Trump Admin Rejects CDC Reopening Guidelines
The Trump administration has buried guidelines from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) detailing how to safely reopen the U.S. economy as the country continues to navigate the coronavirus pandemic.
The 17-page "Guidance for Implementing the Opening Up America Again Framework" was supposed to be published last Friday, but agency scientists were told it would "never see the light of day," an anonymous CDC official told The Associated Press. The move continues the administration's pattern of hostility towards government scientists, a pattern that predates the pandemic and has been especially noted in relation to the climate crisis.
"Why are scientists & CDC always being muzzled???" Harvard public health scientist Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding asked on Twitter.
⚠️EXPLOSIVE: 17-page CDC guide to reopening the country "has been shelved by Trump administration... but CDC scient… https://t.co/Hd6AViA93N— Eric Feigl-Ding (@Eric Feigl-Ding)1588854808.0
In this case, the administration was concerned that the guidelines were too restrictive, would infringe on religious freedom and would harm the economy, The New York Times explained.
The document issued detailed reopening guidelines for childcare programs, schools and day camps, religious communities, employers with vulnerable workers, restaurants and bars and public transportation, according to CNN.
The White House coronavirus task force had originally requested the document from the CDC, but ended up deciding it was "overly prescriptive" as a document for the whole country, an administration official told CNN.
"[G]uidance in rural Tennessee shouldn't be the same guidance for urban New York City," the official said.
But task force coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx told CNN she had gotten revisions on the guidelines back from CDC and was working on them "to really make sure that both the American people, as well as public health officials, understand the guidelines."
There have been mixed reports of Birx's opinion of the guidelines. One anonymous senior administration official told The New York Times she mistrusted the data, while a federal official who supports the guidelines said she was in favor of publishing them.
There were also concerns expressed internally about the guidelines' impact on religious services and the economy. The CDC recommended, for example, that churches require members to wear face coverings inside the building and suspend musical or choral performances. But some officials thought those recommendations violated religious freedoms.
"Governments have a duty to instruct the public on how to stay safe during this crisis and can absolutely do so without dictating to people how they should worship God," Roger Severino, the director of the Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Civil Rights and the former head of the DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at the Heritage Foundation, said, according to The New York Times.
But a draft of the guidelines makes clear that the religious recommendations are "not intended to infringe on First Amendment rights as provided in the U.S. Constitution," and that faith communities are free to choose to follow them or not.
The guidelines were also caught in the crossfire of an ongoing administration debate about how many restrictions to maintain as the economy reopens, an anonymous CDC official told CNN.
"The CDC, the White House task force and White House principles were in disagreement on how strongly a public health response should still be in place," said the official.
Officials at the Department of Labor argued that some of the recommendations to businesses were too strict and could expose them to lawsuits if workers got sick or died from COVID-19.
President Donald Trump has also said he wants to return the country to "what it was three months ago."
However, some public health experts said the guidelines could have been helpful for states trying to navigate reopening requirements. For example, the guidelines stated restaurants should place tables six feet apart and use phone apps to alert customers when their tables are ready.
"States and local health departments do need guidance on a lot of the challenges around the decision to reopen," Dr. Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, told The Associated Press. "You can say that restaurants can open and you need to follow social distancing guidelines. But restaurants want to know, 'What does that look like?'"
Ultimately, the rejected guidelines highlight how the CDC has been sidelined in the government's response to the new coronavirus.
"CDC has always been the public health agency Americans turn to in a time of crisis," Dr. Howard Koh, a Harvard professor who served as a health official in the Obama administration during the 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic, told The Associated Press. "The standard in a crisis is to turn to them for the latest data and latest guidance and the latest press briefing. That has not occurred, and everyone sees that."
- Coronavirus and the Terrifying Muzzling of Public Health Experts ... ›
- As CDC Says 'Do Not Go to Work,' Trump Says Thousands With ... ›
- CDC Recommends Big Changes to Office Life - EcoWatch ›
- COVID-19: What Experts Think About Reopening Schools - EcoWatch ›
- Trump Orders Hospitals to Stop Sending COVID-19 Data to CDC - EcoWatch ›
- Trump Orders Hospitals to Stop Sending COVID-19 Data to CDC - EcoWatch ›
- CDC Data Disappearance Sparks Outcry, Forces HHS to Reverse Course - EcoWatch ›
- Trump and FDA Misrepresent Data as They Tout Blood Plasma Treatment - EcoWatch ›
- Trump Denies CDC Director's 2021 Timeline for Coronavirus Vaccine - EcoWatch ›
By Brett Wilkins
With President Donald Trump's re-election very much in doubt, his administration is rushing to ram through regulatory rollbacks that could adversely affect millions of Americans, the environment, and the ability of Joe Biden—should he win—to pursue his agenda or even undo the damage done over the past four years.
