The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Will Ohio Become First State to Rescind Renewable Energy Mandates?
Ohio is the latest state with utilities and elected officials trying to thwart the renewable energy industry.
The Ohio Senate's Public Utilities Committee is expected to vote on a bill this week that would make the state the first to rid itself of mandates that require an increased amount of renewable energy and energy efficiency over time, reported WKSU.org. The bill, introduced as Senate Bill (SB) 58 by committee chair Sen. Bill Seitz (R-Cincinnati) earlier this year, would rescind standards and goals established five years ago under SB 221, including powering 25 percent of the state with renewables by 2025.
The state's largest utilities, including FirstEnergy Corp., have shown support for the legislation. Though, Seitz told the Columbus Dispatch that the bill was supposed to be a five-year checkup in March, he introduced a substitute version of SB 58 in September that would "remove a requirement for utilities to buy half of their renewable power from Ohio suppliers, broaden activities that count toward energy management for large commercial and industrial power users and cap how much utilities can spend on energy-saving programs," the Cincinnati Enquirer reported.
Around the same time, The Ohio State University’s Center for Resilience estimated that SB 58 would cost the state more than $3 billion over the next dozen years.
"Projecting to 2025, we estimate that continuation of current SB 221 provisions will result in lower electricity demand, lower electricity prices, more jobs created and less [carbon dioxide] emissions compared to the modifications proposed under SB 58," Ohio State's report reads. "If SB 58 is enacted, the net effect of these differences is an electricity bill 3.9 percent higher than projected under maintaining the current SB 221 actual scenario.
"This translates into increases of $1.1 billion between 2014 and 2020 and $3.65 billion between 2014 and 2025, with average annual increases of $300 million."
Lorry Wagner, president of the Lake Erie Energy Development Corporation, said the bill could end the chances of Ohio receiving $1.6 billion in proposed wind projects. Wagner is also part of a group that introduced an amendment on last week that retains the renewable mandates.
“They have their permits. They are waiting to start construction," he said. "So if this bill is passed, $1.6 billion in capital investment will not be made in Ohio.
"So the wind industry will go operate in the other 49 states that welcome it.”
According to The Associated Press, early versions of Ohio's proposed legislation were based on models provided by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which plans to discuss legislation to get of net metering in a few weeks at its States and National Policy Summit in Washington D.C.
Visit EcoWatch’s RENEWABLES page for more related news on this topic.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
It appears Jane Fonda is good for her word. The actress and political activist said she would hold demonstrations on Capitol Hill every Friday through January to demand action on the climate crisis. Sure enough, Fonda was arrested for demonstrating a second Friday in a row Oct. 18, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Only this time, her Grace and Frankie co-star Sam Waterston joined her.
Switzerland's two Green parties made historic gains in the country's parliamentary elections Sunday, according to projections based on preliminary results reported by The New York Times.
By Jeff Turrentine
The coal industry is dying. But we can't allow the communities that have been dependent on coal to die along with it.
By David R. Montgomery
Would it sound too good to be true if I was to say that there was a simple, profitable and underused agricultural method to help feed everybody, cool the planet, and revitalize rural America? I used to think so, until I started visiting farmers who are restoring fertility to their land, stashing a lot of carbon in their soil, and returning healthy profitability to family farms. Now I've come to see how restoring soil health would prove as good for farmers and rural economies as it would for the environment.