Help Support EcoWatch
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience while browsing it. By clicking 'Got It' you're accepting these terms.
Most recent
Trending
Top Videos
The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Yard owner Ped Rossiter removes spare parts from a old, end-of-life Ford Transit as it is processed at Pylle Motor Spares and Metal Processing, a licensed scrap yard near Somerset in the UK in 2017 when the UK government had announced its ban on the sale of petrol and diesel powered cars and vans from 2040. The move followed similar pledges in France and has seen a number of car manufacturers offering substantial savings or 'scrappage' deals on new cars if customers trade-in older more polluting cars. Matt Cardy / Getty Images
Britain announced that it will ban sales of new diesel and gasoline powered cars in 15 years last week. That was five years earlier than expected, but necessary for the UK to reach its goal of net-zero emissions by 2050, according to a statement from the prime minister's office, as CNN reported.
<p>The UK's Transportation Secretary Grant Shapps, revised that number this week, when he told BBC Radio 5 Live it could happen by 2032, adding there would be consultation, as the <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/business-51474769?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science_and_environment&link_location=live-reporting-story" target="_blank">BBC reported</a>.</p>
<p>"Michael Gove announced the original 2040, the Prime Minister last week said actually we would like to do that by 2035 at the latest," Shapps said in the interview, as the <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/cars/1241215/petrol-diesel-car-ban-transport-secretary-grant-shapps-electric-cars" target="_blank">Express reported</a>. "We have said 2035 or even 2032. That's in consultation, we will say 2032-2035."</p>
<p>The 2032 target puts the UK in line with <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/Scotland" rel="noopener noreferrer">Scotland</a>, which, three years ago, pledged to ban sales of new combustion engine cars by 2032. However, Scotland does not have the authority to ban new cars, so it plans to phase out the need for combustion engines, by reducing the number of gas stations and adding many more charging stations, as the <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/business-51474769?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science_and_environment&link_location=live-reporting-story" target="_blank">BBC</a> reported.</p>
<p>Glasgow, in Scotland, will host COP26 later this year, and the UK government is laying out its environmental proposals in the build-up the November UN conference, as the BBC reported. </p>
<p>The proposed ban also includes hybrid cars, so the only sales that will be allowed are fully electric or hydrogen cars and vans, according to the BBC.</p>
<p>Predictably, representatives from the automotive industry have balked against the timeline, raising concerns about whether the government would continue to subsidize sales of <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/electric-vehicles" rel="noopener noreferrer">electric vehicles</a>, a dearth of charging infrastructure, and potential job losses, as CNN reported.</p>
<p>"It's extremely concerning that government has seemingly moved the goalposts for consumers and industry on such a critical issue," Mike Hawes, the chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, said in a statement, as CNN reported. "With current demand for this still expensive technology still just a fraction of sales, it's clear that accelerating an already very challenging ambition will take more than industry investment."</p>
<p>The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders's numbers show that while electric car sales rose 144 percent last year in the UK, they make up less than two percent of the total number of cars on the road, as the Express reported. In 2019, nearly 1.5 million new combustion engines cars were sold in Britain. Only 37,000 electric cars were sold. </p>
<p>Since charging infrastructure is not in place yet, many car buyers have anxiety about running out of a charge and being stuck. In his interview, Shapps sought to ease anxiety by assuring the public that additional infrastructure for electric cars was part of the government's budget.</p>
<p>"We have domestic car producers and we want to help them to transition so we are doing a lot of work," Shapps said in his interview, as the Express reported. "In fact tomorrow I'm meeting with the car manufacturers on this very subject. We are putting in about £1.5billion at the moment and there is more to come."</p>
<p>Prime Minister Boris Johnson has pledged that no driver will be more than 30 miles away from a charging station. Yet, a considerable investment is needed to make that claim a reality, according to the Express.<a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/cars/1241215/petrol-diesel-car-ban-transport-secretary-grant-shapps-electric-cars" target="_blank"></a></p>
<p>The commitment pairs the UK with several countries phasing out greenhouse gas emitting combustion engines, including <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/Norway" rel="noopener noreferrer">Norway</a>, which wants all new passenger cars and vans sold in the country to be zero-emission vehicles by 2025, and India, which has called for new cars sold there to be powered by electricity by 2030, as CNN reported.</p>
<p><br/></p>From Your Site Articles
- Bristol Diesel Ban Approved in Effort to Clean Air - EcoWatch ›
- UK Bans All New Petrol and Diesel Cars by 2040 - EcoWatch ›
- Scotland to Ban Sale of New Gas and Diesel Cars by 2032 - EcoWatch ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
'This Is History in the Making': Cherokee Nation Is First U.S.-Based Tribe to Preserve Seeds in 'Doomsday Vault'
10 February
Popular
Svalbard Global Seed Vault or the 'doomsday vault' is seen above. Global Crop Diversity Trust / Flickr / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
The Cherokee Nation will save seeds from the "three-sisters" crops in the Arctic "doomsday vault," making it the first Native American tribe to ensure culturally emblematic crops will be preserved for the future, as The Guardian reported.
<p>Never before has a Native American tribe received an invitation to store heirloom seeds in the <a href="https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/food-fisheries-and-agriculture/svalbard-global-seed-vault/id462220/" target="_blank">Svalbard Global Seed Vault</a>, which lies in the permafrost over 800 miles into the Arctic Circle. </p>
<p>The Cherokee nation has donated seeds for nine varieties of corn, squash and beans to the vault, which has nearly one million packs of seeds from almost every country in the world, according to its own <a href="https://www.nordgen.org/sgsv/" target="_blank">statistics</a>. The vault has the capacity to store about 4.5 million varieties of seeds.</p>
<p>The seed vault, which is owned and operated by <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/Norway" rel="noopener noreferrer">Norway</a>, aims to store seeds to protect them from catastrophe, such as disease, pests or war, as <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/05/us/cherokee-nation-svalbard-global-seed-vault-trnd/index.html" target="_blank">CNN reported</a>. </p>
<p>Included in the nine crops that the Cherokee nation sent is "Cherokee White Eagle Corn, the tribe's most sacred corn, which is typically used during cultural activities, and three other varieties of corn grown for consumption in distinct locations to keep the strains pure. Other seeds sent to the seed bank include Cherokee Long Greasy Beans, Cherokee Trail of Tears Beans, Cherokee Turkey Gizzard black and brown beans, and Cherokee Candy Roaster Squash," <a href="https://anadisgoi.com/archive/2756-cherokee-nation-first-tribe-in-u-s-to-send-heirloom-seeds-to-global-seed-vault-in-norway" target="_blank">according to Anadisgoi</a>, the official Cherokee Nation newsletter. The crops all predate European settlement of the Americas and are vital to the Cherokee cultural identity. </p>
<p>"This is history in the making, and none of it could have been possible without the hard work of our staff and the partnership with the team in Norway," Cherokee Nation Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. said to Anadisgoi. "It is such an honor to have a piece of our culture preserved forever. Generations from now, these seeds will still hold our history and there will always be a part of the Cherokee Nation in the world."</p>
<p>As <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/07/cherokee-nation-seeds-arctic-vault-svalbard" target="_blank">The Guardian reported</a>, the Cherokee are only the second native peoples to deposit seeds into the vault. Their deposit follows the banking of 750 potato seeds from an indigenous Andean community. </p>
<p>The invitation to bank seeds in the Arctic stemmed from the Cherokee Nation's own seed-saving program, which distributes packs of heirloom seeds to tribe members. Just last week, the Cherokee Nation Heirloom Garden and Native Plant Site started its annual distribution of seeds to any Cherokee citizen who requested them. Last year, it sent out nearly 10,000 packs of seeds, <a href="https://www.foodandwine.com/news/cherokee-indigenous-seed-vault-donation-norway" target="_blank">according to Food and Wine</a>. The program has been running since 2006 and growing steadily.</p>
<p>"It's important that we continue to distribute these seeds every year," Feather Smith, a cultural biologist for the Cherokee Nation, <a href="https://www.cherokeephoenix.org/Article/index/114057" target="_blank">told the Cherokee Phoenix</a><u>,</u> as <a href="https://www.foodandwine.com/news/cherokee-indigenous-seed-vault-donation-norway" target="_blank">Food and Wine reported</a>. "These plants represent centuries of Cherokee cultural and agricultural history. They provide an opportunity for Cherokees to continue the traditions of our ancestors and elders, as well as educate our youth in Cherokee culture." </p>
<p>The Svalbard Global Seed Vault inspired the Cherokee seed bank. It has become a means to both save heirloom seeds and to also preserve Cherokee culture, Pat Gwin, senior director of environmental resources for the Cherokee Nation, <a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/04/02/704795157/how-a-seed-bank-helps-preserve-cherokee-culture-through-traditional-foods" target="_blank">said to NPR</a>.</p>
<p>The NPR story caught the attention of Luigi Guarino, director of science for the Global Crop Diversity Trust, who contacted Gwin about having the tribe's seeds in the Global Seed Vault, according to CNN.</p>
<p>"The Cherokee Nation Seed Bank has always hoped to be able to deposit our traditional food crops into Svalbard one day," Feather Smith, Cherokee Nation cultural biologist, said to Anadisgoi.</p>
<p>"This is a tremendous opportunity and honor for the tribe," Gwin said in a statement, as CNN reported. "Additionally, knowing the Cherokee Nation's seeds will be forever protected and available to us, and us only, is a quite valuable thing indeed."</p>
From Your Site Articles
- Record Warm Water Measured Beneath Antarctica's 'Doomsday ... ›
- Doomsday Clock Moves to 100 Seconds Before Midnight Due to ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Greta Thunberg Declines $51K Environmental Prize, Says ‘Climate Movement Does Not Need any More Awards’
30 October 2019
Climate
"FridaysForFuture" climate protest at Civic Center Park in Denver on Oct. 11. FREDERIC J. BROWN / AFP / Getty Images
Greta Thunberg wants action, not prizes.
