Photo courtesy of Shutterstock
There were good, bad and ugly things happening in the solar industry in 2012, and though more of the same can be expected in 2013, it may end up being the year that the solar industry evolves out of the growing pains of a young industry and into a more mature and balanced market.
Solar in 2012
The “good” is that 2012 was a record year for annual capacity additions in the U.S. Based on forecasts (actual numbers won’t be available until later this quarter) by SEIA-GTM Research, there were 3.2 gigawatts (GW) of photovoltaics (PV) installed in the U.S. in 2012, which is nearly 70 percent more than was installed in 2011. This brings cumulative installed PV capacity to about 7.2 GW.
Though the U.S. is not yet the global leader in solar capacity—Germany installed about 7.6 GW in 2012 alone—it has become a major global player and is increasingly penetrating electricity markets across all sectors—residential, commercial and utility-scale. About 85 percent of this new capacity occurred in the utility- and commercial-scale markets and was the product of low solar material costs and the delayed completion of systems leveraging the 1603 U.S. treasury grant. However, an expansion of financing models—most notably third party ownership financing—is supporting a resurgence in the residential market as well.
The greatest driver of growth in U.S. (and global) solar capacity has been cost reductions in PV hardware and its various components (polysilicon, wafers, cells and modules). These cost reductions in turn have contributed to price reductions in installed costs for end-users. For example, the average installed costs for distributed PV installations (both residential and non-residential) declined about 15 percent from 2011 Q3 to 2012 Q3, following a similar annual trend witnessed in 2010 and 2011. The installed cost of utility PV systems fell by more than 30 percent from 2011 Q3 to 2012 Q3. These reductions have played a huge role in accelerating interests by consumers and utilities alike for obtaining solar capacity.
The 1603 grant provided an enticing offer for non-residential PV projects to take a 30 percent investment cash grant in lieu of the investment tax credit (ITC). Though the grant option technically expired at the end of 2011, installations that began construction in 2009, 2010 or 2011 remain eligible. Therefore, 2012 included a wave of large projects being completed that had leveraged the 1603 grant in previous years.
Third-party ownership financing, which has driven commercial sector installations for nearly a decade, dominated new installations in the residential sector in markets where it is allowed. In the third quarter of 2012, third-party systems accounted for 57-91 percent of residential deployments in Arizona, Colorado, California and Massachusetts. By removing the burdensome upfront costs of solar, third party financing is significantly expanding the market potential for residential solar by making it affordable to, essentially, anyone with good credit.
Although the low solar material costs mentioned above contributed to the “good” growth in installed capacity, it was in fact directly related to “bad” manufacturing conditions. A boom in manufacturing—particularly in China—created a supply of panels that more than doubled what the market demanded in 2011 and 2012. As a result, prices for PV components experienced massive declines over the past couple years. For example, the spot market prices for high purity polysilicon—the main component in crystalline solar cells—dropped 59 percent in 2011 and 47 percent in 2012. Squeezed by falling margins, many manufacturers have been forced to consolidate, shut factories, and/or file for bankruptcy.
In part, these “bad” manufacturing conditions also contributed to some “ugly” finger pointing by companies, and ultimately countries, concerned with unfair trade practices. After a year of investigation, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) voted to issue antidumpting (AD) and countervailing duties to all crystalline silicon PV cells, modules, laminates and panels coming into the U.S. from China. The call for tariffs, which are not retroactive and will be in place for five years, was driven by a coalition led by the largest U.S. solar panel manufacturer, SolarWorld which claimed China was unlawfully harming U.S. manufacturing jobs. Ironically, U.S. solar developers and installers have actually opposed the tariffs on the grounds that they could increase costs and harm downstream employment. Regardless, SolarWorld has led a similar coalition in Europe resulting in the European Commission launching their own investigation of Chinese imports. In retaliation, China recently launched their own AD investigations into polysilicon imports from the U.S. and South Korea as well as Europe.
