Quantcast

Will the Colorado River Get Fracked?

Energy

Gary Wockner

Two months ago a story started ‘leaking’ out of Western Colorado about a fracked-gas pipeline break—loaded with cancer-causing benzene—with fluids heading toward and eventually into Parachute Creek which is a tributary to the Colorado River. As water wells close to the Creek started testing positive for benzene, and then as the Creek itself tested positive for benzene above drinking water standards, the news media started telling a story of how the Colorado River—a drinking water source for 35 million people across the Southwest U.S.—was threatened. As of this writing the leak is still not cleaned up and the creek is still testing positive for benzene.

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock

This one leak may be the tip of the iceberg for fracking impacts in the Colorado River basin.

Across the Colorado River basin in Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico, Utah and in Southern California, a huge boom in natural gas and oil exploration and drilling—all using the extremely dangerous and controversial extraction method of fracking—is taking place that is increasingly imperiling water resources. Fracking has these impacts on water resources:

  1. Fracking uses enormous amounts of water.
  2. Fracking uses cancer-causing chemicals.
  3. “Spills and releases” of drilling and fracking fluids on the ground are commonplace during the drilling and fracking stage of each well.
  4. Unless wells are drilled and fracked properly, chemicals can leak into surrounding groundwater. Even when wells are drilled and fracked to the highest standards, there’s no guarantee that cement casings around wells can’t break and leak over time.
  5. After the drilling and fracking process, there’s no guarantee that fluids injected into the well can’t migrate up into groundwater through geological fissures and cracks.
  6. Millions of gallons of waste products from each fracked well are so badly poisoned with cancer-causing chemicals that the water is never purified and returned to rivers and streams, and instead is usually injected into even deeper aquifers and wells where government regulating agencies hope it stays forever.

More than a hundred thousand active oil and gas wells in the Colorado River already exist, and approximately a hundred thousand new wells—all to be fracked—are proposed. Many of these existing wells are near streams that connect to the Colorado River and some are right beside the Colorado River, and all of the proposed wells are in the same locations. Billions of gallons of toxic water and waste products have already been injected into deep disposal wells across the Colorado River basin every year, and billions more are proposed. Cancer-causing fracking chemicals are sometimes stored in tanks and open pits on the surface right beside rivers, including the Colorado River.

Here’s a quick summary of drilling and fracking activity in the Colorado River basin:

Wyoming: Wyoming has thousands of oil and gas wells in and around the Colorado River headwaters of the Green River, and is planning for thousands more. Wyoming is home to one of the most famous and controversial cases of groundwater contamination due to fracking and drilling, in Pavillion in the southwestern part of the state, and is also known to have worse drilling-related air quality than Los Angeles. Drilling has decimated the landscape in the Green River valley, seriously impacting water runoff and wildlife habitat.

Colorado: Colorado’s growing population has already stretched water supplies thin, but fracking is on track to help drain the last legally allowed drops of water out of the Colorado River’s headwaters. Colorado currently has more than 40,000 active oil and gas wells, and is planning for up to 100,000—although many of those are on the Front Range, Colorado River water is piped under and across the Continental Divide to serve those wells, as well as to serve the thousands of wells in the Western part of the state in the Colorado River basin. About 60 percent of all waste is injected into deep disposal wells, and thousands of “spills and releases” have impacted groundwater and surface water throughout the state. Two Colorado cities have banned fracking and over a dozen have placed a moratorium on fracking.

Utah: All of the same drilling and fracking chaos in Colorado and Wyoming has also occurred in Utah which has been on a “fracking frenzy,” with plans for thousands of more wells, many in the Colorado River basin, and some near and right beside the Colorado River on vast swaths of publicly owned land. Some of the ground-breaking science around climate-change causing methane leakage has occurred in Utah which currently has 11,000 producing oil and gas wells statewide.

New Mexico: New Mexico has more than 50,000 oil and gas wells and is drilling about 1,500 new wells per year, most of them fracked and the majority of which are in the Colorado River basin in northwest New Mexico. Industry spokespeople say New Mexico is in the “early stage of the shale play” as new hydraulic fracking technology has opened up hundreds of thousands of acres of public land for exploration and drilling. Of note, a bill was just killed in the state legislature to ban fracking, and Mora County New Mexico just recently passed a ban on fracking.

Nevada: Almost all of Nevada is outside of the Colorado River basin and there’s currently only about 1,000 active oil and gas wells in the state, so fracking is not a huge issue for Nevada as it relates to the Colorado River. However in the northern part of the state, fracking proposals are moving forward, and because Nevada is a very parched state with internal water wars between Las Vegas and areas to the north, it is unpredictable how fracking could play out.

Arizona: There are very few active oil and gas wells in Arizona, almost no new prospecting, and virtually no fracking at this time.

California: California’s current and future fracking potential is huge with more than 50,000 active oil and gas wells (mostly oil) and potential for “major shale oil plays” in the Monterey Shale adding up to 28,000 new wells. Where the water will come from to frack these wells is a big question that activists and academics are already grappling with. The state legislature is considering bills to put a statewide moratorium on fracking, and environmental groups are girding for a large-scale battle. Colorado River water supplies—which are used by all of Southern California’s cities and millions of acres of farmland—will surely be used if and when California moves forward with massive fracking.