The 16-year-old Swedish climate activist was awarded the 2019 Nordic Council Environment Prize Tuesday, but refused to accept it, CNN reported.
<p>"I want to thank the Nordic Council for this award. It is a huge honour," Thunberg wrote in an Instagram post from the U.S., where she is currently traveling. "But the climate movement does not need any more awards. What we need is for our politicians and the people in power start to listen to the current, best available science."</p>
<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/B4Ns7PQpE5C/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="12" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:16px;"> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B4Ns7PQpE5C/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank"> <div style=" display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div></div></div><div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display:block; height:50px; margin:0 auto 12px; width:50px;"><svg width="50px" height="50px" viewBox="0 0 60 60" version="1.1" xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g stroke="none" stroke-width="1" fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd"><g transform="translate(-511.000000, -20.000000)" fill="#000000"><g><path d="M556.869,30.41 C554.814,30.41 553.148,32.076 553.148,34.131 C553.148,36.186 554.814,37.852 556.869,37.852 C558.924,37.852 560.59,36.186 560.59,34.131 C560.59,32.076 558.924,30.41 556.869,30.41 M541,60.657 C535.114,60.657 530.342,55.887 530.342,50 C530.342,44.114 535.114,39.342 541,39.342 C546.887,39.342 551.658,44.114 551.658,50 C551.658,55.887 546.887,60.657 541,60.657 M541,33.886 C532.1,33.886 524.886,41.1 524.886,50 C524.886,58.899 532.1,66.113 541,66.113 C549.9,66.113 557.115,58.899 557.115,50 C557.115,41.1 549.9,33.886 541,33.886 M565.378,62.101 C565.244,65.022 564.756,66.606 564.346,67.663 C563.803,69.06 563.154,70.057 562.106,71.106 C561.058,72.155 560.06,72.803 558.662,73.347 C557.607,73.757 556.021,74.244 553.102,74.378 C549.944,74.521 548.997,74.552 541,74.552 C533.003,74.552 532.056,74.521 528.898,74.378 C525.979,74.244 524.393,73.757 523.338,73.347 C521.94,72.803 520.942,72.155 519.894,71.106 C518.846,70.057 518.197,69.06 517.654,67.663 C517.244,66.606 516.755,65.022 516.623,62.101 C516.479,58.943 516.448,57.996 516.448,50 C516.448,42.003 516.479,41.056 516.623,37.899 C516.755,34.978 517.244,33.391 517.654,32.338 C518.197,30.938 518.846,29.942 519.894,28.894 C520.942,27.846 521.94,27.196 523.338,26.654 C524.393,26.244 525.979,25.756 528.898,25.623 C532.057,25.479 533.004,25.448 541,25.448 C548.997,25.448 549.943,25.479 553.102,25.623 C556.021,25.756 557.607,26.244 558.662,26.654 C560.06,27.196 561.058,27.846 562.106,28.894 C563.154,29.942 563.803,30.938 564.346,32.338 C564.756,33.391 565.244,34.978 565.378,37.899 C565.522,41.056 565.552,42.003 565.552,50 C565.552,57.996 565.522,58.943 565.378,62.101 M570.82,37.631 C570.674,34.438 570.167,32.258 569.425,30.349 C568.659,28.377 567.633,26.702 565.965,25.035 C564.297,23.368 562.623,22.342 560.652,21.575 C558.743,20.834 556.562,20.326 553.369,20.18 C550.169,20.033 549.148,20 541,20 C532.853,20 531.831,20.033 528.631,20.18 C525.438,20.326 523.257,20.834 521.349,21.575 C519.376,22.342 517.703,23.368 516.035,25.035 C514.368,26.702 513.342,28.377 512.574,30.349 C511.834,32.258 511.326,34.438 511.181,37.631 C511.035,40.831 511,41.851 511,50 C511,58.147 511.035,59.17 511.181,62.369 C511.326,65.562 511.834,67.743 512.574,69.651 C513.342,71.625 514.368,73.296 516.035,74.965 C517.703,76.634 519.376,77.658 521.349,78.425 C523.257,79.167 525.438,79.673 528.631,79.82 C531.831,79.965 532.853,80.001 541,80.001 C549.148,80.001 550.169,79.965 553.369,79.82 C556.562,79.673 558.743,79.167 560.652,78.425 C562.623,77.658 564.297,76.634 565.965,74.965 C567.633,73.296 568.659,71.625 569.425,69.651 C570.167,67.743 570.674,65.562 570.82,62.369 C570.966,59.17 571,58.147 571,50 C571,41.851 570.966,40.831 570.82,37.631"></path></g></g></g></svg></div><div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style=" color:#3897f0; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:550; line-height:18px;"> View this post on Instagram</div></div><div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"><div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div></div><div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg)"></div></div><div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style=" width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div></div></div></a> <p style=" margin:8px 0 0 0; padding:0 4px;"> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B4Ns7PQpE5C/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" style=" color:#000; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none; word-wrap:break-word;" target="_blank">I have received the Nordic Council’s environmental award 2019. I have decided to decline this prize. Here’s why: “I am currently traveling through California and therefore not able to be present with you today. I want to thank the Nordic Council for this award. It is a huge honour. But the climate movement does not need any more awards. What we need is for our politicians and the people in power start to listen to the current, best available science. The Nordic countries have a great reputation around the world when it comes to climate and environmental issues. There is no lack of bragging about this. There is no lack of beautiful words. But when it comes to our actual emissions and our ecological footprints per capita - if we include our consumption, our imports as well as aviation and shipping - then it’s a whole other story. In Sweden we live as if we had about 4 planets according to WWF and Global Footprint Network. And roughly the same goes for the entire Nordic region. In Norway for instance, the government recently gave a record number of permits to look for new oil and gas. The newly opened oil and natural gas-field, ”Johan Sverdrup” is expected to produce oil and natural gas for 50 years; oil and gas that would generate global CO2 emissions of 1,3 tonnes. The gap between what the science says is needed to limit the increase of global temperature rise to below 1,5 or even 2 degrees - and politics that run the Nordic countries is gigantic. And there are still no signs whatsoever of the changes required. The Paris Agreement, which all of the Nordic countries have signed, is based on the aspect of equity, which means that richer countries must lead the way. We belong to the countries that have the possibility to do the most. And yet our countries still basically do nothing. So until you start to act in accordance with what the science says is needed to limit the global temperature rise below 1,5 degrees or even 2 degrees celsius, I - and Fridays For Future in Sweden - choose not to accept the Nordic Councils environmental award nor the prize money of 500 000 Swedish kronor. Best wishes Greta Thunberg”</a></p> <p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;">A post shared by <a href="https://www.instagram.com/gretathunberg/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px;" target="_blank"> Greta Thunberg</a> (@gretathunberg) on <time style=" font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px;" datetime="2019-10-29T19:37:01+00:00">Oct 29, 2019 at 12:37pm PDT</time></p></div></blockquote> <script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script><p>The Nordic Council is one of the "main forums for official Nordic cooperation," <a href="https://www.norden.org/en" target="_blank">according to its website</a>. It brings together Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the Faroe Islands, Greenland and Åland in order to "make the Nordic region the most sustainable and integrated region in the world."</p><p>But in her rejection post, Thunberg criticized the Nordic countries for the gap between their rhetoric and their action when it comes to the <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/climate-change" target="_self">climate crisis</a>.</p><p>"The Nordic countries have a great reputation around the world when it comes to climate and environmental issues. There is no lack of bragging about this. There is no lack of beautiful words," she wrote. "But when it comes to our actual emissions and our ecological footprints per capita—if we include our consumption, our imports as well as aviation and shipping—then it's a whole other story."</p><p>She pointed to data from WWF and Global Footprint Network showing that <a href="https://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2054&artikel=6550103" target="_blank">we would require around four planet earths</a> to sustain us if everyone lived like the population of Sweden. She also called out Norway's newly-opened <a href="https://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/johan-sverdrup-field-north-sea/" target="_blank">Johan Sverdrup</a> oil field, which is expected to produce oil and natural gas for 50 years.