The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Rocket Fuel Chemical Doesn’t Belong in Food Packaging
iStock / Getty Images
Perchlorate has been shown to impair the development of fetuses and young children — and yet the FDA refuses to act. So the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is taking the agency to court.
NRDC and partners took legal action to overturn the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's decision to allow the harmful chemical perchlorate to be used in food packaging. "Perchlorate harms kids, and it's all over our food supply," says Erik D. Olson, senior strategic director for health and food at NRDC. "The FDA has enough evidence of these health dangers to take action right now—and its refusal to ban this toxic chemical was unreasonable."
Exposure to perchlorate — which is used in rocket fuel — has been linked to developmental delays, reduced growth, and impaired learning capabilities in young children. And yet it's frequently used as an additive in food packaging as well as in materials used to store and transport foods like cereal, flour, and spices. The chemical has also been detected in drinking water systems that serve up to 16.6 million Americans.
In 2005, the FDA authorized perchlorate to be used in certain kinds of food packaging. NRDC and other public health groups fought to undo that decision in 2014, but the agency denied our petition in 2017. The latest lawsuit is an effort to require the agency to review that petition again. "The courts are absolutely key in blocking brazen Trump administration attempts like this one to ignore science and put people at risk for the benefit of private corporate interests," Olson says.
- Common Food Additives Harm Children's Health, Pediatricians Warn ›
- EPA's Proposal for Limiting Rocket Fuel in Drinking Water Is ... ›
- EPA: Perchlorate in Drinking Water Can Harm Fetal Brain ... ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Genna Reed
The EPA announced last week that it is issuing a preliminary regulatory determination for public comment to set an enforceable drinking water standard to two of the most common and well-studied PFAS, PFOA and PFOS.
This decision is based on three criteria:
- PFOA and PFOS have an adverse effect on public health
- PFOA and PFOS occur in drinking water often enough and at levels of public health concern;
- regulation of PFOA and PFOS is a meaningful opportunity for reducing the health risk to those served by public water systems.
By Kieran Cooke
Driving an electric-powered vehicle (EV) rather than one reliant on fossil fuels is a key way to tackle climate change and improve air quality — but it does leave the old batteries behind as a nasty residue.
Finance ministers from the 20 largest economies agreed to add a scant mention of the climate crisis in its final communiqué in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on Sunday, but they stopped short of calling it a major economic risk, as Reuters reported. It was the first time the G20 has mentioned the climate crisis in its final communiqué since Donald Trump became president in 2017.