Spinach vs. Kale: Is One Healthier?
Though they hail from entirely different plant families, they're often used interchangeably in recipes ranging from salads to soups to smoothies and beyond.
Still, despite their many similarities, several distinctions set them apart.
This article takes an in-depth look at the nutritional content and benefits of spinach and kale to determine which is healthier.
Both kale and spinach are highly nutritious, low-calorie vegetables that provide a wide array of important vitamins and minerals.
They're both high in vitamin K — a key vitamin involved in healthy blood clotting and bone formation (1).
Plus, they're rich in vitamin C, which plays a central role in disease prevention and immune function (2).
Both also contain fiber and several other important micronutrients in varying amounts, including vitamin A, riboflavin and calcium.
Here's how kale and spinach stack up against one another (3):
Spinach and kale offer a similar amount of several nutrients, but there are some differences as well.
For instance, kale contains more than twice the amount of vitamin C, while spinach provides more vitamin K, vitamin A and folate.
Still, though spinach and kale have different concentrations of certain nutrients, they're both highly nutritious vegetable choices overall.
Spinach and kale are both low in calories but contain varying amounts of fiber, vitamin K, vitamin C and several other micronutrients.
Potential Health Benefits
In addition to their stellar nutrient profiles, both kale and spinach have been linked to impressive health benefits.
They've also each been shown to positively impact heart health by improving several heart disease risk factors, such as high cholesterol and blood pressure.
Meanwhile, a small study in 27 people found that eating a soup made with about 9 ounces (250 grams) of spinach for just 7 days improved blood pressure.
Spinach and kale are high in antioxidants and cancer-fighting compounds. Both have been shown to reduce several heart disease risk factors and may aid weight loss.
Spinach Is High in Oxalate
Eating oxalate-rich foods also increases the excretion of oxalate through your urine, which can lead to the formation of calcium oxalate kidney stones (15).
There are several different types of kidney stones, but it's estimated that about 80% are composed of calcium oxalate (16).
Those who are at high risk of kidney stones are often advised to limit their intake of foods high in oxalate, including spinach (17).
Boiling spinach can reduce the concentration of dietary oxalate by up to 87% (18).
Spinach contains oxalate, which can prevent calcium absorption in your body and may contribute to kidney stone formation.
Kale May Contain Goitrin
Cruciferous vegetables, such as kale, contain goitrin — a compound that may interfere with thyroid function by decreasing the uptake of iodine, which is necessary for the production of thyroid hormones (19).
Spinach may also contain goitrogenic properties, though not to the same extent as cruciferous vegetables like kale.
Disruptions in thyroid function can impact your metabolism and cause symptoms like fatigue, sensitivity to cold and weight changes (20).
However, recent research suggests that eating goitrogen-rich foods in moderation is unlikely to cause issues for most people.
For example, human and animal studies show that eating broccoli sprouts and Brussels sprouts doesn't affect thyroid function or thyroid hormone levels, suggesting that it's safe for those with thyroid issues (21, 22).
Additionally, cooking vegetables deactivates the enzyme responsible for the release of goitrin (25).
Therefore, if you have thyroid problems, cooking kale or spinach prior to eating it and ensuring you get enough iodine in your diet from foods like seafood and dairy can help prevent any side effects caused by goitrin.
Kale contains goitrin, a compound that can interfere with thyroid function. Eating enough iodine and cooking kale before eating it can help prevent any potential negative side effects.
Is One Healthier?
There are several small differences in the nutritional content and health benefits of kale and spinach.
Still, both are incredibly nutrient-dense and can be enjoyed as part of a well-rounded, healthy diet.
Ideally, try incorporating a few servings of each into your weekly meals, along with an assortment of other leafy greens, such as romaine, Swiss chard, collard greens and cabbage.
Not only do each of these ingredients bring a different set of nutrients to the table, but they can also add a bit of variety and new flavors to your diet.
Here are a few simple ideas to start adding these delicious vegetables to your routine:
- Add kale or spinach to a salad topped with vegetables and a good source of protein.
- Use kale or spinach as a topping for your favorite dishes, including sandwiches, tacos, pasta or casseroles.
- Try sautéing and seasoning kale or spinach as a healthy side dish for your main courses.
