Sierra Club and U.S. Rep. Mike Pompeo Spar in Twitter Debate on Climate Change
Because it flows frenetically, all day and every day, Twitter makes it easy to miss out on good exchanges.
And if you weren't on your laptop, phone or tablet around 12:30 p.m. on Thursday, you definitely missed a good one.
Back-and-forth tweeting between the Sierra Club and U.S. Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KS) centered on climate change, but in a way that offered a little something for everybody. There was evidence of donations from the Koch Brothers; an accusation that U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy was unable to answer one of Pompeo's climate questions; and a couple requests from Pompeo for others to "show me the data."
The Sierra Club responded with a mention of the common belief of 97 percent of climate scientists, followed by a rather sharp zinger: "... it's refreshing to see a Republican suddenly so interested in science."
The Twitter exchange embedded below speaks for itself, but notice that Pompeo never responded to one of the Sierra Club's early questions: "So you're saying that you agree with the science that says that climate change is real and caused by burning fossil fuels?"
.@repmikepompeo can't stand the @epa carbon standards. His top donors? Koch bros and the oil & gas industry: http://t.co/heJyqdMQYD
— Sierra Club (@sierraclub) June 19, 2014
@sierraclub @EPA is proposing a costly policy. They refuse to show data supporting their claims. I'm focused on science and good policy here
— Mike Pompeo (@RepMikePompeo) June 19, 2014
@sierraclub @EPA claims it can fix climate change. I ask "How much?" "When?" Show me the data. Nothing. Instead it's all just politics.
— Mike Pompeo (@RepMikePompeo) June 19, 2014
.@RepMikePompeo @EPA So you're saying that you agree w/ the science that says that climate change is real & caused by burning fossil fuels?
— Sierra Club (@sierraclub) June 19, 2014
@sierraclub If @EPA proposes costly policies that hurt American families, it has responsibility to provide the supporting data. They won't.
— Mike Pompeo (@RepMikePompeo) June 19, 2014
@sierraclub Motivations are immaterial to a policy discussion. Show science of how this specific policy impacts sea levels, or world temp.
— Mike Pompeo (@RepMikePompeo) June 19, 2014
@sierraclub When I asked Gina McCarthy of @EPA, she explained she couldn't measure that. But that it positioned us as a global leader.
— Mike Pompeo (@RepMikePompeo) June 19, 2014
@sierraclub If @EPA is serious about policymaking it should do things it can measure and impact, and that won't hurt American families.
— Mike Pompeo (@RepMikePompeo) June 19, 2014
@sierraclub I'm disappointed to see you keep attacking those who use empirical data in policy discussion. @EPA shouldn't be guesstimating.
— Mike Pompeo (@RepMikePompeo) June 19, 2014
.@RepMikePompeo Simple! Plan cuts carbon pollution from power plants = #1 cause of climate disruption = #1 cause of sea level rise
— Sierra Club (@sierraclub) June 19, 2014
.@RepMikePompeo If you're looking for empirical data on climate science, which you deny, 97% of climate scientists can provide that for you.
— Sierra Club (@sierraclub) June 19, 2014
.@RepMikePompeo On the other hand, it's refreshing to see a Republican suddenly so interested in science.
— Sierra Club (@sierraclub) June 19, 2014
@sierraclub So how much sea level rise will we stop as a consequence of this plan? Show me data. Hard numbers. Or is that all guesswork?
— Mike Pompeo (@RepMikePompeo) June 19, 2014
.@RepMikePompeo Do you understand the hard numbers about carbon pollution leading to sea level rise?
— Sierra Club (@sierraclub) June 19, 2014
Actress Lucy Lawless Joins Greenpeace Protest Against Arctic Drilling
Eleven peaceful activists from the Greenpeace ship Arctic Sunrise have taken to the water in inflatable boats with handheld banners to oppose the Statoil Songa Enabler oil rig, 275 km North off the Norwegian coast, in the Arctic Barents sea.
