Tyson plants have suffered some of the worst COVID-19 outbreaks, yet the company pressed its workers to keep reporting for duty, creating an ideal environment for viral transmission. The Humane League / YouTube
By Karen Perry Stillerman
Tyson Foods is the nation's largest (and world's second largest) meat and poultry producer. It operates 110 processing plants with 121,000 employees in the United States and boasted $42 billion in revenue in 2019, putting the publicly traded, Arkansas-based company at #79 in the Fortune 500. As it seeks to maintain meat industry dominance, Tyson is counting on many of us to put its products — which include Jimmy Dean breakfast sausage and Hillshire Farm hams, as well as the ubiquitous Tyson chicken — on our holiday tables.
<p>But as you celebrate the season (<a href="https://twitter.com/UCSUSA/status/1331704326276919306?s=20" target="_blank">safely, please!</a>), consider the source of the protein on your plate and its costs beyond the checkout stand. Because the handful of multinational conglomerates that produce and process industrial pork, beef, and chicken in this country are profiting at the expense of workers, farmers, consumers, and the planet. And in an industry full of terrible actors this terrible year, Tyson is perhaps the most terrible.</p>
<h3>1. Tyson has been the worst of the worst during the meat industry's COVID-19 disaster.</h3><p>In the early days of the pandemic, the meat industry was one of the first sectors to face economic consequences from the spread of the novel coronavirus. Their vast facilities dismember and pack staggering numbers of animals — Tyson's largest pork plant, for example, processes <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tyson-foods-suspends-its-largest-pork-plant-amid-iowa-outbreak-n1189566" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">19,500 hogs per day</a>. It's a feat that relies on thousands of low-paid workers toiling shoulder to shoulder at physically demanding tasks, which is awful enough (as I'll discuss below), but it also creates an <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/why-meatpacking-plants-have-become-covid-19-hot-spots/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ideal environment for viral transmission</a>.</p><p>That's exactly what happened. COVID-19 cases began appearing in meat and poultry plants in March; by late April, the CDC received reports of positive cases at <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6918e3.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">115 plants in 19 states</a>, along with 20 COVID-19-related deaths. Tyson plants — including its largest pork plant in Waterloo, Iowa, and a beef plant in Dakota City, Nebraska — saw some of the worst outbreaks during the spring, yet the company pressed its workers to keep reporting for duty, while failing to provide the personal protective equipment and appropriate distancing needed to keep them safe. In late April, Tyson sought cover from the Trump administration — the company's board chairman <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/26/business/tyson-foods-nyt-ad/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">took out a full-page ad</a> in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and its hometown paper, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, claiming that "the food supply chain is breaking." Just days later, President Trump famously <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-28/trump-says-he-s-issuing-order-for-tyson-s-unique-liability" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">issued an executive order</a> aimed at keeping meat and poultry plants open despite the risks and lack of protections. In signaling the move, Trump <a href="https://thecounter.org/trump-meatpackers-liability-protection-tort-reform-tyson-covid-19/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">specifically referenced Tyson</a> and its "liability problems." In June, Tyson was among the <a href="https://www.politico.com/newsletters/morning-agriculture/2020/06/29/fed-to-buy-bonds-from-food-ag-firms-788854" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">recipients of corporate welfare</a> as the Federal Reserve bought bonds from large companies to prop up the economy.</p><p>Throughout the crisis, Tyson has behaved badly in ways that endangered its workers. It has reportedly offered <a href="https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/07/20/armp-j20.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">"incentives" to keep sick workers on the job</a>, <a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/emails-reveal-chaos-as-meatpacking-companies-fought-health-agencies-over-covid-19-outbreaks-in-their-plants" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">stonewalled local health departments</a> over testing data, <a href="https://thefern.org/2020/12/documents-show-scope-of-covid-19-in-north-carolina-meat-industry/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">low-balled case reporting</a>, and <a href="https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/money/business/2020/11/30/lawsuit-tyson-managers-lied-interpreters-covid-19-threat-waterloo-iowa-plant/6464310002/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">lied about the dangers of the virus</a> to interpreters for its immigrant workers. In June, the company <a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/06/22/879774584/how-widespread-coronavirus-testing-helped-meatpacking-plants-halt-outbreaks" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">announced a major testing program</a> but by July the company had <a href="https://thefern.org/ag_insider/covid-19-cases-appear-to-be-slowing-at-meat-plants-but-companies-arent-releasing-test-results/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">stopped releasing the results</a>.</p><p>In a particularly egregious incident, managers at Tyson's Waterloo pork plant <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/11/19/tyson-foods-waterloo-bets-covid/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">organized a betting pool</a> around how many of the plant's employees would contract the virus. Those managers <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/tyson-fires-7-at-iowa-pork-plant-after-covid-betting-inquiry/2020/12/16/1b0c1d2c-3fd6-11eb-b58b-1623f6267960_story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">have now been fired</a>, but culpability for the company's brazen negligence goes much deeper — all the way to the top of Tyson's corporate structure. After all, in the words of one of my colleagues, the behavior of these managers, "while clearly sociopathic, is just a predictable outgrowth of their institutional context: absolute contempt for workers and criminal disregard for their safety."</p><p>Neglect, malfeasance, and efforts by Tyson and other companies to evade regulation and liability has had horrifying consequences for workers. According to <a href="https://thefern.org/2020/04/mapping-covid-19-in-meat-and-food-processing-plants/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">tracking by the Food & Environment Reporting Network</a> (as of Dec. 18, 2020), at least 51,519 workers across 565 meatpacking plants have tested positive for COVID-19. To date, 262 of those workers have died, and Tyson is facing <a href="https://siouxcityjournal.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/lawsuit-says-tyson-did-little-to-prevent-covid-death-at-storm-lake-plant/article_b6d5b2ea-ddc0-566c-b6bd-39d6f7a8d8c1.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">multiple gross negligence lawsuits</a> from victims' families. Communities around these plants, many of them rural areas with inadequate access to healthcare, have also paid a price (just as <a href="https://blog.ucsusa.org/rebecca-boehm/with-trump-executive-order-are-meat-and-poultry-plants-a-covid-19-ticking-time-bomb" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">my colleagues predicted</a> back in July): a <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/117/50/31706" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">new study</a> shows that as many as 8 percent of U.S. COVID-19 cases and up to 4 percent of deaths in the early stage of the pandemic can be connected to outbreaks at meatpacking plants and subsequent spread in nearby communities.</p><p>As this FERN graphic illustrates, Tyson has dwarfed its rivals in terms of total COVID-19 cases at its facilities:</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDk4NzE3OS9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY2NDEyNTQyM30.iqQMONbk90vmzYcBBgVnMEw0HaU3npFkop1UkhquQLM/img.png?width=980" id="7c60a" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="dd7c7579d4c7fb24d9b6a23cc49f20ed" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" data-width="899" data-height="869" />
The Food & Environment Reporting Network has closely tracked the spread of COVID-19 at meatpacking plants, food processing facilities, and farms. FERN data, updated Dec.18, shows that Tyson Foods is responsible for the highest number of cases among workers, by far.
<p>And because Tyson's low-paid frontline workforce skews heavily toward immigrants and people of color, its actions have disproportionately harmed and put these populations at risk. The nonprofit <a href="https://foodchainworkers.org/2020/07/fcwa-joins-civil-rights-complaint-challenging-meat-processing-corporations/" target="_blank">Food Chain Workers Association</a> and other allies in July <a href="https://food.publicjustice.net/case/food-chain-workers-alliance-v-tyson-foods-title-vi-complaint?link_id=0&can_id=92857e325bc7090f1179dd6a53d503e8&source=email-we-must-continue-to-act-to-protect-food-workers-all-workers&email_referrer=&email_subject=fcwa-joins-civil-rights-complaint-challenging-meat-processing-corporations" target="_blank">filed an administrative civil rights complaint</a> with the U.S. Department of Agriculture alleging that Tyson and another meat processing corporation have engaged in racial discrimination prohibited by the Civil Rights Act through their workplace policies during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>Now, in a move best described as a day late and a dollar short, Tyson is reportedly "going on offense," implementing new <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/meat-giant-tyson-girds-for-virus-surge-tracking-covid-19-with-algorithms-11605448801" target="_blank">testing and tracking algorithm programs</a> and <a href="https://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/530379-tyson-joins-growing-list-of-companies-hiring-chief-medical-officers-amid" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">hiring a chief medical officer</a>.</p><p>Oh, and that whole supply-chain-breaking thing? Right. The same month Tyson published its <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/26/business/tyson-foods-nyt-ad/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">sky-is-falling ad</a>, the company <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/16/business/meat-industry-china-pork.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">exported 1,289 tons of pork to China</a>, the most since January 2017. And by November, the company was back to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tyson-foods-results/tyson-foods-beats-profit-estimates-sees-lower-covid-19-costs-in-2021-idUSKBN27W1JG" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">beating its profit estimates</a>.</p><p>But its reckless management of the COVID-19 pandemic is just one way that Tyson made 2020 worse. There's more.</p>
<h3>2. Tyson pushed rules that would harm poultry workers even after the pandemic.</h3><p>Though Tyson is also in the pork and beef businesses, most consumers know it as a chicken company. It's the nation's largest producer of "broilers" (chickens raised for meat), slaughtering <a href="https://talkbusiness.net/2020/08/tyson-foods-the-largest-u-s-chicken-processor-in-2019-georges-ranked-9th/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">38.3 million birds and producing 200.47 million pounds of ready-to-cook chicken</a> every week. And that mind-boggling level of production comes at a high cost to the workers who kill, cut up, and package all those chickens.</p><p>Working in a Tyson plant is unimaginably difficult. It's <a href="https://www.splcenter.org/20130228/unsafe-these-speeds" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">physically debilitating</a>: Workers who hang live chickens on the conveyors for slaughter are pecked and clawed, while others are at constant risk of injury from knives and other sharp tool used in close confines. Workers in these plants are susceptible to repetitive stress injuries, exposed to cold temperatures and noxious odors and chemicals in the air, and denied bathroom breaks. Women and immigrants, in particular, are <a href="https://archive.thinkprogress.org/ice-raids-follow-massive-sexual-harassment-settlement-mississippi-plant-koch-foods-d95eb2720f67/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">harassed and threatened</a> by supervisors. And the whole operation subjects workers to unrelenting <a href="https://yaleglobalhealthreview.com/2016/01/25/a-call-to-action-psychological-harm-in-slaughterhouse-workers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">psychological stress</a>.</p><p>In recent years, Tyson has had one of the highest rates of severe injury among its workers — more than 68 workers per 100,000 sustained such an injury in 2015-16. One of the reasons for such injuries is the rapidity with which employees work, as birds whizz past on fast-moving automated conveyers. Workers <a href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/09/18/line-speeds-increase-meatpacking-workers-are-ever-more-danger" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">report constant pressure</a> to keep these automated lines moving. And still, Tyson and other poultry companies want those lines to move even faster.</p><p>Tyson <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/national-chicken-council" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">is a member</a> of a lobbying group called the National Chicken Council (NCC), which <a href="https://www.nationalchickencouncil.org/about/overview/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">claims to represent</a> companies that collectively produce 95 percent of U.S. chicken. Through the NCC, Tyson and other companies have <a href="https://s27147.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Brief-USDA-Poultry-Line-Speed-Increases-Exacerbate-COVID-19-Risk.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">lobbied the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) since 2017</a> to allow plants to increase their line speeds an already-fast 140 birds per minute (bpm) to a dizzying 175 bpm. Although the USDA denied the NCC's first petition to allow such an increase in all chicken processing plants, in 2018 the Trump administration began allowing individual plants to <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/28/2018-21143/petition-to-permit-waivers-of-maximum-line-speeds-for-young-chicken-establishments-operating-under" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">request waivers</a> from existing line speed restrictions.</p><p>In April 2020, just as Tyson was setting off alarm bells about meat and poultry supply disruption due to the pandemic, Trump's USDA <a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/usda-oks-record-number-of-poultry-line-speed-waivers-in-april" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">approved a record number of line-speed waivers</a> at poultry plants, including six waivers for Tyson facilities. Three of those Tyson plants <a href="https://s27147.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Brief-USDA-Poultry-Line-Speed-Increases-Exacerbate-COVID-19-Risk.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">have had documented COVID-19 outbreaks</a>. A recent <a href="https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/11/18/2010115117" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">study</a> shows a disturbing relationship between waivers granting increased line speeds and COVID transmission: The researchers' analysis suggests that waivers predict increases in county-level case rates <em>double those</em> in counties with nonwaiver poultry plants.</p><p>Now, the Trump USDA is pushing to give Tyson and the NCC the ultimate gift: a <a href="https://civileats.com/2020/08/31/usda-seeks-to-permanently-speed-up-poultry-plant-line-speeds/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">new rule that would allow increased line speeds</a> at chicken plants without the need for waivers. It's a race against the clock at this point, with a new administration set to take office Jan. 20, but they are <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-11/trump-makes-last-push-to-speed-up-chicken-lines-despite-pandemic" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">trying</a>.</p><p>Should that effort fail, public records show that Tyson and the NCC have also given Congress an earful about labor, line speed, food safety, and other issues this year. In the first three quarters of 2020, <a href="https://lda.senate.gov/filings/public/filing/search/?registrant=Tyson+Foods&registrant_country=&registrant_ppb_country=&client=&client_state=&client_country=&client_ppb_country=&lobbyist=&lobbyist_covered_position=&lobbyist_conviction_disclosure=&lobbyist_conviction_date_range_from=&lobbyist_conviction_date_range_to=&report_type=&report_period=&report_year=2020&report_dt_posted_from=&report_dt_posted_to=&report_amount_reported_min=&report_amount_reported_max=&report_issue_area_description=&affiliated_organization=&affiliated_organization_country=&foreign_entity=&foreign_entity_country=&foreign_entity_ppb_country=&foreign_entity_ownership_percentage_min=&foreign_entity_ownership_percentage_max=&search=search" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tyson spent more than $900,000</a> lobbying Congress and the <a href="https://lda.senate.gov/filings/public/filing/search/?registrant=National+Chicken+Council&registrant_country=&registrant_ppb_country=&client=&client_state=&client_country=&client_ppb_country=&lobbyist=&lobbyist_covered_position=&lobbyist_conviction_disclosure=&lobbyist_conviction_date_range_from=&lobbyist_conviction_date_range_to=&report_type=&report_period=&report_year=2020&report_dt_posted_from=&report_dt_posted_to=&report_amount_reported_min=&report_amount_reported_max=&report_issue_area_description=&affiliated_organization=&affiliated_organization_country=&foreign_entity=&foreign_entity_country=&foreign_entity_ppb_country=&foreign_entity_ownership_percentage_min=&foreign_entity_ownership_percentage_max=&search=search#js_searchFormTitle" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">NCC spent an additional $360,000</a>.</p>