<div id="04704" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="89d490c741c2b7d2f95200298145c69b"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1317147432002703361" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">JUST POSTED: Facing the prospect that President Trump could lose his re-election bid, his cabinet is scrambling to… https://t.co/hy6L5aOtdv</div> — Eric Lipton (@Eric Lipton)<a href="https://twitter.com/EricLiptonNYT/statuses/1317147432002703361">1602867393.0</a></blockquote></div>
<div id="4f924" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="189304aaf1a15ae9bfdda6698bfb975b"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1317167529362599938" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">I think people underestimate the amount of time and energy that is going to be needed just to climb out from under… https://t.co/FxEMRcMv1E</div> — Matthew Gertz (@Matthew Gertz)<a href="https://twitter.com/MattGertz/statuses/1317167529362599938">1602872185.0</a></blockquote></div><p>Many of the changes reflect the agendas of the powerful corporate and other business interests whose key players have donated generously to Trump, belying the president's oft-repeated claim that he is "draining the swamp." Other regulator rollbacks come despite <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/epas-scientific-advisers-warn-its-regulatory-rollbacks-clash-with-established-science/2019/12/31/a1994f5a-227b-11ea-a153-dce4b94e4249_story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">warnings</a> from career officials within federal agencies about the harm they could cause. </p>
<div id="2e10f" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="f42c16794ddc25dcf8bf54a443854416"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1212091176091869184" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">EPA’s scientific advisers warn its regulatory rollbacks clash with established science https://t.co/RBdUsNvNEy</div> — Carl Zimmer (@Carl Zimmer)<a href="https://twitter.com/carlzimmer/statuses/1212091176091869184">1577820030.0</a></blockquote></div><p>Alarmed by the administration's rushed rate of regulatory rollbacks, a group of over 15 Democratic senators earlier this month sent a letter to Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia warning of "profound economic implications" for some 143 million U.S. workers that would result from curtailing public comment periods for the <a href="https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/flsa/2020-independent-contractor-nprm" target="_blank">proposed rule change</a> regarding independent contractors.</p><p>"Workers across the country deserve a chance to fully examine and properly respond to these potentially radical changes, and a 30-day comment period is not nearly enough," the letter states. </p>
- Trump's Hand-Picked Scientists Rebuke EPA Rollbacks - EcoWatch ›
- Trump Announces Final Rollback of Law That Gives Communities a ... ›
- New Report Details Dozens of Trump Rollbacks During Pandemic ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
New York is finally bagging plastic bags.
The statewide ban on the highly polluting items actually went into effect March 1. But enforcement, which was supposed to start a month later, was delayed by the one-two punch of a lawsuit and the coronavirus pandemic, NY1 reported. Now, more than six months later, enforcement is set to begin Monday.
- Plastic Bag Bans Put on Hold Amid Coronavirus Fears - EcoWatch ›
- New York's Plastic Bag Ban Begins - EcoWatch ›
- New York Becomes Second State to Ban Plastic Bags ›
Nobody should have to live with pain. Since many prescription painkillers are both addictive and dangerous, more people are turning to CBD as a natural means of relief. If you're new to CBD, our guide to the best CBD oils for pain will help you find the brand that's right for you.
North Carolina's Outer Banks are dotted with vacation beaches and historic communities. But the sweeping water views do not only draw tourists. They give locals a front row seat to sea-level rise.
By Priyanka Jaisinghani
COVID-19, "stay-at-home" orders and enforced physical distancing has made us more dependent on digital when it comes to connection and communication at both a local and global level.
Civic Engagement Redefined<p>Long-lasting impact requires changes from the bottom up. Civic engagement means working to make a difference in our communities to promote quality of life in a community, through both political and non-political processes.</p><p>We're seeing how, across multiple issues, young people are becoming active participants in driving dialogues with policy-makers, on a state and federal level. In addition, they are empowering the citizens of the communities in which they reside, taking an active role in shaping the future we hold.</p>
1. Racial Justice<p>Across the U.S., we saw the rise of the racial justice movement through Black Lives Matter. Hundreds of protestors came to the streets, from New York to Nevada, acknowledging, supporting and condemning the long-existing inequalities faced by the black community. We saw this movement propel beyond the streets, throughout social media, and to the polling stations.</p><p>Young activists were demanding not only awareness but also change. In this digital space, young people started sharing resources and information for others to educate themselves about the pressing need for racial justice. They were able to mobilize support to inform, educate and shape citizen action. They shared links to petitions, offered advice for safe protesting practices, created templates for emailing authorities, listed bail funds and black-owned restaurants and businesses in need of support. They used social media to support the various needs of this movement – and continue to do so.</p>
2. Climate Change<p>The youth-led climate change has become dominant online. Every Friday, young people lead a digital #ClimateStrike to raise awareness of important legislative initiatives and create tangible ways for individuals to get involved in the fight against climate change.</p><p>As a leading example, to commemorate this year's Earth Day, youth held a 72-hour, live-streamed "digital march" with protests, speeches, and more. This "digital march" was attended by more than 200,000 viewers. Young people are pivoting their strategies and applying them to a digital space. We know when the streets are safe again, they will continue their activism by marching to raise awareness both on the streets and digitally.</p>
3. Voting Rights<p>Voting is another pertinent issue coming to the fore. In <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/315761/lack-voting-information-hamper-youth-turnout.aspx" target="_blank">a Gallup poll</a>, four out of five (79%) young people say "the coronavirus pandemic has helped them realize how much political leaders' decisions impact their lives"; three in five say "they are part of a movement that will vote to express its views."</p><p>As a result of these changing attitudes, young people are having conversations with their families and finding ways to get politically active. They're donating funds to campaigns, volunteering their time to raise awareness around voting and creating social campaigns to try to influence other people to vote and register to vote.</p>
How social media is used in the U.S. for political issues. Statista<p>It's inspiring to see young people around the world deeply engaged in the digital space and continuing their activism. They have played a critical role in calling for change and transformation in society. From climate to health to politics, young people are the most affected. The only way to make progress is to build back better. They're building upon existing issues and movements, creating new alliances and driving conversations and action. This generation is also building upon the same values and ideas of those before them to change the status quo and find ways to enact change for a better future.</p>
- Portuguese Youth Activists Sue 33 Countries Over Climate Crisis ... ›
- 4 Ways to Be a Real Youth Activist - EcoWatch ›
- The Power of Inclusive, Intergenerational Climate Activism - EcoWatch ›