The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
More than 2,700 hydropower plants are in the planning phase across the Balkans, with 37 percent of dams slated to be built on land with "high protection status," according to Save the Blue Heart of Europe, a coalition of NGOs. Within that 37 percent, 118 dams will be constructed in national parks, while another 547 will be built in Natura 2000 areas, an EU-designated network of nature protection areas.
On Wednesday, New Zealand Parliament passed the Te Awa Tupua Bill which states that the river is "an indivisible and living whole," making it the world's first river to be given this special designation.
The river has been granted the ability to represent itself through human representatives, one appointed by the Whanganui Iwi (Maori people) and one by the Crown (government of New Zealand), Treaty Negotiations Minister Chris Finlayson explained to Newshub.
"I know some people will say it's pretty strange to give a natural resource a legal personality, but it's no stranger than family trusts, or companies, or incorporated societies," Finlayson added.
More than 200 descendants of the Whanganui Iwi witnessed the bill's passage. Songs were sung and tears were shed after Parliament's third and final reading of the bill.
The decision marks the end of New Zealand's longest-running court case, as the Whanganui Iwi have long fought for the recognition of their authority over the river.
"Since the mid-1850s Whanganui Iwi have challenged the Crown's impact on the health and wellbeing of the river and those who lived on it, and have fought to have their rights and their relationship with the River recognized," said Gerrard Albert, Whanganui Iwi spokesperson, in a statement.
"Eighty years ago Whanganui Iwi started what was to become the longest running court case in New Zealand history over who owned the bed of the river. It has been a long, hard battle," he continued. "We have always believed that the Whanganui River is an indivisible and living whole—Te Awa Tupua—which includes all its physical and spiritual elements from the mountains of the central North Island to the sea."
The Whanganui River in the North Island of New Zealand is the country's third-longest river and a culturally and spiritually important entity to the area's tribes. According to a government website:
"The tribes of Whanganui take their name, their spirit and their strength from the great river which flows from the mountains of the central North Island to the sea. For centuries the people have travelled the Whanganui River by canoe, caught eels in it, built villages on its banks, and fought over it. The people say, 'Ko au te awa. Ko te awa ko au' (I am the river. The river is me)."
The bill includes $80 million (about USD$56 million) financial redress payment and another $30 million from the Crown to "promote the health and well-being" of the river.
Albert said that the Whanganui Iwi looks forward to working closely with other Iwi, local government, the Crown and other parties with an interest in the future of the river.
"It has taken us a century-and-a-half to get to this point. We will take a steady, calm and methodical approach to the next steps," he said. "While today we close the book on this part of our history, tomorrow we start writing a new one."
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Black Warrior River Named One of America's Most Endangered
Pollution caused by coal mining near Alabama’s Black Warrior River has landed the river on the list of America’s Most Endangered Rivers—which is compiled each year by the conservation group American Rivers.
The Black Warrior River and its tributaries are a major source of drinking water for Birmingham and surrounding communities. The headwaters of the Black Warrior River include the federally designated Wild and Scenic Sipsey Fork, which, along with the river’s Mulberry and Locust Forks, is rated among the top two percent of United States streams by the National Park Service. The river, known for fishing, boating, commercial navigation, recreation and wildlife, also runs through the Warrior Coal Field where most of Alabama’s coal reserves are found.
For many years, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has allowed the majority of the Black Warrior River watershed’s approximately 95 active coal mines to operate under a general permit known as Nationwide Permit (NWP) 21. NWP 21 does not take local wetland and stream conditions into account, study the possible impacts of the mines or provide for public input. This situation contrasts with the process in other Appalachian states, where the Corps last year suspended the use of NWP 21 to require more careful consideration of a mine’s impacts on water resources and the environment.
“The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has wisely closed this dangerous mining loophole across the Appalachian coal mining region – except for Alabama,” said Gerrit Jobsis, American Rivers’ Southeast Regional Director. “It’s time to give Alabama’s people, water and wildlife the protection they deserve.”
Eva Dillard, staff attorney for Black Warrior Riverkeeper, agrees: “Under NWP 21, the Corps has allowed numerous mines to operate in our watershed with no consideration of their cumulative impacts on water quality or the environment. With NWP 21 up for possible renewal in 2012, now is the time to tell the Corps to end the use of this rubber stamp in Alabama.”