<h3>3. Tyson has colluded to cheat farmers and consumers.</h3><p>U.S. meatpacking is a highly consolidated industry, and Tyson is <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-29/tyson-foods-helped-create-the-meat-crisis-it-now-warns-against" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">one of the top players</a> in every major industry segment: It's one of <a href="https://mofb.org/meatpacking-industry-consolidation-must-be-investigated/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">four companies that control more than 80 percent of beef processing</a>, it's one of three that control nearly two-thirds of pork processing, and it's at the top of the list of five companies that control 60 percent of the chicken market. Such consolidation makes Tyson and its top competitors powerful — <a href="https://prospect.org/economy/meat-monopolies-endanger-workers-farmers-consumers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">too powerful</a>. Over the past year, we've learned that these companies have used their collective power to cheat both the farmers who raise the animals they slaughter and the customers who purchase their meat and poultry.</p><p>Early allegations of meat industry price fixing arose in 2016 with a <a href="https://dandodiary.lexblogplatformthree.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/265/2016/10/maplevale-lawsuit.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">class-action lawsuit</a> accusing Tyson and other chicken producers of conspiring to raise broiler chicken prices. The suit alleged that the companies have used a data company to <a href="https://thefern.org/2019/08/is-the-u-s-chicken-industry-cheating-its-farmers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">quietly share detailed financial information with each other</a> for decades. Last year, the U.S. Department of Justice intervened in that suit and launched a criminal investigation that, by October 2020, had led to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-poultry-charges/u-s-indicts-six-more-chicken-industry-executives-over-alleged-price-fixing-idUSKBN26T0BT" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">indictments of 10 poultry industry executives</a>, including a former Tyson exec. Since June, <a href="https://www.politico.com/newsletters/morning-agriculture/2020/06/11/tyson-gets-immunity-from-price-fixing-charges-788429" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tyson has been cooperating with the DOJ</a>, which has granted the company immunity.</p><p>Even before the price-fixing story emerged, it was clear that Tyson and its competitors were exploiting their chicken farmers, more than <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/apr/22/chicken-farmers-big-poultry-rules" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">97 percent of whom</a> operate through contracts with the conglomerates. It's a vertically integrated system in which Tyson and other companies own the birds and control (and <a href="https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/politics/2018/12/20/chicken-growers-slaves-own-land-look-sba-loans-big-poultry-ms/2339548002/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">frequently change</a>) the terms under which they are raised. Contracts with chicken farmers are so lopsided that the <a href="https://newfoodeconomy.org/poultry-farms-arent-independent-businesses-sba-report-says/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Small Business Administration concluded</a> in 2018 that chicken growers may not qualify for small business loans because they're not actually independent businesses at all.</p><p>In the chicken business, legal action against Tyson keeps coming. Boston Market and three other <a href="https://investigatemidwest.org/2020/07/10/four-restaurant-chains-sue-tyson-and-pilgrims-pride-saying-companies-fixed-chicken-prices/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">restaurant chains sued Tyson</a> and other companies for price-fixing in July. And just this month, <a href="https://www.startribune.com/target-joins-other-retailers-grocers-in-accusing-chicken-suppliers-of-price-fixing/573323631/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Target and other retailers joined</a> the original class action lawsuit, while famed <a href="https://blog.ucsusa.org/karen-perry-stillerman/that-tasty-chicken-sandwich-is-brought-to-you-by-a-stomach-turning-industry" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">chicken sandwich</a> purveyor <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/06/business/chickfila-poultry-prices-lawsuit.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chick-fil-A brought a new suit</a> against the companies.</p><p>But it's not just about chicken. In May, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/6a34d27d3d7f9fdcf837c272ba539972" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">attorneys general for 11 states</a> urged the Justice Department to pursue a federal investigation into market concentration and price fixing in the beef industry as well. DOJ <a href="https://thecounter.org/department-justice-doj-antitrust-investigation-big-four-meatpackers-cargill-tyson-jbs-beef/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">launched such an investigation in June</a>, issuing subpoenas to Tyson and three other companies.</p>
<h3>4. Despite its commitments, Tyson has continued to trash our environment.</h3><p>The business models and practices Big Meat use to crank out ever-increasing volumes of their products also pose a threat to our environment, and again Tyson is an industry "leader." In 2016, an environmental organization <a href="https://environmentamerica.org/news/ame/report-tyson-1-water-polluter-among-agribusinesses" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">named Tyson the #1 water polluter among agribusinesses</a>, and another group has <a href="https://www.iatp.org/supersized-climate-footprint" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">documented its supersized climate footprint</a>. To feed the machine, Tyson and its livestock growers buy enormous quantities of industrially produced feed grains such as corn and soybean, which <a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/reviving-dead-zone" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">UCS</a> and <a href="https://www.mightyearth.org/2017/08/03/heartlanddestruction/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">other groups</a> have shown to have devastating environmental consequences.</p><p>There's also an issue of wastewater pollution from Tyson processing plants. Earlier this year, for example, the <a href="https://talkbusiness.net/2020/05/alabama-ag-sues-tyson-foods-over-2019-spill/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">state of Alabama sued Tyson for damages</a> caused by a pair of 2019 releases from one of its facilities, which killed an estimated 175,000 fish.</p><p>And while Tyson made new sustainability commitments in 2018, watchdog group Mighty Earth alleges they haven't followed through. In February, citizens in Tyson's northwest Arkansas back yard <a href="https://www.mightyearth.org/2020/02/06/activists-stage-protest-at-tyson-shareholder-meeting-over-sustainability-concerns/" target="_blank">rallied outside the company's annual shareholder meeting</a> for greater action, <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/meat-industry-s-role-as-polluter-poses-financial-risk-to-investors-60565131" target="_blank">and investor groups are becoming more vocal</a> about the industry's environmental impact.</p>
<h3>Leaving Tyson off the table?</h3><p>So we've established that Tyson Foods is a terrible, awful, no-good company. But if you want to spend your food dollars in ways that are better for workers, farmers, and the planet, what to do? The vast majority of the industry is rotten — after all, Tyson couldn't fix prices without co-conspirators — and a case could be made that any of those companies is also villainous. Juries have repeatedly found, for example, that Chinese-owned Smithfield Foods' hog CAFOs have made life unbearable for neighbors in North Carolina (and a federal <a href="https://apnews.com/article/north-carolina-courts-4b2f1db4c21e03653851e81b81996410" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">appeals court agreed</a> last month). And there's <a href="https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2020/07/17/meat-packers-jbs-lawsuit-coronavirus" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">JBS</a>, a Brazilian company you've probably never heard of that has nonetheless become the world's largest <em>meat</em> producer, while <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/this-foreign-meat-company-got-us-tax-money-now-it-wants-to-conquer-america/2019/11/04/854836ae-eae5-11e9-9306-47cb0324fd44_story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">taking U.S. taxpayer bailouts</a> and <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/27/revealed-new-evidence-links-brazil-meat-giant-jbs-to-amazon-deforestation" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">destroying the Amazon rainforest</a>.</p><p>So simply saying no to Tyson in favor of their also-awful rivals probably isn't a solution. Eating less — and better — meat is probably the best thing the average consumer can do. This <a href="https://thecounter.org/conscious-carnivore-project/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">excellent article</a> explores the extent to which it's possible to be a "conscious carnivore." There are promising signs that the COVID-19 pandemic — which has led many consumers to look for better meat and poultry options from smaller-scale local farmers — may actually <a href="https://www.hcn.org/issues/52.7/covid-19-will-covid-19-help-save-small-slaughterhouses" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">revive the system of small slaughterhouses</a> those farmers rely on.</p><p>But changing consumer choices is just the tip of the iceberg. It will take public policies on a large scale to break the power of Tyson and Big Meat once and for all. That includes serious antitrust policies that would level the playing field for smaller producers and processors. <a href="https://www.motherjones.com/food/2019/12/cory-booker-just-went-all-in-against-factory-farming-and-the-meat-industry/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) has introduced legislation</a> that would begin to do that. And while the Obama administration's USDA was widely criticized for failing to enforce anticompetitive rules and promote deconsolidation in our food system, presumptive agriculture secretary Tom Vilsack has <a href="https://civileats.com/2020/12/11/op-ed-dear-secretary-of-agriculture-this-is-your-chance/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">another chance at that</a> in his second act at the USDA.</p><p>So while we may choose to leave Tyson off the table this holiday, here's hoping that in 2021, policymakers find the resolve to take on the company and the industry, for the good of workers, farmers, and our environment.</p>
<p><em>Reposted with permission from <a href="https://blog.ucsusa.org/karen-perry-stillerman/4-ways-tyson-foods-made-2020-worse" target="_blank">Union of Concerned Scientists</a>.</em><br/></p>From Your Site Articles
- Tyson Exploits Consumers Just Like Its Animals and the Workers ... ›
- USDA and Meatpacking Industry Collaborated to Undermine COVID ... ›
- USDA Is Removing Safeguards on Food While Everyone Else Is ... ›
- Tyson Pork Plant Closes After More Than 20% of Workers Test ... ›
- Tyson Foods Warns of Meat Shortage Following Coronavirus ... ›
Read More
Show Less
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Trump looks on as EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler speaks during an event to unveil changes to the National Environmental Policy Act on Jan. 9, 2020 in Washington, DC. Drew Angerer / Getty Images
The Trump administration announced that it would roll back a rule from 2015 that was put in place to limit the amount of toxic chemicals that are in the wastewater of coal plants, according to The Washington Post.
<p>The rule insisted that coal plants invest in newer technologies to treat their wastewater so toxic heavy metals like <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/lead">lead</a>, selenium and arsenic are not leached into nearby <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/rivers">rivers</a> and streams where they can damage fragile ecosystems and also seep into <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/drinking-water">drinking water</a>, as The Washington Post reported.</p><p>The new <a href="https://www.epa.gov/eg/2020-steam-electric-reconsideration-rule" target="_blank">regulations</a> put forth by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (<a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/epa">EPA</a>), which is run by Andrew Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the coal industry, allows coal plants to dial back their investment in new technologies; the regulations delay the date that plants needed to be in compliance, and they exempt some coal-fired plants from taking any corrective or pollution-limiting action, according to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/31/climate/trump-coal-plants.html" target="_blank">The New York Times.</a></p>
<p>The compliance date is pushed back to 2025 for some plants. The ones exempted from the rule are done so with the expectation that they will be retired by 2028.</p><p>The "effluent limitations" regulations that the EPA rolled out Monday will save the coal industry $140 million, according to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-epa-coal/u-s-epa-rolls-back-limits-on-waste-water-from-coal-plants-idUSKBN25R2QK" target="_blank">Reuters</a>.</p><p>"Newer, more affordable pollution control technologies and flexibility on the regulation's phase-in will reduce pollution and save jobs at the same time," said Wheeler, as Reuters reports.</p><p>The Obama administration had said that the 2015 rule would limit 1.4 billion pounds of toxic pollutants from entering U.S. waterways each year. Coal plants use scrubbers to capture mercury, sulfur dioxide and heavy metals that would be emitted through smoke stacks. That rule has been in place since the 1980s, but what to do with those trapped pollutants is a thorny issue. Coal plants had been allowed to dump them into nearby waterways until the 2015 rule took effect, according to The New York Times.</p>
<p>And yet, without evidence, the current EPA said it expects the same or even greater pollution reductions because coal plants will supposedly adopt the newer technologies voluntarily. The EPA's math is based on the assumption that 30 percent of coal plants will implement technologies that are beyond the regulations required by the EPA, according to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/aug/31/trump-toxic-water-pollution-wastewater" target="_blank">The Guardian</a>.</p><p>"It's clear from this rule that a relatively inexpensive treatment technology is available – the one that they made voluntary – that would eliminate the toxic contamination of drinking water supplies and is very affordable. And yet they did not require it," said Betsy Southerland, an Obama EPA water official, to The Guardian. "People should be very concerned."</p>
<p>Environmental activists quickly criticized the rule as a gift to the coal industry and a shortsighted measure that ignored the health of the <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wildlife">wildlife</a> and people that live near coal plants, according to The Washington Post.</p><p>Thomas Cmar, an attorney with Earthjustice, told The New York Times that the EPA's actions will allow older, dirtier coal plants to stay alive longer since they do not have to invest in upgrades.</p><p>"There are dozens of water bodies around the country where the local water is significantly impacted by this type of direct dumping of toxic metals from power plants," said Cmar to The Times.</p><p>Cmar said Earthjustice will attempt to stop the rollback in court.</p><p>"Giving coal companies a free pass to dump more toxic heavy metals like mercury and arsenic into our waters is a travesty," Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, said in an email, to The Washington Post. "This shameless handout will allow greater amounts of these dangerous pollutants to be spewed directly into our waterways, threatening public health and pushing hundreds of aquatic endangered species, including salmon, sturgeon and hellbender salamanders, closer to extinction."</p>
From Your Site Articles
- Trump's Toxic Wake: 10 Ways the EPA Has Made Life More ... ›
- EPA Moves to Overhaul Obama-Era Coal Ash Disposal Rule ... ›
- EPA Delays Toxic Waste Rule for Coal-Fired Power Plants - EcoWatch ›
- Trump's EPA Weakens Justification for Life-Saving Mercury Pollution ... ›
- EPA Chief Previews a Second Trump Term: More Deregulation, Fewer Environmental Protections - EcoWatch ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Like many other plant-based foods and products, CBD oil is one dietary supplement where "organic" labels are very important to consumers. However, there are little to no regulations within the hemp industry when it comes to deeming a product as organic, which makes it increasingly difficult for shoppers to find the best CBD oil products available on the market.
