The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Watch Colbert Shame GOP Climate Deniers: 'I am Not a Scientist'
A favorite meme among climate denier politicians these days is "I'm not a scientist but ..." Usually, the "but" is their escape hatch to say they don't have to believe what scientists are saying about climate change.
And with their election victories Tuesday and takeover of the Senate, putting James Inhofe, author of The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future, in charge of the Senate Environment Committee, we're going to be hearing that line a lot more.
Stephen Colbert shows a video montage of Republican leaders mouthing those words, commenting to appreciative applause from his audience, "Yes, everyone who denies manmade climate change has the same stirring message: we don't know what the f**k we're talking about."
He added, "I hope that these conservative leaders can inspire all the children out there watching to think to themselves, 'Hey, maybe someday I can grow up to be not a scientist.'"
He then performed his "not a scientist" demonstration of the impacts of rising sea levels by pouring colored water over a map of the U.S., saying, "Remember, kids, if you get unhooked on science early maybe some day you could completely lack any understanding of science and then grow up to be chairman of the Senate Environment Committee!"
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Colorado senator and 2020 hopeful Michael Bennet introduced his plan to combat climate change Monday, in the first major policy rollout of his campaign. Bennet's plan calls for the establishment of a "Climate Bank," using $1 trillion in federal spending to "catalyze" $10 trillion in private spending for the U.S. to transition entirely to net-zero emissions by 2050.
When Trump's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its replacement for the Obama-era Clean Power Plan in August 2018, its own estimates said the reduced regulations could lead to 1,400 early deaths a year from air pollution by 2030.
Now, the EPA wants to change the way it calculates the risks posed by particulate matter pollution, using a model that would lower the death toll from the new plan, The New York Times reported Monday. Five current or former EPA officials familiar with the plan told The Times that the new method would assume there is no significant health gain by lowering air pollution levels below the legal limit. However, many public health experts say that there is no safe level of particulate matter exposure, which has long been linked to heart and lung disease.
By Andrea Germanos
Animal welfare advocates are praising soon-to-be introduced legislation in the U.S. that would ban the use of wild animals in traveling circuses.
By Tara Lohan
It's been the wettest 12 months on record in the continental United States. Parts of the High Plains and Midwest are still reeling from deadly, destructive and expensive spring floods — some of which have lasted for three months.
Mounting bills from natural disasters like these have prompted renewed calls to reform the National Flood Insurance Program, which is managed by Federal Emergency Management Agency and is now $20 billion in debt.