</p><p>"So until you start to act in accordance with what the science says is needed to limit the global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees celsius, I—and Fridays For Future in Sweden—choose not to accept the Nordic Councils environmental award nor the prize money of 500,000 Swedish kronor," ($51,000) she concluded.</p><p>The theme for the council's 2019 prize was "initiatives that promote sustainable consumption and production by doing more with less," according to its <a href="https://www.norden.org/en/news/greta-thunberg-declines-nordic-council-environment-prize" target="_blank">website</a>.</p><p>Thunberg was nominated by Sweden and Norway, and selected by the jury for "breathing new life into the debate surrounding the environment and climate at a critical moment in world history."<br></p><p>In Thunberg's absence, the award was presented by Swedish environmental activist Noura Berrouba to Isabelle Axelsson and Sophia Axelsson of <a href="http://www.ecowatch.com/tag/fridays-for-future" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fridays For Future</a>, who declined it on Thunberg's behalf.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Greta Thunberg was awarded the Nordic Council Environment Prize, but has chosen not to accept it in protest at a lack of climate action. This was the message from Isabelle Axelsson and Sophia from <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FridaysForFuture?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FridaysForFuture</a> 🌍 during the award ceremony: <a href="https://t.co/vxnuakQuMH">https://t.co/vxnuakQuMH</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ActNow?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ActNow</a></p>— Nordic Co-operation (@nordenen) <a href="https://twitter.com/nordenen/status/1189273979065962496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 29, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><p>Fridays for Future was started by Thunberg in August 2018 when she launched a one-person school strike outside Swedish parliament that grew into a global youth movement.<br></p><p>"Like none before her, in a very short space of time Greta has succeeded in raising awareness of climate and environmental issues in the Nordic countries and the rest of the world. She has stubbornly and persuasively urged the world to listen to research and act on the basis of facts," the Nordic Council wrote.</p><p>Her refusal message is a case in point.</p>
From Your Site Articles
- Greta Thunberg Chastises European Parliament for Prioritizing ... ›
- 'It Is Time to Rebel': Listen to Greta Thunberg on New Track From ... ›
- Greta Thunberg Says 'Haters' Attacking Her Asperger's Have ... ›
- Greta Thunberg to Cross the Atlantic by Emissions-Free Boat to ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Brazil from space. Harvepino / iStock / Getty Images
Norway has urged its companies that actively do business in Brazil to make sure that they are not contributing to destruction of the Amazon rainforest, as Reuters reported.
<p>Norway's Climate and Environment Minister Ola Elvestuen discussed the Amazon fires with representatives of the oil firm Equinor, fertilizer-producer Yara, and aluminum producer Norsk Hydro. The Norwegian state is the largest shareholder of all three firms, according to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-environment-norway-idUSKCN1VH1RQ" target="_blank">Reuters</a>.</p>
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1166431460649254912" id="twitter-embed-1166431460649254912" lazy-loadable="true" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1166431460649254912&created_ts=1566933906.0&screen_name=AJENews&text=Norway%27s+biggest+asset+investors+demand+action+on+Amazon+fires+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FomeEMKEcRT+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2F3Ml5PLvqza&id=1166431460649254912&name=Al+Jazeera+News" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="UDTCG01576661514"></iframe><p>"They must be conscious about their supply chains and ensure that they do not help contribute to deforestation," Elvestuen told reporters after the meeting.</p><p>The meeting was also attended by pension fund Kommunal Landspensjonskasse (<a href="https://www.klp.no/en/facts-about-klp" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">KLP</a>) and environmental non-governmental organizations to discuss ways to help save the rainforest from devastation. </p><p>KLP, Norway's largest pension fund, has taken an activist role in pressuring investors, banks and <a href="http://ecowatch.com/tag/agribusiness" rel="noopener noreferrer">agribusinesses</a> operating in Brazil to take action on the fires decimating the Amazon rainforest, as <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amazon-fires-norways-largest-pension-fund-wants-action-from-companies-investors-linked-to-brazilian-ag-trade-2019-08-27" target="_blank">MarketWatch</a> reported.</p><p>"We have engaged companies which undertake significant trade in agricultural products from Brazil because we want rapid dialogues and concrete actions given this extremely serious situation," said Jeanett Bergan, KLP's head of responsible investments, last week, according to <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amazon-fires-norways-largest-pension-fund-wants-action-from-companies-investors-linked-to-brazilian-ag-trade-2019-08-27" target="_blank">MarketWatch</a>.</p><p>KLP was joined by Storebrand ASA, another sizeable investor, to make sure companies are not contributing to the ongoing environmental catastrophe in Brazil, which controls 90 percent of the Amazon rainforest. With nearly $170 billion under management, the two investment giants started to contact large corporations that have agricultural business in Brazil. The firms also asked other institutional investors to support them in using financial leverage to reverse ecological devastation, as <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/norway-biggest-asset-investors-demand-action-amazon-fires-190827161800900.html" target="_blank">Al Jazeera</a> reported. </p><p>"If there is evidence that we are invested in companies that contribute to develop new deforested land or deforest areas … we will withdraw from investments," said Bergan as the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/30/corporations-pile-pressure-on-brazil-over-amazon-fires-crisis" target="_blank">Guardian</a> reported.</p>
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1167696965422977025" id="twitter-embed-1167696965422977025" lazy-loadable="true" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1167696965422977025&created_ts=1567235625.0&screen_name=GreenGreenwich&text=We+need+more+of+this%3A+%E2%80%9CIf+there+is+evidence+that+we+are+invested+in+companies+that+contribute+to+develop+new+defore%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FINDytU6D9Q&id=1167696965422977025&name=Greenwich+Greens" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="DJCWHL1576661514"></iframe><p>Bergan says KLP is seeking dialogue with companies that operate in Brazil, including transnational commodities trading giants Cargill, Bunge, and Archer Daniels Midland with the goal of ensuring they follow sustainable supply chain practices, according to <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2019/09/giant-norway-pension-fund-weighs-brazil-divestment-over-amazon-deforestation/" target="_blank">Mongabay</a>.<br></p><p>"It's always very hard," Bergan said. "Responsible corporate behavior, or responsible behavior from anybody, is always a challenge when there is a conflict between economic development and responsible business practice or ethics."</p><p>The wildfires in the rainforest are a bitter pill to swallow for Norway, which has worked closely with Brazil for over a decade to protect the Amazon rainforest, and has paid some $1.2 billion into the Amazon Fund, to which it is by far the biggest donor, as <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-environment-norway-idUSKCN1VH1RQ" target="_blank">Reuters</a> reported.</p><p>Oslo has stop contributing to the Amazon fund after the Brazilian government refused to divest aid to an organization earmarked to receive the funds. </p><p>The three companies involved in the meeting with Norway's Climate and Environment all issued statements reassuring their commitment to sustainable practices and their support for maintaining the rainforests. </p><p>Yara, which makes fertilizers in Brazil and supplies Brazilian farmers with products, said that it was "very important to safeguard the rainforest."</p><p>"This has high priority in Yara and we do our utmost to ensure compliance across the supply chain to prevent the illegal clearing of land," said a company spokeswoman, as <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-environment-norway-idUSKCN1VH1RQ" target="_blank">Reuters</a> reported.</p>