<p>Here you can learn about the importance of organic hemp oil, why it's better for the environment, and which CBD companies actually make trustworthy products with sustainable farming processes. origins which weigh heavily on many consumers who want to buy a product that's produced in the best way possible for not only themselves to ingest, but for the environment as well through sustainable farming methods. </p><h2>What Is CBD Oil?</h2><p>First things first, CBD stands for cannabidiol, and it's a cannabinoid found within cannabis sativa plants. This plant compound is believed to have many potential benefits, and it is primarily derived from hemp plants via a CO2 extraction process. </p><p>Since CBD is extracted from industrial hemp, which contains only trace amounts of THC (the psychoactive component in cannabis plants), this means that CBD won't make you feel high like marijuana, which has much higher levels of THC that causes psychoactive effects. Instead, the effects of CBD are much more subtle and promote a general sense of calm and relaxation in most users.</p><h2>What Makes a CBD Oil Organic?</h2><p>In terms of organic labels, perhaps the most important (and prominent) certification comes from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). This government organization has been labeling foods as "organic" for many years, but what exactly does this certification entail? Essentially, a label indicating that a product is "USDA Organic" or "Certified Organic" means that at least 95% of the ingredients are obtained from organic sources.</p><p>For a crop to be considered organic by the USDA, it must be grown without the use of industrial solvents, irradiation, genetic engineering (GMOs), synthetic pesticides, or chemical fertilizer. Instead, farmers rely on natural substances and <a href="https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2012/03/22/organic-101-what-usda-organic-label-means" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">mechanical, physical, or biologically based farming</a> techniques to cultivate healthy and organic crops.</p><p>Before the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, no hemp-derived products could be dubbed as "certified organic" since the hemp plant and its extracts were still categorized as a Schedule I Controlled Substance. However, it's still difficult for CBD companies to obtain a USDA certified organic label for their products due to the legal grey area that still surrounds CBD extracts. </p><p>Because of these challenges, and due to the fact that industrial hemp has only recently become an agricultural crop, very few CBD oils are USDA certified organic. Rather, many CBD products contain hemp extracts from plants that were grown in organic conditions but may not be federally certified.</p><h2>What are the Best Organic CBD Oil Brands?</h2><p><em>Each product featured here has been independently selected by the writer. If you make a purchase using the links included, we may earn commission.</em></p><em><br></em>
<h2>Why Organic Hemp Oil Matters</h2><p>Hemp is a unique plant, not only for its rich cannabinoid content, but also for its ability to absorb a wide variety of components in soil. But this trait poses great risks when it comes to the creation of CBD products derived from hemp.</p><p>Because hemp has a high capacity for compound uptake, this means that the plants can retain <a href="https://www.remedyreview.com/industry/lab-test-results/" target="_blank">harmful chemicals like pesticides</a>, heavy metals, and other residual solvents. This is especially true when it comes to synthetic chemicals that are more toxic to humans, and difficult to remove once they have been absorbed by the hemp plant.</p><p>Organic farming practices help reduce the risk of hemp crops absorbing harsh chemicals that may later end up in CBD oil after extraction. When you're taking CBD as a wellness supplement to help alleviate your symptoms or improve your overall well-being, the last thing you want is to ingest compounds that might negatively outweigh the benefits of CBD. This is an important reason to look for third party lab test results when shopping for CBD products since these certificates of analysis can show the full cannabinoid and terpene profile of a hemp extract, as well as test results that search for the presence of any residual solvents.</p><p>In addition to creating a better end product, organic farming practices are also better for the environment. Sustainable and organic farming methods may <a href="https://www.helpguide.org/articles/healthy-eating/organic-foods.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">reduce pollution, conserve water, reduce soil erosion, increase soil fertility, and use less energy</a>. The use of natural pest deterrents as opposed to chemical pesticides is also better for nearby animal populations and ecosystems.</p><h3>Organic vs. Natural</h3><p>While there are only a select few companies offering certified organic ingredients in their products, almost every brand in the CBD market creates "natural" products. The term "all-natural" or "plant-based" does not mean that a product is organic, and since hemp oil is a natural derivative of hemp plants, these products are often referred to as all-natural. However, there are some synthetic CBD oils that should be avoided because they are chemically constructed and may produce unwanted side effects that are not caused by naturally derived CBD extracts.</p><h2>What are the Benefits of Organic CBD Oil?</h2><p>There's a long list of potential CBD oil health benefits, and some of the most common wellness advantages include:</p><ul class="ee-ul"><li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2503660/" target="_blank">Chronic pain relief</a></li><li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604171/" target="_blank">Anti-anxiety effects</a></li><li>Better sleep</li><li><a href="https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/inner-source/201901/cbd-oil-mental-health-should-you-take-it-too" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Improvements in mood</a></li><li>Internal balance and regulation</li></ul><p>When dealing with pain, inflammation, sleep issues, and mental health struggles, it can be hard to find sufficient treatment options. The use of certain prescriptions can cause unwanted side effects, yet they are often the only solution for patients with these medical conditions. In search of other therapies, people have started to flock towards CBD oil as an alternative remedy for a variety of conditions. However, it should be noted that CBD products are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and you should seek your doctor's advice before using CBD if you have a serious medical condition.</p><h2>Look at the Labels Before You Buy CBD Oil</h2><p>When you go online to buy CBD oil, you'll quickly realize there is an overwhelming number of brands that are saturating the market. It can be difficult to determine which products are truly as good as they make themselves out to be. Always look for up-to-date third-party lab tests so you know you are getting a great product, and don't hesitate to contact the brand if you have any additional questions. And if you're intent on purchasing 100% organic CBD oil, it's best to look for certified products or brands that are held to strict regulatory standards.</p><p><strong>Melena Gurganus </strong>is the Reviews Editor at EcoWatch. She is passionate health and wellness and her writing aims to help others find products they can trust. Her work has been featured in publications such as Health, Shape, Huffington Post, Cannabis Business Times, and Bustle.<br></p>
Spruce
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDY4NjI3OC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyOTM2NzgzOX0.axY0HjeqRctJsR_KmDLctzDpUBLBN-oNIdqaXDb4caQ/img.jpg?width=980" id="774be" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="8379f35b1ca8a86d0e61b7d4bfc8b46e" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="spruce organic cbd oil" data-width="710" data-height="959" /><p>As one of the best brands in the business, Spruce CBD is well-known for its potent CBD oils that feature many additional beneficial phytocannabinoids. This brand works with two family-owned, sustainably focused farms in the USA (one located in Kentucky and one in North Carolina) to create its organic, small product batches. The max potency Spruce CBD oil contains 2400mg of full-spectrum CBD extract, but the brand also offers a lower strength tincture with 750mg of CBD in total.</p>
$89
CBDistillery
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDcwMjkzNC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyMTU4OTM4Nn0.ypRdeDSBcE87slYrFfVrRwtJ2qGIK6FD5jBB4pndTMo/img.jpg?width=980" id="b473b" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9930b53c9d58cb49774640a61c3e3e75" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="cbdistillery cbd oil" data-width="1244" data-height="1244" /><p>All of the products from CBDistillery are <a href="https://ushempauthority.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">U.S. Hemp Authority Certified</a>, and for good reason. The company only uses non-GMO and pesticide-free industrial hemp that's grown organically on Colorado farms. Its hemp oils are some of the most affordable CBD products on the market, yet they still maintain a high standard of quality. CBDistillery has a wide variety of CBD potencies across its product line (ranging from 500mg to 5000mg per bottle) and offers both full-spectrum and broad-spectrum CBD oils to give customers a completely thc-free option.</p>
$35
FAB CBD
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDY4NjIyNS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY2NDIwOTEyMn0.MlTjz096FJ0ev_-soK7_Z-FeQeJczWoeh9Qi9SSkHsY/img.jpg?width=980" id="04b26" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="76aa4862f44603242e318982acea6646" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="fab cbd oil" data-width="800" data-height="800" /><p>For an organic CBD oil that has it all, FAB CBD offers plenty of variety for any type of consumer. All of its products are made with zero pesticides and extracted from organically grown Colorado industrial hemp. FAB CBD oil comes in five all-natural flavors (mint, vanilla, berry, citrus, and natural) and is also available in four strengths (300, 600, 1200, and 2400mg per bottle).</p>
$39
NuLeaf Naturals
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDY4NjIxOS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY1NzExNTgyMX0.D6qMGYllKTsVhEkQ-L_GzpDHVu60a-tJKcio7M1Ssmc/img.jpg?width=980" id="94e4a" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="3609a52479675730893a45a82a03c71d" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="nuleaf naturals organic cbd oil" data-width="600" data-height="600" /><p>As an industry-leading brand, it comes as no surprise that NuLeaf Naturals sources its CBD extract from organic hemp plants grown on licensed farms in Colorado. The comany's CBD oils only contain two ingredients: USDA certified organic hemp seed oil and full spectrum hemp extract.</p><p>NuLeaf Naturals uses one proprietary CBD oil formula for all of its products, so you will get the same CBD potency in each tincture (60mg per mL), but can purchase different bottle sizes depending on how much you intend to use.</p>
$38.50
Charlotte's Web
<img type="lazy-image" data-runner-src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yNDcwMjk3NS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0MzQ0NjM4N30.SaQ85SK10-MWjN3PwHo2RqpiUBdjhD0IRnHKTqKaU7Q/img.jpg?width=980" id="84700" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="a2174067dcc0c4094be25b3472ce08c8" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" alt="charlottes web cbd oil" data-width="1244" data-height="1244" /><p>Perhaps one of the most well-known brands in the CBD landscape, Charlotte's Web has been growing sustainable hemp plants for several years. The company is currently in the process of achieving official USDA Organic Certification, but it already practices organic and sustainable cultivation techniques to enhance the overall health of the soil and the hemp plants themselves, which creates some of the highest quality CBD extracts. Charlotte's Web offers CBD oils in a range of different concentration options, and some even come in a few flavor options such as chocolate mint, orange blossom, and lemon twist.</p>
$60
From Your Site Articles
- Best CBD Oils of 2020: Reviews & Buying Guide - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD Oil for Pain Management - Top 10 CBD Oil Review 2020 ... ›
- Best CBD for Dogs 2020 - Organic CBD Oil for Pets - EcoWatch ›
- Full Spectrum CBD Oil: What To Know - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD Waters: Plus All You Need to Know - EcoWatch ›
- The Best Water Soluble CBD Available Online - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD for Sleep (Lab-Tested, Person-Tested Oils) - EcoWatch ›
- Strongest CBD Oils to Buy in 2021? - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD Oils For Pain: Top 3 Brands of 2021 - EcoWatch ›
- 8 Science-Based Benefits of CBD Oil - EcoWatch ›
- Best CBD Vape Pen: Top Brands of 2020 - EcoWatch ›
- Because Price Matters: Most Affordable CBD Oils of 2021 - EcoWatch ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
The modern global textile and fashion industries rely on many chemical dyes to create patterns and colors, but these often produce toxic wastewater. Engin Akyurt / Pixabay
Fast fashion has been called the second dirtiest industry in the world, next to big oil, and how we color our clothes is a large part of the problem. Now, Colorifix, a UK biotech company founded by Cambridge University scientists, has developed a new way to dye clothes that doesn't harm the planet.