“Our wetlands and headwater tributary streams are critical conveyors of clean water, controllers of runoff and flooding, and providers of fish and wildlife habitat,” said Black Warrior Riverkeeper Nelson Brooke. “Their loss under NWP 21 hurts the river, local communities, fishermen and sportsmen, and ultimately the state.”
Black Warrior Riverkeeper and American Rivers are calling on the Corps to discontinue the use of NWP 21 and to include Alabama in all protective guidance and regulations that apply to Appalachian region mining. Ending the use of NWP 21 in Alabama would force the Corps to consider the cumulative impact of mines on the Black Warrior River and allow local people to voice their concerns.
The two groups also called on the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and Alabama Surface Mining Commission to strengthen coal mining permits and enforcement efforts. Additionally, these agencies should collaborate with the Corps to address the cumulative effects of mining on the river.
Judge Stands Up for Salmon
Klamath Riverkeeper and allies won a landmark ruling from a San Francisco Superior Court judge that a program allowing ranchers to divert water from the Shasta and Scott Rivers is illegal. The judge ruled that the program, run by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), failed to adequately consider the harm to protected Coho salmon caused by diverting water for farm irrigation from both rivers. The two rivers, both tributaries of the Klamath River, often run dry in summer months due to the water diversion. Both support dwindling populations of state and federally protected Coho salmon.
Permits to divert river water were recently required after years of unregulated water diversions and the widespread loss or “incidental take” of endangered salmon.
Klamath Riverkeeper and its partners, which included the Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman’s Associations, the Quartz Valley Indian Reservation and the Sierra Club, challenged the permit program, alleging violations of the California Endangered Species Act and other laws.
“Fish and Game needs to take the court’s ruling seriously and modify the permit program so enough water is left in the rivers for the salmon to survive,” said Wendy Park, attorney for the public interest law firm Earthjustice, which represented the environmental groups. “Though the Department of Fish and Game claimed that the program would do some good things for fish habitat, CDFG undermined their own success from the beginning by ignoring the fact that water diversions are making the rivers go completely dry at some points in the year,” said Klamath Riverkeeper Erica Terence. “The simple fact is that fish need water.”
“This ruling tells the state and ranchers that band-aid solutions, such as installing fish screens and ladders on diversion ditches and dams or revegetating stream banks, are not an acceptable substitute for leaving water in the river,” Terence continued.
In his decision, issued in late April, Judge Ernest Goldsmith found that the Department of Fish and Game’s permits were based on an erroneous assumption that ongoing water diversions couldn’t be restricted and would harm Coho salmon regardless of whether CDFG permitted the diversions or not.
The court further ruled the permit program violated the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) because the Department of Fish and Game didn’t quantify how many fish deaths the water diversions would cause, didn’t show the sufficiency of mitigation measures to protect and restore Coho, and didn’t seek public input on whether the program would further jeopardize the salmon.
“Such a permit program can do a lot of good for the salmon, if properly constructed,” said Glenn Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman’s Associations, whose member’s fishing industry jobs are directly affected by salmon declines in these rivers. In December of 2009, CDFG scientists reported that two out of three generations of Coho salmon in the Shasta River are “functionally extinct.” Coho salmon have a three-year life cycle that results in three distinct generations of Coho in any given year. The only viable generation spawned in fall of 2010, and the resulting juvenile hatched and emerged from the gravels to face their odds this past spring. However, salmon populations are likely to rebound if adequate water is left in the rivers.
Georgia Court Rules for Clean Water for the Chattahoochee
In a precedent-setting decision, an Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper, finding that a wastewater discharge permit issued for the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area would unnecessarily degrade water quality. Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper appealed the permit, which was issued by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) to Forsyth County. The permit would have allowed six million gallons of treated sewage with high levels of phosphorous and fecal coliform bacteria into the primary drinking water source for more than 3.5 million people.
Judge Kristin Miller, of the Office of State Administrative Hearings, found, after a technical and economic analysis of alternative levels of treatments, that the County can treat its wastewater and discharge significantly less pollution at minimal additional cost. Thus, the permit issued by EPD violated state and federal water-quality laws that prohibit the lowering of water quality unless it is necessary for important social or economic development.
