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover's abuse of power and persecution of Martin Luther King, Jr. and other civil right leaders, feminists and early environmentalists, and reveals the ties between Hoover and San Francisco FBI agent Richard Held who supervised the Bari/Cherney bombing investigation.
The misconduct of the investigation makes it seem like the bombing was an act of political sabotage aimed at Redwood Summer and that Bari was being framed.
In response to the pathetic work of local and federal law enforcement, Cherney said, "It wasn't that the FBI and Oakland Police bungled the investigation, it was that they never conducted any investigation at all. What we proved in court was that they knew we were innocent and just lied in order to silence us on behalf of Big Timber. Let's not forget there was a ballot initiative to ban clearcutting and reform forest practices, so billions of dollars were at stake. And the authorities were doing, as usual, the bidding of the corporations."
Twelve years after the bombing, justice was served when a federal jury awarded Cherney and the late Bari $4.4 million for violations of their rights of free speech and for illegal search and false arrest. Six of the seven law enforcement officials were found to have broken the law and violated civil rights for framing Cherney and Bari.
But the title of the film is never answered. There's speculation throughout the film about who might have been responsible for the bombing, but the need for further investigation is obvious. Had government investigators followed the chain of evidence 20 years ago, chances are this film would have never been made.
This film was particularly interesting for me, as I was one of those college students participating in Redwood Summer. Little did I understand at that time the significance behind the bombing and the levels of corruption in the timber industry.
I found great comfort in the music throughout the film as I'm a big fan of many of the artists, including, Robert Hoyt, Danny Dolinger, Dana Lyons, Casey Neil, Joanne Rand, Alice DiMicele, and of course Bari and Cherney as they often played at the rallies and protests. Bonnie Raitt's performance of Angel from Montgomery near the end of the film at a celebration of Bari's life was a pleasant surprise.
"Despite the serious content of the movie, we included humor, songs and numerous victories so that we hopefully empower and inspire future activism," Cherney commented.
Who Bombed Judi Bari? left me wishing that Judi were still alive. Her spirit, passion and skills sets as an organizer are desperately needed during this period of massive destruction of our natural resources. Her courage to live Earth First!'s motto of "no compromise in defense of mother earth" is unmatched.
I'll leave you with a quote from Bari that appears at the beginning of the film: "You cannot seriously address the destruction of wilderness without addressing the society that is destroying it."
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
- 29 Wildfires Blaze Across the West, Fueled by Drought and Wind ... ›
- Large Wildfires Scorch Forests in Drought-Stricken Southwest ... ›
Accessibility to quality health care has dropped for millions of Americans who lost their health insurance due to unemployment. mixetto / E+ / Getty Images
Accessibility to quality health care has dropped for millions of Americans who lost their health insurance due to unemployment. New research has found that 5.4 million Americans were dropped from their insurance between February and May of this year. In that three-month stretch more Americans lost their coverage than have lost coverage in any entire year, according to The New York Times.
- Trump Plans to End Federal Funding for COVID-19 Testing Sites ... ›
- 'Unfathomable Cruelty': Trump Admin Asks Supreme Court to ... ›
On hot days in New York City, residents swelter when they're outside and in their homes. The heat is not just uncomfortable. It can be fatal.
- Extreme Heat-Stressed Locations Could Increase by 80% - EcoWatch ›
- African Americans Are Disproportionately Exposed to Extreme Heat ... ›
- Extreme Heat Is Killing Americans While Government Neglect ... ›
Fracking companies are going bankrupt at a rapid pace, often with taxpayer-funded bonuses for executives, leaving harm for communities, taxpayers, and workers, the New York Time reports.
- Plunging Oil Prices Trigger Economic Downturn in Fracking Boom ... ›
- Fracking Boom Bursts in Face of Low Oil Prices - EcoWatch ›
- As Fracking Companies Face Bankruptcy, U.S. Regulators Enable ... ›
A report scheduled for release later Tuesday by Congress' non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) finds that the Trump administration undervalues the costs of the climate crisis in order to push deregulation and rollbacks of environmental protections, according to The New York Times.
- Under Trump, EPA Workers Seek Bill of Rights to Allow Them to ... ›
- Trump Adds 'Tasteless Insult to Injury' by Pushing Fossil Fuel ... ›
By Kristen Fischer
It's going to be back-to-school time soon, but will children go into the classrooms?
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) thinks so, but only as long as safety measures are in place.
