The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Pruitt Blasted for Advising States to Ignore Major Climate Change Regulation
A group of 14 attorneys general and local officials are urging the U.S. Environmental Agency (EPA) to retract a "legally incorrect" letter sent to states in March that said they do not have to comply with the Clean Power Plan.
In a letter sent Thursday to the EPA Office of General Counsel, state officials call the instruction from EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt "unsolicited legal advice."
The officials wrote that the Clean Power Plan "remains the law of the land" despite a Supreme Court hold on the rule, and it asked that the EPA retract the letters from Pruitt.
"Although the letters do not purport to take final agency action, we are nonetheless concerned that because the EPA Administrator authored the letters, states and power companies may mistakenly believe they can rely on Mr. Pruitt's views," the letter scolded.
"The facts are clear: the EPA has a legal obligation to limit carbon pollution from its largest source: fossil-fueled power plants," New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said in a statement. "So if President Trump wants to repeal the Clean Power Plan, he must replace it."
"Scott Pruitt cannot simply wish away the facts by giving governors bad legal advice," he added.
For a deeper dive:
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Dan Gray
Pediatricians are being urged to start writing "exercise prescriptions" for the children they see in their office.
An indigenous rail blockade that snarled train travel in Canada for more than two weeks came to an end Monday when police moved in to clear protesters acting in solidarity with another indigenous community in British Columbia (B.C.), which is fighting to keep a natural gas pipeline off its land.
A Florida hiker recently stumbled across a slithering surprise — a rare snake that hadn't been spotted in the area for more than 50 years.
By Genna Reed
The EPA announced last week that it is issuing a preliminary regulatory determination for public comment to set an enforceable drinking water standard to two of the most common and well-studied PFAS, PFOA and PFOS.
This decision is based on three criteria:
- PFOA and PFOS have an adverse effect on public health
- PFOA and PFOS occur in drinking water often enough and at levels of public health concern;
- regulation of PFOA and PFOS is a meaningful opportunity for reducing the health risk to those served by public water systems.
By Kieran Cooke
Driving an electric-powered vehicle (EV) rather than one reliant on fossil fuels is a key way to tackle climate change and improve air quality — but it does leave the old batteries behind as a nasty residue.