The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Hundreds of scientists gathered in Boston's Copley Square on Sunday to "stand up for science," marking the latest protest in a wave of outspoken political engagement from scientists in reaction to the Trump administration.
The rally, timed to coincide with the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Boston, brought together concerned scientists and activists from across the country.
While the event's organizers did not explicitly call out Trump, the signs protesters toted highlighted a larger concern for science's future. As Chris Mooney wrote in the Washington Post, "The challenges for scientists during the Trump administration could not only be bigger, but also potentially more diverse, than those seen during George W. Bush's administration."
Geoffrey Supran, a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies renewable energy solutions to climate change, told the AP, scientists are responding to the Trump administration's "anti-science rhetoric."
"We're really trying to send a message today to Mr. Trump that America runs on science, science is the backbone of our prosperity and progress," Supran said.
For a deeper dive:
Commentary: Washington Post, Chris Mooney analysis
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Many people don't begin worrying about their cholesterol levels until later in life, but that may be increasing their odds of heart problems in the long term.
Nestlé cannot claim that its Ice Mountain bottled water brand is an essential public service, according to Michigan's second highest court, which delivered a legal blow to the food and beverage giant in a unanimous decision.
A number of supermarkets across the country have voluntarily issued a recall on sushi, salads and spring rolls distributed by Fuji Food Products due to a possible listeria contamination, as CBS News reported.
If you read a lot of news about the climate crisis, you probably have encountered lots of numbers: We can save hundreds of millions of people from poverty by 2050 by limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, but policies currently in place put us on track for a more than three degree increase; sea levels could rise three feet by 2100 if emissions aren't reduced.