The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Which Financial Funds Actually Consider Climate Change Risks?
Photo courtesy of Shutterstock
Is your pension fund or insurance company a leader or laggard when it comes to avoiding risky bets on the future impacts of climate change?
A new survey released today finds that many major institutional investors, like retirement funds and insurance companies, are putting their investments (read: your money) at risk by not addressing the negative financial impacts posed by climate change and atmospheric disruption.
The survey, called the Global Climate Investment Risk, is based on data acquired from 460 funds who were invited to provide data, from members of those funds and using publicly available information. Each fund is rated from AAA to X based on investment mix and recognition of the financial risks that climate change will have now and in the future.
Conducted by the Asset Owners Disclosure Project (AODP), the survey concludes that of the 460 funds, only five received a AAA rating, while 173 funds are rated "X."
"While we can see some leaders emerging, many haven't acknowledged their dangerous and foolhardy addiction to investments riddled with climate risk, let alone checked themselves into rehab," says Julian Poulter, Executive Director of AODP.
Sharan Burrow, AODP board member and General Secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation said:
It's pretty clear through the Index that the big laggard funds continue to be too scared to take on big fossil fuel companies, even though they know there are enormous risks through continuing investing in them.
A majority of the world's investment industry are clearly acting contrary to the interests of those whose money they represent - this is an outrageous situation. It must be remembered that much of the money being held by these organizations is the product of workers' lifelong savings.
Here are the 10 best funds that are actively addressing the financial risks of climate change on behalf of their members:
1. Environment Agency Active Pension Fund (UK)
2. Local Government Super (Australian pension fund)
3. CalPERS (US pension fund)
4. Stichting Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW/PGGM) (Dutch pension fund)
5. VicSuper (Australian pension fund)
6. AustralianSuper (pension fund)
7. Government Employees Pension Fund (South Africa)
8. Florida Retirement System Pension Plan
9. BT Super for Life (Australia pension fund)
10. Aviva (UK insurance company)
There are too many "X-rated" companies to list here, you can find a complete list on the AODP website.
So where is your money in this mix?
Visit EcoWatch’s CLIMATE CHANGE page for more related news on this topic.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Ketura Persellin
Global consumption of beef, lamb and goat is expected to rise by almost 90 percent between 2010 and 2050. But that doesn't mean you need to eat more meat. In fact, recent news from Washington gives you even less confidence in your meat: Pork inspections may be taken over by the industry itself, if a Trump administration proposal goes into effect, putting tests for deadly pathogens into the hands of line workers.
‘Companies Should Not Be Allowed to Use Hazardous Ingredients in Products People Use’: Michelle Pfeiffer Speaks Up for Safer Cosmetics
The beauty products we put on our skin can have important consequences for our health. Just this March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned that some Claire's cosmetics had tested positive for asbestos. But the FDA could only issue a warning, not a recall, because current law does not empower the agency to do so.
Michelle Pfeiffer wants to change that.
The actress and Environmental Working Group (EWG) board member was spotted on Capitol Hill Thursday lobbying lawmakers on behalf of a bill that would increase oversight of the cosmetics industry, The Washington Post reported.
By Julia Conley
Scientists at the United Nations' intergovernmental body focusing on biodiversity sounded alarms earlier this month with its report on the looming potential extinction of one million species — but few heard their calls, according to a German newspaper report.