- Combine your choice of greens with other veggies and eggs to make a hearty breakfast scramble.
- Whip up a green smoothie using kale, spinach and a few of your favorite fruits and vegetables.
Kale and spinach may differ slightly in terms of nutritional value and health benefits, but both can be included as part of a healthy diet.
The Bottom Line
Kale and spinach are highly nutritious and and associated with several benefits.
While kale offers more than twice the amount of vitamin C as spinach, spinach provides more folate and vitamins A and K.
Both are linked to improved heart health, increased weight loss and protection against disease.
Therefore, enjoying both as part of a healthy, balanced diet can ensure you're able to take advantage of the unique benefits that each has to offer — while also adding a bit of variety to your daily meals.
Reposted with permission from our media associate Healthline.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
- 29 Wildfires Blaze Across the West, Fueled by Drought and Wind ... ›
- Large Wildfires Scorch Forests in Drought-Stricken Southwest ... ›
Accessibility to quality health care has dropped for millions of Americans who lost their health insurance due to unemployment. mixetto / E+ / Getty Images
Accessibility to quality health care has dropped for millions of Americans who lost their health insurance due to unemployment. New research has found that 5.4 million Americans were dropped from their insurance between February and May of this year. In that three-month stretch more Americans lost their coverage than have lost coverage in any entire year, according to The New York Times.
- Trump Plans to End Federal Funding for COVID-19 Testing Sites ... ›
- 'Unfathomable Cruelty': Trump Admin Asks Supreme Court to ... ›
On hot days in New York City, residents swelter when they're outside and in their homes. The heat is not just uncomfortable. It can be fatal.
- Extreme Heat-Stressed Locations Could Increase by 80% - EcoWatch ›
- African Americans Are Disproportionately Exposed to Extreme Heat ... ›
- Extreme Heat Is Killing Americans While Government Neglect ... ›
Fracking companies are going bankrupt at a rapid pace, often with taxpayer-funded bonuses for executives, leaving harm for communities, taxpayers, and workers, the New York Time reports.
- Plunging Oil Prices Trigger Economic Downturn in Fracking Boom ... ›
- Fracking Boom Bursts in Face of Low Oil Prices - EcoWatch ›
- As Fracking Companies Face Bankruptcy, U.S. Regulators Enable ... ›
A report scheduled for release later Tuesday by Congress' non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) finds that the Trump administration undervalues the costs of the climate crisis in order to push deregulation and rollbacks of environmental protections, according to The New York Times.
- Under Trump, EPA Workers Seek Bill of Rights to Allow Them to ... ›
- Trump Adds 'Tasteless Insult to Injury' by Pushing Fossil Fuel ... ›
By Kristen Fischer
It's going to be back-to-school time soon, but will children go into the classrooms?
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) thinks so, but only as long as safety measures are in place.
Keeping Schools Safe<p>What will safer schools look like?</p><p>In a <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766822" target="_blank">JAMA article</a> published last month, <a href="https://www.jhsph.edu/faculty/directory/profile/1781/joshua-m-sharfstein" target="_blank">Dr. Joshua Sharfstein</a>, a pediatrician and professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, outlined suggestions — many of which are similar to AAP's.</p><p>Remote learning protocols must stay in place, especially as some schools stagger home and in-building learning. If another shutdown needs to occur, children will rely on distance learning completely, so it must be easy to switch to, he said.</p><p>He suggested giving parents a daily checklist to document their child's health. Kids should be screened quickly on arrival and be given hygiene supplies. Maintenance staff should use appropriate PPE and have regular cleaning schedules. A notification system should be in place if a case is identified, Sharfstein recommended.</p><p><a href="https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/erika-martin" target="_blank">Erika Martin</a>, PhD, an associate professor of public administration and policy at University at Albany, said nutrition assistance and health services should be included. She called for tutoring programs with virtual options as well as technology access.</p>
Supporting Staff<p>Teachers and staff will be affected by safeguarding measures, noted <a href="https://directory.sph.umn.edu/bio/sph-a-z/rachel-widome" target="_blank">Rachel Widome</a>, PhD, an associate professor of epidemiology and community health at University of Minnesota.</p><p>"In order for all of the in-school precautions to work well, we'll be asking a lot of teachers and staff," Widome told Healthline. In addition to their usual workload, they'll now be asked to monitor mask-wearing, ensure children are keeping distance, and be aware of any symptoms.</p><p>Along with Sharfstein, Widome called for an increase in financial support. More employees will likely be required so teachers and staff members can keep up with the added demands.</p>