From Your Site Articles
- Amazon Deforestation Increase Prompts Germany to Cut $39.5M in ... ›
- Amazon Deforestation Rate Hits 3 Football Fields Per Minute, Data ... ›
- Norway Freezes $33.2M Transfer to Brazil's Amazon Fund Amid ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Norway Freezes $33.2M Transfer to Brazil's Amazon Fund Amid Deforestation 'Surge'
19 August 2019
Politics
The huge surge this year in Amazon deforestation is leading some European countries to think twice about donations to the Amazon Fund. LeoFFreitas / Moment / Getty Images
By Sue Branford and Thais Borges
Ola Elvestrun, Norway's environment minister, announced Thursday that it is freezing its contributions to the Amazon Fund, and will no longer be transferring €300 million ($33.2 million) to Brazil. In a press release, the Norwegian embassy in Brazil stated:
<blockquote>Given the present circumstances, Norway does not have either the legal or the technical basis for making its annual contribution to the Amazon Fund.</blockquote>
<p>Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro reacted with sarcasm to Norway's decision, which had been widely expected. After an official event, he <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-environment-norway/norway-stops-amazon-fund-contribution-in-dispute-with-brazil-idUSKCN1V52C9" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">commented</a>: "Isn't Norway the country that kills whales at the North Pole? Doesn't it also produce oil? It has no basis for telling us what to do. It should give the money to Angela Merkel [the German Chancellor] to reforest Germany."</p><p>According to its website, the <a href="http://www.amazonfund.gov.br/en/home/" target="_blank">Amazon Fund</a> is a "<a href="https://redd.unfccc.int/" target="_blank">REDD+</a> mechanism created to raise donations for non-reimbursable investments in efforts to prevent, monitor and combat deforestation, as well as to promote the preservation and sustainable use in the Brazilian Amazon." The bulk of funding comes from Norway and Germany.</p><p>The annual transfer of funds from developed world donors to the Amazon Fund depends on a report from the Fund's technical committee. This committee meets after the National Institute of Space Research, which gathers official Amazon deforestation data, publishes its annual report with the definitive figures for deforestation in the previous year.</p><p>But this year the Amazon Fund's technical committee, along with its steering committee, COFA, were abolished by the Bolsonaro government on 11 April as part of a sweeping move to dissolve some 600 bodies, most of which had NGO involvement. The Bolsonaro government views NGO work in Brazil as a conspiracy to undermine Brazil's sovereignty.</p><p>The Brazilian government then demanded far-reaching changes in the way the fund is managed, as documented in <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2019/06/brazil-guts-environmental-agencies-clears-way-for-unchecked-deforestation/" target="_blank">a previous article</a>. As a result, the Amazon Fund's technical committee has been unable to meet; Norway says it therefore cannot continue making donations without a favorable report from the committee.</p>
<img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMDU3ODc3OC9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTU5MTM3NDUyN30.TGCDvQAgNAdhd57mnAuaGUn3dQwoL_WQfhFAhCGmSBA/img.jpg?width=980" id="bec18" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9a63fb48c5a51aef0069d0e105161de7" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Archer Daniels Midland soy silos in Mato Grosso along the BR-163 highway, where Amazon rainforest has largely been replaced by soy destined for the EU, UK, China and other international markets.
Thaís Borges.
An Uncertain Future
<p>The Amazon Fund was announced during the 2007 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Bali, during a period when environmentalists were alarmed at the rocketing rate of <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/deforestation">deforestation</a> in the Brazilian Amazon. It was created as a way of encouraging Brazil to continue bringing down the rate of forest conversion to pastures and croplands.</p><p>Government agencies, such as IBAMA, Brazil's environmental agency, and NGOs shared Amazon Fund donations. IBAMA used the money primarily to enforce deforestation laws, while the NGOs oversaw projects to support sustainable communities and livelihoods in the Amazon.</p><p>There has been <a href="https://redd-monitor.org/2019/07/12/norway-and-brazils-negotiations-about-the-amazon-fund-are-ignoring-the-failure-to-address-the-drivers-of-deforestation/" target="_blank">some controversy</a> as to whether the Fund has actually <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2018/05/brazil-has-the-tools-to-end-amazon-deforestation-now-report/" target="_blank">achieved its goals</a>: in the three years before the deal, the rate of deforestation fell dramatically but, after money from the Fund started pouring into the Amazon, the rate remained fairly stationary until 2014, when it began to rise once again. But, in general, the international donors have been pleased with the Fund's performance, and until the Bolsonaro government came to office, the program was expected to continue indefinitely.</p><p>Norway has been the main donor (94 percent) to the Amazon Fund, followed by Germany (5 percent), and Brazil's state-owned oil company, Petrobrás (1 percent). Over the past 11 years, the Norwegians have made, by far, the biggest contribution: R$3.2 billion ($855 million) out of the total of R$3.4 billion ($903 million).</p><p>Up till now the Fund has approved 103 projects, with the dispersal of R$1.8 billion ($478 million). These projects will not be affected by Norway's funding freeze because the donors have already provided the funding and the Brazilian Development Bank is contractually obliged to disburse the money until the end of the projects. But there are another 54 projects, currently being analyzed, whose future is far less secure.</p><p>One of the projects left stranded by the dissolution of the Fund's committees is Projeto Frutificar, which should be a three-year project, with a budget of R$29 million ($7.3 million), for the production of açai and cacao by 1,000 small-scale farmers in the states of Amapá and Pará. The project was drawn up by the Brazilian NGO IPAM (Institute of Environmental research in Amazonia).</p><p>Paulo Moutinho, an IPAM researcher, <a href="https://oglobo-globo-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/oglobo.globo.com/sociedade/noruega-paralisa-repasses-para-fundo-amazonia-23879397?versao=amp" target="_blank">told</a> Globo newspaper: "Our program was ready to go when the [Brazilian] government asked for changes in the Fund. It's now stuck in the BNDES. Without funding from Norway, we don't know what will happen to it."</p><p>Norway is not the only European nation to be reconsidering the way it funds environmental projects in Brazil. Germany has many environmental projects in the Latin American country, apart from its small contribution to the Amazon Fund, and is deeply concerned about the way the rate of <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2019/08/future-of-amazon-deforestation-data-in-doubt-as-research-head-sacked/" target="_blank">deforestation has been soaring this year</a>.</p><p>The German environment ministry told Mongabay that its minister, Svenja Schulze, had decided to put financial support for forest and biodiversity projects in Brazil on hold, with €35 million ($39 million) for various projects <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2019/08/germany-cuts-39-5-million-in-environmental-funding-to-brazil/" target="_blank">now frozen</a>.</p><p>The ministry explained why: "The Brazilian government's policy in the Amazon raises doubts whether a consistent reduction in deforestation rates is still being pursued. Only when clarity is restored, can project collaboration be continued."</p><img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMDU3ODc4Ny9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYxMjQ2NzE5NX0.No6gkDpmMTiTZPXil9TPTegPUHlR86Mhv-5CsLhiXn0/img.jpg?width=980" id="2b8a5" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="3b58c325d206763519c81fab74aba0f9" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Bauxite mines in Paragominas, Brazil. The Bolsonaro administration is urging new laws that would allow large-scale mining within Brazil's indigenous reserves.
