EcoWatch
Facebook 558k Twitter 222k Instagram 52k Subscribe Subscribe
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Conservation
  • Food + Agriculture
  • Renewables
  • Oceans
  • Policy
  • Insights + Opinion
  • Go Solar Today
      • Top Companies By State
        • California Solar Companies
        • Texas Solar Companies
        • New York Solar Companies
        • Florida Solar Companies
        • See All States
      • Top Incentives By State
        • California Solar Incentives
        • Texas Solar Incentives
        • New York Solar Incentives
        • Florida Solar Incentives
        • See All States
      • Solar Panel Costs By State
        • Solar Panel Costs in California
        • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
        • Solar Panel Costs in New York
        • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
        • See All States
      • Value of Solar by State
        • Is Solar Worth It In California?
        • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
        • Is Solar Worth It New York?
        • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
        • See All States
      • Company Reviews
        • Tesla Solar Review
        • Sunrun Solar Review
        • SunPower Solar Review
        • Vivint Solar Review
        • See All Companies
      • Common Solar Questions
        • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
        • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
        • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
        • Can You Finance Solar?
        • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
        • Payback On Solar Panels?
      • Solar Resources
        • Interactive Solar Calculator
        • Federal Solar Tax Credit
        • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
        • Tesla Solar Roof Review
        • Cheapest Solar Panels
      • Companies Compared
        • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs SunPower
        • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
        • SunPower vs ADT Solar
EcoWatch
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Conservation
  • Food + Agriculture
  • Renewables
  • Oceans
  • Policy
  • Insights + Opinion
  • Go Solar Today
    • Go Solar Today
    • Top Companies By State
      • California Solar Companies
      • Texas Solar Companies
      • New York Solar Companies
      • Florida Solar Companies
      • See All States
    • Top Incentives By State
      • California Solar Incentives
      • Texas Solar Incentives
      • New York Solar Incentives
      • Florida Solar Incentives
      • See All States
    • Solar Panel Costs By State
      • Solar Panel Costs in California
      • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
      • Solar Panel Costs in New York
      • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
      • See All States
    • Value of Solar by State
      • Is Solar Worth It In California?
      • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
      • Is Solar Worth It New York?
      • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
      • See All States
    • Company Reviews
      • Tesla Solar Review
      • Sunrun Solar Review
      • SunPower Solar Review
      • Vivint Solar Review
      • See All Companies
    • Common Solar Questions
      • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
      • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
      • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
      • Can You Finance Solar?
      • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
      • Payback On Solar Panels?
    • Solar Resources
      • Interactive Solar Calculator
      • Federal Solar Tax Credit
      • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
      • Tesla Solar Roof Review
      • Cheapest Solar Panels
    • Companies Compared
      • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs SunPower
      • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
      • SunPower vs ADT Solar

The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 558k Twitter 222k Instagram 52k
    EcoWatch
    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 558k Twitter 222k Instagram 52k
    Home Health + Wellness

    ‘Screamingly High’ Levels of PFAS in Common Insecticides, New Study Finds

    By: Olivia Rosane
    Published: October 7, 2022
    Edited by Irma Omerhodzic
    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon
    Jakub Porzycki / NurPhoto / Getty Images
    Why you can trust us

    Founded in 2005 as an Ohio-based environmental newspaper, EcoWatch is a digital platform dedicated to publishing quality, science-based content on environmental issues, causes, and solutions.

    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

    Pesticides have been linked to a host of environmental and public health harms, from the insect apocalypse to cancer.

    Now, a study published in the November issue of the Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters gives another reason to avoid insecticides in particular: they may contain the toxic forever chemicals known as Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). The research found the PFAS known as Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in six out of 10 insecticides tested at levels hundreds of thousands of times higher than the safety levels for drinking water set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

    “[T]he level of PFAS absorption by plants detected in this study suggests that this exposure pathway poses a major threat to the safety of our food supply,” Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) Executive Director Tim Whitehouse wrote in a letter to EPA administrator Michael Regan. “For this reason, it is quite possible that PFAS in our food is a bigger PFAS exposure pathway than water.” 

    “It is quite possible that PFAS in our food is a bigger PFAS exposure pathway than water. This threat is not merely to the safety of U.S. agriculture but of the world’s food supply…"—@TimWhitehouseUS, PEER's Executive Director via @thenewledenews https://t.co/rtiaTIxVPi

    — PEER (@PEERorg) September 29, 2022

    The research was spurred by a troubling finding in another study as researchers were preparing to measure the degree to which plants might absorb PFAS contamination, according to the paper. Those researchers found that there was PFAS contamination even in the U.S.  Department of Agriculture (USDA) greenhouse plants that were supposed to be the control in the experiment. Further testing revealed PFAS contamination in the greenhouse’s soil, plants and insecticides. 

    The new paper followed up by testing 10 “widely used” insecticides for PFAS, environmental toxicologist and lead author Steve Lasee told The Guardian. Lasee, who was at Texas Tech University at the time of the study and is now an independent consultant and EPA research fellow, said that they found “screamingly high” levels of PFOS in six of the 10 insecticides. In June, the EPA set a safety limit for PFOS in drinking water at 0.02 parts per trillion (ppt), PEER pointed out in a press release about the findings, but the PFOS was found in the pesticides at levels ranging from 3,920,000 to 19,200,000 ppt. 

