Quantcast
Environmental News for a Healthier Planet and Life

Help Support EcoWatch

Rollback of Environmental Regulations Destroy Florida's Greatest Assets

Rollback of Environmental Regulations Destroy Florida's Greatest Assets

St. Johns Riverkeeper

By Jimmy Orth

Are you one of the millions of Florida citizens who love and value our state’s beautiful beaches, springs, wetlands, forests and rivers, like the St. Johns River? If so, buckle your chinstrap and get ready to help defend and protect Florida’s natural heritage from another barrage of attacks from shortsighted politicians and industry groups. Governor Rick Scott and many of our state’s legislators have made no bones about their intentions to scale back environmental and growth management regulations, and they are off to a good start. Regrettably, this wrong-headed approach to stimulating Florida’s economy will only benefit a few at the expense of the majority of our citizens and future generations.

Unfortunately, they don’t seem to grasp the significant economic and human health benefit of a clean and healthy environment. Natural systems provide valuable services to humans (clean air, food prevention, water purification, etc.) that would be much more expensive or even impossible for us to replicate. Our natural resources are extremely important to our quality of life and are a major reason why so many people visit or relocate to our state in the first place. They have also ignored the enormous cost of pollution. Pollution hurts many businesses, costs jobs, impacts human health, reduces property values and our tax base, and diminishes recreational opportunities and our quality of life. These significant costs are rarely if ever mentioned or offset against the cost of compliance when the efficacy of regulations is being publicly debated or evaluated. Ignoring the consequences and external costs of pollution is irresponsible and a disservice to the citizens of Florida.

The result is that these politicians are dismantling our environmental safeguards with very little evidence or justification for their actions. In fact, regulations generally provide a net economic benefit that far outweighs the cost of compliance. The most recent cost-benefit report on major regulations by the non-partisan Office of Management and Budget found that total annual benefits are “between $132 billion and $655 billion, while the estimated annual costs are in the aggregate between $44 billion and $62 billion.” The same holds true when only looking at environmental regulations, such as the Clean Air Act. The OMB found that the total economic benefits of the Clean Air Act are estimated at more than four to eight times the costs of compliance. In the last two decades, emissions of the most common air pollutants have declined by 41 percent, while Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has increased by more than 64 percent. In other words, most of the environmental safeguards that protect our environment and human health are actually a boon for our economy, not the “job killing” red tape that detractors would have us falsely believe.

In addition to abolishing regulations, our governor and legislature are threatening the health of Florida’s environment by weakening policies, lowering water quality standards and neutralizing planning and regulatory agencies through budget cuts, moratoriums or political pressure. Their aggressive actions have already dramatically changed the course of the water management districts and water policy in this state, putting us on a path toward less protection for our already-imperiled waterways and aquifer.

For instance, a dramatic shift has taken place within the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). The SJRWMD has abandoned efforts to produce an updated water supply plan, once a top priority said to be legislatively mandated and an essential road map to the future. The SJRWMD has pulled back on funding commitments and plans for critical water conservation and restoration programs. The agency has also ended an important rule-making process that would have established sensible water conservation requirements for permit applicants. Less than a year ago, the SJRWMD was sounding the alarm that Northeast Florida was reaching the sustainable limits of the aquifer. However, the District recently issued an unprecedented Consumptive Use Permit to the JEA utility that could eventually result in a 40 percent increase in withdrawals from the aquifer. Use permit was issued despite U.S. Geological Survey models that indicate current Northeast Florida groundwater pumping is already adversely impacting the flows and levels of springs, lakes and waterways to the west.

We have also turned back the clock on growth management in our state, with recent changes to the Growth Management Act and the dismantling of the Department of Community Affairs. We now have a much smaller and less capable state planning agency, and Gov. Scott vetoed state funding for Florida’s 11 regional planning councils. This will result in less-effective state and regional oversight and guidance, and potentially less protection for our critical water resources from sprawl and poor planning. Unfortunately, many local governments don’t have sufficient planning departments or expertise. Many also often lack the resources to engage in regional planning efforts necessary to protect surface and groundwater resources that extend beyond county lines and are of regional or statewide significance. Now, local governments can also change their comprehensive plans at every commission or council meeting, instead of twice a year as previously allowed. These are critical road maps for smart growth that must be updated periodically, but were never intended to be changed easily or often.