Hydro / Halvor Molland / Flickr
Alternative Amazon Funding
<p>Although there will certainly be disruption in the short-term as a result of the paralysis in the Amazon Fund, the governors of Brazil's Amazon states, which rely on international funding for their environmental projects, are already scrambling to create alternative channels.</p><p>In a press release issued yesterday Helder Barbalho, the governor of Pará, the state with the highest number of projects financed by the Fund, said that he will do all he can to maintain and increase his state partnership with Norway.</p><p>Barbalho had announced earlier that his state would be receiving €12.5 million ($11.1 million) to run deforestation monitoring centers in five regions of Pará. Barbalho said: "The state governments' monitoring systems are recording a high level of deforestation in Pará, as in the other Amazon states. The money will be made available to those who want to help [the Pará government reduce deforestation] without this being seen as international intervention."</p><p>Amazonas state has funding partnerships with Germany and is negotiating deals with France. "I am talking with countries, mainly European, that are interested in investing in projects in the Amazon," said Amazonas governor Wilson Miranda Lima. "It is important to look at Amazônia, not only from the point of view of conservation, but also — and this is even more important — from the point of view of its citizens. It's impossible to preserve Amazônia if its inhabitants are poor."</p><img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMDU3ODc5NS9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYyMzIzODM2OX0.9umI457RQ-AWQih5eWgyuRidYPXfLii8bH2jZxjuXYs/img.jpg?width=980" id="0ae08" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="8f273906cd42848552df850ae736ca12" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
Signing of the EU-Mercusor Latin American trading agreement earlier this year. The pact still needs to be ratified.
Council of Hemispheric Affairs
Looming International Difficulties
<p>The Bolsonaro government's perceived reluctance to take effective measures to curb deforestation may in the longer-term lead to a far more serious problem than the paralysis of the Amazon Fund.</p><p>In June, the European Union and Mercosur, the South American trade bloc, reached an agreement to create the largest trading bloc in the world. If all goes ahead as planned, the pact would account for a quarter of the world's economy, involving 780 million people, and remove import tariffs on 90 percent of the goods traded between the two blocs. The Brazilian government has predicted that the deal will lead to <a href="https://gestagro360.com.br/2019/07/04/especial-acordo-mercosul-ue-preve-ate-2035-aumento-no-pib-nos-investimentos-e-nas-exportacoes/" target="_blank">an increase of almost $100 billion</a> in Brazilian exports, particularly agricultural products, by 2035.</p><p>But the huge surge this year in Amazon deforestation is leading some European countries to think twice about ratifying the deal. In an interview with Mongabay, the German environment ministry made it very clear that Germany is very worried about events in the Amazon: "We are deeply concerned given the pace of destruction in Brazil … The Amazon Forest is vital for the atmospheric circulation and considered as one of the tipping points of the climate system."</p><p>The ministry stated that, for the trade deal to go ahead, Brazil must carry out its commitment under the Paris Climate agreement to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 43 percent below the 2005 level by 2030. The German environment ministry said: If the trade deal is to go ahead, "It is necessary that Brazil is effectively implementing its climate change objectives adopted under the [Paris] Agreement. It is precisely this commitment that is expressly confirmed in the text of the EU-Mercosur Free Trade Agreement."</p><p><a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2017/07/soy-king-blairo-maggi-wields-power-over-amazons-fate-say-critics/" target="_blank">Blairo Maggi</a>, Brazil agriculture minister under the Temer administration, and a major shareholder in Amaggi, the largest Brazilian-owned commodities trading company, has said very little in public since Bolsonaro came to power; he's been "in a voluntary retreat," as he puts it. But Maggi is so concerned about the damage Bolsonaro's off the cuff remarks and policies are doing to international relationships he decided to speak out earlier this week.</p><img lazy-loadable="true" src="https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8yMDU3ODgwNy9vcmlnaW4uanBnIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTYzNDMzNDMwNH0.BX7ZCmbPwHU8X-4eOwmBjrWCP5lhTwkD1TIPFIylOQ4/img.jpg?width=980" id="c72a3" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="d63b1060a8cb3864437977b05fa90cd6" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" />
<p class=""><em><em>Reposted with permission from our media associate <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2019/08/norway-freezes-support-for-amazon-fund-eu-brazil-trade-deal-at-risk/" target="_blank">Mongabay</a>.</em></em></p>Former Brazil Agriculture Minister Blairo Maggi, who has broken a self-imposed silence to criticize the Bolsonaro government, saying that its rhetoric and policies could threaten Brazil's international commodities trade.
Senado Federal / Visualhunt / CC BY
<p>Maggi, a ruralista who strongly supports agribusiness, <a href="https://www.valor.com.br/brasil/6391459/retorica-do-governo-levara-agronegocio-estaca-zero-diz-blairo" target="_blank">told</a> the newspaper, Valor Econômico, that, even if the European Union doesn't get to the point of tearing up a deal that has taken 20 years to negotiate, there could be long delays. "These environmental confusions could create a situation in which the EU says that Brazil isn't sticking to the rules." Maggi speculated. "France doesn't want the deal and perhaps it is taking advantage of the situation to tear it up. Or the deal could take much longer to ratify — three, five years."</p><p>Such a delay could have severe repercussions for Brazil's struggling economy which relies heavily on its commodities trade with the EU. Analysists say that Bolsonaro's fears over such an outcome could be one reason for his <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-g20-summit-brazil-china/brazils-bolsonaro-to-meet-chinas-xi-for-first-time-at-g20-idUSKCN1TP2L0" target="_blank">recently announced</a> October meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, another key trading partner.</p><p>Maggi is worried about another, even more alarming, potential consequence of Bolsonaro's failure to stem illegal deforestation — Brazil could be hit by a boycott by its foreign customers. "I don't buy this idea that the world needs Brazil … We are only a player and, worse still, replaceable." Maggi warns, "As an exporter, I'm telling you: things are getting very difficult. Brazil has been saying for years that it is possible to produce and preserve, but with this [Bolsonaro administration] rhetoric, we are going back to square one … We could find markets closed to us."</p>From Your Site Articles
- Brazil's New President Could Spell Catastrophe for the Amazon ... ›
- Amazon Deforestation Increase Prompts Germany to Cut $39.5M in ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Dusk at the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. Frode Bjorshol / Flickr / CC BY 2.0
By Eoin Higgins
Just over a decade after it first opened, the world's "doomsday vault" of seeds is imperiled by climate change as the polar region where it's located warms faster than any other area on the planet.
<p>The Svalbard Global Seed Vault, which opened in late February 2008, was <a href="https://www.croptrust.org/our-work/svalbard-global-seed-vault/" target="_blank">built</a> by the organization Crop Trust and the Norwegian government on the island of Svalbard next to the northernmost town in the world with more than 1,000 residents, Longyearbyen.</p>
<p>"Svalbard is the ultimate failsafe for biodiversity of crops," <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/26/europe/longyearbyen-doomsday-vault-climate-change-intl/index.html" target="_blank">said</a> Crop Trust executive director Marie Haga.</p><p>Northern temperatures and environment on the island were a major reason for the construction. According to in-depth reporting from <em>CNN</em>, the project planners hoped that the permafrost around the construction of the underground vault would, in time, refreeze. But the planet has other plans.</p><p>Longyearbyen and, by extension, the vault, is warming more rapidly than the rest of the planet. That's because the polar regions of Earth—the coldest areas on the planet—are <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/11/climate/arctic-warming.html" target="_blank">less able</a> to reflect sunlight away from the polar seas due to disappearing ice and snow cover. </p>
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1110864180121354240" id="twitter-embed-1110864180121354240" lazy-loadable="true" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1110864180121354240&created_ts=1553685634.0&screen_name=johnrhanger&text=%27Doomsday+vault%27+town+warming+faster+than+any+other+on+Earth%3A+3.7+degrees+Centigrade+warming+already+in+this+Arctic%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FOqcAiMkpDd&id=1110864180121354240&name=John+Raymond+Hanger" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="JW5G4I1576661867"></iframe><p>It's an ironic turn of events for the creators of the vault, who chose the location for the vault "because the area is not prone to volcanoes or earthquakes, while the Norwegian political system is also extremely stable,'" said <em>CNN</em>.</p><p>Because of the warming, the permafrost around the underground vault's tunnel entrance has not refrozen. That led to leaking water in the tunnel in October 2016, which then froze into ice. </p><p>In response, <em>CNN </em>reported, "Statsbygg [the Norwegian state agency in charge of real estate] undertook 100 million Norwegian krone ($11.7 million) of reconstruction work, more than double the original cost of the structure."</p><p>But the warming now may become unsustainable for the structure. It's already forcing changes to Longyearbyen's population of 2,144 as the people in the town find themselves scrambling to avoid avalanches and deal with a changing climate that's more often dumping rain rather than snow. </p><p>"We can't trust the permafrost anymore," said Statsbygg communications manager Hege Njaa Aschim.</p><p>British advocacy group Global Citizen was more to the point. </p><p>"Not good," the group tweeted.</p>
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1110920401138401280" id="twitter-embed-1110920401138401280" lazy-loadable="true" src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1110920401138401280&created_ts=1553699038.0&screen_name=GlblCtznUK&text=Not+good.+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2F8qSmzYGD1P&id=1110920401138401280&name=Global+Citizen+UK" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="ZCU6J11576661867"></iframe>
<p> <em>Reposted with permission from our media associate <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/03/27/we-cant-trust-permafrost-anymore-doomsday-vault-risk-norway?cd-origin=rss" target="_blank">Common Dreams</a>.</em><em></em></p>From Your Site Articles
- 'Doomsday' Seed Vault Flooded After Arctic Permafrost Melts ... ›
- World's Largest Seed Bank Hits One Million Unique Food Crops ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Norway Set to Divest $1 Trillion Wealth Fund From Oil and Gas Exploration Companies
08 March 2019
Popular
Pixabay
By Andy Rowell
The beginning of the end of the age of oil moved a step closer Friday, with Norway's government recommending that its $1 trillion wealth fund should divest from upstream oil and gas producers.