Analysts predict that 2013 will bring another increase (~30 percent) in annual installed capacity in the U.S, with additional market growth anticipated in related storage and battery technologies. Prices for solar component costs will continue to drop—though probably less precipitously as in 2012—and in turn drive installations across sectors. Third-party financing will continue opening new markets for commercial and residential sector deployment. In addition, community solar and emerging innovations such as crowd funding and real estate investment trusts (REIT) are gaining traction as potential opportunities for residents and investors alike. In parallel, rising interests in energy storage and battery technologies are surfacing in the U.S. and Europe. Examples of activities in the U.S. include: a $120 million federal award toward a Battery and Energy Storage Hub, pilot programs run by California utilities, and raised awareness by the commercial and residential sectors due to the grid vulnerability experienced during Hurricane Sandy. Not surprisingly, Germany recently announced an intention to subsidize solar energy storage as soon as April.
The supply chain “glut” will likely continue to drive prices down in early 2013 and more manufacturers will either be swallowed up by larger companies or simply go out of business. GTM Research predicts that as many as 180 module manufacturers alone will go bankrupt by 2015. The largest portion (88) of these companies will be in the high-cost manufacturing markets of the U.S., Europe and Canada, however China will also take a big hit, with as many as 54 companies expected to fail. That said, the exit of these firms combined with increased demand from the U.S., China, India, Japan and emerging solar markets could help stabilize the supply-demand balance by as soon as the second half of 2013.
The trade wars will probably hurt more than help the manufacturing industry, and though there are methods of circumventing new requirements, there remain uncertainties as to what the actual price impacts will be if tariffs are imposed by not only the U.S., but Europe and China as well. That said, most analysts aren’t yet anticipating major disruptions to the general price decline resulting from oversupply in the market.
Although the southeast U.S. remains a relatively small player in the national solar market, it embodies many of the national trends discussed above. Georgia Power Company, citing “recent declines in the cost of installations,” will be launching the largest solar initiative in state history and the largest voluntarily developed solar portfolio from an investor-owned utility. In Tennessee, Silicon Ranch recently completed the largest solar system in the state, a 9.5 megawatt PV system at Volkswagen Chattanooga. Further, legislative bills are being pushed in several southern states to allow for third party ownership. Conversely, just this month Hemlock Semiconductor announced it was holding off production at its new plant in Clarksville, TN, “in response to significant oversupply in the polysilicon industry and the threat of potential tariffs on its products sold into China.”
Visit EcoWatch’s RENEWABLES page for more related news on this topic.
Many people shop online for everything from clothes to appliances. If they do not like the product, they simply return it. But there's an environmental cost to returns.
- Are We Doomed If We Don't Curb Carbon Emissions by 2030 ... ›
- California Winery Cuts Carbon Emissions With Lighter Bottles ... ›
- Wealthy One Percent Are Producing More Carbon Emissions Than ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Dolf Gielen and Morgan Bazilian
John Kerry helped bring the world into the Paris climate agreement and expanded America's reputation as a climate leader. That reputation is now in tatters, and President-elect Joe Biden is asking Kerry to rebuild it again – this time as U.S. climate envoy.