<p><br/></p>
<p>Historically, natural dyes extracted from plants and flowers were used to color fabrics. The production of modern chemical dyes uses more than 8,000 chemicals, solvents and additives to create different colors and effects on fabrics, reported <a href="https://www.worstpolluted.org/projects_reports/display/105">Pure Earth</a> and <a href="https://www.cnn.com/style/article/colorifix-sustainable-dyeing-water-pollution-spc-intl/index.html">CNN</a>. Many, like sulfur, arsenic and formaldehyde, are harmful to wildlife and humans, and end up in industrial <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wastewater">wastewater</a> from the dye production process, reported CNN.</p>
<p>In less developed Asian countries, where a large share of today's clothes is produced, weak regulations and/or enforcement allow textile manufacturers to dump toxic substances directly into local waterways, reported CNN. This has caused the dyeing industry to become one of the most environmentally harmful in the world. In fact, according to the UN Environment Program, <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/sustainable-fashion-2646356550.html?rebelltitem=3#rebelltitem3" target="_self">around 20% of global wastewater is generated during textile dyeing and processing.</a></p><p>"When we realized that so much of the pollution comes from something as simple as putting color into our clothes, we thought 'there has to be a better way,'" Colorifix's CEO Orr Yarkoni told <a href="https://www.cnn.com/style/article/colorifix-sustainable-dyeing-water-pollution-spc-intl/index.html" target="_blank">CNN</a>.</p>
<p>According to Yarkoni, Colorifix's new method uses biotechnology and bacteria to eliminate the need for toxic <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/chemicals">chemicals</a> and claims its processes use 90% less water and up to 40% less energy than conventional dyeing, reported CNN.</p><p>Unlike with natural dyeing, Colorifix pigments are not derived straight or extracted from plants or animals. And, unlike with chemical dyeing, they don't use anything hazardous in the process, explained Yarkoni in a CNN video. </p><p>Instead, Colorifix "copies nature's processes in a lab setting, by replicating the 'DNA message' that codes for color in an organism," according to CNN. This tricks the genetically-modified bacteria to create and fill up with those exact same colors.</p><p>"So what we can do is take a feather off a parrot, scrape a few cells off ... and in those cells, look for the DNA message 'make red,'" Yarkoni told CNN. "We can then put that same message into our microorganism that will make that same red that the parrot makes the same way that the parrot makes it."</p>
<p>Yarkoni's team then duplicates the dyed bacterial cells in a fermenting machine, feeding them sugar molasses and nitrogen — byproducts from the agricultural industry, <a href="https://www.labiotech.eu/biotech-of-the-week/colorifix-dye-synthetic-biology/" target="_blank">LA BioTech</a> reported. The cells duplicate themselves every 25 minutes. The fermentation process which duplicates the bacteria is similar to beer, but instead of making alcohol, Colorifix makes pigments, <a href="https://www.cnn.com/style/article/colorifix-sustainable-dyeing-water-pollution-spc-intl/index.html" target="_blank">CNN</a> reported. </p><p>In an industry-first, the dyed bacteria are then applied onto the fabric directly and heated until they burst, releasing their dye onto the fabric, <a href="https://www.labiotech.eu/biotech-of-the-week/colorifix-dye-synthetic-biology/" target="_blank">LA BioTech</a> reported. The cell membranes then wash off but the color stays. </p><p>"What we're doing is not just providing a new pigment. We're providing a new way of getting the pigment into the fiber," Yarkoni told LA BioTech.</p>
<p>This new way of applying dyes to fabrics is more efficient and environmentally-beneficial because it removes the middle step of isolating dyes from microbes and applying them to textiles, which is water- and chemical-intensive, Colorifix told <a href="https://www.cnn.com/style/article/colorifix-sustainable-dyeing-water-pollution-spc-intl/index.html" target="_blank">CNN</a>.</p><p>Yarkoni also touted the additional benefit of reducing fashion's huge carbon footprint from shipping. Currently, <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tips-sustainable-wardrobe-2634726552.html" target="_self">the industry produces more greenhouse gas emissions per year than all international airline flights and maritime shipping trips combined</a>. </p><p>Rather than shipping large amounts of dye, Colorifix can send five grams of color-packed bacteria to a dyehouse, and the microorganisms will multiply within 10 days to the point where the factory can produce 50 tonnes of dye solution a day, according to <a href="https://www.cnn.com/style/article/colorifix-sustainable-dyeing-water-pollution-spc-intl/index.html" target="_blank">CNN</a>.</p>
<p>Competitor PILI, a French startup creating ready-to-use dyes from plant sugars and microbes, critiqued Colorifix's "grow your own" approach to dyeing because dyehouses will need to buy fermenting equipment and receive training on the process, CNN reported. These hurdles could create resistance to making the switch to sustainable dyes, Pili claimed, CNN reported. Other industry experts worried about the regulatory issues surrounding the transport of live microbes safely. </p><p>Colorifix has been hugely successful and received backing from Swedish fashion giant H&M. Colorifix has more customers than it can handle, and launched its first industrial trial at a Portuguese dyehouse last month, CNN reported. </p><p>"I truly believe that in the future, a very large proportion of our industry — if not all of it — will be based on these biological principles," Yarkoni told CNN.</p>
From Your Site Articles
- Fast Fashion: Cheap Clothes = Huge Environmental Cost - EcoWatch ›
- 5 Tips for a More Earth-Conscious Wardrobe - EcoWatch ›
- Will America's Love for Cheap Clothing Doom the Sustainable ... ›
- Fast Fashion Is the Second Dirtiest Industry in the World, Next to Big ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Trending
An aerial view shows the pollution in a river outside Norilsk, Russia following an oil spill, on June 6, 2020. IRINA YARINSKAYA / AFP via Getty Images
Russia's Norilsk Nickel ran into trouble earlier this month when one of its subsidiaries accidentally spilled 21,000 tons of diesel that ended up polluting a pristine Arctic lake. Now the company admits that it has been dumping wastewater into the Arctic tundra, as Agence-France Press, (AFP) reported.
<p>The metallurgical giant said on Sunday that it had taken steps to suspend the workers who dumped the wastewater, saying that their actions were in "flagrant violation of operating rules," according to AFP.</p><p>Independent newspaper <a href="https://novayagazeta.ru/news/2020/06/28/162616-novaya-grinpis-i-eks-sotrudnik-rosprirodnadzora-norilskoy-oblasti-nornikel-prodolzhaet-sbrasyvat-proizvodstvennye-othody-v-ozero-pyasino-foto" target="_blank">Novaya Gazeta published videos</a> from the scene showing large metal pipes carrying wastewater from the reservoir and dumping foaming liquid among nearby trees.</p><p>The company issued the statement just hours after the Novaya Gazeta video surfaced that showed water tainted with heavy metals from the tailings at a nickel-processing plant were being pumped into a river, according to <a href="https://apnews.com/bb823ae09f205fe32d0cd5b83d11b9e7" target="_blank">The Associated Press</a>.</p>
<p>As <a href="https://www.dw.com/en/russian-nickel-mining-firm-admits-pollution-in-arctic/a-53976282" target="_blank">Deutsche-Welle</a> reported, when investigators arrived at the scene, the pipes were "hastily" removed, and a car that had delivered officials to the scene was partly squashed by a heavy earthmoving machine. Nobody was injured in the accident that crushed part of the car.</p><p>Before the time when investigators arrived, 6,000 cubic meters of liquid had been dumped over "several hours," reported the Russian news agency Interfax, according to Deutsche-Welle. It was impossible to tell how far the wastewater had dispersed.</p>
<p>The incident occurred at the Talnakh enrichment plant near the Arctic city of Norilsk, the company said, as <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/06/russian-metal-giant-admits-pollution-arctic-tundra-200628181846954.html" target="_blank">Al-Jazeera</a> reported. This incident is just one month after the unprecedented fuel leak led President Vladimir Putin to declare a state of emergency.</p><p>The journalists who investigated the area claimed the factory deliberately sent the wastewater into <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wildlife" target="_self">wildlife</a> areas and then hastily removed their pipes when they caught wind of investigators and emergency services arrived on the scene. That hasty removal led to the accident that dropped machinery on an investigator's car, according to Al-Jazeera.</p><p>The Investigative Committee, which probes serious crimes, said it had received reports of "unauthorized dumping of liquid waste into the tundra" on the site of the facility, and had opened an inquiry.</p>
<p>According to the AFP, Russia's natural resources agency said the decision to remove water from the reservoir was taken to avoid an emergency after heavy rains and recent tests had caused water levels to increase dramatically. The local emergency services in a statement said the wastewater was unlikely to reach the nearby Kharayelakh River.</p><p>A similar statement was made by Norilsk Nickel spokeswoman Tatiana Egorova who said on Sunday that employees at the factory had pumped out "clarified water" and that an internal investigation was under way.</p>
Read More
Show Less
An estimated 14,000 tons of microfibers sloughed off of soiled laundry is believed to be released into European oceans every year. ODD ANDERSEN / AFP via Getty Images
An estimated 14,000 tons of microfibers sloughed off of soiled laundry is believed to be released into European oceans every year, further contributing to microplastic pollution with a threat of becoming a "significant environmental issue."
<p>That amounts to about two garbage trucks every day, new research suggests.</p><p>Many synthetic clothes, linens, and households textiles are made with petroleum-based products like <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/plastics">plastic</a>. When these are laundered in a washing machine, microscopic pieces fragment and break down before being flushed into <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wastewater">wastewater</a> systems that ultimately enter rivers, waterways and world oceans. A new forensic analysis published in <a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233332" target="_blank">PLOS ONE</a> suggests that an average of 114 milligrams of microfibers — defined by a fine strand of synthetic fiber with a diameter fewer than ten micrometers — is released for every two pounds of fabric washed during a standard cycle.</p>
<p>However, researchers at Northumbria University say that microfiber contamination could be cut by nearly one-third if people choose to wash at cooler, faster cycles — an annual amount of over 4,000 tons.</p><p>"This is the first major study to examine real household wash loads and the reality of fiber release. We were surprised not only by the sheer quantity of fibers coming from these domestic wash loads but also to see that the composition of microfibers coming out of the washing machine does not match the composition of clothing going into the machine, due to the way fabrics are constructed," <a href="https://phys.org/news/2020-06-thousands-tons-ocean-pollution-habits.html" target="_blank">said</a> John R. Dean, professor of analytical and environmental sciences at Northumbria University.</p>
<p>"Finding an ultimate solution to the pollution of marine ecosystems by microfibers released during laundering will likely require significant interventions in both textiles manufacturing processes and washing machine appliance design."</p><p>The team, led by university researchers joined with laundry detergent companies, turned to forensics expert Dr. Kelly Sheridan whose work has been employed on murder investigations analyzing small, microscopic fibers left behind at crime scenes. Scientists employed similar technologies and ensured that cross contamination from other sources didn't occur. Using a spectroscope and microscope, the team was able to examine the structure and composition of microfibers released from clothing to then weigh and characterize those released in each load.</p>
<p>Larger wash loads were shown to <em>decrease </em>the release of microfibers because of the ratio of water to the fabric. As such, people should fill — not overfill — their washing machines to around three-quarters. A 30 percent reduction of microfiber release was observed when launderers used a half-hour wash cycle at 86 degrees Fahrenheit compared to the standard 85-minute cycle with a water temperature at 104 degrees Fahrenheit. Newer clothes were shown to release more microfibers than older clothes, particularly during the first eight weeks. Additionally, fibers made from plant and animal fibers degraded more quickly than those from synthetic fabrics.</p><p>Consumer choice can have a "significant impact" on decreasing pollution caused by microfibers when making informed decisions in how they do laundry and the products that they purchase, the researchers conclude. Though such choices will not eliminate the issue, they may "achieve a meaningful short-term reduction" in harmful environmental pollution.</p>
From Your Site Articles
- Delicate Wash Cycle Uses More Water and Releases 800,000 More ... ›
- Your Washing Machine Can Be a Home for Bacteria — What You ... ›
- What You Can Do to Make Your Clothing Ocean Safe - EcoWatch ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Mt. Rainier and Reflection Lake on Sept. 10, 2015. Crystal Geyser planned to open a bottling plant near Mt. Rainier, emails show. louelke - on and off / Flickr
Bottled water manufacturers looking to capture cool, mountain water from Washington's Cascade Mountains may have to look elsewhere after the state senate passed a bill banning new water permits, as The Guardian reported.