Northern Mexico: The Colorado River serves water to the Mexicali region and to northern Baja, Mexico. At this time there is no current or proposed fracking in these regions of Mexico.

So, there’s two big take-home messages from all of this, with water quantity and water quality.

Water quantity: Over the next few decades we may see 100,000 new fracked wells in the Colorado River basin or in areas like California and the Front Range of Colorado that are dependent on Colorado River water. With an estimate of up to 4 million gallons of water per well, those new frack jobs would require 400 billion gallons of water. In an average year, the total flow in the entire Colorado River system is more than ten times greater, about 5 trillion gallons of water. But more importantly, given that all of the Colorado River’s water is already allocated—the river is drained completely dry before it reaches the Gulf of California, all 5 trillion gallons diverted out—the only way large-scale fracking is going to take place is if some city or farmer that already owns Colorado River water sells their water for fracking. Stated differently, fracking is a new and additional water requirement in a system where there’s no water left, and frackers can afford pay practically any price for water and outbid cities or farms when water is for sale.

Water quality: Waste disposal and water pollution are also serious concerns, as depicted by the harbinger in Parachute Creek. With up to two hundred thousand wells, tens-of-thousands of miles of pipes, hundreds of compressor stations and dozens of large-scale processing and refining plants all in Colorado River basin, the chances of spills and accidents are increasing. Disposing of hundreds of billions of gallons of toxic waste in deep injection wells creates unknown risks too—in many ways, the disposal of fracking wastes is much like the disposal of nuclear wastes where government regulators are putting the cancer-causing waste slurry deep underground and hoping it stays there forever. Could just one of these accidents create a large-scale disaster?

When benzene was detected in Parachute Creek about four miles from where the Creek flows into the Colorado River, a spokesperson for the State of Colorado said it was “not a concern” because the increased flow in the Colorado River would dilute the benzene and make the Colorado River water safe to drink. Local citizens were not convinced and complained loudly in the media, and a downstream town on the Colorado River started testing their water for benzene which is extremely difficult to remove from groundwater once the pollution has occurred.

The Colorado River is a very thin lifeline stretching nearly 1,500 miles from Denver to San Diego uniting the entire Southwest U.S.—city, farmer and fracker alike—with one single strand of flowing water. Everything that happens on the landscape across seven states and northern Mexico eventually flows into the Colorado River, and every drop of the Colorado River eventually flows into a city faucet or a farm.

Can we really afford to let the Colorado River get fracked?

Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.

——–

Sign the petition today, telling President Obama to enact an immediate fracking moratorium:

 

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

By Sabrina Kessler

Far-reaching allegations about how a climate-sinning American multinational could shamelessly lie to the public about its wrongdoing mobilized a small group of New York students on a cold November morning. They stood in front of New York's Supreme Court last week to follow the unprecedented lawsuit against ExxonMobil.

Read More Show Less

By Alex Robinson

Leah Garcés used to hate poultry farmers.

The animal rights activist, who opposes factory farming, had an adversarial relationship with chicken farmers until around five years ago, when she sat down to listen to one. She met a poultry farmer called Craig Watts in rural North Carolina and learned that the problems stemming from factory farming extended beyond animal cruelty.

Read More Show Less
Sponsored
People navigate snow-covered sidewalks in the Humboldt Park neighborhood on Nov. 11 in Chicago. Scott Olson / Getty Images

Temperatures plunged rapidly across the U.S. this week and around 70 percent of the population is expected to experience temperatures around freezing Wednesday.

Read More Show Less
A general view of the flooded St. Mark's Square after an exceptional overnight "Alta Acqua" high tide water level, on Nov. 13 in Venice. MARCO BERTORELLO / AFP / Getty Images

Two people have died as Venice has been inundated by the worst flooding it has seen in more than 50 years, The Guardian reported Wednesday.

Read More Show Less
Supply boats beside Aberdeen Wind Farm on Aug. 4, 2018. Rab / CC BY 2.0

President Donald Trump doesn't like wind turbines.

In April, he claimed they caused cancer, and he sued to stop an offshore wind farm that was scheduled to go up near land he had purchased for a golf course in Aberdeenshire in Scotland. He lost that fight, and now the Trump Organization has agreed to pay the Scottish government $290,000 to cover its legal fees, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.

Read More Show Less
Sponsored
A verdant and productive urban garden in Havana. Susanne Bollinger / Wikimedia Commons

By Paul Brown

When countries run short of food, they need to find solutions fast, and one answer can be urban farming.

Read More Show Less
Trevor Noah appears on set during a taping of "The Daily Show with Trevor Noah" in New York on Nov. 26, 2018. The Daily Show With Trevor Noah / YouTube screenshot

By Lakshmi Magon

This year, three studies showed that humor is useful for engaging the public about climate change. The studies, published in The Journal of Science Communication, Comedy Studies and Science Communication, added to the growing wave of scientists, entertainers and politicians who agree.

Read More Show Less
rhodesj / Flickr / CC BY 2.0

Cities around the country are considering following the lead of Berkeley, California, which became the first city to ban the installation of natural gas lines in new homes this summer.

Read More Show Less