The permit, issued to Forsyth County in August 2010, allowed discharges of fecal coliform bacteria and phosphorous as much as 100 times higher than in other recently issued permits in the watershed. Fecal coliform bacteria indicate the presence of contamination from human or animal waste. As a result, microbiological organisms such as pathogenic bacteria and viruses can cause illnesses in humans. Phosphorous is a nutrient that, when discharged in wastewater into a water body, can cause, among other problems, algal blooms and the reduction of oxygen needed to support fish and aquatic organisms. Increased phosphorous, therefore, would threaten the important trout fishery in the Chattahoochee- the southernmost reproductive trout fishery in the United States. In her decision, Judge Miller called the river “an important economic, recreational, and environmental resource for the state of Georgia and metropolitan Atlanta in particular.”
Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper was represented by Andy Thompson and Steve O’Day, attorneys with Smith, Gambrell, and Russell, LLP. Thompson described Judge Miller’s decision as “thorough, well- reasoned and detailed,” and one in which she recognized “that the Fowler/Shakerag permit violated the clear language of the state and federal antidegradation rules.”
Watershed Center Awarded $2.2 Million for Great Lakes Restoration
The Watershed Center Grand Traverse Bay, the parent organization of Grand Traverse Baykeeper John Nelson, has been awarded three grants totaling $2.2 million in Great Lakes Restoration Initiative funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Two of the grants will install stormwater filtration measures to decrease bacterial contamination at local beaches and clean up stormwater pollution in Grand Traverse Bay. The third will help manage sediment on the Boardman River as two large dams are being removed.
“This is big news for The Watershed Center and Grand Traverse Baykeeper,” said John Nelson. “These are the largest grants we’ve ever been awarded!”
More than 95 percent of this funding will be invested in projects in local communities. “These are critically needed funds,” said Andy Knott, executive director of the Watershed Center. “Grand Traverse Bay and its 1,000 square-mile watershed are the foundation of our region’s economy and our Up North quality of life.”
The Suttons Bay project involves working with the Village of Suttons Bay to install three runoff drain systems using green infrastructure techniques. “By managing runoff from the three largest storm drains in Suttons Bay, we hope to drastically decrease public health risks at local beaches associated with runoff,” said Sarah U’Ren, program director for the Watershed Center.
The Traverse City project involves working with the City of Traverse City to install a runoff filtering system at East Bay Park to reduce bacterial contamination at the beach.
The Boardman Dams project will manage sediment to protect aquatic habitat during removal of Brown Bridge and Sabin dams. Removing the two dams, part of a larger project that involves removing a third dam and modifying a fourth, will restore 184 acres of wetlands and 32 acres of upland habitat.
All three grant applications cited community collaborations as important factors for these projects. “More than 12,000 citizens crafted the Grand Vision, which includes protecting our magnificent natural resources as a guiding principle,” said Knott.
Waterkeepers Demand Action From Maryland Legislators
In late May, a flotilla of small craft landed at the City Dock in Annapolis, Maryland’s state capitol, bringing with them citizen groups demanding that Maryland state legislators deliver leadership, action and results on the cleanup of the state’s major rivers and coasts, and Chesapeake Bay.
Eighteen affiliated Chesapeake Waterkeeper groups, made up of concerned citizens, including farmers, watermen, business owners and families from throughout the Chesapeake Bay region, charged that the state legislature had deferred critical environmental work and failed to address the state’s mounting water pollution problems.
“At a time when the need for environmental leadership has never been greater, Marylanders were forced to suffer through a ‘do-nothing’ state legislature,” said Fred Tutman, the Patuxent Riverkeeper. “All of us have a responsibility not to let history repeat itself.”
The flotilla arrived at City Dock to insist that lawmakers make good on campaign promises to clean up the area’s waterways. Concerned Marylanders joined the Waterkeepers at the event, demanding that elected leaders act during the next session. The flotilla was made up of Waterkeepers and their boats, a symbol of the ever- vigilant presence that Waterkeepers provide throughout their individual watersheds.
“With the clock ticking and water quality rapidly declining, the lost economic value, jobs and quality of life present real suffering for people and communities,” said Kathy Phillips, Assateague Coastkeeper.
