The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
By Marlene Cimons
Scientists know that sea levels have risen more in some places during the past century than in others. They've gone up faster along the Mid-Atlantic States, particularly near Cape Hatteras and the Chesapeake Bay, compared to north along the Gulf of Maine and south along the South Atlantic Bight. But why?
"Sea-level rise affects us all," said Chris Piecuch, assistant scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and lead author of a new study recently published in the journal Nature that explains the reasons for sea-level rise variations on the East Coast. "Those of us who live on the coast are feeling, and will continue, to feel more acutely its effects. But even those who don't live on the coast will feel the effects. Going into the future, over the coming centuries, multiple meters of global sea-level rise are possible. And even if the nature of storms doesn't change in the future, the higher 'baseline' of rising seas will make the impacts of coastal storms worse. Sea-level rise will come, making the bad worse."
Piecuch and his colleagues attribute the "unequal" sea-level rise in the East to a phenomenon known as "post-glacial rebound."
Thousands of years ago, large ice sheets covered large parts of northern North America, including large swaths of Canada and the northeastern U.S. As a consequence—because the ice sheets were so massive and heavy—they weighed down Earth's crust, causing it to sink directly beneath the ice sheet. "As a result, places that were around the edges or periphery of that ice sheet were actually levered up," Piecuch explained. "It's an imperfect analogy, but you can perhaps think of a see-saw. When you sit on one end of a seesaw, it goes down, whereas the other end of the seesaw goes up. Again, this was the picture thousands of years ago."
In the intervening time, the ice sheets melted, reducing the weight. As a result, the areas formerly sunken down under that massive weight could relax and rise up, whereas those regions around the edges that were formerly levered or bulged up sank, he said. "The seesaw is again helpful here," he said. "If you imagine stepping off the seesaw now, the end you'd been sitting on can rise back up, whereas the other end now sinks down."
Even though the ice sheets had disappeared by 7,000 years ago, the see-sawing of post-glacial rebound continues to this day, he said. "Because the Earth responds so gradually—and is, in a sense, still feeling the last ice age—that 'reverse' see-sawing is still ongoing, with land moving up in some places and down in others," he said. "And it's that spatially variable land motion that gives the effect of different rates of sea-level rise at different places on the East Coast."
While the differences on the East Coast are due mainly to naturally occurring post-glacial rebound, the exacerbating effects of climate change are "felt everywhere along the east coast commonly," he said. "The oceans are warming and expanding thermally, and land ice is melting, and that water is running off into the ocean, both causing sea level to rise. We know that global sea-level rise over the last century was faster than any other time during the last three millennia, that sea levels wouldn't have risen nearly the amount we observe if it weren't for human influence, and we know that—even over just the last 25 years—the rate of global sea-level rise has been accelerating. These and other evidences are telling us that what has been happening during the recent past is unusual and anomalous. And, based on our best understanding of the science, we can only anticipate that things will continue to accelerate, and problems of coastal impacts worsen."
To figure out why sea levels rose faster during the last 100 years in such areas as Norfolk Naval Station in Virginia and the Outer Banks in North Carolina, Piecuch and his team collected tidal gauge measurements of sea levels, GPS satellite data showing the extent of up-and-down land movement over time, and fossils in sediment from salt marshes, a record of past coastal sea levels. They combined this observational data with complex geophysical models—which hasn't been done before, they said—for a more complete interpretation of sea level changes since 1900.
Norfolk, Virginia and the Outer Banks, North Carolina.Google Maps
They found that post-glacial rebound accounted for most of the variation in sea-level rise along the East Coast. But even after eliminating the post-glacial rebound factor, "sea level trends [still] increased steadily from Maine all the way down to Florida," Piecuch said. "The cause for that could involve more recent melting of glaciers and ice sheets, groundwater extraction and damming over the last century.
"Sea level is a complicated problem," he continued. "Lots of processes can lead to sea-level rise, for example, geological processes like post-glacial rebound compounding the problem of climate change and its impacts on the coast. One thing that's useful about our study is that, for the East Coast, we've pinned down one part of the problem. And, since that problem unfolds over very long time scales, we can be confident predicting that component of sea-level rise centuries into the future. But, of course, that says nothing about the other parts of the sea-level rise problem, for example, due to ongoing ice melting and ocean warming."
His study is an attempt to bolster scientific knowledge about the factors involved, which should "help us understand how and why they will rise into the future, at a particular place, and for a particular time horizon," he said. "While these studies can't stem the rise of the tides, it can give us the best information possible so as to help us anticipate the impacts on our coasts."
To be sure, uncertainties remain. "We're still trying to understand just how much and just how fast sea levels will rise in the future," he said. Nevertheless, the news almost certainly will be bad. "There really are no good stories here," he said. "Under no physically plausible scenarios will global sea levels go down. They're certainly going to continue rising, very probably at accelerated rates, for decades and centuries into the future."
Reposted with permission from our media associate Nexus Media.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
‘Companies Should Not Be Allowed to Use Hazardous Ingredients in Products People Use’: Michelle Pfeiffer Speaks Up for Safer Cosmetics
The beauty products we put on our skin can have important consequences for our health. Just this March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned that some Claire's cosmetics had tested positive for asbestos. But the FDA could only issue a warning, not a recall, because current law does not empower the agency to do so.
Michelle Pfeiffer wants to change that.
The actress and Environmental Working Group (EWG) board member was spotted on Capitol Hill Thursday lobbying lawmakers on behalf of a bill that would increase oversight of the cosmetics industry, The Washington Post reported.
By Julia Conley
Scientists at the United Nations' intergovernmental body focusing on biodiversity sounded alarms earlier this month with its report on the looming potential extinction of one million species — but few heard their calls, according to a German newspaper report.
The climate crisis is a major concern for American voters with nearly 40 percent reporting the issue will help determine how they cast their ballots in the upcoming 2020 presidential election, according to a report compiled by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
Of more than 1,000 registered voters surveyed on global warming, climate and energy policies, as well as personal and collective action, 38 percent said that a candidate's position on climate change is "very important" when it comes to determining who will win their vote. Overall, democratic candidates are under more pressure to provide green solutions as part of their campaign promises with 64 percent of Democrat voters saying they prioritize the issue compared with just 34 percent of Independents and 12 percent of Republicans.
President Donald Trump has agreed to sign a $19.1 billion disaster relief bill that will help Americans still recovering from the flooding, hurricanes and wildfires that have devastated parts of the country in the past two years. Senate Republicans said they struck a deal with the president to approve the measure, despite the fact that it did not include the funding he wanted for the U.S.-Mexican border, CNN reported.
"The U.S. Senate has just approved a 19 Billion Dollar Disaster Relief Bill, with my total approval. Great!" the president tweeted Thursday.