<p>The state, with its glacier-fed springs and rainforests, will become the first state in the country to put a total ban on new bottling operations looking to plunder the state's natural resources. The proposal is one of several in the works in Washington to protect local groundwater and to fend off the growing bottled-water industry, as the <a href="https://www.pressherald.com/2020/02/14/washington-state-opens-groundwater-fight-against-bottled-water-companies/" target="_blank">Tribune News Service</a> reported.</p><p>The bill, once signed into law, will go into effect retroactively and apply to all new permits filed after Jan. 1, 2019, according to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/18/bottled-water-ban-washington-state" target="_blank">The Guardian</a>.</p><p>"Washington State is carving the path towards a groundbreaking solution," said Mary Grant, the director of Food & Water Action's public water for all campaign, in a statement, as <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/18/bottled-water-ban-washington-state" target="_blank">The Guardian</a> reported. "This legislation … would ban one of the worst corporate water abuses – the extraction of local water supplies in plastic bottles shipped out of watersheds and around the country."</p><p>Across the country, local activists have warned that bottling companies are taking their water almost for free and then shipping it elsewhere, leaving local aquifers depleted.</p><p>"I was jolted to the core to realize the depth and breadth and magnitude of how they have lawyered up in these small towns to take advantage of water rights," said Washington state Sen. Reuven Carlyle, who sponsored the bill to ban bottling companies from extracting groundwater, as the <a href="https://www.pressherald.com/2020/02/14/washington-state-opens-groundwater-fight-against-bottled-water-companies/" target="_blank">Tribune News Service</a> reported. "The fact that we have incredibly loose, if virtually nonexistent, policy guidelines around this is shocking and a categorical failure."</p><p>One of the jolting actions was revealed in leaked emails after Crystal Geyser planned to open a bottling plant near Mount Rainier. Locals feared that the company's plan to pump 400 gallons a minute from the site would lead to dry wells. In emails, Crystal Geyser mounted a legal campaign to sue the local subdivision opposing the plant and then it intended to conduct an underground public relations campaign to garner support for their proposal, as the <a href="https://www.pressherald.com/2020/02/14/washington-state-opens-groundwater-fight-against-bottled-water-companies/" target="_blank">Tribune News Service</a> reported.</p><p>"Pumping water out of the ground, putting it in plastic bottles and exporting it out of the state of Washington is not in the public interest," said Craig Jasmer, a leader of the Lewis County Water Alliance, the group that sprung up to oppose the Randle plant and has pushed for the statewide ban, as the <a href="https://www.pressherald.com/2020/02/14/washington-state-opens-groundwater-fight-against-bottled-water-companies/" target="_blank">Tribune News Service</a> reported.</p><p>Crystal Geyser has recently proven its disdain for public safety. Last month, the company pleaded guilty to storing toxin-laden <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wastewater">wastewater</a> in arsenic in eastern California, and then delivering the water to treatment plants without disclosing its hazard, as <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/18/bottled-water-ban-washington-state" target="_blank">The Guardian</a> reported.</p><p>The Environmental Priorities Coalition, a network of groups including Americans Rivers, Audubon, and Sierra Club Washington State, advanced the legislation on its highest priorities list, saying it would stop "new water bottling plants from proliferating in Washington state, effecting small rural community water supplies necessary for both agriculture and threatened salmon species," as <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/02/17/safeguard-public-welfare-and-public-interest-groundbreaking-measure-washington-state" target="_blank">Common Dreams</a> reported.</p><p>"Washington's waters belong to the people of Washington," said the Center for Environmental Law & Policy, according to <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/02/17/safeguard-public-welfare-and-public-interest-groundbreaking-measure-washington-state" target="_blank">Common Dreams</a>. "There has been an increasing number of proposals to locate commercial water bottling plants in Washington. These plants would allow Washington's water to be taken for the benefit of corporations and users outside of the local area, perhaps out-of-state."</p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/18/bottled-water-ban-washington-state" target="_blank">The Guardian</a> noted that the tide is turning against bottle-water manufacturers, with bills also introduced in Michigan and Maine, and local measures introduced in Oregon and Montana.</p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
- Some states are going after bottled water companies to protect ... ›
- Legislative Work - Zero Waste Washington ›
- Washington state takes bold step to restrict companies from bottling ... ›
- Washington State Senate Passes Ban on Bottled Water Extraction ... ›
- Washington State Moves Towards Ban on Bottled Water Extraction ... ›
Read More
Show Less
The Bulgarian prime minister fired Neno Dimov, pictured above, for mismanagement of a water crisis. EU2018BG Bulgarian Presidency / Flickr / CC BY 2.0
Bulgaria's minister for the environment abruptly resigned after he was arrested and charged for mismanagement of a water crisis in a western Bulgaria city, as the AP reported.
<p>The city of Pernik and its surrounding areas, which is home to about 100,000 people, was the epicenter of antigovernment protests after the city faced severe water restrictions for about two months, according to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bulgaria-politics-environment/bulgaria-environment-minister-quits-amid-water-crisis-idUSKBN1Z91BC" target="_blank">Reuters</a>. Pernik is 20 miles west of the country's capital, Sofia.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjUwMjIyMi9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyMjg2NzI2NH0.PadTaaaE0XzxxOj_jIR6FSnPwAAkTyaLDKd55i9rUgo/img.jpg?width=980" id="05320" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="323e46c4e1b7f2f3cbd6285ca859f67e" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />Protest In Pernik
Citizens of the town of Pernik on a procession and public prayer for rain. They have been protesting against the city's water regime and have asked those responsible for the water crisis to bear responsibility. Hristo Vladev / NurPhoto / Getty Images
<p>The former minister of the environment, Neno Dimov, said dry weather and poor management by local authorities caused the water crisis in Pernik. However, prosecutors contend that Dimov allowed water to go to industrial facilities despite knowing that diverting the water would lead to shortages in <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/drinking-water" rel="noopener noreferrer">drinking water</a> for Pernik and its surrounding villages, as the <a href="https://apnews.com/b3f6123b1e60794a0be2084c331812e7" target="_blank">AP</a> reported. </p><p>Dimov was arrested late last week and stayed in custody for 72 hours while he denied wrongdoing, according to the <a href="https://apnews.com/b3f6123b1e60794a0be2084c331812e7" target="_blank">AP</a>.</p><p>Pernik and the nearby villages source all their water from a single dam, which had drastically decreased when Dimov allowed industrial facilities to use the water. </p><p>"Some 97,000 people will not have normal access to drinking water in the next five months --- which they would have had if the minister had exercised his authority," Prosecutor Angel Kanev told reporters, as <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bulgaria-politics-environment/bulgaria-environment-minister-quits-amid-water-crisis-idUSKBN1Z91BC" target="_blank">Reuters</a> reported.<br></p><p>"This is the biggest damage," he said.</p><p>An investigation by <a href="https://bivol.bg/en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bivol News</a> showed that mismanagement of the water supply led to the city being left without potable water. It published documents signed by Dimov to allow for the industrial use of water as the reservoir reached a critically low level.</p><p>Furthermore, the <a href="https://bivol.bg/en/new-illegal-diversion-of-waters-for-studena-dam.html" target="_blank">investigative report identified an illegal canal</a> that diverted a significant amount of water from the Studena dam. </p><p>On Thursday, prosecutors raided the offices of the company managing Pernik's water supply utility and Pernik's municipal council. Irena Sokolova, a former district governor of Pernik and Ivan Vitanov, the suspended head of the water and sanitation company were also questioned, according to <a href="https://sofiaglobe.com/2020/01/09/bulgarias-environment-minister-neno-dimov-arrested-reports/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Sofia Globe</a>.</p><p>"Evidence is being collected of crimes committed by officials that led to water supply problems in Pernik," the prosecutor's office said in a statement, as <a href="https://sofiaglobe.com/2020/01/09/bulgarias-environment-minister-neno-dimov-arrested-reports/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Sofia Globe</a> reported.</p>
<p>The water crisis peaked in November when residents were forced to ration water due to a lack of supplies from nearby Studena Dam, as the <a href="https://apnews.com/b3f6123b1e60794a0be2084c331812e7" target="_blank">AP</a> reported. Initially water was available 10 hours a day, but more recently it has been reduced to seven hours a day of water access.</p><p>The rationing is expected to last no more than five months, according to <a href="https://www.rferl.org/a/bulgaria-prosecutors-charge-environmental-minister-dimov/30371411.html" target="_blank">Radio Free Europe</a>. </p><p>The water infrastructure in Pernik has not been renovated for more than 50 years. The antiquated structure means that more than 70 percent of the potable water that runs through it gets wasted, according to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bulgaria-politics-environment/bulgaria-environment-minister-quits-amid-water-crisis-idUSKBN1Z91BC" target="_blank">Reuters</a>. </p><p>The rationing and mismanagement has led to protests and calls for the government to resign. The opposition Bulgarian Socialist Party said it would file a no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Boyko Borriso's government, though it is unlikely to pass, according to <a href="https://www.rferl.org/a/bulgaria-prosecutors-charge-environmental-minister-dimov/30371411.html" target="_blank">Radio Free Europe</a>. </p><p><a href="https://fyeg.org/news/neno-dimov-resign" target="_blank">The Federation of Young European Greens</a> had previously petitioned for Dimov to resign after he claimed global warming is a fraud, tried to amend legislation that would allow the expansion of a ski resort that would damage the ecology of Pirin National Park, and after he tried to amend the Natura 2000 network to allow construction in protected areas.</p>The European Commission also filed a <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eir/pdf/report_bg_en.pdf" target="_blank">report</a> that criticized Bulgaria for failing to tackle air pollution and treat urban <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wastewater" rel="noopener noreferrer">wastewater</a> properly.
From Your Site Articles
- How Cape Town Avoided a Water Crisis at the Eleventh Hour ... ›
- Sydney Water Crisis Warnings Ignored by Officials 6 Months Ago ... ›
- 'We've Made History': Ireland Joins France, Germany and Bulgaria in ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Trending
Residents of La Chiquita say they don't have adequate access to safe drinking water. David Silva
By Alejandro Pérez, translated by Romina Castagnino
Fifteen years ago, Martha Valencia relied on the nearby river for water and for food. But then oil palm crops arrived in the area and polluted the river, say Martha and her neighbors. The community took the oil palm grower to court, which ultimately resulted in a ruling in their favor.
<p>"It is determined that there had been serious environmental effects in the territory of the communities … which should have been prevented by the Ecuadorian government," the ruling read, and a judge ordered compensation for those affected.</p><p>That was two years ago. And Martha and her neighbors say they are still waiting for things to change.</p>
<h3>No Clean Water</h3><p>The river and the community, both named La Chiquita, are located within the municipality of San Lorenzo in the Esmeraldas province of Ecuador. Logging and oil palm plantations, in addition to its proximity to the Colombian border where drug trafficking and armed conflict is rife, contribute to the area's dubious honor of having the highest levels of poverty and violence in the country.</p><p>Every eight to 15 days, the municipality sends a <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/drinking-water">water</a> truck to La Chiquita. The tank fills a 1,500-liter blue plastic tank "but not even that water is clean. We were told by the Municipality to put chlorine before drinking it," says Olga, another community member.</p>
<p>When a new truck does not arrive in town before their tank runs dry, residents say they can buy 20-liter water canisters in San Lorenzo, which last three or four days. However, this option often proves too expensive for community members who must subsist off meager profits from small farms. They say that in that case, they are forced to walk great distances to other rivers.</p><p>There's little in the way of alternatives for people living in the area. According to the National Statistical System and the National Statistics and Census Institute (INEC), 16% of San Lorenzo residents are illiterate, which is more than double the national rate of 6.8%. Almost half of its population is engaged in agriculture and fishing due to a lack of industrial development in the area.</p><p>Two years have passed since the Jan. 2017 ruling of Esmeraldas' Provincial Court of Justice, and those affected in La Chiquita are still waiting for the judge to order the provision of drinking water, among other compensations. The ruling also requires the construction of a health center and a school.</p><p>La Chiquita lies in the the Chocó-Darién, an ecosystem that extends from Panama to northwest Ecuador and is known for its unique <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/forests">forests</a> and vast biological wealth – both of which are disappearing at a fast clip due to <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/agribusiness">agribusiness</a> and other human pressures.</p><p>Oil palm companies are required to have a buffer zone between planted fields and water sources. They must remove any crops that are located less than ten meters (33 feet) from community water sources and replace them with endemic species such as guadua bamboo. According to former environment ministers, a fine is applied "for obvious negligence in the performance of their duties."</p><p>"It is a historic ruling, although it has objections and inaccuracies that must be corrected in its execution," says Manolo Morales, a lawyer and representative of the Corporation of Management and Environmental Law (Ecolex) that sponsored the lawsuit.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjQ4OTkwMS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY3Njk4Nzg3Nn0.jpTdkpO-16pgmDsvvtnB5gtoDVVMo2bpaZgFlAD8bdk/img.jpg?width=980" id="95198" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="5beed33c898dbf531c01db76efda48b7" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Oil palm cultivation is one of the primary drivers of deforestation in the province of Esmeraldas. Eduardo Rebolledo