The banners say: "People Vs. Arctic Oil" and are directed at Statoil and the Norwegian government, which has opened a new, aggressive search for oil in the waters of the Barents Sea.
FERC Paves Way for Atlantic Coast Pipeline
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) paved the way Friday for the 600-mile, 42-inch fracked gas Atlantic Coast Pipeline to proceed when it issued the final environmental impact statement (FEIS). A joint project of utility giants Duke Energy and Dominion Energy, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline would move fracked gas from West Virginia into Virginia and North Carolina.
In April, the Sierra Club submitted more than 500 pages of legal and technical comments on FERC's draft EIS, which were joined by more than 18,000 individual comments detailing opposition to the project. The pipeline has been met with widespread opposition, with more than 1,000 people participating in public hearings across the three affected states. The Sierra Club recently requested that FERC issue a new environmental review document analyzing information that came in after or late in, the public comment process.
Exxon Fined $2M for 'Reckless Disregard' of Sanctions During Tillerson Era
By Jessica Corbett
"It's time Rex Tillerson step down or be removed," said Gigi Kellett of Corporate Accountability International, following an announcement on Thursday that ExxonMobil will pay $2 million for violating U.S. sanctions against Russian officials while the now-secretary of state was the company's CEO.
"ExxonMobil demonstrated reckless disregard for U.S. sanction requirements," according to enforcement filing released by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which issued the penalty. Though the fine is reportedly the maximum penalty allowed, it's pittance to one of the world's most profitable and powerful corporations, which last year reported a profit of $7.8 billion.
Amory Lovins: Nukes Not the Answer
New analysis from Amory B. Lovins debunks the notion that highly unprofitable, economically distressed nuclear plants should be further subsidized to meet financial, security, reliability and climate goals. The analysis, which will appear shortly in The Electricity Journal, shows that closing costly-to-run nuclear plants and reinvesting their saved operating costs in energy efficiency provides cheaper electricity, increases grid reliability and security, reduces more carbon, and preserves (not distorts) market integrity—all without subsidies.
Senate's Dirty Energy Bill Would Lock U.S. Into Fossil-Fuel Dependency for Decades
By Christian Detisch and Seth Gladstone
In the wake of Senate Republicans' ever-deepening debacle over their flailing attempts to strip health insurance from 22 million people, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is desperate to do something—anything—to show that he can get legislation passed. To this end, he's bypassing the standard committee review process to push a complex 850+ page energy bill straight to the full Senate floor. Perhaps not surprisingly, this legislation, the Energy and Natural Resources Act of 2017, would be a disaster for public health and our climate.
Thanks to Inspiration From a Teenager, All New Homes in South Miami Must Install Solar
A new law passed this week in South Miami will require all new homes built in the city to install solar panels. The measure, which was inspired by a proposal from a teenage climate activist, will go into effect in September.
The text of the ordinance details the climate impacts facing South Miami.
Koch-Funded Electric Car Video Debunked Again and Again
By Ben Jervey
Just last week, we fact-checked and debunked every line of The Dirty Secrets of Electric Cars, a video produced by Fueling U.S. Forward, a Koch-funded campaign to push fossil fuels. That video represents the group's first public pivot from fossil fuel boosterism to electric vehicle (EV) attacks. More electric vehicle experts are also picking the video apart.
One effort is this video highlighting many of the same falsehoods we wrote about, and which adds key context about some of the video footage. Like, for instance, the fact that the photo that Fueling U.S. Forward claims is a lithium, cobalt or cerium mining operation is actually a copper mine.
Here's How to Boycott Organic Imposters
By Katherine Paul and Ronnie Cummins
A recent series of articles by a Washington Post reporter could have some consumers questioning the value of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) organic seal. But are a few bad eggs representative of an entire industry?
Consumers are all for cracking down on the fraudulent few who, with the help of Big Food, big retail chains and questionable certifiers give organics a bad name. But they also want stronger standards, and better enforcement—not a plan to weaken standards to accommodate "Factory Farm Organic."