“Waterkeepers and the people of Maryland whom we represent decry our state legislature’s failure to live up to promises made by its constituent lawmakers,” said Drew Koslow, the Choptank Riverkeeper. “Maryland sets the tone for Chesapeake Bay cleanup, and so Maryland’s inaction calls into serious question the credibility and sincerity of our elected officials, particularly because it will now be much more difficult for Maryland to meet the Bay Pollution standards set by EPA for the Bay States.”
The protesters were concerned in particular with the Chesapeake Bay, which is in precipitous decline, with increasing dead zones. Few if any of the rivers and creeks draining into the bay have managed to achieve a scorecard grade that rises above a “D” from the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Studies. The Maryland Coastal Bays Program, an EPA National Estuary Program, has not been able to issue a grade above “C+” for the Coastal Bays on the Eastern Shore. The Legislature is tasked with passing laws that curb pollution from sources such as pesticides, agricultural runoff, including arsenic in chicken manure, natural gas fracking, plastic bags, problems associated with overdevelopment and the increasing problem of stormwater runoff.
One of the most important bodies of water in the United States from the standpoint of economics and diversity of marine life, Chesapeake Bay has a heavy concentration of Waterkeepers, most of whom patrol a tributary that drains into the bay. The local Waterkeeper movement includes people working in Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia, and has emerged as the eyes, ears and voice of waterways and communities that are struggling to turn the tide.
Ultimatum on Cleaning Up the Anacostia
A federal court ruled in July that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the District of Columbia, and Maryland had failed to set pollution caps adequate to assure cleanup of the trash and assorted debris polluting the Anacostia River. Decrying years of delay and “deliberate indifference” to cleaning up the river, Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia set a one-year deadline for adopting caps adequate to make the river fit for recreational use and aesthetic enjoyment.
The ruling came in a suit brought by Earthjustice on behalf of the Anacostia Riverkeeper and Friends of the Earth. The suit argued that existing caps for sediment pollution in the Anacostia were too weak to clean up the trash that often mars the river’s appearance.
“This is a big win for people who dream of a clear and beautiful Anacostia River,” said Earthjustice attorney Jennifer Chavez. “The Court ruled that pollution caps need to make the river clean enough for enjoyment by people who walk along its shores and boat its waters. The EPA, the District, and Maryland will now have to address head on the visible filth that mars the Anacostia for much of the year.”
The Court rejected EPA’s argument that the pollution caps only needed to be strong enough to protect the growth of submerged vegetation, holding that the Clean Water Act also required protection of the river’s recreational and aesthetic values. The Court said that it “will not countenance” the failure by the EPA, the District, and Maryland to provide all the required protections.
“We must improve the river for aquatic and human life,” said former Anacostia Riverkeeper Dottie Yunger. “While the Anacostia has recovering wildlife, it remains extremely unsafe for fishing and swimming. This is unacceptable anywhere, but a travesty here in the backyard of the nation’s capital.”
The sediment pollution caps at issue were adopted in 2007, only after years of litigation by Earthjustice to force their issuance. As the Court noted, “the District and EPA spent 20 years ignoring [their] obligations and fighting attempts to compel them to act.”
The sediment caps, called “total maximum daily loads” or “TMDLs,” are required to set a daily limit on the amount of sediment allowed in the river. Once these caps are in place, the District and Maryland have to require pollution controls adequate to ensure the caps are met.
More than 5 billion gallons of stormwater and sewage pollution drain into the Anacostia River each year, carrying with it the trash, silt, and chemical residue from the river’s 176-square mile watershed. Efforts to clean up this pollution have been slow and half-hearted, Anacostia Riverkeeper and Earthjustice contend.
Nuking the Nolichuck: Suit Charges Damages
As the Nolichucky River snakes and tumbles out of the Blue Ridge Mountains in North Carolina, it is confronted by more than 100 miles of contamination, all the way to its confluence with the French Broad River in northwestern Tennessee. The French Broad Riverkeeper has claimed that the source of this pollution is Nuclear Fuel Services (NFS) in Erwin, Tennessee, which reprocesses nuclear weapons into nuclear fuel and consistently discharges nuclear waste from this conversion process into the Nolichucky, a drinking-water source for numerous communities along its banks and a major tributary of the French Broad River.
The rural communities along the Nolichucky have long complained about NFS’s disregard for safety and environmental standards, and fretted about the health problems thought to be associated with the radioactive waste. Many believe that the river’s polluted waters have been a cause of cancer in the area. But an environmental assessment by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission concluded that there was no significant impact from the plant, and this finding was used to justify NFS’s unprecedented attempt to secure an additional 40- year license for the plant.
