Real Chemical Reform Must Ban Asbestos Completely

Health + Wellness

Environmental Working Group

By Linda Reinstein

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock

What you can’t see can be deadly: Virtually invisible, yet absolutely lethal asbestos fibers lead to environmental and occupational diseases that claim the lives of 30 Americans every day.

The time is now for the Senate to draft and pass meaningful legislation to overhaul the outdated and ineffective Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 and protect children from asbestos and dangerous toxic chemicals such as bisphenol A, an endocrine-disrupting chemical in some plastics and food can linings, and flame retardants infused into car seats, nap pads and other kid goods.

Currently, prevention is the only cure for environmental and occupational asbestos-caused diseases. Though I am encouraged by bipartisan efforts to overhaul the outdated and ineffective federal law, the Chemical Safety Improvement Act of 2013 is critically flawed. Americans deserve a bill that protects public health and the environment and prevents disease—not legislation written for the chemical industry.

This proposal will not outlaw asbestos, which has been known for more than 100 years to cause deadly diseases. The World Health Organization, International Labor Organization, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Surgeon General all agree: Asbestos is a human carcinogen and there is no safe level of exposure. The nearly invisible asbestos fibers can be 700 times smaller than human hair. They can cause mesothelioma and lung, gastrointestinal, laryngeal and ovarian cancers, as well as non-malignant lung and respiratory diseases.

This lethal mineral has been banned in 54 countries. The U.S. and Canada are the only two industrialized nations not among them. With a blatant disregard for human rights, the asbestos industry continues to expose people to asbestos in pursuit of profits.

Asbestos remains legal and lethal in the U.S., tragically impacting families. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that the U.S. consumed 31 million metric tons of asbestos from 1900 to 2011. Asbestos has not been mined in the U.S. since 2002. Since then, American industry has depended on imports mostly from Canada. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that the U.S. consumed about 1060 metric tons of asbestos last year alone. Of that, 57 percent was used in the chloralkali industry, which makes chemical building blocks for a wide variety of materials. Another 41 percent went into roofing.  

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock

The facts are clear: The tons of asbestos that have been mined in and imported to the U.S. have created a public health crisis. Asbestos remains in an estimated 35 million homes, schools and buildings, and even on consumer shelves. In 2007, Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO) identified five consumer products, including a child’s toy, that were contaminated with asbestos.

Workers and consumers cannot adequately manage the risks of consumer, environmental and occupational asbestos exposure. An estimated 10,000 Americans die every year from preventable asbestos-caused diseases. Without adequate regulations, Americans cannot determine or manage consumer, environmental and occupational asbestos risk.

Mes-o-the-li-o-ma: Can’t Pronounce It—Can’t Cure It.

I remember as if it were yesterday—the day in 2003 when my husband Alan was diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma. We had never heard of mesothelioma. We were devastated when we learned that the asbestos-caused disease has no cure. Our daughter was only 10 years old.

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock

Alan had no idea how he was exposed to asbestos. Back in the 1960s, he had done a short stint as an engineer inside nuclear submarines when they were being built. In those days, asbestos was a common insulation material in gaskets, boiler rooms and many other places inside ships. Alan was good with his hands and loved to do home repairs. He removed contaminated floor tiles and fixed walls with compounds that probably contained asbestos. Like many other asbestos victims who suffer from these terrible diseases, he had many encounters with this substance. That’s part of the tragedy is our inability to identify toxic materials and products—we are left in the dark and cannot always avoid being exposed to them.

An avid marathon runner, Alan underwent chemotherapy and radical surgeries in hopes of buying more time with his family. He spent his last year tethered to oxygen 24 hours a day as mesothelioma ravaged his body. He died in 2006, three years after diagnosis.

Fueled by my intense grief, I turned my anger into action by co-founding the ADAO in 2004. Since then, it has become the largest independent nonprofit organization in the U.S. dedicated to preventing asbestos exposure to eliminate asbestos-caused diseases.

History is a Great Teacher to Those Who Listen—But is Congress Listening?

In 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a regulation banning most products that contained asbestos. But in 1991, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, based in New Orleans, LA, overturned the regulation.

In April 2013, the ADAO applauded the introduction of the Safe Chemicals Act of 2013, which would adequately protect American families from toxic exposures.

But the ADAO and most other environmental and public health organizations do not support the current language of the Chemical Safety Improvement Act of 2013, introduced in May, for these reasons: 

  • It has a grossly inadequate safety standard that would place a heavy burden on EPA to find that a chemical such as asbestos is unsafe. The burden should be shifted to chemical companies to show chemicals are safe.
  • It lacks deadlines to require the EPA to act quickly to assess and restrict the use of harmful chemicals such as asbestos.
  • It would retain the unworkable standard of court review found in current law, which prevented EPA from banning asbestos in 1989.
  • Its far-reaching language would paralyze state efforts to enforce existing laws or pass new ones to increase protections against harmful chemicals such as asbestos.

Congress should draft and pass meaningful chemical safety reform legislation that truly strengthens protections for our families and environment by preventing the further use of asbestos.

Americans need and deserve legislation to:

  1. Expedite action to ban asbestos imports.
  2. Ban the manufacture, sale and export of asbestos and asbestos-containing products.
  3. Protect each state’s ability to pass laws that regulate chemicals.

In support of Environmental Working Group’s efforts to protect public health and the environment for generations to come, ADAO's is circulating a petition for a world free from asbestos. 

One life lost to a preventable asbestos-caused disease is tragic; hundreds of thousands of lives shattered is unconscionable.

Visit EcoWatch’s HEALTH page for more related news on this topic.


EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

New pine trees grow from the forest floor along the North Fork of the Flathead River on the western boundary of Glacier National Park on Sept. 16, 2019 near West Glacier, Montana. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

By Alex Kirby

New forests are an apparently promising way to tackle global heating: the trees absorb carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas from human activities. But there's a snag, because permanently lower river flows can be an unintended consequence.

Read More
Household actions lead to changes in collective behavior and are an essential part of social movements. Pixabay / Pexels

By Greg McDermid, Joule A Bergerson, Sheri Madigan

Hidden among all of the troubling environmental headlines from 2019 — and let's face it, there were plenty — was one encouraging sign: the world is waking up to the reality of climate change.

So now what?

Read More
Logging state in the U.S. is seen representing some of the consequences humans will face in the absence of concrete action to stop deforestation, pollution and the climate crisis. Mark Newman / Lonely Planet Images / Getty Images

Talk is cheap, says the acting executive secretary of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, who begged governments around the world to make sure that 2020 is not another year of conferences and empty promises, but instead is the year to take decisive action to stop the mass extinction of wildlife and the destruction of habitat-sustaining ecosystems, as The Guardian reported.

Read More
The people of Kiribati have been under pressure to relocate due to sea level rise. A young woman wades through the salty sea water that flooded her way home on Sept. 29, 2015. Jonas Gratzer / LightRocket via Getty Images

Refugees fleeing the impending effects of the climate crisis cannot be forced to return home, according to a new decision by the United Nations Human Rights Committee, as CNN reported. The new decision could open up a massive wave of legal claims by displaced people around the world.

Read More
The first day of the Strike WEF march on Davos on Jan. 18, 2020 near Davos, Switzerland. The activists want climate justice and think the WEF is for the world's richest and political elite only. Kristian Buus / In Pictures via Getty Images

By Ashutosh Pandey

Teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg is returning to the Swiss ski resort of Davos for the 2020 World Economic Forum with a strong and clear message: put an end to the fossil fuel "madness."

Read More