    “We know PFOS is a carcinogen, we know it’s a deadly chemical and there’s no safe level in drinking water,” PEER science policy director Kyla Bennett told The Guardian. “Our soil and water are now contaminated.”

    The study also found signs of PFAS that were not among the 24 chemicals targeted for initial analysis in seven of the 10 insecticides, according to the paper. 

    The research casts doubt on the EPA’s effectiveness at regulating the use of PFAS in pesticides. The agency has researched the presence of PFAS in pesticide containers and invited public comment in September on a plan to ban 12 PFAS previously approved as inert ingredients in pesticides, according to its website. However, it claimed that the chemicals targeted by the proposed ban were not currently in use by any registered pesticide. Lasee told The Guardian that the EPA had been aware of his findings since March, when he presented them to agency scientists. He received one request for another presentation that was never followed up on and no requests for the brand names of the pesticides in the study. One of the tested insecticides was malathion, which is one of the most commonly used worldwide, according to PEER.

    “If the intent was to spread PFAS contamination across the globe there would be few more effective methods than lacing pesticides with PFAS,” Bennett said in the press release. “These findings point to an appalling regulatory breakdown by EPA.”

    In response to the study, Whitehouse called on Regan and the EPA to take three steps:

    1. Mandate that every pesticide manufacturer test their products for PFAS and back that up with agency testing.
    2. Ban all pesticides containing PFAS.
    3. Delete all agency statements saying that there are no PFAS in registered pesticides until testing is complete. 

    Bennett told The Guardian that concerned individuals could protect themselves by eating organic food, but acknowledged that not everyone can afford that option and that the EPA should step up to protect consumers.

    “We have to get the EPA to stop allowing PFAS in pesticides,” she said. “We’ve got a toxic chemical in them that doesn’t need to be there, and pesticides are bad enough on their own without adding another carcinogen.”

    Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

      By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, and to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

      Olivia Rosane

      Olivia Rosane is an environmental journalist with a decade’s worth of experience. She has been contributing to EcoWatch since 2018 and has also covered environmental themes for Common Dreams, Atmos, Rewilding, Seattle Met, Treehugger, The Trouble, YES! Magazine and Real Life. She holds a Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Cambridge and a master’s in Art and Politics from Goldsmiths, University of London.
      Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

      Read More

      PFAS Found in 65% of Private Wells Sampled in Pennsylvania
      New research has found that 18 percent of private wells
      By Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
      Trump EPA Announces Major Weakening of Power Plant Emissions Rules
      The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Wednesday announced
      By Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
      Trump Administration Fires Entire Content Team of Major NOAA Climate Website
      In an apparent attempt to dismantle Climate.gov, a major United
      By Cristen Hemingway Jaynes

      Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

        By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, and to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

        Latest Articles

        • A ‘Profound Mistake’: Senate Republican Rollback of IRA Clean Energy Tax Credits Would Cost Jobs, Raise Energy Prices and Bring More Climate Extremes
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          June 18, 2025
        • Are Sharks and Rays Using Offshore Wind Farms as Habitats?
          by Paige Bennett
          June 18, 2025
        • 2025 UN World Oceans Day Highlights ‘Wonder’ of the Deep Blue Sea
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          June 17, 2025
        • PFAS Found in 65% of Private Wells Sampled in Pennsylvania
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          June 17, 2025
        • As Trump Cuts Conservation Funds, Florida’s Miccosukee Tribe Will Purchase Land for Wildlife Corridor
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          June 16, 2025
        • Pacific Island Nations Announce Plans for Indigenous-Led Melanesian Ocean Reserve, a World First
          by Paige Bennett
          June 16, 2025
        • UK Plans to Ban Destructive Activities Like Bottom Trawling in Marine Protected Areas
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          June 16, 2025
        • New Maps Show Best Places for Global Reforestation: Study
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          June 13, 2025
        EcoWatch

        The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

          • Climate Climate
          • Animals Animals
          • Health + Wellness Health + Wellness
          • Insights + Opinion Insights + Opinion
          • Adventure Adventure
          • Oceans Oceans
          • Business Business
          • Solar Solar
          • About EcoWatch
          • Contact EcoWatch
          • EcoWatch Reviews
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy Policy
          • Learn About Solar Energy
          • Learn About Deregulated Energy
          • EcoWatch UK
          Follow Us
          Facebook 558k
          Twitter 222k
          Instagram 52k
          Subscribe Subscribe

          Experts for a healthier planet and life.

          Mentioned by:
          Learn more
          • Privacy Policy
          • Terms of Use
          • Cookie Preferences
          • Do Not Sell My Information
          © 2025 EcoWatch. All Rights Reserved.

          Advertiser Disclosure

          Our editorial team is committed to creating independent and objective content focused on helping our readers make informed decisions. To help support these efforts we receive compensation from companies that advertise with us.

          The compensation we receive from these companies may impact how and where products appear on this site. This compensation does not influence the recommendations or advice our editorial team provides within our content. We do not include all companies, products or offers that may be available.