<p>The ruling also calls for the Ministry of Environment, together with affected communities, to reforest 500 hectares of degraded land with native species. However, La Chiquita resident Isaha Ezequiel says this is absurd. "Companies are the ones that have polluted and killed the forest but they want <em>us</em> to reforest," he told Mongabay.</p><p>Violence is common in the region. The murder rate in San Lorenzo in 2018 was 96 per 100,000 inhabitants – almost ten times the national rate. The area gained further notoriety that year when a reporting team from the El Comercio newspaper was kidnapped and then killed by FARC dissident groups. The incident occurred in Mataje, a border town near Guadalito, Colombia.</p><p>Although four companies were referenced during the trial, two were included in the ruling: Palmera de los Andes and Palmar de los Esteros (Palesema). Only Palmera de los Andes agreed to comment for this story.</p>
<h3>Never-Ending Battle</h3><p>Oil palm plantations in Ecuador cover about 250,000 hectares (617,763 acres) and are distributed among several provinces. Due to its suitable growing conditions, Esmeraldas has the lion's share.</p><p>Palm oil companies arrived in San Lorenzo in the late 1990s and early 2000s, settling in an area of around 30,000 hectares (74,131 acres) that was later expanded to 50,000 (123,552 acres). The inhabitants of La Chiquita, who are mostly the descendants of enslaved people of African ancestry, say local children began to develop stomach diseases and that they noticed oil and <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/pesticides">pesticide</a> residue in a river that was their primary water source.</p><p>When La Chiquita residents went into the forest to investigate the cause of this pollution, they discovered that one of the oil palm growers had installed a palm oil mill less than three kilometers upriver that was dumping liquid waste into the water. The same thing was reported by members of the Awá Guadalito indigenous community, who also joined the demand for change and reparations.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjQ4OTkwNS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyNjI1MTkzMX0.S2TpMCNsFN-rFlwVPso_oU7Kh-JZndeSZcumt7GSN8s/img.jpg?width=980" id="7364f" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="ac0a4e2a548cd1ddafc72293e13e4ad6" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Aerial view of a young oil palm plantation in Esmeraldas. Eduardo Rebolledo
<p>However, a representative of Palmera de los Andes contends claims of pollution.</p><p>"We have 11 processing pools with strict environmental controls," said Fabián Miño, a lawyer and director of the company's legal department. "It is false that we are the cause of any contamination." He explained that, after the palm oil refinement process, <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wastewater">wastewater</a> is treated in each pool until it is decontaminated. "To confirm that the liquid comes out clean from our building, in the last two pools we have fish and seaweed," he said.</p><p>Miño says communities have been manipulated by NGOs with ulterior motives. He claims Ecolex is an environmental organization that receives funds from abroad, and that the organization attacks oil palm growers to justify its activities and budget regardless of the employment and development opportunities plantations create.</p><p>Manolo Morales, of Ecolex, says Miño's accusations are absurd. He says the organization has worked in the area since 1998 helping local communities gain legal rights to their ancestral territories. He claims that in the intervening years the government promoted and encouraged the cultivation of oil palm and that many inhabitants were persuaded to sell their territories to agroindustry companies. He said he made the decision to advise La Chiquita and Guadalito when he learned of the problems they face.</p><p>In 2005, a water quality study by the Al Tropic environmental foundation detected the presence of endosulfan and terbufos in the tributaries that provide water for these two communities. Commonly used as pesticides, these compounds can cause severe illness and death in humans, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency classifies both as Category 1 toxins – a designation reserved for the most dangerous substances. This information was included in a <a href="http://suia.ambiente.gob.ec/documents/10179/242256/03+PLAN+DE+MANEJO+CAYAPAS+MATAJE.pdf/300e86f9-31ef-492a-8b3f-da397583949c" target="_blank">report from the Ministry of Environment (MAE) in 2009</a> and served as the basis for initiating the trial. However, subsequent water studies were not decisive enough to directly hold oil palm companies accountable. Therefore, the judge only partially accepted the claim, ordering the government to fulfill some of the requested reparations to affected communities.</p><p>Ecolex reported that oil palm grower companies were alerted by government authorities before officials went to take water samples looking for the presence of toxins. Meanwhile, Fabián Miño, from Palmera de los Andes, claims that the organization was trying to obtain samples of stagnant water.</p><p>"They went out of their way to find pollution," Miño said. "We have all the environmental certifications, national and international."</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjQ4OTkwOS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0NjY1NTc3MH0.JQOvJIM0B7E8d7CWqu_ThpEiuXOtJOQKeM5EHAgOkEY/img.jpg?width=980" id="cea9d" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="575e74bb5ddd0eae2eaa648e152525c3" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Satellite image of oil palm plantations in San Lorenzo. Rodrigo Sierra
<p>Isaha Ezequiel and his neighbors say two years have passed and they have seen no progress towards court-mandated reparations. According to Nathalia Bonilla, an environmental engineer and coordinator with the NGO Ecological Action in Ecuador, this is because the judge did not report the verdict to the ministries responsible for carrying them out.</p><p>Because there is a mountain between the towns of Guadalito and La Chiquita, the judge ordered the building of a school in each. However, Bonilla says the Ministry of Education was also not made aware of this ruling.</p><p>Palmera de los Andes reports that it has already begun fulfilling the reparations required by the ruling. However, company representatives say it is doing so because such activities are within its environmental responsibilities and protocols, not because it considers the ruling to be right.</p><p>"We are reforesting as required by the ruling," says lawyer Fabián Miño. He adds that the company has a 1200-hectare (2,965-acre) forest reserve, which was not requested in the reparations, and that the company has an environmental license and provides upwards of 700 jobs to local residents. "They should applaud us and not judge us," he said.</p>
<h3>A Refuge for Many Species</h3><p><a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/deforestation">Deforestation</a> in northern Esmeraldas began well before oil palm moved in. In the 1960s, the government implemented its Northwest Forestry Development project that established 14 forest concessions. According to project data, more than 400,000 hectares (988,421 acres) of dense forest was cleared between 1966 and 1975. Five more concessions were subsequently created.</p><p>"This is how the primary forests of Esmeraldas were cut down," says Walter Palacios, a forest engineer and associate researcher at the National Institute of Biodiversity (Inabio). He explains that the primary forests of northwestern Ecuador are home to around 4,000 species of plants, and says many may have disappeared due to habitat loss without biologists ever knowing them.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjQ4OTkxMi9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY2MjU3ODA2NX0.5jBPM3L88GnZBDdtpqL2wSyQQb4WhnYDV5etxLDCzg4/img.jpg?width=980" id="2994f" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="133882db4ceb21be266165fcc98e3592" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Oil palm plantations in San Lorenzo, Ecuador. Eduardo Rebolledo
<p>The region's protected areas preserve what has been lost to agriculture elsewhere: reserves, rich in orchids and giant ferns, extend to the paramos of the Ecuadorian highlands, providing vital habitat for a multitude of species including jaguars and ocelots. A microcosm of the biodiversity of the Chocó-Darién can be seen in just one of its massive trees. A Sande tree, for example, can be covered by as many as 60 species of ferns, orchids and other plants, its fruit important food for birds and insects.</p><p>According to Walter Palacios, when the palm plantations first appeared in the area, the secondary forests that had regenerated after the mass clearing of the 1960s were cleared once again.</p><p>"A secondary forest no longer has the same species density, it has less wildlife," Palacios said. "However, it is better to preserve them than to turn them into monocultures."</p><p>Of the region's remaining primary forest, Palacios says he hopes that the government spares these areas from the expansion of the agricultural frontier.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjQ4OTkxNC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY2ODYxMDY3M30.XMspJrwfViZENhGDvTz4MbggQOTbYxLHt37LFscGuao/img.jpg?width=980" id="d5ede" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="c0cfb8c7cf43e3cfcfca0f4addafea4b" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Oil palm crops near the town of San Lorenzo. Eduardo Rebolledo
<p>Residents say conversion of forest to plantations has affected their lives.</p><p>"I used to make with my mother wicker baskets out of Piquigua – an endemic plant," Martha Valencia said. "We used the baskets to transport fish, or the meat of guanta, deer and other animals that we hunted. The forest and the river gave us everything, now we have to go to San Lorenzo to buy the food that was taken from us."</p><p>Residents like Valencia say they know everything they had before will not return in their lifetimes, but that they should still be able to expect clean water. "That is why we need the reparations promised by the ruling," says Wilberto Valencia, another community member.</p><p>The current Minister of Environment in Ecuador is Raúl Ledesma, who assumed the position four months ago. In an appearance before the National Assembly, together with the affected community members, Ledesma offered to further investigate the situation in La Chiquita to verify the damage that Wilberto Valencia and others say is affecting their ability to live. At that same meeting, Ledesma said he was aware that Energy Palma is breaking environmental standards.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjQ4OTkxNy9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyMDI0NzkzN30.NMhg3Xk97VtVikarIHlwl4T6QZolIunwrA_X8_DB340/img.jpg?width=980" id="328fe" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="e529de6f36be9c720473d60a5000571c" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Inhabitants of La Chiquita are fighting against the pollution of their water sources. David Silva
<h3>What Does the Future Hold?</h3><p>Large-scale plantations aren't the only places where oil palm is grown in Ecuador, and advocates of the crop say stricter regulations on its cultivation could hurt small farmers.</p><p>"If there are infractions, justice must act," says Wilfredo Acosta, executive director of the National Association of Palm Oil Growers (Ancupa). "But 89% are small producers and for us, it is an agricultural activity, like any other, that encourages the development of the country."</p><p>In recent years oil palm crops have been beset with "bud rot." As of October 2019, the fungal disease had wiped out 15,000 hectares (37,065 acres) of plantations, according to Acosta. His proposed solution: support farmers with credits and provide, through the Ministry of Agriculture, new seeds that are resistant to this disease.</p><p>Assemblyman Lenin Plaza, a native of Esmeraldas and president of the Committee on Food Sovereignty, together with Ancupa, is promoting a bill in the National Assembly, which has already passed the first debate. One of its objectives is to double palm oil yields for biofuel production, but Plaza says that does not necessarily mean expanding the agricultural frontier with new plantations. "This will depend on the country's demand," Plasa said. "The important thing now is to help the producers."</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjQ4OTkyMS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY1MDY4ODQzMX0.lsGtkv969Gr1Xh1dJ1eRaPwu3Twsf-23NbO77s5KBuQ/img.jpg?width=980" id="90ff7" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="226012e8b64a58ccdbdaf69da704e26a" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Assemblyman Lenin Plaza has proposed a law to increase palm oil production. He says it is necessary to help small producers. Cecilia Puebla
<p>Acosta says oil palm expansion could take advantage of underutilized land once used for <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/agriculture">agriculture</a> but which has since been abandoned.</p><p>"It's not necessary to expand, it's about optimizing crops," Acosta said. "With that, we take the pressure off the forests."</p><p>However, even if the majority of producers may be small, environmental organizations say large companies control around 80% of land used for oil palm cultivation.</p><p>"The big companies are the ones that benefit," said Nathalia Bonilla of Ecological Action. "What they say about small producers is just a story. [Oil] palm is an activity that uses chemicals that seep into the earth [and] needs large areas, and working conditions are precarious."</p>
<p><em>Reposted with permission from <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2020/01/communities-in-ecuador-fight-back-against-palm-oil/" target="_blank">Mongabay</a>.</em></p>Related Articles Around the Web
- 'I can't get out': Farmers feel the pressure as Ecuador's palm oil ... ›
- Liberia's biggest palm oil project quits eco-certification scheme ... ›
- Palm Oil Is Everywhere in India—and Public-Health Experts Are ... ›
- European banks accused of failing to protect DRC palm oil workers ... ›
- Community vs. company: A tiny town in Ecuador battles a palm oil ... ›
Read More
Show Less
As Fracking Companies Face Bankruptcy, U.S. Regulators Enable Firms to Duck Cleanup Costs
24 December 2019
Fracking
Heavy equipment sits on the edge of a rocky stream bank as part of U.S. Bureau of Land Management-Forest Service reclamation efforts for abandoned oil and gas wells in the eastern U.S. Bureau of Land Management
By Justin Mikulka
In over their heads with debt, U.S. shale oil and gas firms are now moving from a boom in fracking to a boom in bankruptcies. This trend of failing finances has the potential for the U.S. public, both at the state and federal levels, to be left on the hook for paying to properly shut down and clean up even more drilling sites.
