The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
By Bob Henson
A ferocious, long-lasting winter storm took its parting swipes at the Eastern Seaboard on Saturday night, leaving in its wake a pile of snowbound cities and shattered records. Millions of people in the nation's most densely populated urban corridor saw snowfall amounts that matched or exceeded the largest amounts observed in more than a hundred years of recordkeeping. It's surprisingly difficult to measure snow in an accurate and consistent way, so you should keep a mental asterisk pinned to the statistics you'll be seeing. Nevertheless, there is no question that this nor'easter, dubbed Winter Storm Jonas by the Weather Channel, was one for the ages—among the most powerful and far-reaching in regional history.
A Sheaf of 24-Hour and Storm-Total Records
Even as the last flakes were flying on Saturday night, a number of sites with century-plus weather histories had already notched the most snowfall ever recorded for a single storm and/or the most ever measured in a 24-hour period. Here's a sample of preliminary data through Sunday morning. (Thanks to Alex Lamers, National Weather Service (NWS)/Tallahassee, for digging up some hard-to-find data on previous record storm totals in the New York City area). Note that the readings below generally pertain to snowfall measurements taken during the storm and added together, with a snow measuring board (snowboard) cleared off between each reading. The final snow depth or the amount you'd measure by sticking a ruler (or yardstick) in the snow at the end of the storm, would normally be a bit less than the amounts shown below, because of the more recent snow on top compressing the lower, earlier layers. Decades ago, snowboards were used less frequently or were cleared less often when used, which means that some past storms would yield higher snow totals if measured with today's standard techniques.
New York, New York (Central Park)
- Calendar-day total: 26.6" (old record 24.1" on Feb. 12, 2006)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 26.8" (record 26.9" on Feb. 11-12, 2006)
New York, New York (LaGuardia)
- Calendar-day total: 27.9" (old record 23.3" on Feb. 12, 2006)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 27.9" (old record 25.4" on Feb. 11-12, 2006)
New York, New York (Kennedy):
- Calendar-day total: 30.3" (old record 24.1" on Feb. 12, 2006)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 30.5" (old record 26.8" on Feb. 16-18 2003)
Newark, New Jersey:
- Calendar-day total: 27.5" (old record 25.9" on Dec. 26, 1947)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 27.9" (old record 27.8" on Jan. 7-8, 1996)
- Calendar-day total: 30.2" (old record 24.0" on Feb. 11, 1983)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 31.9" (old record 25.6" on Jan. 7-8, 1996)
- Calendar-day total: 26.4" (old record 24.0" on Feb. 11, 1983)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 30.2" (old record 25.0" on Feb. 12-13, 1983)
- Calendar-day total: 19.4" (record 27.6 on Jan. 7, 1996)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 22.4" (record 31.0" on Jan. 6-8, 1996)
Baltimore, Maryland (Baltimore-Washington Airport and earlier sites):
- Calendar-day total: 25.5" (old record 23.3" on Jan. 28, 1922)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 29.2" (old record 26.8" on Feb. 16-18, 2003)
Washington, DC (Dulles)
- Calendar-day total: 22.1" (record 22.5" on Feb. 11, 1983)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 29.3" (record 32.4" on Feb. 5-6, 2010)
Washington, DC (National Airport and earlier sites):
- Calendar-day total: 11.3" (record 21.0" on Jan. 28, 1922)
- Storm total through Sunday a.m.: 17.8" (record 28.0" on Jan. 27-29, 1922)
How Widespread Was the Snow?
- This was the first storm on record to dump at least 24" of snow in both Baltimore and New York City, according to weather.com.
- At least one location in all 21 New Jersey counties received at least 12" of snow.
- Snowflakes fell as far south as the Florida Panhandle on Friday night and more than a foot of snow fell as far north as Massachusetts, giving this remarkable storm a north-to-south reach reminiscent of the even-more-sprawling Storm of the Century in March 1993.
Controversy in Washington, Snowfall-Style
As noted by Capital Weather Gang's Angela Fritz, the readings at Washington National through Saturday evening struck many as being oddly low compared to neighboring reports, especially toward the north and west. The NWS plans to review the DCA snow reports, which were gathered by contractors for the Federal Aviation Administration, a common practice at many airport locations. In a follow-up story on Sunday, Capital Weather Gang reported that the contractors at DCA had improvised and interpolated from snow-depth measurements after the on-site snowboard could not be found beneath the snow.
The Weather Underground almanac for Saturday at DCA shows that at 4:52 p.m. ET, Washington National reported 18" of snow on ground (rounded to the nearest inch), with 1" having fallen in the previous hour. Snow continued at DCA through midnight; however, the visibility jumped from just 1/16 mile at 4:52 p.m. to much higher values after that point (1/2 mile at 5:39 p.m. and 1.75 mile at 6:49 p.m.), which is consistent with snowfall becoming much lighter.