Keeping Schools Safe<p>What will safer schools look like?</p><p>In a <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766822" target="_blank">JAMA article</a> published last month, <a href="https://www.jhsph.edu/faculty/directory/profile/1781/joshua-m-sharfstein" target="_blank">Dr. Joshua Sharfstein</a>, a pediatrician and professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, outlined suggestions — many of which are similar to AAP's.</p><p>Remote learning protocols must stay in place, especially as some schools stagger home and in-building learning. If another shutdown needs to occur, children will rely on distance learning completely, so it must be easy to switch to, he said.</p><p>He suggested giving parents a daily checklist to document their child's health. Kids should be screened quickly on arrival and be given hygiene supplies. Maintenance staff should use appropriate PPE and have regular cleaning schedules. A notification system should be in place if a case is identified, Sharfstein recommended.</p><p><a href="https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/erika-martin" target="_blank">Erika Martin</a>, PhD, an associate professor of public administration and policy at University at Albany, said nutrition assistance and health services should be included. She called for tutoring programs with virtual options as well as technology access.</p>
Supporting Staff<p>Teachers and staff will be affected by safeguarding measures, noted <a href="https://directory.sph.umn.edu/bio/sph-a-z/rachel-widome" target="_blank">Rachel Widome</a>, PhD, an associate professor of epidemiology and community health at University of Minnesota.</p><p>"In order for all of the in-school precautions to work well, we'll be asking a lot of teachers and staff," Widome told Healthline. In addition to their usual workload, they'll now be asked to monitor mask-wearing, ensure children are keeping distance, and be aware of any symptoms.</p><p>Along with Sharfstein, Widome called for an increase in financial support. More employees will likely be required so teachers and staff members can keep up with the added demands.</p>
Should Kids Go Back?<p>While these guidelines may help get some schools to reopen, many people don't think children should go back to school over fears they could contract the disease and spread it to other vulnerable family members like grandparents, infant siblings, or their parents.</p><p>In a <a href="https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2020/07/08/peds.2020-004879" target="_blank">Pediatrics</a> commentary, <a href="https://www.md.com/doctor/william-raszka-md" target="_blank">Dr. William V. Raszka, Jr.</a>, an infectious disease specialist at The University of Vermont Medical Center, argued that schools should open because school-aged children are far less important drivers of COVID-19 than adults.</p><p>But he says the risk and benefit is not equal among all students ages 5 to 18.</p><p>"Elementary schools are arguably higher priority for face-to-face schooling, since younger children are at lower risk for infection and transmission, and since parental supervision of younger children's distance learning may be particularly challenging," added Sorensen, who penned a <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/channels/health-forum/fullarticle/2767411" target="_blank">June article in JAMA</a> with reopening tips. "That means middle and high schools are more likely to emphasize distance learning."</p><p>Specific student populations, such as special education students and students with disabilities, would also benefit greatly from more time spent in face-to-face environments, Sorensen said.</p>
What Parents Can Do<p>Parents should ask for and receive frequent updates from schools about plans for the fall. They should also be informed about plans if and when COVID infections are identified, Sharfstein said.</p><p>"I'd like to see parents investing now, during the summer, in doing things that can slow and stop the spread of the virus in their communities," Widome said.</p><p>"Now is a good time for kids to practice wearing masks and get used to them as they may be wearing them for longer stretches if school starts up in person," Widome suggested.</p><p>She recommends parents try different mask designs and materials to see what children are more comfortable wearing.</p><p>"If you are using cloth face coverings, it's good to have extras on hand," Widome added.</p><p>Parents should model healthy behavior at home and while out in public — another thing that could affect how well children adapt to reopening practices, Sorensen said.</p><p>"Children may want to know more about face coverings," added <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/leescott/" target="_blank">Lee Scott</a>, chairwoman of the Educational Advisory Board at <a href="https://www.goddardschool.com/" target="_blank">The Goddard School</a>. "Dramatic play, such as creating or wearing a face covering, may help some children adjust to this concept." Schools can also show children photos of what faculty members look like in their masks so the students are familiar with that appearance.</p><p>Johns Hopkins University recently released its eSchool+ Initiative, a slew of resources surrounding education during the pandemic. These include a <a href="https://equityschoolplus.jhu.edu/reopening-checklist/" target="_blank">checklist for administrators</a>, report on <a href="https://equityschoolplus.jhu.edu/ethics-of-reopening/" target="_blank">ethical considerations</a>, and a tracker of <a href="https://equityschoolplus.jhu.edu/reopening-policy-tracker/" target="_blank">state and local reopening plans</a>.</p>
- Trump Admin Rejects CDC Reopening Guidelines - EcoWatch ›
- How Do You Stay Safe Now That States Are Reopening? - EcoWatch ›
- Florida Breaks U.S. Daily Record With Over 15,000 New ... ›
By Eoin Higgins
Over 300 groups on Monday urged Senate leadership to reject a bill currently under consideration that would incentivize communities to sell off their public water supplies to private companies for pennies on the dollar.
<div id="fea63" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9a6f211c2bc5aedd34837944cb8eeedf"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1281000111481294849" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Water in Illinois is overwhelmingly public. Why is Tammy Duckworth sponsoring a bill that aims to change that? https://t.co/1V36Kkd99s</div> — The American Prospect (@The American Prospect)<a href="https://twitter.com/TheProspect/statuses/1281000111481294849">1594249201.0</a></blockquote></div>
- DNC Ignores Progressive Climate Activists - EcoWatch ›
- Who's a Climate Champion and Who's a Climate Disaster? - EcoWatch ›