Idaho activists are concerned that Alta Mesa Services (AMS) of Houston, TX, could hydraulically fracture rocks almost a mile underground to obtain natural gas and oil. AMS submitted an application to the Idaho Department of Lands (IDL) on April 30, for a permit to directionally drill a natural gas well under Highway 52 in Payette County, ID, using a lease to the mineral rights under Smoke Ranch.
Unlike the 11 wells sunk by Bridge Resources in 2010 and 2011 in the shallower, “tight” gas sandstone formation of the Hamilton field under Payette River bottomlands (at about 1,400 to 1,750 feet), this well represents the first incursion into the Willow gas field. This deeper of two potential plays in southwestern Idaho lies beneath the hills and buttes surrounding the agricultural communities of New Plymouth and Fruitland, below the Hamilton sandstone and underlying shale, at depths between 4,500 and 5,800 feet in sands over basalt.
As a dangerous method of oil and gas well stimulation, fracking forces millions of gallons of pressurized freshwater and toxic substances down wells to crack subsurface rocks and release small, substandard pockets of oil and natural gas. In dozens of states across the country, this process has produced hazardous, radioactive wastewater, contaminated air and water, generated cancer-causing pollution, compromised human and environmental health and safety, and released greenhouses gases causing climate change. Earthquakes triggered by fracking’s explosive charges and wastewater well injections could exacerbate Idaho’s fifth greatest amount of seismic activity in the nation and consequently shatter the mechanical integrity of such inherently toxic oil and gas wells.
The proposed Smoke Ranch well would frack Birding Island, within the extensive wetlands and floodplain confluence of the Payette River and Big Willow Creek, only a few miles upriver from the where the City of Fruitland's drinking water intake and the Payette/Snake River converge. The surrounding landscape is full of farms, ranches, livestock and wildlife dependent on clean surface streams and irrigation canals, and aquifers only 660 feet deep perch, without much distance or barriers, over gas-bearing zones in porous layers punctured by drilling activities.
Within one-half mile of this gas well, braided river islands to the southeast and bluffs to the north comprise the two largest sites of the 1,200-acre Payette River Wildlife Management Area (WMA), overseen by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game since 1960. The Payette River WMA maintains a rich Idaho natural heritage supporting year-round residents and migratory populations of raptors, waterfowl, song, water, shore and upland birds and other wildlife. The unique, diverse habitats of the islands and nearby mainland provide prime refuges for waterfowl nesting and brooding and for upland game bird nesting and wintering. Free, popular access to a network of walking trails and canoe reaches through riparian woods, lakes, ponds and marshes benefits the public with bird watching and other recreational opportunities.
Birding Island also hosts the former dwelling and lands of the Lenni-Lenape people, migrating descendants of the Delaware tribe. Between the later-established WMA on the east and the Payette River on the west, the home site next to the water was reached by a road from the north. Leander Creech and Pearl Stephenson Creech inhabited a three-room, log-frame “Big House” with pot-belly and cook stoves and a tar-paper roof, while several dozen tribal members stayed in tents and tee pees around their home. Living close to the land and animals, the extended families nurtured and protected the birds that resided in the riverine area. Gathering and hatching wild eggs or sometimes clipping birds’ wings, they raised birds in an enclosed, screened coup before freeing them on the island. Canada geese, great blue herons, snowy egrets, mallards, and other significant ancestors of WMA birds often returned to their island home of birth. The Delawares left the place that they called “Birdies Island” in 1945, after someone stole jewelry hidden in the walls and burned the house to the ground.
At an Aug. 3, 2012, auction, for the minimum average amount of $2.35 per acre, the IDL leased 1,900 acres of state mineral and surface rights in Payette and Gem counties to the high and only bidder, Snake River Oil and Gas (SROG), for about $4,450. The transferable, ten-year (or indefinite if productive) leases for oil and gas exploration and development cover 44 tracts of public trust lands, ranging from one-third acre to 153 acres, along and beneath the navigable river and lake beds of the Payette River. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game manages 395 acres of these public lands and received about $1,000 of the lease proceeds. Along with other industry-written state laws, rules and regulations, SROG railroaded House Bill 464 through the 2012 Idaho legislative session, essentially undermining local ordinances and control of oil and gas facilities and siting. SROG has since performed seismic tests to gather data and map areas surrounding the river, information that is not available to the public. Lease preconditions disallow drilling on—but not under—the river. Proceeds from the leases and the state’s 12 percent royalty fee on oil and natural gas production revenues could benefit Idaho’s general fund, which will probably be ultimately ravaged by the environmental aftermath of mine-and-run gas companies.
Now that oil and natural gas industry representatives have steamrolled every facet of state and county government, southwestern Idaho’s vital agricultural lands and recreational waters and forests could soon be poisoned by fracking around our rivers. Many of our lawmakers have too readily accepted industry assurances of safety and profitability as well as corresponding campaign contributions. They have neglected to demand studies to ascertain possible drilling impacts to surface, ground and irrigation waters, harm of human and wildlife health, damages to property values and public infrastructure, and costs to agricultural, recreation and tourism sectors. Who will pay for subsequent remediation of these myriad losses? Idaho citizens will, unless we resist this risky, industrial development of state lands, waters and adjacent parcels.
Alta Mesa Services may have already started site preparation of the Smoke Ranch well, although comments about this drilling application for the first potentially fracked well in Idaho are due to the IDF by May 30. Wild Idaho Rising Tide (WIRT) and our allies ask everyone to comment against permitting this poorly-placed well, while we further investigate these circumstances. WIRT will be distributing regional and national media releases opposing the permit, and coordinate protests at IDL offices throughout the state during the Stop the Frack Attack Week of Action, June 3 to 9. We are planning 3 p.m. demonstrations on Tuesday, June 4, at the IDL office at 3284 West Industrial Loop in Coeur d’Alene, and on Friday, June 7, at the IDL office at 300 North Sixth St. in Boise. WIRT is also instigating similar public participation at IDL units in Deary, Idaho Falls, Kamiah, McCall, Orofino, Priest Lake, St. Maries and Sandpoint.
Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.
- Thom Yorke of Radiohead Releases Song With Greenpeace to Help ... ›
- Patti Smith, Thom Yorke, Flea and More Featured on Just Released ... ›
- Musicians and Activists Unite at 'Pathway to Paris' - EcoWatch ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
A national park in Thailand has come up with an innovative way to make sure guests clean up their own trash: mail it back to them.
- Supermarkets in Thailand and Vietnam Swap Plastic Packaging for ... ›
- Malaysia Sends Plastic Waste Back to 13 Wealthy Countries, Says It ... ›
- Thailand Begins the New Year With Plastic Bag Ban - EcoWatch ›
- Coronavirus Worsens Thailand's Plastic Waste Crisis - EcoWatch ›
- Marium, Thailand's Beloved Baby Dugong, Is the Latest Victim of ... ›
By Ilana Cohen
Four years ago, Jacob Abel cast his first presidential vote for Donald Trump. As a young conservative from Concord, North Carolina, the choice felt natural.
But this November, he plans to cast a "protest vote" for a write-in candidate or abstain from casting a ballot for president. A determining factor in his 180-degree turn? Climate change.
Fractures Among Young Climate Conservatives<p>While young conservatives have united around the urgency of climate change, they remain divided over how to bring their concerns to the ballot box. Some embrace right-wing <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-attacks-republican-convention/2020/08/24/434e5b46-e66d-11ea-970a-64c73a1c2392_story.html" target="_blank">attacks</a> painting Biden as a "tool of the left" and find his climate agenda "radical." Others can't find a way to justify voting for Trump, even if it means breaking with their party.</p><p>Patrick Mann from Orange County, California, voted for Trump in 2016. But today, he's leading Aggies for Joe at Texas A&M University and is co-founder of Texas Students for Biden. </p><p>Mann grew up watching wildfires ravage his home state, nearly forcing his family to evacuate in 2017. The GOP is failing to "meet the moment" for climate action, Mann said. He's hoping Biden will deliver on a promise to "<a href="https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/caucus/2020/01/06/joe-biden-democrat-president-iowa-caucus-restore-soul-our-nation/2806422001/" target="_blank">restore the soul of our nation</a>." </p><p>Taylor Walker from Pensacola, Florida, is also determined to make her voice heard on climate, including by casting her first-ever vote for president—but not for Biden.</p>
A False Equivalency<p>Young climate conservatives may fear climate denial and delayed climate action, but more than that, they fear the growing political momentum around the Green New Deal, the massive spending it entails and <a href="https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/" target="_blank">Biden's citing of it</a> as a "crucial framing for meeting the climate challenges we face."</p><p>Many don't want to split with their party to support a Democrat whose <a href="https://www.npr.org/2019/09/03/757220130/joe-biden-on-bipartisanship-gun-control-and-regrets-over-inaction-after-a-traged" target="_blank">allegedly bipartisan intentions</a> they doubt. If stymieing what they consider a radical green agenda means re-electing a climate change denying president, so be it. </p><p>"I'm scared of climate change, but I'm also scared of the Green New Deal and what it means for America," said Ben Mutolo, a republicEN spokesperson and junior at SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. </p><p>Mutolo felt encouraged by former Ohio Governor John Kasich's <a href="https://www.rollcall.com/2020/08/17/kasich-speech-to-democratic-convention-follows-years-of-building-conservative-credentials/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">appearance</a> at the Democratic National Convention, but he still struggles to see himself voting for Biden. Though the candidate paints himself as a <a href="https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-08-12/harris-biden-different-generation-similar-political-instinct" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">centrist,</a> Mutolo believes he's "cozying up to the ultra-progressive left." </p><p>Mutolo, who wants to see market-based climate solutions like a carbon tax, feels torn between a candidate whose climate plan relies on taking an "<a href="https://joebiden.com/environmental-justice-plan/#" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">All-of-Government approach</a>," and one with no efforts to reign in global warming at all. <span></span></p><p>Leiserowitz said he appreciated how a conservative might feel Biden's climate plan "doesn't jive with their limited government, free-market approach."</p><p>But he sees a strong distinction between voting for a presidential candidate with a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/us/politics/biden-climate-plan.html" target="_blank">$2 trillion climate plan</a> that includes large renewable energy investments, which have <a href="https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/politics-global-warming-april-2020/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">bipartisan support</a>, and a candidate trying "to take the country in the opposite direction, towards more fossil fuels."</p>
- 7 Republicans Joined Senate Democrats in Vote to Fight Climate ... ›
- Climate Change Acknowledged by Increasing Number of ... ›
The World Health Organization (WHO) announced Monday that 64 high-income nations have joined an effort to distribute a COVID-19 vaccine fairly, prioritizing the most vulnerable citizens, as Science reported. The program is called the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access Facility, or Covax, and it is a joint effort led by the WHO, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
- Trump Denies CDC Director's 2021 Timeline for Coronavirus Vaccine ›
- CDC Tells States to Prepare for a Vaccine Before November Election ›
- Fauci Warns Pre-Pandemic Normalcy Not Likely Until Late 2021 ... ›
By Gloria Oladipo
In the face of dangerous heat waves this summer, Americans have taken shelter in air conditioned cooling centers. Normally, that would be a wise choice, but during a pandemic, indoor shelters present new risks. The same air conditioning systems that keep us cool recirculate air around us, potentially spreading the coronavirus.