<p>The news that the world's largest wealth fund, known as the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG), which is highly influential just by its huge financial size, will divest from companies that explore and produce oil, "has sent shockwaves through the energy sector," according to the <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/d32142a8-418f-11e9-b896-fe36ec32aece" target="_blank">Financial Times</a>.</p><p>Whilst the move is significant in driving the fossil fuel disinvestment momentum, the <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/d32142a8-418f-11e9-b896-fe36ec32aece" target="_blank">Financial Times</a> notes there are caveats: "the world's largest sovereign wealth fund has given a reprieve to the global oil majors" such as Shell and BP and "the fund appears to be allowed to still invest in oil and gas companies if they have activities in renewable energy."</p><p>The move is primarily concerned about protecting the Norwegian economy from any future plunge in the oil price rather than climate concerns, although these are mentioned by the government.</p><p>In its report, <a href="https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/c8cd5eea5a2b499388462ffcc70e4339/en-gb/pdfs/stm201820190014000engpdfs.pdf" target="_blank">published Friday</a>, it stated that "Climate risk is an important financial risk factor for the GPFG, and may over time have an impact on several of the companies in which the Fund is invested, including those in the energy sector."</p><p>Norway's Finance Minister Siv Jensen said: "The objective is to reduce the vulnerability of our common wealth to a permanent oil price decline. Hence, it is more accurate to sell companies which explore and produce oil and gas, rather than selling a broadly diversified energy sector."</p><p>But the move will have an impact: The strategy will affect 1.2 percent of its holdings, worth about 66bn Norwegian krone or $7.5 billion and its investments in some 150 oil companies. Although the likes of BP and Shell won't be affected, some American fracking companies will be, such as Chesapeake Energy. <a href="https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/d46151e0df8a4a73887e16862e7ffde7/0533-ep-companies-in-gpfg-equity-portfolio.pdf" target="_blank">The full list is here</a>.</p><p>The reaction from some in the environmental community was positive. Bill McKibben from 350 tweeted:</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1103975154458263552" id="twitter-embed-1103975154458263552" type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1103975154458263552&created_ts=1552043162.0&screen_name=billmckibben&text=Huge+huge+huge+win--Norwegian+govt+%28an+oil+state%29+is+recommending+that+the+world%27s+largest+sovereign+wealth+fund+Fu%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FljR5ff7V0z&id=1103975154458263552&name=Bill+McKibben" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="3F1TZZ1576663867"></iframe>
</p>
<p>Our own Alex Doukas, Stop Funding Fossils Program director at Oil Change International, <a href="http://priceofoil.org/2019/03/08/norway-divest-oil-gas/" target="_blank">remarked</a>:<br/></p><p style="margin-left: 20px;">"This planned move by Norway's government is a clear signal of where the global financial community is headed: directly away from fossil fuels. The companies listed for exclusion are focused exclusively on drilling more oil and gas out of the ground when climate safety requires the exact opposite — a rapid and just managed decline of all fossil fuel production. Ultimately, all oil and gas companies continuing to expand production should be shunned by the global financial community as bad actors and risky investments."</p><p>"Today's decision by the oil fund is even more impactful than when they divested from coal in 2015," Mark Campanale, CEO of Carbon Tracker, told <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/08/investing/norway-fund-oil-stocks/index.html" target="_blank">CNN</a> "It shows that while the fund was initially built on revenue from oil and gas, the ministry of finance understands that the future belongs to those who transition away from fossil fuels."</p><p>Mark Gilbert from Bloomberg wrote in the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/norways-wealth-fund-is-right-to-dump-oil-stocks/2019/03/08/2e5f1494-41a7-11e9-85ad-779ef05fd9d8_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1f77ec29d8d1" target="_blank">Washington Post</a>:</p><p style="margin-left: 20px;"> "Friday's government decision to partially back the divestment strategy marks a big victory in the battle against climate change ... The decision should resonate throughout the debate about the need to address climate change. Norway's move highlights the risk that energy producing countries will be left with so-called stranded assets — petrochemical reserves that the world no longer needs as countries embrace cleaner energy sources."</p><p>Others were slightly more cautious: Simon Evans from Carbon Brief tweeted:</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1103989093191409665" id="twitter-embed-1103989093191409665" type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1103989093191409665&created_ts=1552046485.0&screen_name=DrSimEvans&text=Norway%27s+%241tn+wealth+fund+to+divest+from+oil+%26amp%3B+gas+firms%E2%80%A6%0A%0A%E2%80%A6but+only+%2Apure+exploration+and+production%2A%2C+not+likes+o%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FTgwAaVAdys&id=1103989093191409665&name=Simon+Evans" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="Z546S61576663867"></iframe>
</p>
<p>Charlie Kronick, from Greenpeace UK, told the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/08/norways-1tn-wealth-fund-to-divest-from-oil-and-gas-exploration" target="_blank">Guardian</a>: "This partial divestment from oil and gas is welcome, but not enough to mitigate Norway's exposure to both global oil and gas prices and the wider financial ramifications of climate change."<br/></p><p>Kronick continued: "However, it does send a clear signal that companies betting on the expansion of their oil and gas businesses present an unacceptable risk, not only to the climate but also to investors."</p><p>"While BP and Shell are excluded from the current divestment proposal, they must now recognize that if they continue to spend billions chasing new fossil fuels, they are doomed," said Kronick.</p><p>The move also comes some 18 months <a href="http://priceofoil.org/2017/09/07/the-lofoten-declaration-a-new-bar-for-climate-leadership/" target="_blank">after 220 organizations</a> from 55 countries signed what is known as <a href="http://lofotendeclaration.org/" target="_blank">The Lofoten Declaration</a>, which called for a managed decline of the fossil fuel sector in line with the Paris UN climate goals.</p><p>The declaration demanded leadership in this fossil fuel phase-out from the countries that can afford it first, such as Norway. The declaration was named after the Lofoten Islands of Norway, which remains a battleground over oil and gas exploration, despite Friday's announcement.</p><p>"We applaud the Norwegian government for this plan but also encourage them to truly go all-in on climate responsibility by divesting from all fossil fuel companies, including integrated major oil and gas companies. We need to stop funding the fossil fuels that are causing the climate crisis, and this move by the Norway Government Pension Fund Global is an important — if limited — step in that direction," <a href="http://priceofoil.org/2019/03/08/norway-divest-oil-gas/" target="_blank">said</a> OCI's Doukas.</p><p> <em>Reposted with permission from our media associate <a href="http://priceofoil.org/2019/03/08/shockwaves-as-norways-1trill-wealth-fund-plans-to-disinvest-from-upstream-oil/" target="_blank">Oil Change International</a>.</em><em></em></p>
Read More
Show Less
Orangutan in Sumatra. Tbachner / Wikimedia Commons
The Norwegian parliament voted this week to make Norway the world's first country to bar its biofuel industry from importing deforestation-linked palm oil starting in 2020, The Independent reported.
