The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Will Gov. Kasich Institute Tighter Regulations on Fracking?
By Dan Moulthrop
Last week, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) released a long anticipated report linking the use of a certain injection well in Youngstown with the eleven earthquakes residents of the Mahoning valley experienced in 2011. If you haven't been paying attention to fracking, that news ought to have been a wake up call. If you have been, you probably know the other shoe is about to drop on this, too.
The other shoe that's about to drop isn't next week's online forum here at The Civic Commons. That's kind of a big deal, though, and we are excited to be partnering with WKYC and The Vindicator to get the word out and invite as many citizens as possible to join representatives of the public sector, private sector nonprofit and government in an open, civil, transparent, solutions focused conversation from March 19-21.
The news from ODNR last week was important, though to people who had been watching this unfold, it was hardly surprising, particularly from the vantage point of the Mahoning Valley, where residents have been insisting for a year or so that the earthquakes were related to the natural gas industry. I used the word "related" because the quakes aren't directly caused by the fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, drilling method. It's kind of surprising, given that the process is designed to break up rock formations. The earthquakes are likely linked to a widely used disposal method of disposing for a fracking byproduct—the injection well. Used fracking fluid, or brine, is injected at high pressure deep underground. It kind of reminds me of the hypothetical idea of carbon sequestration. It also reminds me of that notion you hear from sustainability advocates—you can't throw anything away...there is no "away."
So what's this other shoe that is going to fall? Ohio Gov. John Kasich is dropping it, and he has been dropping hints for a few weeks now. He seems to be staking out some territory unfamiliar to many in the GOP—a policy platform that includes tighter environmental regulations and higher taxes on a burgeoning industry. I blogged about this back in January, and people I know on the Left cynically told me they believed it was just lip service. I remain optimistic. The governor is obviously pro-business, but he's also rabidly pro-Ohio, and I believe he wants to look out for the state and the environment we share. I'm sure his efforts in this regard won't measure up to everyone's standards, but I see this as a potentially very important moment of a GOP leader redefining what Republican values can be.
On top of all of this, most people who are paying attention believe the development of shale gas could be one of the biggest economic boons to Ohio in a long time. And like a lot of economic benefits, it comes with trade-offs. We don't have to guess what they are. There's a lot of information available to you here at the Commons, including this podcast.
But the real reason we don't have to guess about the trade offs is that we can look across our eastern border, to Pennsylvania, where shale gas exploration began in earnest a few years ago. Some of the stuff you don't want—boomtowns, EPA investigations—it's all happening there and in other states. So maybe we can avoid it in Ohio.
From March 19-21, leaders, policy makers and others will join in a three day online discussion focused on finding a way to develop Ohio's shale gas resources in a way that maximizes economic benefit for Ohioans and minimizes environmental threats. I will moderate, and everyone in the community is invited to offer their questions, concerns and comments.
- Brad Whitehead, The Fund for our Economic Future
- Karl Henkel, The Youngstown Vindicator
- Jeffrey Dick, Youngstown State
- Stefanie Spear, EcoWatch
- Mike Foley, State Represenative (D-14)
- Dave Crandall, Fairmount Minerals
- Heidi Hetzel Evans, Ohio Department of Natural Resources
- Others to be announced
Last New Year's Eve Youngstown rocked like an earthquake hit it. Because, well, it did. Since then there's been a lot of loaded questions about drilling for oil and natural gas bounced around by politicians, environmentalists, oil and gas industry reps and anyone who felt the earth move under their feet. How come? Why here? Whose fault?
Listen to the podcast below and join Dan Moulthrop and Noelle Celeste from the Civic Commons as they travel to the Mahoning Valley to peer down the hole issue.
For more information, click here.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Zak Smith
It is pretty amazing that in this moment when the COVID-19 outbreak has much of the country holed up in their homes binging Netflix, the most watched show in America over the last few weeks has been focused on wildlife trade — which scientists believe is the source of the COVID-19 pandemic. Make no mistake: Tiger King: Murder, Mayhem and Madness is about wildlife trade and other aspects of wildlife exploitation, just as surely as the appearance of Ebola, SARS, MERS, avian flu and probably COVID-19 in humans is a result of wildlife exploitation. As a conservationist, this is one of the things I've been thinking about while watching Tiger King. Here are five more:
By Hector Chapa
With the coronavirus pandemic quickly spreading, U.S. health officials have changed their advice on face masks and now recommend people wear cloth masks in public areas where social distancing can be difficult, such as grocery stores.
But can these masks be effective?
By Carey Gillam
Bayer AG is reneging on negotiated settlements with several U.S. law firms representing thousands of plaintiffs who claim exposure to Monsanto's Roundup herbicides caused them to develop non-Hodgkin lymphoma, sources involved in the litigation said on Friday.
With many schools now closed due to the current COVID-19 outbreak, you may be looking for activities to keep your children active, engaged, and entertained.
Although numerous activities can keep kids busy, cooking is one of the best choices, as it's both fun and educational.
Germany's target for renewable energy sources to deliver 65% of its consumed electricity by 2030 seemed on track Wednesday, with 52% of electricity coming from renewables in 2020's first quarter. Renewable energy advocates, however, warned the trend is imperiled by slowdowns in building new wind and solar plants.