Americans went into the voting booth yesterday with horrific images of the fallout from superstorm Sandy fresh in their minds. Pictures of homes ripped from their moorings, stories of children whisked away by rushing waters, reports of elderly people trapped on top floors of buildings—the true cost of ignoring science's warnings about global warming are now all too vivid.
But as you prepared to pull the lever for your favored issues and candidates, I hope that more positive images also crossed your mind. As they always do, our citizens are working together to dig each other out from the devastation left in Sandy's wake.
At Greenpeace, our first thoughts after Sandy were about the safety of those left homeless in the storm's wake, so we did what little we could, sending our Rolling Sunlight truck to bear witness and help power relief efforts in Rockaway Beach with its solar panels. We've been encouraged to see how much others in the community are doing as well. You should help however you can too.
But after doing what we can for those hurt by the storm, it's time to think about global warming and what we can do about it. And, as you would expect in the wake of a massive crisis that scientists say was driven in part by global warming, many Americans are demanding that their leaders finally find the courage to stand up to the fossil fuel industry and take action on climate change.
At Greenpeace we are far from the only ones connecting the dots. My new issue of Bloomberg Businessweek arrived last week, shouting from the cover: "It's Global Warming, Stupid." New York's Mayor Bloomberg, the most famous independent voter the country, said he voted for the man he thought was most likely to stop global warming because he wants his city protected from increasingly extreme weather that is fueled by global warming.
President Obama took good steps to address global warming during his first term, enacting some policies that support clean energy and others that cut pollution from cars and power plants. But he never made global warming a priority. Of course, Sandy wasn't President Obama's fault. But if he doesn't hear this storm as a wake-up call that he echoes to businesses, governments, and the public, future generations will judge him for not doing more to prevent future disasters.
What would presidential leadership look like?
First, the president should acknowledge that the decades of inaction wrought by industry lobbyists mean that we're already facing a reality of extreme weathers like Sandy. You don't need a Ph.D. to see that—you just need the Weather Channel. The president must convene stakeholders from the local, state and federal levels to prepare for the impacts of global warming. We need to start planning now for the next Hurricane Sandy, for more droughts like the one that decimated crop yields in the Midwest this year, for longer and more intense wildfire seasons in the West, and the myriad other impacts coming our way.
Second, the president needs to go after the carbon pollution that's driving storms like Sandy. That means getting serious about replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy. He should prioritize cutting emissions from power plants, but there's a long list of actions he can take, like cutting taxpayer subsidies to coal, oil and fracking, passing tax incentives for electric cars and safe, renewable energy like wind and solar, and putting a price on carbon so that the polluters pay for the damage they've done. And he must not fall into the trap of thinking natural gas is the answer—at the end of the day, gas is still a dirty fuel, and every dollar spent on fracking and gas plants is a dollar wasted because it's not spent on renewable energy and efficiency.
But the most important thing the president can do is to use the bully pulpit to unite the country behind solutions. He needs to make global warming a priority, and explain—as many times as necessary—that this issue is tied up in every challenge America faces. We will never have real national security if our water resources edge closer to running out and the most anti-American and conflict-rife regions of the world face greater and greater climate impacts. We won't stay competitive with China if we fail to invest in the clean energy technologies that are helping to drive job growth there. We won't balance the national checkbook if we continue to respond reactively to $50 billion storms year in and year out. And American families won't have peace and prosperity if we let their houses get wiped away by superstorms because we lacked the political courage to stand up to Exxon-Mobil and Peabody coal.
These tasks won't be easy. King Coal and Big Oil will fight the president harder and dirtier than ever to protect their profits with no regard for the Americans who bear the brunt of storms like Sandy. But now is the moment, while the horrific pictures from New York and New Jersey are still seared into the public consciousness, for President Obama to set us on a course to a world which I would feel far better about passing on to my children.
If President Obama rises to meet this challenge, Americans will remember Sandy, and we will stand behind him.
Visit EcoWatch’s CLIMATE CHANGE page for more related news on this topic.
By Jessica Corbett
This story was originally published on Common Dreams on September 19, 2020.
Some advocates kicked off next week's Climate Week NYC early Saturday by repurposing the Metronome, a famous art installation in Union Square that used to display the time of day, as a massive "Climate Clock" in an effort to pressure governments worldwide to take swift, bold action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and rein in human-caused global heating.
<div id="0bde7" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="002ce26d8d0c627f76d752e14d234d6e"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1307397838884741121" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">LIVE: #ClimateClock about to go live at Union square replacing the atronomical clock, with a carbon countdown!… https://t.co/5OzxwUwWDf</div> — Greg Schwedock🌹(⧖) (@Greg Schwedock🌹(⧖))<a href="https://twitter.com/GregSchwedock/statuses/1307397838884741121">1600542909.0</a></blockquote></div><p>A mobile climate clock that Swedish youth activist Greta Thunberg "now carries with her, as well as the larger Climate Clock project, was assembled by a team of artists, makers, scientists, and activists based in New York, and is part of the Beautiful Trouble community of projects," according to <a href="https://climateclock.world/" target="_blank">Climateclock.world</a>, which details the science behind the numbers displayed and how to install clocks in other cities.</p>
- 5 Virtual Events to Check Out This Climate Week NYC - EcoWatch ›
- Covering Climate Now Highlights Solutions for Earth Week - EcoWatch ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
The passing of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg means the nation's highest court has lost a staunch advocate for women's rights and civil rights. Ginsburg was a tireless worker, who continued to serve on the bench through multiple bouts of cancer. She also leaves behind a complicated environmental legacy, as Environment and Energy News (E&E News) reported.
- Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule ... ›
- Supreme Court Upholds Virginia's Ban on Uranium Mining - EcoWatch ›
- In Major Win for Indigenous Rights, Supreme Court Rules Much of ... ›
Project goal: To create an environmentally friendly and sustainable alternative to leather, in this case using fungi.
The plastic recycling model was never economically viable, but oil and gas companies still touted it as a magic solution to waste, selling the American public a lie so the companies could keep pushing new plastic.
- U.S. Products Labeled Recyclable Really Aren't, Greenpeace ... ›
- The Recycling Dilemma: Good Plastic, Bad plastic? - EcoWatch ›
- The Complex and Frustrating Reality of Recycling Plastic - EcoWatch ›
By Pamela Davis-Kean
With in-person instruction becoming the exception rather than the norm, 54% of parents with school-age children expressed concern that their children could fall behind academically, according to a poll conducted over the summer of 2020. Initial projections from the Northwest Evaluation Association, which conducts research and creates commonly used standardized tests, suggest that these fears are well-grounded, especially for children from low-income families.
- How Other Countries Reopened Schools During the Pandemic ... ›
- Young People Are Primary Coronavirus Spreaders, WHO Warns ... ›
- How Families Can Boost Kids' Mental Health During the Pandemic ... ›