<p>Expect these companies to try reducing their debt through the process of bankruptcy and, like <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/01/business/murray-energy-coal-bankruptcy-pension/index.html" target="_blank">the coal industry</a>, attempting to get out of environmental and employee-related financial obligations.</p>
<h3>The Bankruptcy of EP Energy</h3><p>In October, EP Energy — one of the largest oil producers in the Eagle Ford Shale region in Texas — <a href="https://www.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/news/2019/10/07/major-eagle-ford-player-declares-bankruptcy.html" target="_blank">filed for bankruptcy</a> because the firm couldn't pay back almost $5 billion in debt, making it the largest <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/ep-energy-files-largest-u-s-energy-bankruptcy-since-2016-11570204927" target="_blank">oil and gas bankruptcy</a> since 2016.</p><p>EP Energy hasn't produced a profit since 2014 and <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-04/apollo-and-elliott-team-up-to-save-ep-energy-stake-in-bankruptcy" target="_blank">Bloomberg reported</a> that the company would need oil to be at "a price closer to $70 per barrel" for EP to be profitable. Oil has not come close to averaging over <a href="https://www.macrotrends.net/1369/crude-oil-price-history-chart" target="_blank">$70 a barrel</a> since 2014.</p><p>Despite its financial struggles at current low oil prices, the company plans to continue operating after restructuring and eliminating up to $3 billion in debt. However, EP has not identified any funds that it would be setting aside for well cleanup, which is not unusual for an oil and gas company.</p><p>In response, <a href="https://cases.primeclerk.com/EPEnergy/Home-DocketInfo?DockRelatedSearchValue=182" target="_blank">as part of the bankruptcy proceedings,</a> the <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/EP%20Energy%20Govt%20Objections.pdf" target="_blank">U.S. Department of the Interior filed a document</a> arguing that EP Energy is still responsible for its obligations to assure the "decommissioning, plugging, and abandonment" of any of the EP Energy wells that are located on leased federal and tribal lands.</p><p>Ideally, that would mean EP Energy sets aside funds for the proper cleanup and end-of-life processes for its oil and gas wells, which number <a href="https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:i3sPT5lEYgAJ:https://www.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/news/2019/10/07/major-eagle-ford-player-declares-bankruptcy.html+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us" target="_blank">more than 800 in the Eagle Ford region</a>.</p><p>However, the federal government hasn't even named a number yet for how much that should be. The Bureau of Land Management and Bureau of Indian Affairs "are currently still assessing the status of reclamation and plugging and abandonment obligations across the Debtors' onshore federal and Indian leases," writes the Interior Department.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In EP Energy <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/bankruptcy?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#bankruptcy</a>, US Interior Department wants to make sure that enough money is set aside for cleanup. For financially struggling companies, cleanup is becoming the tail that's wagging the dog. <a href="https://t.co/LDrnMr01rn">https://t.co/LDrnMr01rn</a></p>— Clark Williams-Derry (@ClarkWDerry) <a href="https://twitter.com/ClarkWDerry/status/1195714652543471616?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 16, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<p>The federal government is only getting around to assessing EP Energy's potential liabilities once the firm is already in the bankruptcy process, revealing one of the flaws in the current system. Federal and state governments have not been holding fracking companies fully liable for the environmental damage and cleanup costs of their drilling activity.</p><p>Joshua Caleb Macey, a visiting assistant professor at Cornell law school who specializes in bankruptcy and energy law, told DeSmog that the situation with EP Energy was "frustrating and completely normal."</p><p>According to the Interior Department filing, "Regardless of its bankruptcy, the Debtor is required to comply with all applicable federal laws."<br><br>As <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2019/10/18/public-paying-cleanup-fracking-boom-oil-gas-bonds" target="_blank">I've reported before</a>, oil and gas companies are legally required to hold a certain amount of funds to pay for well cleanup costs, a process known as bonding that varies by state and for <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/public-lands">public lands</a>.</p><p>Because companies are rarely required to have those funds available before they start drilling (and thanks to industry-friendly regulators and politicians), in reality oil and gas companies can walk away from cleanup obligations with relative ease, which has become the pattern for bankrupt <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/coal">coal</a> companies.</p>
<h3>Including Cleanup Costs Would Make Extraction 'Uneconomic'</h3><p>Federal and state regulators have been failing to require companies to <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2019/10/18/public-paying-cleanup-fracking-boom-oil-gas-bonds" target="_blank">fully fund expected cleanup liabilities</a>, which helps mask the true cost of oil and gas production. Passing environmental cleanup costs on to the taxpayer amounts to a backdoor subsidy for the oil and gas industry.</p><p>Requiring oil and gas companies to pay for shutting down and cleaning up wells would greatly increase the cost of drilling for many oil and gas wells. The fracking industry already <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/finances-fracking-shale-industry-drills-more-debt-profit" target="_blank">can't make money</a> pumping <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/fossil-fuels">fossil fuels</a> out of shale in the U.S., and that's without these firms coming even close to fully <a href="https://bismarcktribune.com/bakken/as-abandoned-oil-wells-climb-regulators-consider-ways-to-stop/article_58c39a16-73a1-5592-ba5f-fc7c9c50cbcd.html" target="_blank">funding their cleanup costs</a>.</p><p>However, <a href="https://www.aberdeennews.com/news/sd-environmental-board-waits-to-plug-abandoned-natural-gas-wells/article_d0a4518b-1733-5a7a-b5f3-65508e26ad66.html" target="_blank">more state governments</a> are realizing <a href="https://www.npr.org/2019/09/06/758284873/cleaning-up-abandoned-wells-proves-costly-to-gas-and-oil-producing-states" target="_blank">the scale of this problem</a> and starting to look at increasing and enforcing bonding requirements for oil and gas well cleanup. However, in oil-rich places like Alberta, Canada, and Alaska, regulators are realizing that <a href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-alberta-ignores-the-ticking-time-bomb-of-orphaned-oil-and-gas-wells-at/" target="_blank">the money just isn't there</a>.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hey <a href="https://twitter.com/jkenney?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@jkenney</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Alberta_UCP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Alberta_UCP</a> after your sustained attacks on the Liberal government, why are you now begging for taxpayer money to clean up Alberta's abandoned oil wells? Oil companies must pay for that. Not us. Hands off our tax dollars. The oil shareholders should pay. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/cdnpoli?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#cdnpoli</a></p>— Trish Palmer (@TrishPalmerYVR) <a href="https://twitter.com/TrishPalmerYVR/status/1201196546563248129?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<p>In 2018, the natural gas driller Amaroq Resources <a href="https://www.petroleumnews.com/pntruncate/771890741.shtml" target="_blank">acquired the Nicolai Creek assets</a> in southwest Alaska from the bankrupt Aurora Gas. This transaction was delayed when the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) announced $7 million in bonding required for the gas wells associated with the purchase. This is the point where the state government had the power to make Amaroq provide adequate bonding for well cleanup.</p><p>The AOGCC then agreed to reduce that amount to $200,000 and the deal went ahead.</p><p>Since that deal, the commission increased the minimum statewide bonding level to $400,000 per well for the first one to 10 wells. Amaroq would be required to abide by these new regulations and has appealed this decision. Company president Scott Pfoff explained that these new bonding requirements make the business "uneconomic."</p><p>And that is the reality. If oil and gas companies were required to pay for the full end-of-life cost of their wells, much of their inventory becomes uneconomic. This is where taxpayers come in.</p>
<h3>Fracking Industry Wants to Dump Wastewater in Streams and Rivers to Save Money</h3><p>Failure to require <a href="https://medium.com/westwise/new-analysis-taxpayers-could-be-on-the-hook-for-billions-to-clean-up-abandoned-oil-and-gas-wells-b0e1e28d20c2" target="_blank">adequate bonding for oil and gas cleanup</a> costs is just one of many backdoor government subsidies for the oil and gas industry. The failure to regulate <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2019/01/29/fracking-industry-gas-flaring-problem" target="_blank">flaring and venting of the potent greenhouse gas methane</a> during oil drilling is another example.</p><p>Fracking firms, which spend a lot of borrowed money to pump out a lot of oil and gas for not much (or any) profit, are experiencing a <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/frackers-face-harsh-reality-as-wall-street-backs-away-11551009601" target="_blank">collapse in financing</a>. Thanks to the industry's failed business model, these companies are desperate for ways to cut costs.</p><p>One of the major costs associated with hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2018/09/18/fracking-industry-waste-water-nightmare" target="_blank">acquiring, pumping and disposing of water</a>, which, after a driller is finished with it, typically contains corrosive levels of salts and contaminants including naturally occurring radioactive materials, chemicals and oil residues. This area has become a major target for the industry to save money.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjIxMDU3My9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYzNjE2Njg2Mn0.lMtMV5SmNv1KnJe05RVbuXuKPfhX1WhynPydQ0AKag8/img.png?width=980" id="a58de" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="74142d5134868c830b71c57da8431b80" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
A graphic showing the water cycle during hydraulic fracturing. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2016
<p>As <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/fracking-is-not-the-cause-of-quakes-rather-its-frackings-wastewater/2015/04/27/e87a6e82-e9f4-11e4-aae1-d642717d8afa_story.html?utm_term=.9934b60ef334" target="_blank">The Washington Post pointed out in 2015</a> (and as I highlighted last year), when it comes to fracked shale oil and gas production, "currently there is no way to treat, store, and release the billions of gallons of <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wastewater">wastewater</a> at the surface." The industry's current range of (legal) approaches to <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2018/09/18/fracking-industry-waste-water-nightmare" target="_blank">disposing of its massive amounts of wastewater</a> involves injecting it underground, which in some cases is tied to increased earthquake activity, using it to irrigate crops or de-ice roads, and sending it to municipal water treatment plants lacking equipment to properly treat it.</p><p>Treating oil and gas drilling wastewater is possible, but expensive. As S&P Global Platts <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/articles/us-oil-drillers-face-growing-issue-of-water-disposal-fuel-for-thought" target="_blank">recently reported</a>, according to a study by the Texas Alliance of Energy Producers and Independent Petroleum Association of America, for Permian drillers in Texas, "Economically, treatment costs must come down."</p><p>The study concludes that dealing with wastewater is already a limiting factor in this prolific region: "Some Permian sub-basins are currently constrained due to insufficient injection well capacity. Projected production growth will worsen the situation."</p><p>With this glut of wastewater combined with high costs, the industry is looking for a cheap alternative. The latest preferred approach seems to be lobbying governments to change the rules to allow dumping wastewater with limited treatment into <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/rivers">rivers</a> and streams.</p><p>In November, E&E News reported that there's movement to allow or expand such wastewater dumping in <a href="http://www.eenews.net/stories/1061525917" target="_blank">Oklahoma</a>, Texas, <a href="https://www.koat.com/article/sides-clash-over-benefits-drawbacks-of-fracking/30126134" target="_blank">New Mexico</a> and <a href="http://www.eenews.net/stories/1061647463" target="_blank">Pennsylvania</a>, all states with major fracking industries. "Within a year, Oklahoma could get approval from EPA to start issuing permits that will allow the oil industry to dispose of briny oil field waste in waterways," E&E wrote.</p><p>As space for injection wells becomes scarce, the industry hopes to dump its wastewater in streams and rivers, once again passing on potential environmental and financial liabilities to the public.</p><p>A 2017 working group looking for alternatives for Oklahoma oil field wastewater (also known as "produced water") found "the most cost-effective means of reducing disposal is for oil companies to treat and clean that produced water so it can be reused for things like fracking," <a href="https://stateimpact.npr.org/oklahoma/2017/04/27/the-most-practical-alternative-to-quake-causing-disposal-wells-is-reusing-wastewater-research-group-finds/" target="_blank">reported NPR's StateImpact Oklahoma</a>.</p><p>However, recycling produced water to again frack wells results in more toxic produced water, which can't be recycled indefinitely. With injection wells increasingly unable to handle the volume of water produced by the industry, shale firms have been seeking cheap alternative disposal methods, including dumping the water in rivers and streams.</p><p>However, the 2017 analysis concluded that treating produced frack water to the point it could be safely dumped into rivers or used to irrigate agriculture wasn't economically viable.</p><p>Owen Mills, the director of water planning for the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, explained to StateImpact Oklahoma why this wasn't an option for the industry: "It's incredibly expensive to do that and it takes a lot of energy."</p><p>To properly treat the fracking wastewater to the point it is no longer a threat to human health and the environment would be incredibly expensive, and that is why the industry is lobbying to change the rules about disposing its wastewater. If it succeeds, expect the eventual clean up costs — also incredibly expensive — to be billed to the American public.</p>
<p><em>Reposted with permission from <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/2019/12/20/fracking-oil-gas-bankruptcies-cleanup-costs-regulators" target="_blank">DeSmogBlog</a>.</em></p>From Your Site Articles
- In Alabama, a Cleanup Unearths Toxins—and Scandal - EcoWatch ›
- Will the Public End up Paying to Clean up the Fracking Boom ... ›
- Bankrupt Fracking Companies Are Harming the Climate and Taxpayers - EcoWatch ›
- Appalachian Fracking Boom Was a Jobs Bust, Finds New Report - EcoWatch ›
- Missouri City Slammed by Skyrocketing Gas Prices as Wells Freeze - EcoWatch ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Trending
New Lawsuit Challenges Trump Admin's Failure to Update Slaughterhouse Pollution Regulations
19 December 2019
Politics
The JBS pork processing plant at the northeast corner of Worthington, Minnesota on Sept. 4, 2019. Courtney Perry / Washington Post / Getty Images
By Andrea Germanos
The Trump administration's decision not to issue upgraded regulations pertaining to pollution discharge from slaughterhouses into waterways sparked a lawsuit Wednesday from a dozen advocacy groups who say the move puts ecosystems and water supplies at risk.
<p>"By not updating these nationwide standards, EPA is rewarding dirty slaughterhouses at the expense of the public," <a href="https://earthjustice.org/news/press/2019/public-interest-groups-sue-epa-to-curb-slaughterhouse-pollution" target="_blank">said</a> Sylvia Lam, attorney with the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP).</p><p>The <a href="https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/environmental_health/pdfs/Petition-for-Review-of-EPA-Factory-Farm-Effluent-Guidelines.pdf" target="_blank">lawsuit</a>, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, was brought by <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/animal-rights" target="_self">animal rights</a>, conservation and community groups including Cape Fear River Watch, Center for Biological Diversity and The Humane Society of the United States.</p><p>At issue is the <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/epa" target="_self">EPA</a>'s decision, published in the Federal Register in October, regarding "effluent guidelines." The federal agency said revisions were "not appropriate at this time."</p><p>The groups are challenging that assessment. The regulations for slaughterhouse emissions that go directly into waterways are in sore need of an upgrade, they said. It's also problematic, the groups added, that the emissions that first head to sewage treatment plants before being released into waterways have had no guidelines.</p><p>There's ample cause for concern.</p><p>The nation has thousands of slaughterhouses, many owned by deep-pocketed agriculture giants including Smithfield Foods and Cargill. The majority of these plants, about 4,700, can legally dump processed <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wastewater" target="_self">wastewater</a> directly into waterways or into treatment plants.</p><p>An <a href="https://www.wypr.org/post/investigation-finds-75-percent-large-slaughterhouses-violate-water-pollution-limits" target="_blank">analysis</a> out last year from EIP looked at nearly 100 large meat-processing plants and found that roughly three-quarters of them exceeded their permit limits for nitrogen, fecal bacteria or other pollutants at least once in the time frame studied. The biggest culprit was the Beardstown, Illinois facility owned by JBS. That slaughterhouse dumped 1,850 pounds of nitrogen on average each day into a tributary of the Illinois River. That's the amount contained in raw sewage produced daily by a city with the population roughly the size of Evanston," the Chicago Tribune <a href="https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-met-beardstown-slaughterhouse-pollution-illinois-20181011-story.html" target="_blank">reported</a> at the time.</p><p>Despite the breadth of the problem, federal guidelines haven't changed. The last regulations for the slaughterhouses that put emissions directly into waterways came 15 years ago, the groups said.</p><p>"Some of EPA's technological requirements for slaughterhouses date from the mid-1970s," said Earthjustice attorney Alexis Andiman. "Technology has changed a lot since then, and EPA needs to catch up."</p><p>Meat processing plants, as animal rights groups noted, have adverse impacts that extend beyond the environment.</p><p>"The pace and size of today's slaughterhouses create an extremely dangerous environment, in which animals suffer and toxic waste spews into our waterways," said Stephen Wells, executive director of the Animal Legal Defense Fund, which is part of the new lawsuit.</p><p>"This contaminates water for wildlife and surrounding communities at unprecedented rates," he said. "The government must do its job to protect people, animals, and the environment — and stop serving corporate interests at our expense."</p>
<p><em>Reposted with permission from <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/12/18/protect-nations-waterways-new-lawsuit-challenges-trump-admins-failure-update?cd-origin=rss" target="_blank">Common Dreams</a>.</em></p>From Your Site Articles
- New Trump Admin Hog Slaughtering Rule 'Will Result in the Fox ... ›
- 'Dangerous Proposal': USDA Seeking to Replace Government ... ›
- Why the USDA Is Being Sued — Again - EcoWatch ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
A man and his dog walk past an H&M store in Stockholm, Sweden on March 11, 2014. Melanie Stetson Freeman / The Christian Science Monitor via Getty Images
By Ashutosh Pandey
H&M's flagship store at the Sergels Torg square in Stockholm is back in business after a months-long refurbishment. But it's not exactly business as usual here.