In 2010, however, samples obtained by the French Broad Riverkeeper, and analyzed pro bono by University of North Arizona Biochemistry Professor Michael Ketterer, documented widespread contamination of surface water, ground water, and air deposition throughout the watershed from highly enriched uranium and plutonium. These findings led some of the leading litigation firms in the country, based in Tennessee, South Carolina and New York, to initiate a class- action lawsuit in June against NFS and six other companies, charging gross negligence and seeking compensation for medical and death expenses, as well as other damages, to residents along the Nolichucky.
After years in which the communities’ concerns have mounted and been ignored, impacted residents will finally have their day in court.
Reprinted with permission from Waterkeeper Magazine. To read the winter issue of the Waterkeeper Magazine, click here.
Iraq is a country clearly in a state of transition. Iraqis have endured nearly 10 years of fierce fighting and civil war and, before that, decades of ruthless totalitarian rule. Now, as a tenuous peace settles over their land and a democratic society begins to emerge in what we know as the cradle of civilization, these resilient people are starting to turn their attention to the elements of their culture that have for centuries, offered not only survival, but quality of life. At the top of this list is water quality and quantity, which for millennia has nurtured the land where agriculture and modern civilization were born. Conflict, neglect and other problems have led to a critical shortage of clean water in Iraq.
Devoted members of the first Waterkeeper in the Middle East, the Iraqi Upper Tigris Waterkeeper, have been working closely with the Iraq Ministry of Environment to update and improve their laws, and with “environmental police” to aid in the enforcement of said laws. The central legal framework supporting water quality in Iraq focuses on preventing the dumping of waste and wastewater into common waterways. The framework uses regulatory mechanisms such as water quality standards, discharge permits, mandatory waste treatment and compulsory utilization of best available technologies very similar to those that emerged from the passage of the Clean Water Act (CWA) in 1972 here in the U.S.
The CWA has helped protect the waterways of the U.S. since 1972, just shy of four decades. However, while the Iraqis look to our system of environmental protection as a shining example to emulate, members of our own government are doing the bidding of corporate polluters and trying to cripple core provisions of the CWA.
One example is the Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act, also known as H.R. 2018, which has passed the House of Representatives and is now pending before the Senate. This legislation proposes to gut the CWA, jeopardizing the environmental health of waterways across the country and the communities that rely upon them. Should it become law, the bill will undermine National Water Quality Standards by—among other limitations—restricting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ability to revise existing water quality standards or promulgate new ones, unless the state in question concurs. Under this proposed legislation, the U.S. EPA will be prohibited from rejecting a water quality certification granted by a state. Additionally, the bill would prohibit the U.S. EPA from objecting to a state's issuance of a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit that it believes does not comply with Water Quality Standards.
Thus, if Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act becomes law, American citizens will be at the mercy of their state representatives in matters of clean water, without any federal oversight. If, or more accurately when, those officials should become influenced by corporate polluters and engage in a race-to-the-bottom, the affected residents, both in that state and in any downstream states, will have none of the protections granted by the federal government, as the U.S. EPA will have little recourse in the face of errant state lawmakers’ decisions. The CWA’s balance of state and federal oversight has helped clean up waterways for almost four decades—clearly, the only reason to dismantle the law is corporate greed. The nominal costs of keeping our water clean for swimming, drinking and fishing get in the way of stuffing a few more bills into a fat cat’s pocket.
Additionally, as we speak, there are ongoing efforts in the U.S. Senate to utilize the appropriations process to insert “riders”—a backdoor method of advancing legislation without process—to further weaken the Clean Water Act only to benefit polluters. It is truly disheartening to think that the Clean Water Act, landmark legislation that began almost 40 years ago and cleaned up the waters of the Hudson and Cuyahoga Rivers, and countless others, is now under the threat of being made obsolete by those in Congress whose duty it is to protect the citizens of this country. Perhaps we can re-learn the value of our own ideals as we watch the Iraqis begin to follow in our once sure-footed steps. Clean water should be the right of every citizen. We as a nation must stand up and demand our rights.
Take action by clicking here and asking your Senators to stand up for your basic right to swimmable, drinkable and fishable waters.