Environmentalists celebrated the move as a victory for rainforests, the climate and endangered species such as orangutans that have lost their habitats due to palm oil production in Indonesia and Malaysia. It also sets a major precedent for other nations.
<p>
"The Norwegian parliament's decision sets an important example to other countries and underlines the need for a serious reform of the world's palm oil industry," said Nils Hermann Ranum of the
<a href="https://www.regnskog.no/en/" target="_blank">Rainforest Foundation Norway</a> (RFN) in a press release emailed to EcoWatch.
</p><p>
A <a href="http://www.cerulogy.com/palm-oil/for-peats-sake/" target="_blank">2017 report</a> commissioned by RFN found that palm oil-based biofuel is worse for the climate than fossil fuels. The report, authored by low carbon fuels policy expert Chris Malins, concludes: "There is a large body of evidence that because of indirect land use change, palm oil biodiesel is worse for the climate than the fossil fuel it replaces—perhaps several times worse."
</p><p>
<span></span>Norway's consumption of palm oil-based fuels hit all-time high in 2017, according to RFN. The country consumed 317 million liters of palm-oil based biodiesel, representing 10 per cent of its overall diesel consumption, the group said.
</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1070725835596926976" id="twitter-embed-1070725835596926976" type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1070725835596926976&created_ts=1544115906.0&screen_name=RainforestNORW&text=As+the+%23COP24+%23climatechange+summit+opened%2C+Norway+made+a+bold+move.+%23Biofuels+based+on+high+%23deforestation+risk+fe%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FDz1bJe7qom&id=1070725835596926976&name=Rainforest+Foundation+Norway+%28RFN%29" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="RBN7YH1576662610"></iframe>
</p><p>
<a href="https://www.regnskog.no/en/news/norway-bans-palm-oil-based-biofuel-in-its-public-procurement" target="_blank">Last year,</a> a majority of the Norwegian parliament actually voted to stop the government from purchasing palm oil-based fuels.
</p><p>
However, the parliamentary decision was never fully implemented, as the government opted instead to rely on voluntary measures, The Independent noted.
</p><p>
The vote that passed Monday is thought to be stronger and was supported by the majority of the government, according to The Independent. The resolution calls on the government "to formulate a comprehensive proposal for policies and taxes in the biofuels policy in order to exclude biofuels with high deforestation risk."
</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-741465102356975616" id="twitter-embed-741465102356975616" type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-741465102356975616&created_ts=1465614030.0&screen_name=RnfrstAlliance&text=Wow%21+%23Norway+pledges+to+become+first+country+to+ban+%23deforestation%21+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FpuW9qIMebo+via+%40EcoWatch+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FtZ1mFu89r6&id=741465102356975616&name=Rainforest+Alliance" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="9WUQVC1576662610"></iframe>
</p><p>
The Indonesian government as well the country's palm oil producers have already expressed concern about Norway's vote this week.
</p><p>
"Although the impact will not be significant (on our exports), that will become a bad example for other countries," Fadhil Hasan, the director for foreign affairs of the Indonesian Palm Oil Producers Association, told
<a href="https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/concern-in-indonesia-over-norways-move-against-biofuels-derived-from-deforestation" target="_blank">The Straits Times</a>.
</p><p>
Oke Nurwan, director-general for foreign trade in Indonesia's Trade Ministry, worried that other countries may follow in Norway's footsteps.
</p><p>
"The policy will certainly amplify the negative impression about palm oil products," he told the publication.
</p><p>
<span></span>Here is the full text of the resolution that passed in Oslo this week, according to RFN's translation:
</p><blockquote>
"The majority [in Parliament] is concerned that indirect land use effects from palm oil production lead to deforestation. The majority therefore believes that the use of palm oil should be limited as much as possible. The majority points out that it is important to find solutions in order to limit and phase out palm oil, and the majority will follow developments closely. The majority therefore puts forward the following proposal:
<br>
<br>
"Stortinget [the Norwegian Parliament] requests that the Government formulate a comprehensive proposal for measures and taxes in the biofuels policy in order to exclude biofuels with high deforestation risk both within and outside the blending mandate. These framework conditions shall be put forward in conjunction with the national budget for 2020, and shall be introduced from 1 January 2020."
</blockquote>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Trending
Barack Obama speaking on Earth day during his presidency at the Everglades National Park, April 22, 2015, Homestead, Florida. Joe Raedle / Getty Images
During a recent interview in Norway, former president Barack Obama answered an interesting question: What would you do if you had one more day as president?
<p style="">In response, Obama said there was "a lot of unfinished business" when he left office, but if he had more time, he would urge a higher global focus on preserving the environment and would build on some of the progress made during his presidency.<br></p><p style="">The "single highest priority that I see globally" are the issues of environmental sustainability and
<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/climate-change/">climate change</a>, he said at the Oslo Business Forum on Wednesday.
</p><p style="">
Obama noted that the
<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/paris-agreement">Paris climate agreement</a> was an "important step in the right direction, but it was only a first step, and so much more work needs to be done."</p>
<div id="c65b7" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9AU9AL1576662550"><blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-version="4" style=" background:#FFF; border:0;
border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15);
margin: 1px; max-width:658px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px);
width:calc(100% - 2px);">
<div style="padding:8px;">
<div style=" background:#F8F8F8; line-height:0; margin-top:40px; padding:50% 0; text-align:center;
width:100%;">
<div style=" background:url();
display:block; height:44px; margin:0 auto -44px; position:relative; top:-22px; width:44px;">
</div></div><p style=" margin:8px 0 0 0; padding:0 4px;">
<a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/BKREjJHBf31/" style=" color:#000; font-family:Arial,sans-serif;
font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none;
word-wrap:break-word;" target="_top">Barack Obama on Instagram: “"We embrace conservation because healthy and diverse lands and waters help us build resilience to climate change." —President Obama Taking…”</a></p>
</div></blockquote></div>
<p style="">"Unfortunately, we have currently a U.S. administration that feels differently around these issues," Obama said, drawing laughter from the audience of business leaders.<br></p><p style="">
Although Obama did not name his successor directly, the comment was a clear ding at President
<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/trump" target="_blank">Donald Trump</a>, who <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/global-warming-trump-tweets-2520671170.html">rejects climate science</a> and <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/trumps-withdraws-paris-climate-agreement-2429436831.html" target="_blank">decided to withdraw</a> the U.S. from the Paris deal last year. Trump and his administration have <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-power-plant-plan-co2-2597454144.html">rolled back</a> a slew of environmental and climate regulations in favor of fossil fuel interests and <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-administration-chlorpyrifos-2607820657.html">other polluting industries</a>.
</p><p style="">
The <a href="https://www.apnews.com/4fb33486c23e449984ab29ea0c6b685c" target="_blank">Associated Press</a> even called Obama's remark a "swipe at Trump's attitude on environment."
</p><p style="">
On the plus side, Obama said that existing technologies and technological advancements can help the world achieve sustainability goals.
</p><p style="">
However, as he pointed out, "that requires a level of political and social commitment on the part of all of us—businesses, the non-profit sector, each of us as individuals."
</p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
Minke whales dragged aboard the Japanese whaling vessel Nisshin Maru. Customs and Border Protection Service, Commonwealth of Australia
Japan is proposing a slew of rule changes at the International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting in Florianópolis, Brazil this week that conservationists worry would ultimately lift a 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling.
Japan, which launched a "scientific whaling" program in 1987 as a loophole to the moratorium, has killed more than 15,600 whales in the Antarctic since the ban (including juvenile and pregnant minke whales), according to a report released last month by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) and the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI).
<p>
Other commercial whalers include
<a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/minke-whales-killed-pregnant-2312849367.html">Norway</a>, which has killed more than 14,000 minke whales, and <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/fin-whale-hunting-iceland-2580295118.html">Iceland</a>, which has killed nearly 1,800 whales in defiance of the moratorium, according to the report.
</p><p>
Previous reports have revealed that the Japanese government has an ultimate <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/minke-whales-killed-japan-2555581472.html" target="_blank">goal</a> to resume commercial whaling, even though most of its citizens no longer eat whales. Whaling proponents say that hunting the mammals is part of their culture.