On Sunday morning, CoCoRaHS reports of snowfall on the ground were all 20" or greater in the District and the adjoining western and northern suburban counties of Fairfax County, Virginia and Montgomery County, Maryland. In the District itself, a snow depth of 22" was reported at the White House CoCoRaHS station, about 4 miles north of the airport and the closest station to DCA that filed a report on Sunday morning. Amounts were substantially lower just east and south of the District, in Prince George's County, Maryland and beyond, although very few of these were close to DCA. A snow-depth report of 16" came in from the vicinity of Fort Washington, about 8 miles south of DCA. To me, the CoCoRaHS data on snow depth imply that the DCA observations of total snowfall could be slightly on the low side but not too far out of line. It will be fascinating to see what the NWS concludes. Perhaps the bigger question is whether reports from DCA should be considered representative of the District, given that snowfalls are often significantly heavier as you go north and west.
Record Storm Tides Along the Southern New Jersey and Northern Delaware Coast
While most eyes were peeled on the big cities of the Northeast, coastal residents on either side of the Delaware Bay had to deal with major coastal flooding, especially during Saturday morning's high tide. Storm-related surges of 4 to 5 feet were common across northern Delaware and southern New Jersey. These are close to the highest values one would expect in any nor'easter. To make matters worse, the full moon added about a foot to the normal morning high tide. The resulting storm tide (the amount over the typical low tide or mean low low water, including both astronomical and storm-related effects) hit a record 9.27 feet at Lewes, Delaware, beating the 9.20 feet observed in the nor'easter of March 6, 1962. Cape May and Stone Harbor, New Jersey, both saw record storm tides that exceeded the values observed during Hurricane Sandy in 2012. Floodwaters poured into Stone Harbor in dramatic fashion on Saturday morning.
North of Atlantic City, the storm surge fell far short of the values observed during Sandy. The circulation around Sandy (which made landfall near Atlantic City) drove far larger storm surges of 10 feet or more into the coasts and bays of northern New Jersey and New York, resulting in storm tides as high as 15 feet. Moreover, Sandy's huge waves—much bigger than those from Jonas—added greatly to the impact of the storm surge throughout the region. “Waves can contribute 50 percent or more to the coastal flooding along the open coastline and these are not included in storm tide measurements," Michael Lowry (The Weather Channel), said.
Widespread Power Outages
As of Saturday, more than 200,000 homes and businesses had lost power due to Jonas, although outages in the blizzard-socked areas were not nearly as widespread as had been feared. North Carolina was especially hard-hit by power losses due to a glaze of freezing rain that fell early in the storm, topped by a coating of snow.
Hats Off to the Computer Models and NWS Forecasts
One can't help but be impressed by the persistence and accuracy of the leading forecast models in predicting near-record snowfall amounts for days on end ahead of the arrival of Jonas. Early in the week, the GFS and ECMWF models correctly zeroed in on Maryland, including Washington, DC, as a focal point for heavy snow around Friday/Saturday. This gave local forecasters the confidence to issue a blizzard watch on Wednesday morning, two full days ahead of the storm's arrival. (The massive traffic tie-ups in the DC area on Wednesday evening were the result of a mere half-inch of snow from a separate storm that preceded Jonas, a vivid reminder that even minor-seeming winter weather events need to be taken seriously in urban areas.)
New York was a tougher forecast nut to crack. Models agreed that there would be a sharp cut-off to the northern edge of heavy snow, a feature common in nor'easters, but they disagreed on where that northern edge would fall. As early as Wednesday, the NAM model was projecting huge weekend snowfall amounts in the New York area, while the GFS and ECMWF models tended to hold the heavy snow just south of New York, projecting only a few inches at best for the Big Apple. Forecasters at the National Weather Service's local office in Upton, New York, wisely issued a prediction of 8-12" of snowfall and a blizzard watch on Thursday, just as blizzard warnings were being hoisted from Washington, DC to Philadelphia. In New York, this was the perfect situation for a watch, which is intended to alert the public that a particular outcome is possible but not guaranteed. As other models joined the NAM bandwagon on Friday, the blizzard watch for New York City was upgraded to a warning, which provided enough advance notice for city dwellers to stock up on provisions and city planners to prepare for the worst.
The storm ended up occluding in classic fashion, meaning that its main coastal surface low hung back while jet-stream energy carved out an occluded front extending northeastward just off the East Coast (see Figure 7). This evolution led to prime snowmaking conditions in a region of frontal formation aloft called a deformation zone that set up inland from the surface front, putting the heavy snow along and just northwest of the urban corridor. (Here's an NWS explanation of deformation zones.)
Weather Underground blogger Steve Gregory, like many others, saw the classic nature of this setup emerging in the NAM and GFS models on Friday, although even then he wasn't totally convinced. “Whenever a storm occludes out, it slows down and is pulled closer to the upper low (500 mb) and the storm track. Most importantly the deformation zone was then able to spiral further outward (northward) by 100-150 nautical miles, which brought very heavy snow bands into the New York City/Long Island/Cape Cod region," Steve told me in an email. “This should not have been a surprise to me."
