The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
A new report released by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory finds that wind farms do not, in fact, affect the property values of nearby homes. This 2013 study builds upon similar research conducted in 2009 and 2011 and various other studies that have focused on the subject.
To support their findings, the researchers considered nearly every single residential property sale within 10 miles of a wind farm (or site of a future wind farm) in the U.S. from 1996 to 2011 (and 2001—2012 in New York). To get the most accurate analysis, they used qualifier metrics to winnow the data to roughly 51,000 property sales in 27 counties in nine states, in proximity to 67 different wind facilities, sized anywhere from one to 150 turbines. In addition, they gathered specific data on the characteristics of the homes (square footage, year built, parcel size, etc.) and data on the characteristics of the wind facilities (number of turbines, potential amount of power generated, etc.).
After compiling and analyzing reams of data sets, the researchers found that there is no statistically significant difference in property values between close-to-turbine properties (within 0.5 mile and one mile) and more distant properties (3—10 miles away) in any phase of the project, whether it’s the pre-announcement phase; the post-announcement, pre-construction phase; or the post-construction phase.
These findings were compared to control groups of homes that sold prior to the wind facilities’ announcement and which were located three to 10 miles away from where the turbines were eventually located, homes five to 10 miles away, and homes sold more than two years before the facilities’ announcements.
In short, these two sentences from the report sum up its findings:
Across all model specifications, we find no statistical evidence that home prices near wind turbines were affected [...] There is no statistical evidence that homes in either the PAPC [post-announcement, pre-construction] or PC [post-construction] periods that sold near turbines (i.e., within a mile or even a half mile) did so for less than similar homes that sold between three and 10 away miles in the same period.
The extensiveness of the research in this report is important; had the study been just a simplistic analysis that ignores market factors such as size and age of home, it may have lead to the conclusion that wind turbine proximity decreases home value. Luckily, the research team that produced this report seems to have dotted all their “i”s and crossed all their “t”s.
As with any credible scientific research, there is a margin of error that is acknowledged and the researchers say that if property price effects do exist, it is because “either the average impacts are relatively small (within the margin of error in the models) and/or sporadic (impacting only a small subset of homes).” The margins of error in this study–which are necessary to keep the results statistically significant–were within five percent for homes within one mile of a wind site and within nine percent for homes within a half mile.
I think this report is of particular interest here on the coast, where offshore wind farms may face opposition from beachfront home owners concerned with their high-dollar property values. While the study does not analyze any offshore wind farms, it seems reasonable to extend its findings to be able to reassure coastal residents that property value effects needn’t be one more obstacle to building these job-creating, pollution-free energy sources.
Visit EcoWatch’s RENEWABLES page for more related news on this topic.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Dan Gray
- Research shows that 16 weeks of a vegan diet can boost the gut microbiome, helping with weight loss and overall health.
- A healthy microbiome is a diverse microbiome. A plant-based diet is the best way to achieve this.
- It isn't necessary to opt for a strictly vegan diet, but it's beneficial to limit meat intake.
New research shows that following a vegan diet for about 4 months can boost your gut microbiome. In turn, that can lead to improvements in body weight and blood sugar management.
By Jeff Turrentine
Nearly 20 years have passed since the journalist Malcolm Gladwell popularized the term tipping point, in his best-selling book of the same name. The phrase denotes the moment that a certain idea, behavior, or practice catches on exponentially and gains widespread currency throughout a culture. Having transcended its roots in sociological theory, the tipping point is now part of our everyday vernacular. We use it in scientific contexts to describe, for instance, the climatological point of no return that we'll hit if we allow average global temperatures to rise more than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. But we also use it to describe everything from resistance movements to the disenchantment of hockey fans when their team is on a losing streak.
By Mark Mancini
On Aug. 18, Iceland held a funeral for the first glacier lost to climate change. The deceased party was Okjökull, a historic body of ice that covered 14.6 square miles (38 square kilometers) in the Icelandic Highlands at the turn of the 20th century. But its glory days are long gone. In 2014, having dwindled to less than 1/15 its former size, Okjökull lost its status as an official glacier.
By Alex Schwartz
Among the many vendors at the Logan Square Farmers Market on Aug. 18 sat three young people peddling neither organic vegetables, gourmet cheese nor handmade crafts. Instead, they offered liberation from capitalism.
I’m a Psychotherapist – Here’s What I’ve Learned From Listening to Children Talk About Climate Change
By Caroline Hickman
Eco-anxiety is likely to affect more and more people as the climate destabilizes. Already, studies have found that 45 percent of children suffer lasting depression after surviving extreme weather and natural disasters. Some of that emotional turmoil must stem from confusion — why aren't adults doing more to stop climate change?