</p><p>
Hideki Moronuki, Japan's senior fisheries negotiator and commissioner for the IWC, told the
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-45364696" target="_blank">BBC</a> that the country is pushing for the "the sustainable use of whales."
</p><p>
Among its proposals, Japan wants to set up a "Sustainable Whaling Committee" which would create catch-quotas for nations wishing to allow their citizens to hunt healthy whale populations for commercial purposes, according to <a href="https://www.afp.com/en/news/2265/pro-and-anti-whaling-nations-set-clash-brazil-doc-18z5ib1" target="_blank">AFP</a>.
</p><p>
Japan, which says minke and other whale stocks have recovered, will propose setting new catch quotas for species whose stocks are recognized as healthy by the IWC scientific committee.
</p><p>
Japan is also seeking to lower the proportion of votes required to set rule changes to a simple majority of the 89-member IWC, rather than three-quarters.
</p><p>
<span style="background-color: initial;">IWC meeting host Brazil is trying to rally other anti-whaling nations, such ads the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, to sign the </span>"Florianópolis Declaration" that states commercial whaling is a no longer economically necessary and would allow the recovery of all whale populations to pre-industrial whaling levels, according to <a href="https://www.france24.com/en/20180910-iwc-chief-says-crucial-talks-could-determine-whalings-future" target="_blank">AFP</a>.
</p><p>
<span style="background-color: initial;"><span></span>Conservation groups have </span>highlighted significant <a href="https://eia-international.org/reports-mm/keeptheban/#inhumane" target="_blank">welfare concerns</a> regarding "inhumane" time to death (TTD) rates after the whales are caught.
</p><ul class="ee-ul">
</ul><p>
<span style="background-color: initial;"><span></span>Whalers typically use an exploding harpoon to try to kill the animal "instantly"—defined by the IWC as within 10 seconds of being shot. </span>
</p><p>
<span style="background-color: initial;">However, t</span>he report from EIA and AWI found that the hunted whales have suffered up to 25 minutes before dying:
</p><ul class="ee-ul">
<li>Iceland's TTD data in 2014 claimed that 42 died "instantly" while eight whales had to be shot a second time and their median TTD was eight minutes.</li>
<li>Norway recently collected TTD data for 271 minke whales. The median TTD for the 49 whales not registered as instantaneous deaths was six minutes. One whale had to be shot twice, taking 20-25 minutes to die.</li>
<li>Japan's minke whales taken in the offshore North Pacific hunt take an average of two minutes to die, while those in the coastal hunt take over five minutes. Antarctic minkes take an average of 1.8 minutes to die.</li>
</ul><p>
Whaling opponents are urging the IWC to reaffirm its international moratorium on commercial whaling.
</p><p>
"If Japan gets its way, it would be a massive victory for those rogue whalers who have time and again defied the international ban on commercial whaling and an absolute disaster for the world's whales," said Clare Perry, EIA's Ocean Campaigns leader in a statement received by EcoWatch.
</p><p>
"Many whale species have not yet recovered from massive overhunting in the past, and they are also facing a wide array of mounting existential threats ranging from climate change to marine pollution by chemicals, plastics and noise," Perry added.
<u></u>
</p><p>
Kate O'Connell, marine wildlife consultant for the Animal Welfare Institute had similar sentiments.
</p><p>
"We're only just beginning to grasp the vital role whales play in maintaining the health of the world's oceans," O'Connell said. "Weakening the ban now would be a fatal mistake, and would open the doors to increased commercial whaling around the world. This cruel and unnecessary industry is a relic of the past that has no place in modern society."
</p><p>
"All other contracting governments to the IWC must step up to vigorously defend the moratorium from this new assault by Japan and its allies," O'Connell concluded.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1001615444745342976" id="twitter-embed-1001615444745342976" type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1001615444745342976&created_ts=1527638705.0&screen_name=EcoWatch&text=Japan+Kills+More+Than+120+Pregnant+Whales+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FPI5eMQHDAH+%40SeaShepherd+%40Oceanwire+%40savingoceans&id=1001615444745342976&name=EcoWatch" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="LWNDUH1576662701"></iframe>
</p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less
World’s Largest Sovereign Wealth Fund Raises Standards for Oceans, Sustainability
05 September 2018
Business
An ocean view in Norway. Harald Johnsen / CC BY 3.0
Norway's $1 trillion sovereign wealth fund, the largest in the world, released two documents Wednesday stating it wants the companies it invests in to follow more rigorous rules on ocean plastic pollution and overall sustainability, Reuters reported.
Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), which manages the fund that invests in more than 9,000 companies in 72 countries, said it expected companies to consider ocean sustainability when creating strategy, take ocean-related risks into account and be transparent and responsible in managing the oceans, CNBC reported.
<p style="">"The ocean is a vital part of the biosphere and an important part of the global economy," NBIM CEO Yngve Slyngstad said in a statement reported by CNBC. "We expect companies to manage the challenges and opportunities related to sustainable use of the ocean." </p><p style="">The fund's ocean "expectation document" is focused on companies that benefit from or impact the ocean in some way, from plastic producers to fisheries to shipping. These companies are worth $56.5 billion total and represent around 8 percent of the fund's global equities portfolio, Reuters reported.</p><p style="">Ocean plastic pollution has emerged as <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/oceans-plastic-pollution-2554131906.html" target="_blank">a major environmental problem</a> in recent years, and plastic producers make up about half of the companies targeted by the new document.</p><p style="">Ocean sustainability is one of Norway's stated foreign policy goals, since its main industries of oil and gas, fishing, shipping and fish farming are all dependent on the ocean.</p><p style="">The fund also issued a note Wednesday saying it wants companies to work towards meeting the <a href="https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs" target="_blank">UN's Sustainable Development Goals</a>, CNBC reported. The goals include environmentally responsible ways to alleviate poverty, promoting social equality and growing the economy by 2030. </p><p style="">The fund said there would be consequences for companies that didn't develop adequate strategies towards achieving these goals, according to Reuters.</p><p style="">"If we believe there isn't a long term sustainable model for various reasons, we will divest from them, like we have done with palm oil and deforestation," the fund's Chief Corporate Governance Officer Carine Smith Ihenacho told Reuters. </p><p style="">The fund was built off of oil and gas revenues, but Norway is currently in the process of deciding if it will divest the fund from <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/fossil-fuels" target="_self">fossil fuel</a> companies. A government-sponsored commission advised against this move in August, to the consternation of <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/climate-change" target="_self">climate change</a> activists, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/aug/24/norway-1tn-wealth-fund-urged-to-keep-oil-and-gas-investments" target="_blank">The Guardian reported</a>. </p><p style="">"This summer Nordic heatwaves, wildfires in the Arctic Circle and alarming news of the thickest Arctic sea ice starting to break up, have brought climate change so close to home for Norway. It seems unthinkable to continue to invest in companies that have caused this chaos," <a href="https://350.org/" target="_blank">350.org</a> Europe Team Leader Nicolò Wojewoda told The Guardian. </p><p style="">In the meantime, environmental group <a href="https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/" target="_blank">Greenpeace</a> was modestly optimistic about the fund's most recent sustainability decision. </p><p style="">"We would have liked to see from the expectation paper more specifics on issues like aquaculture, seabed mining and plastic use reduction," head of Greenpeace Nordic's sustainable finance campaign Martin Norman told Reuters. "But it is clearly a step in the right direction and we look forward to see results of their engagement with companies on ocean sustainability."</p>
<p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-twitter_embed">
<iframe width="100%" height="150" scrolling="no" class="rm-shortcode twitter-embed-1017773668087357440" id="twitter-embed-1017773668087357440" type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="/res/community/twitter_embed/?iframe_id=twitter-embed-1017773668087357440&created_ts=1531491126.0&screen_name=EcoWatch&text=Ireland+on+Path+to+Become+First+Country+to+Divest+from+Fossil+Fuels+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FgOUxFRu5AC+%23Ireland+%23Divestment%E2%80%A6+https%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FKj5RpMqidg&id=1017773668087357440&name=EcoWatch" frameborder="0" data-rm-shortcode-id="NCMPSD1576661692"></iframe>
</p>
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Read More
Show Less