Should Kids Go Back?<p>While these guidelines may help get some schools to reopen, many people don't think children should go back to school over fears they could contract the disease and spread it to other vulnerable family members like grandparents, infant siblings, or their parents.</p><p>In a <a href="https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2020/07/08/peds.2020-004879" target="_blank">Pediatrics</a> commentary, <a href="https://www.md.com/doctor/william-raszka-md" target="_blank">Dr. William V. Raszka, Jr.</a>, an infectious disease specialist at The University of Vermont Medical Center, argued that schools should open because school-aged children are far less important drivers of COVID-19 than adults.</p><p>But he says the risk and benefit is not equal among all students ages 5 to 18.</p><p>"Elementary schools are arguably higher priority for face-to-face schooling, since younger children are at lower risk for infection and transmission, and since parental supervision of younger children's distance learning may be particularly challenging," added Sorensen, who penned a <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/channels/health-forum/fullarticle/2767411" target="_blank">June article in JAMA</a> with reopening tips. "That means middle and high schools are more likely to emphasize distance learning."</p><p>Specific student populations, such as special education students and students with disabilities, would also benefit greatly from more time spent in face-to-face environments, Sorensen said.</p>
What Parents Can Do<p>Parents should ask for and receive frequent updates from schools about plans for the fall. They should also be informed about plans if and when COVID infections are identified, Sharfstein said.</p><p>"I'd like to see parents investing now, during the summer, in doing things that can slow and stop the spread of the virus in their communities," Widome said.</p><p>"Now is a good time for kids to practice wearing masks and get used to them as they may be wearing them for longer stretches if school starts up in person," Widome suggested.</p><p>She recommends parents try different mask designs and materials to see what children are more comfortable wearing.</p><p>"If you are using cloth face coverings, it's good to have extras on hand," Widome added.</p><p>Parents should model healthy behavior at home and while out in public — another thing that could affect how well children adapt to reopening practices, Sorensen said.</p><p>"Children may want to know more about face coverings," added <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/leescott/" target="_blank">Lee Scott</a>, chairwoman of the Educational Advisory Board at <a href="https://www.goddardschool.com/" target="_blank">The Goddard School</a>. "Dramatic play, such as creating or wearing a face covering, may help some children adjust to this concept." Schools can also show children photos of what faculty members look like in their masks so the students are familiar with that appearance.</p><p>Johns Hopkins University recently released its eSchool+ Initiative, a slew of resources surrounding education during the pandemic. These include a <a href="https://equityschoolplus.jhu.edu/reopening-checklist/" target="_blank">checklist for administrators</a>, report on <a href="https://equityschoolplus.jhu.edu/ethics-of-reopening/" target="_blank">ethical considerations</a>, and a tracker of <a href="https://equityschoolplus.jhu.edu/reopening-policy-tracker/" target="_blank">state and local reopening plans</a>.</p>
- Trump Admin Rejects CDC Reopening Guidelines - EcoWatch ›
- How Do You Stay Safe Now That States Are Reopening? - EcoWatch ›
- Florida Breaks U.S. Daily Record With Over 15,000 New ... ›
By Eoin Higgins
Over 300 groups on Monday urged Senate leadership to reject a bill currently under consideration that would incentivize communities to sell off their public water supplies to private companies for pennies on the dollar.
<div id="fea63" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9a6f211c2bc5aedd34837944cb8eeedf"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1281000111481294849" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Water in Illinois is overwhelmingly public. Why is Tammy Duckworth sponsoring a bill that aims to change that? https://t.co/1V36Kkd99s</div> — The American Prospect (@The American Prospect)<a href="https://twitter.com/TheProspect/statuses/1281000111481294849">1594249201.0</a></blockquote></div>
- DNC Ignores Progressive Climate Activists - EcoWatch ›
- Who's a Climate Champion and Who's a Climate Disaster? - EcoWatch ›