<p>In one corner of the store replete with plants and trees, H&M is offering some of its customers the possibility to rent rather than buy from its popular party and wedding collection — the latest bid by the budget fashion chain, which has already been <a href="https://www.dw.com/en/hm-wants-your-old-clothes/a-16630550" target="_blank">collecting used clothes at its stores,</a> to boost its environmental credentials.</p><p>The move comes as the fashion industry, <a href="https://www.dw.com/en/can-plastic-recycling-solve-the-fast-fashion-problem/a-44197074" target="_blank">especially fast-fashion companies such as H&M and Zara,</a> faces growing criticism over its carbon footprint and energy use. The industry is one of the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases and producers of global <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wastewater" target="_self">wastewater</a>.</p><p>"Today, we all can agree that <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/fast-fashion" target="_self">fast fashion</a> is not a sustainable business model. That's exactly why we want to take circularity to the next level," Pascal Brun, the head of sustainability at H&M, told DW. "The clothing rental fits perfectly with our goal. It is something we have been wanting to try for quite some time."</p>
<h2>Concept Stores</h2><p>H&M's new service is limited to a selected collection of party dresses and skirts and is available only to customers who have signed up for its loyalty program. Customers can rent garments for around 350 Swedish kronor (€33, $37) a week.</p><p>The concept store also features clothing repair services, a coffee shop and a beauty bar, where customers can get their hair, nails and makeup done.</p><p>H&M is setting up new concept stores as it seeks to boost profit amid <a href="https://www.dw.com/en/hm-sits-on-billions-of-unsold-clothes-as-profits-plummet/a-43175750" target="_blank">slowing sales and growing inventories.</a> An H&M boutique store in Berlin, which opened in October, offers yoga classes, a café and space for external brands.</p><p>"H&M is in 'test-and-learn' mode and will, in due course, look to scale one of its new concepts," RBC retail analyst Richard Chamberlain said in a note to clients.</p>
<h2>Business Viability</h2><p>The Swedish retailer plans to study the rental service over the next three months before taking it to other markets. Brun says the response so far has been "tremendous" with slots required to trial dresses for rent almost fully booked for December.</p><p>But there are some sceptics of H&M's plan, who question its business viability.</p><p>"I can't see that the kind of labor cost involved in a rental model at those price points really makes sense," Credit Suisse analyst Simon Irwin was quoted by Bloomberg as saying.</p><p>Brun says it's too early to make a call on the rental service's profitability prospects.</p><p>"We have done our business case before launching it and hopefully it will show that it's successful," Brun said and added that the company could eventually bring its rental business online.</p>
<h2>Fear of Missing Out?</h2><p>H&M's foray into clothing rentals comes at a time the retailer and other fast-fashion chains are being threatened by a mushrooming of platforms selling and renting secondhand clothes and accessories.</p><p>The secondhand apparel market, excluding clothing rentals, was valued at $24 billion in 2018 and is expected to grow to $64 billion by 2028, according to online fashion resale platform thredUP and retail analytics firm Global Data. By comparison, the fast-fashion market, which was worth $35 billion in 2018, is expected to only touch $44 billion.</p><p>H&M, which is yet to get on the resale bandwagon, owns a majority stake in a Swedish company, Sellpy, that offers a platform for people to buy and sell secondhand clothes and accessories. The Swedish retailer's U.S. rivals, Banana Republic and Urban Outfitters, have already launched clothing rental services.</p><p>"It [the growth in secondhand fashion] comes at a point of time when customers in this part of the world are being responsible and want to be able to consume differently or are being offered to consume differently," Brun said. "We are just here answering to consumer demand."</p>
<p><em>Reposted with permission from <a href="https://www.dw.com/en/hm-tests-renting-clothes-to-boost-environmental-credentials/a-51546103" target="_blank">DW</a>.</em></p>From Your Site Articles
- How to Shop Sustainably - EcoWatch ›
- Secondhand Clothing Sales Boom Is Good News for the Environment ›
Related Articles Around the Web
- Millennials renting more clothes threatens H&M, Zara, Forever 21 ... ›
- Renting clothes could be the future of fashion | World Economic Forum ›
- Could rental fashion help us become more sustainable? ›
- H&M wants a piece of the booming clothing rental market — Quartzy ›
- Is clothing rental the secret to making fashion sustainable? | The ... ›
Read More
Show Less
Biosolids are applied to fallow wheat fields to build healthy soils at Boulder Park, Washington. King County
By Sarah Wesseler
Talk of natural climate solutions typically conjures up images of lush forests or pristine wetlands. But in King County, Washington, one important natural solution comes from a less Instagram-worthy source: the toilets of Seattle.
<p>After human waste gets flushed out of sight, it's routed to a <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/wastewater" target="_self">wastewater</a> treatment plant (or, in many rural areas, to a septic tank ). At the publicly owned treatment plants, it's put through a series of mechanical, biological and/or chemical processes that separate water from the solid matter suspended within. The water then is released back into the environment. The solids left behind can be dealt with in one of three ways: incineration, burial in a landfill, or application on the land, typically in the form of agricultural fertilizer.</p><p>The first two options are extremely expensive in many parts of the country. They also have a number of drawbacks from a climate perspective: landfilled solids release <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/methane" target="_self">methane</a>, while incineration releases another powerful greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide. Land application, however, tends to be less of a burden on public finances, and has a number of mitigation and adaptation benefits.</p><p>In King County, treated human waste, also known as biosolids, plays an important part in the county's efforts to combat global warming. "Every year we provide the equivalent of taking about 8,000 cars off the road," said Cat Gowan, a biosolids project manager in the county's wastewater treatment division.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjA5OTIwNy9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY0NzUwMTc1MX0.aly32C-M0E9-oQJnVI4by5H3JifIa4sQIaQR1UCevxQ/img.jpg?width=980" id="ccfe0" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="bba3a9434a2c5b3f69ad8dc786b1d462" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
A manure spreader applies Loop to a farm field. King County
<h2>Robust Communications and Partnerships</h2><p>King County is far from alone in sending its biosolids to farms; about 55% of all treated human waste in the U.S. is added to soils. But the Seattle-area program, which began in the 1970s, is one of the nation's most ambitious. It includes research partnerships with several universities, along with robust communications efforts: the county branded its biosolids as Loop and created a standalone <a target="_blank" href="https://www.loopforyoursoil.com/">website</a> that provides in-depth information about the program.</p><p>Each day, a dozen 31-ton Loop-branded trucks deliver biosolids to farmers throughout the region. According to Doug Poole, who uses it on his crop fields, Loop costs about one-half to one-third less than chemical fertilizer.</p><p>Consisting of about 80% water, Loop is applied in a thin layer with a manure spreader. Fields typically receive applications once every few years.</p><p>Poole took over his farm from his father, who was one of the first growers to use King County biosolids; the program's longest-running research plots are located on the family's land. Poole credits Loop for raising his crop yields between 10 and 40%.</p><p>Andy Bary, a <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/soil">soil</a> scientist at Washington State University, has been studying Poole's farm since 1994. His research demonstrates that yields on plots that use biosolids are consistently equal to or higher than those using synthetic fertilizers.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjA5OTIxNC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY1MDc1MzIxOH0.DQi40vD8ZAIXtBZqc0iUYOxUX6JEdVSWLremGocLO5c/img.jpg?width=980" id="62e5a" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="1b2ca4311751b268f62d34c26f45d19d" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Comparison of wheat root systems grown with conventional fertilizer, left, and Loop, right. King County
<p>The reason? Bary says biosolids provide a broader range of plant-beneficial nutrients than farmers can typically provide through synthetic fertilizers alone. "When you're using biosolids, you're not just putting down nitrogen, which is pretty typical," he said. "You get a broad range of nutrients, the full meal deal – you're getting nitrogen, you get phosphorus, you get sulfur, you get a whole raft of micronutrients." Replicating this cocktail with chemical inputs is prohibitively expensive for most farmers, he said.</p>
<h2>Mitigation, Adaptation Benefits</h2><p>Biosolids-based yield gains have important ramifications for climate mitigation and for adaptation. Producing and applying chemical fertilizers releases carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. Preventing these emissions without jeopardizing food supplies represents a significant achievement.</p><p>Biosolids also help sequester carbon in the soil, something that's increasingly seen as a promising way to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas levels. In a 20-year <a target="_blank" href="https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/sssaj/articles/81/6/1381">study on Poole's farm</a>, Bary found a significant increase in soil organic carbon in fields where Loop had been applied compared to those where commercial fertilizer, or none at all, was used.</p><p>Soils treated with biosolids also retain more moisture, which, on the mitigation side, can reduce the need for energy-intensive irrigation and pesticides. It's another important adaptation benefit, helping farms become more resistant to drought.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMjA5OTIyNC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTY2MDg5MDM4MH0.ICVy5bImqoBrRnLvqDfgP1OyDpkEMg-EErMNZJ9mIBI/img.jpg?width=980" id="50967" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="91eeb096c4c443b0c6f9c82df182a2ac" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Documentation of rainfall infiltration and soil moisture retention in agricultural fields treated with Loop, conventional fertilizer, and no fertilizer. More infiltration and moisture retention, as seen in the Loop-treated field, has a variety of benefits, including helping plants resist drought – important from a climate adaptation perspective. King County
<p>Biosolids currently are applied to only about 1% of America's agricultural lands. According to Ned Beecher, a longtime biosolids advocate at the North East Biosolids & Residuals Association, there's simply not enough raw material available to dramatically scale up use. Nonetheless, he estimates that if all solids produced in U.S. wastewater treatment plants were applied to land rather than burned or sent to landfills, approximately 7 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions would be prevented each year. In addition, he wrote in an email, "recycling to soils benefits local economies, improves soils, reduces irrigation needs, etc. – and puts to use a material that has to be managed somehow (biosolids are not optional)."</p>
<h2>Not All Are Fans of Biosolids on Farmlands</h2><p>Still, it's no surprise that not everyone is a fan of using treated human waste on farms. The USDA's organic standards prohibit the practice, as does Switzerland. Anti-biosolids activists cite several reports of health impacts to humans and livestock, accusing EPA and other organizations of cover-ups, conspiracies and lax oversight. Detractors often describe foul odors. Some scientific studies raise concerns that land application of biosolids may spread contaminants.</p><p>In response, proponents point to what they see as decades of successful use on farms like Poole's, and to a substantial volume of studies concluding that biosolids pose little threat. "Early on, there was a lot of concern about pathogens and metal contents," said Andy Bary. But now, "through research from various universities across the nation, there's a huge amount of research showing that if you meet the pathogen reduction guidelines and the trace element reduction numbers, biosolids are very safe, if not beneficial."</p><p>In a recent <a target="_blank" href="https://wordsonwaterwef.com/2019/08/05/words-on-water-99-dr-sally-brown-on-communicating-about-biosolids/">podcast</a> produced by the nonprofit Water Environment Federation, Sally Brown, a soil scientist at the University of Washington, said that it's important to consider questions of origin and scale when discussing biosolids contamination. The chemicals most often cited as concerns – e.g., PFAS "forever chemicals" – enter the sewer from homes, where they're present in much higher concentrations than are found in biosolids, she said.</p><p>There's also a big difference between identifying a contaminant in treated waste and finding enough of it to cause harm. In one recent study, Brown's team sought to understand how much exposure to biosolids an individual would need in order to absorb one dose of pain relief medication. The result: "You would basically have to eat about 30 wet tons of biosolids to get the equivalent of two tablets," she said.</p>
<h2>Willing to Engage With Those Skeptical</h2><p>According to Cat Gowan, a willingness to engage with people who are uneasy about biosolids has helped the Loop program flourish. "Our agricultural project manager, if somebody has a concern about biosolids being applied near their home, he calls them and talks them through it, and they work out a solution," she said.</p><p>But Gowan and her colleagues put most of their outreach efforts into educating the general public, most of whom have never heard of using treated sewage as fertilizer, let alone formed strong opinions on the subject. Local gardeners who use the county's biosolids compost product, which receives an extra layer of treatment to make it safe for use in backyards and community gardens, have become particularly enthusiastic brand ambassadors.</p><p>"People are not as against it as you'd think once you explain to them how it's made," said Ashley Mihle, another King County biosolids project manager. "It's a natural process with microorganisms. It produces this thing that's so great for the soil and helps your plants grow. And if they use it, then they're sold forever."</p>
<p><em>Reposted with permission from <a href="https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2019/11/in-king-county-washington-human-waste-is-a-climate-solution/" target="_blank">Yale Climate Connections</a>.</em></p>
Read More
Show Less