The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
President Obama, Stop the Monsanto Protection Act
Food Democracy Now!, a national grassroots movement to build a safe, sustainable food system is urging President Obama to veto HR. 933, the short-term funding measure that Congress passed last Thursday morning by a vote of 318 to 109. Tucked inside the Congressional spending bill is a poison pill, Section 735, known as the Monsanto Protection Act, that undermines the independence of judicial review and gives biotech seed companies like Monsanto, DuPont and Dow Chemical a blank check on the approval of new genetically engineered crops.
Since the bill’s passage in Congress, more than 225,00 Food Democracy Now! members have signed a letter to President Obama, asking that he strike the Monsanto Protection Act from being signed into law.
The so-called "biotech rider" was included in budget legislation that won final approval from the House, avoiding a shutdown of the federal government on March 27, when the current funding was set to expire. The provision was slipped into the legislation anonymously and explicitly grants the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) the authority to override a judicial ruling stopping the planting of a genetically modified crop.
At this moment, due to Congress passing the Monsanto Protection Act, the Obama administration has been forced into a high-stakes standoff of avoiding government shutdown due to mandatory budget agreements and ensuring that it fully protects Constitutional mandates of judicial review and independent regulatory oversight.
“Section 735 is unconstitutional, it’s a clear violation of the separation of powers between three equal branches of government,” says Dave Murphy, founder and executive director of Food Democracy Now!
“Not only does the Monsanto Protection Act undermine the sovereignty of U.S. courts, but it also makes it impossible for government officials to faithfully protect the American public from potential human health and environmental harms of untested genetically engineered crops,” says Murphy.
The passage of the Monsanto Protection Act is another sign of how out of Congress is with the sentiment of the America public. The insertion of the biotech rider in a backroom deal with corporate lobbyists and Senate leaders is a new low. Since losing a court case in 2010 to Center for Food Safety for the unlawful planting of genetically modified organism (GMO) sugar beets, Monsanto and other biotech companies have been desperate to find a way around court mandated environmental impact statements required as a result of a U.S. district court’s ruling.
There is a new urgency in the fight over the Monsanto Protection Act for family farmers and food activists across the country as thirteen new genetically engineered crops await approval at the USDA and AquaBounty's GMO salmon could be approved at the Food and Drug Administration next month, and the passage of this rider in an unrelated budget spending bill could open the floodgates for their new approval, even if the budget agreement only lasts for the next six months.
At the same time, any new approvals could threaten the livelihoods of America’s farmers, as any of the approval of even a single of these untested crops could lead to widespread contamination of farmers’ crops as it has in several instances in the past.
“If allowed to pass, the Monsanto Protection Act will open farmers and the agricultural economy to very real and significant harm from cross-contamination events like the StarLink corn and LibertyLink rice incidents, which cost American farmers and businesses more than $1 billion,” said Murphy.
“Without President Obama intervening to protect the constitution, biotech seed and chemical companies will be allowed to openly skirt even minimal protections of human health and environmental concerns,” said Murphy. “As a constitutional law scholar, the president knows better than almost anyone what’s at stake.”
For the past year, family farm advocates and legal experts have fought to stop the Monsanto Protection Act, another special interest corporate giveaway that fundamentally undermines federal courts’ ability to protect family farmers and the environment from potentially hazardous GMO crops that have not been proven safe.
Visit EcoWatch’s GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM page for more related news on this topic.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
At least 1,688 dams across the U.S. are in such a hazardous condition that, if they fail, could force life-threatening floods on nearby homes, businesses, infrastructure or entire communities, according to an in-depth analysis of public records conducted by the the Associated Press.
By Sabrina Kessler
Far-reaching allegations about how a climate-sinning American multinational could shamelessly lie to the public about its wrongdoing mobilized a small group of New York students on a cold November morning. They stood in front of New York's Supreme Court last week to follow the unprecedented lawsuit against ExxonMobil.
By Alex Robinson
Leah Garcés used to hate poultry farmers.
The animal rights activist, who opposes factory farming, had an adversarial relationship with chicken farmers until around five years ago, when she sat down to listen to one. She met a poultry farmer called Craig Watts in rural North Carolina and learned that the problems stemming from factory farming extended beyond animal cruelty.
Temperatures plunged rapidly across the U.S. this week and around 70 percent of the population is expected to experience temperatures around freezing Wednesday.
In April, he claimed they caused cancer, and he sued to stop an offshore wind farm that was scheduled to go up near land he had purchased for a golf course in Aberdeenshire in Scotland. He lost that fight, and now the Trump Organization has agreed to pay the Scottish government $290,000 to cover its legal fees, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.
By Paul Brown
When countries run short of food, they need to find solutions fast, and one answer can be urban farming.
By Lakshmi Magon
This year, three studies showed that humor is useful for engaging the public about climate change. The studies, published in The Journal of Science Communication, Comedy Studies and Science Communication, added to the growing wave of scientists, entertainers and politicians who agree.