Energy Is at the Center of the Climate Challenge<p>The <a href="https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/1/" target="_blank">effects of climate change</a> are already evident across the globe, from <a href="https://theconversation.com/100-degrees-in-siberia-5-ways-the-extreme-arctic-heat-wave-follows-a-disturbing-pattern-141442" target="_blank">extreme heat waves</a> to <a href="https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/12/" target="_blank">sea level rise</a>. But while the challenge is daunting, there is hope. Solar and wind power have become the <a href="https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2019" target="_blank">cheapest forms of power generation globally</a>, and technology progress and innovation continue apace to support a transition to clean energy.</p><p>In the U.S. under a Biden administration, long-term national climate legislation will depend on who controls the Senate, and that won't be clear until after two run-off elections in Georgia in January.</p><p>But there is no shortage of <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2020-biden-climate-change-advice/" target="_blank">ideas for ways Biden</a> could still take action even if his proposals are blocked in Congress. For example, he could use executive orders and direct government agencies to tighten regulations on greenhouse gas emissions; increase research and development in clean energy technologies; and empower states to exceed national standards, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autos-emissions-california/defying-trump-california-locks-in-vehicle-emission-deals-with-major-automakers-idUSKCN25D2CH" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">as California did in the past with auto emission standards</a>. A focus on a just and equitable transition for communities and people affected by the decline of fossil fuels will also be key to creating a sustainable transition.</p><p>The U.S. position as the world's largest oil and gas producer and consumer creates political challenges for any administration. U.S. forays into European energy security are often treated with suspicion. Recently, France blocked <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/frances-engie-backs-out-of-u-s-lng-deal-11604435609" target="_blank">a multi-billion dollar contract</a> to buy U.S. liquefied natural gas because of concerns about limited emissions regulations in Texas.</p><p>Strengthening cooperation and partnerships with like-minded countries will be critical to bring about a transition to cleaner energy as well as sustainability in agriculture, forestry, water and other sectors of the global economy.</p>
Creating a Global Sustainable Transition<p>How the world recovers from COVID-19's economic damage could help drive a lasting shift in the global energy mix.</p><p>Nearly one-third of Europe's US$2 trillion economic relief package <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-21/eu-approves-biggest-green-stimulus-in-history-with-572-billion-plan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">involves investments that are also good for the climate</a>. The European Union is also strengthening its 2030 climate targets, though each country's energy and climate plans will be critical for successfully implementing them. The <a href="https://joebiden.com/clean-energy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Biden plan</a> – including a $2 trillion commitment to developing sustainable energy and infrastructure – is aligned with a global energy transition, but its implementation is also uncertain.</p><p>Once Biden takes office, Kerry will be joining ongoing <a href="https://www.un.org/en/conferences/energy2021/about#:%7E:text=The%20overarching%20goal%20of%20the,2030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development.&text=Accelerate%20delivery%20of%20United%20Nations,related%20issues%20at%20all%20levels." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">high-level discussions on the energy transition</a> at the U.N. General Assembly and other gatherings of international leaders. With the U.S. no longer obstructing work on climate issues, the G-7 and G-20 have more potential for progress on energy and climate.</p><p>Lots of technical details still need to be worked out, including international trade frameworks and standards that can help countries lower greenhouse gas emissions enough to keep global warming in check. <a href="https://www.carbonpricingleadership.org/what" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carbon pricing</a> and <a href="https://www.csis.org/analysis/how-can-europe-get-carbon-border-adjustment-right" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">carbon border adjustment taxes</a>, which create incentive for companies to reduce emissions, may be part of it. A consistent and comprehensive set of national energy transition plans will also be needed.</p><p>The global shift to <a href="https://www.irena.org/publications/2019/Jan/A-New-World-The-Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transformation" target="_blank">clean energy will also have geopolitical implications for countries and regions</a>, and this will have a profound impact on wider international relations. Kerry, with his experience as secretary of state in the Obama administration, and Biden's plan to make the climate envoy position part of the National Security Council, may help mend these relations. In doing so, the U.S. may again join the wider community of countries willing to lead.</p>
- 14 States On Track to Meet Paris Targets - EcoWatch ›
- Biden Vows to Ax Keystone XL if Elected - EcoWatch ›
- Biden Names John Kerry as First-Ever Climate Envoy - EcoWatch ›
By Maria Caffrey
As we approach the holidays I, like most people, have been reflecting on everything 2020 has given us (or taken away) while starting to look ahead to 2021.