The Outer Edge Strikes Again
Many New Yorkers remember the storm of late January 2015, when forecasters called for as much as 3 feet of snow in New York City, far more than actually fell there. Though that forecast might seem like a bust, the prediction of huge snows over much larger areas of eastern Long Island and southern New England actually proved correct. Again, the problem was a sharp cutoff to the heavy snow on the storm's outer edge, with models disagreeing on whether that edge would end up west or east of New York City. NWS forecasters went big, then held off on dialing back the forecasts until it was abundantly clear that New York City would escape the worst.
It's crucial that residents, businesses and local government understand that some storms have a wider range of uncertainty than others at a given location. The experimental probabilistic guidance for snowfall that was posted on the home page of the NWS/New York office (see Figure 6) helped provide that sense. On Friday, it showed a low-end outcome of just an inch, but a high-end outcome of around two feet. I look forward to seeing this valuable tool become operational across the nation as soon as possible.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Julia Conley
Climate campaigners on Friday expressed hope that policymakers who are stalling on taking decisive climate action would reconsider their stance in light of new warnings from an unlikely source: two economists at J.P. Morgan Chase.
Tensions are continuing to rise in Canada over a controversial pipeline project as protesters enter their 12th day blockading railways, demonstrating on streets and highways, and paralyzing the nation's rail system
Colorado River Has Lost 1.5 Billion Tons of Water to the Climate Crisis, 'Severe Water Shortages' May Follow
California is headed toward drought conditions as February, typically the state's wettest month, passes without a drop of rain. The lack of rainfall could lead to early fire conditions. With no rain predicted for the next week, it looks as if this month will be only the second time in 170 years that San Francisco has not had a drop of rain in February, according to The Weather Channel.
The last time San Francisco did not record a drop of rain in February was in 1864 as the Civil War raged.
"This hasn't happened in 150 years or more," said Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at UCLA's Institute of the Environment and Sustainability to The Guardian. "There have even been a couple [of] wildfires – which is definitely not something you typically hear about in the middle of winter."
While the Pacific Northwest has flooded from heavy rains, the southern part of the West Coast has seen one storm after another pass by. Last week, the U.S. Drought Monitor said more Californians are in drought conditions than at any time during 2019, as The Weather Channel reported.
The dry winter has included areas that have seen devastating fires recently, including Sonoma, Napa, Lake and Mendocino counties. If the dry conditions continue, those areas will once again have dangerously high fire conditions, according to The Mercury News.
"Given what we've seen so far this year and the forecast for the next few weeks, I do think it's pretty likely we'll end up in some degree of drought by this summer," said Swain, as The Mercury News reported.
Another alarming sign of an impending drought is the decreased snowpack in the Sierra Nevada Mountain range. The National Weather Service posted to Twitter a side-by-side comparison of snowpack from February 2019 and from this year, illustrating the puny snowpack this year. The snow accumulated in the Sierra Nevadas provides water to roughly 30 percent of the state, according to NBC Los Angeles.
Right now, the snowpack is at 53 percent of its normal volume after two warm and dry months to start the year. It is a remarkable decline, considering that the snowpack started 2020 at 90 percent of its historical average, as The Guardian reported.
"Those numbers are going to continue to go down," said Swain. "I would guess that the 1 March number is going to be less than 50 percent."
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Prediction Center forecast that the drier-than-average conditions may last through April.
NOAA said Northern California will continue deeper into drought through the end of April, citing that the "persistent high pressure over the North Pacific Ocean is expected to continue, diverting storm systems to the north and south and away from California and parts of the Southwest," as The Weather Channel reported.
As the climate crisis escalates and the world continues to heat up, California should expect to see water drawn out of its ecosystem, making the state warmer and drier. Increased heat will lead to further loss of snow, both as less falls and as more of it melts quickly, according to The Guardian.
"We aren't going to necessarily see less rain, it's just that that rain goes less far. That's a future where the flood risk extends, with bigger wetter storms in a warming world," said Swain, as The Guardian reported.
The Guardian noted that while California's reservoirs are currently near capacity, the more immediate impact of the warm, dry winter will be how it raises the fire danger as trees and grasslands dry out.
"The plants and the forests don't benefit from the water storage reservoirs," said Swain, as The Mercury News reported. "If conditions remain very dry heading into summer, the landscape and vegetation is definitely going to feel it this year. From a wildfire perspective, the dry years do tend to be the bad fire years, especially in Northern California."
- Is California heading for another drought? - Los Angeles Times ›
- CA wildfire season: Will rain, snow weather forecast end risk? | The ... ›
- California Fires Now Rage All Year as Drought Creates Tinderbox ... ›
- California weather stays dry as rain and snow come up short | The ... ›
- California Emerged From Drought and Is Still Catching Fire - The ... ›