The bottom line is, the dramatic changes to water policy and growth management that are taking place are limiting our ability to adequately protect our natural resources. These changes have been hyped as efforts to stimulate our economy by creating jobs and attracting businesses. However, these policy changes are actually counter to the economic interests of our state and its citizens and do nothing to address the root causes of our economic woes.

For instance, we all know that overbuilding and speculation played a big role in our current problems, yet, inexplicably, efforts are underway to expedite the permitting process. The president of the Florida Home Builders Association recently said, “No one can argue that we have excess housing inventory in Florida, given that our state is ground zero for foreclosures and distressed properties.” The recent census revealed that 1.6 million homes are vacant in Florida, not to mention all of the homes and offices that have already been approved for development. According to Charles Lee of Audubon of Florida, “between 2007 and 2011, over 2,500 comprehensive plan amendments were approved under Florida’s growth management laws that would allow over 1,000,000 new residential dwellings and over 2.7 billion square feet of commercial, office and industrial space.” So how can anyone really think that a burdensome permitting process and growth management laws have stymied growth and economic development in Florida? We obviously needed more controls in place, not fewer, to ensure smarter growth patterns and keep in check the kind of rampant growth that’s helped to drag our economy down.

We already have approximately 569 square miles of estuaries, 1,918 miles of rivers and streams and 378,435 acres of lakes that have been identified as impaired by nutrients. In addition, lakes, rivers and streams classified as impaired increased 3 percent compared with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s 2008 Water Quality Assessment. According to the SJRWMD, 97 percent of the District is either a Priority Water Resource Caution Area or a Potential Caution Area.

Despite the obvious shortcomings of our growth and water management systems, we don’t need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. The previous system clearly offered more planning guidance, oversight and protections than are provided by the recent changes. However, we do need to make improvements to the planning process and water management districts and implement more vigorous protections to better protect our environment. Instead, the governor and legislature are making radical changes that will only make matters worse—for both our environment and our economy.

Now is the time to recognize the value of investing in the protection and restoration of our water resources and environment. Dismantling and eliminating environmental safeguards and refusing to address costly pollution problems that threaten human health and hurt local communities is a radical proposition that will have devastating long-term consequences for our state’s economy and its citizens.

Our economic well-being is inextricably linked to how effectively we protect our environment and preserve our natural resources. Safeguarding all of Florida’s air, waters and natural lands is simply a prudent and wise economic investment in the future of our state and a more sensible and defensible approach to economic recovery.

For more information, click here.

A "trash tsunami" has washed ashore on the beaches of Honduras, endangering both wildlife and the local economy.

Read More Show Less

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

Long-finned pilot whales are seen during a 1998 stranding in Marion Bay in Tasmania, Australia. Auscape / Universal Images Group / Getty Images

More long-finned pilot whales were found stranded today on beaches in Tasmania, Australia. About 500 whales have become stranded, including at least 380 that have died, the AP reported. It is the largest mass stranding in Australia's recorded history.

Read More Show Less

Trending

A protest in solidarity with the Wetʼsuwetʼen's anti-pipeline struggle, at Canada House in Trafalgar Square on March 1, 2020 in London, England. More than 200 environmental groups had their Facebook accounts suspended days before an online solidarity protest. Ollie Millington / Getty Images

Facebook suspended more than 200 accounts belonging to environmental and Indigenous groups Saturday, casting doubt on the company's stated commitments to addressing the climate crisis.

Read More Show Less
The Västra Hamnen neighborhood in Malmö, Sweden, runs on renewable energy. Tomas Ottosson / Wikimedia Commons / CC by 3.0

By Harry Kretchmer

By 2030, almost a third of all the energy consumed in the European Union must come from renewable sources, according to binding targets agreed in 2018. Sweden is helping lead the way.

Read More Show Less
An Extinction Rebellion protester outside the Bank of England on Oct. 14, 2019 in London, England. John Keeble / Getty Images

By Jessica Corbett

In another win for climate campaigners, leaders of 12 major cities around the world — collectively home to about 36 million people — committed Tuesday to divesting from fossil fuel companies and investing in a green, just recovery from the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

Read More Show Less

Support Ecowatch