We Need More Than Listening<p>By now we have all become sadly accustomed to the current administration sidelining scientists, most prominently Dr. Anthony Fauci, because the facts they provide do not fit with the political rhetoric of the moment.</p><p>I have <a href="https://www.csldf.org/2019/08/22/csldf-helps-climate-scientist-maria-caffrey-fight-for-scientific-integrity/" target="_blank">my own history</a> of filing a scientific integrity complaint with the National Park Service (which falls under the Department of the Interior) after senior ranking employees attempted to censor one of my scientific reports. I know all too well the damage and pain that these actions cause, not just for the individual scientist, but also because these <a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/attacks-on-science" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">attacks on science</a> over the last few years have undermined sound, evidence-based decision making.</p><p>President-elect Biden has repeatedly said that he will <a href="https://thehill.com/homenews/521638-trump-biden-will-listen-to-the-scientists-if-elected" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">listen to the scientists</a>. While this is certainly a welcome change, listening can only take us so far. This past week Lauren Kurtz from the <a href="https://www.csldf.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Climate Science Legal Defense Fund</a> and my colleague <a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/about/people/gretchen-goldman" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gretchen Goldman</a> published <a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ten-steps-that-can-restore-scientific-integrity-in-government/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">an article</a> listing 10 actions the new administration should implement to show their commitment to strengthening government science:</p><ol><li>Clearly prohibit political interference and censorship.</li><li>Protect scientists' communication rights.</li><li>Acknowledge that attempts to violate scientific integrity, even if ultimately not fruitful, are still violations.</li><li>Protect federal scientists' right to provide information to Congress and other lawmakers.</li><li>Commit to incorporating the best science as part of agency decisions.</li><li>Elevate agency scientific integrity policies to have the full force of law.</li><li>Publicly release anonymized information about scientific integrity complaints and their resolutions at every agency.</li><li>Institute an intra-agency workforce, potentially under the White House <a href="https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2020-09/strengthening-science-and-si-at-ostp.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Office of Science and Technology Policy</a>, to coordinate scientific integrity efforts across agencies, foster discussion of policy improvements, and standardize criteria for policies across agencies.</li><li>Strengthen whistleblower protections.</li><li>Ensure that policies cover all actors who will be dealing with science.</li></ol>
Time for Action<p>I have spoken to many scientists, particularly federal scientists, who are eager to turn the page so they can hurry back to the work they had been doing before this administration, but I urge caution in assuming that things can be "normal" again.</p><p>Before Trump, I naively thought the scientific integrity policies established during the <a href="https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/12/19/scientific-integrity-policies-update" target="_blank">Obama administration</a> would be sufficient. I never imagined that any administration could so willfully ignore and attack expert advice and evidence that is intended to protect us and our public lands.</p><p>I have personally witnessed how hard our federal scientists work. They put in long hours with minimal pay (far less that what they could get if they worked in private industry) to pursue one simple goal: to make things better for the nation.</p><p>We need stronger scientific integrity policies to protect these people and their work. But more than that, we need stronger scientific integrity laws because they also benefit society.</p>
By Andrea Germanos
Environmental campaigners stressed the need for the incoming Biden White House to put in place permanent protections for Alaska's Bristol Bay after the Trump administration on Wednesday denied a permit for the proposed Pebble Mine that threatened "lasting harm to this phenomenally productive ecosystem" and death to the area's Indigenous culture.
<div id="da98c" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="478a197b7c59c92787c92bec92f1ac39"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1331662923710693376" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Bristol Bay forever, Pebble mine never. #NoPebbleMine #SaveBristolBay https://t.co/CBQ9zuy8A5</div> — Save Bristol Bay (@Save Bristol Bay)<a href="https://twitter.com/SaveBristolBay/statuses/1331662923710693376">1606328156.0</a></blockquote></div>
- Pebble Mine Threatens One of the Last Great Salmon Rivers ... ›
- The Pebble Mine Is Too Toxic Even for the Trump Administration ... ›
- Trump Admin Reverses Obama-Era Restrictions on Pebble Mine ... ›
OlgaMiltsova / iStock / Getty Images Plus
By Gwen Ranniger
In the midst of a pandemic, sales of cleaning products have skyrocketed, and many feel a need to clean more often. Knowing what to look for when purchasing cleaning supplies can help prevent unwanted and dangerous toxics from entering your home.