The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Patagonia Invests in Textile Company in Hopes of Ditching Toxic Chemicals in Outerwear
As many of us pack up our big, puffy coats after this season's unusually harsh winter on the East Coast, it's important to remember that our clothing—outerwear especially—can have a big impact on the environment. Though outerwear keeps us warm and dry, many popular brands contain fluorocarbon chemicals, or polyfluorinated chemicals (PFCs), which make these garments water- and soil-resistant, but also happens to be terrible for our health and the environment.
But one clothing company, Patagonia, is making efforts to get rid of this toxic chemical, through a strategic investment in Beyond Surface Technologies (BST), a Swiss start-up that's developing high-quality, durable textiles based on natural raw materials. Patagonia has a reputation for strong environmental stewardship, having recently established the Traceable Down Standard.
"This is the tension we feel every day, making the best technical products for our core sports and working to fulfill our environmental commitments," said Patagonia CEO Rose Marcario. "We look for better, cleaner, safer ways to do things, we apply our own R&D and look for brilliant companies to partner with. Beyond Surface Technologies has the potential to help Patagonia and our entire industry get to the next level of chemical safety without compromising performance, and we're very excited to invest in their success."
BST was founded in 2008 by scientists and marketing experts with more than four decades of experience in the textile industry. "Patagonia's investment gives us the opportunity to accelerate testing and reduce time to market for our pipeline of groundbreaking new treatments for the entire apparel industry," Matthias Foessel, CEO of BST said. "Patagonia is enabling us to grow even faster benefiting the environment and enhancing product performance while remaining completely independent and in control of the original founders. This is truly unique." BST has a whole line of sustainable textiles, including the miDori evoPel, a water-repellent material made without hazardous ingredients such as PFCs.
The investment was made through Patagonia's $20 Million & Change venture fund that invests in companies making positive impacts on the environment.
Patagonia has been trying to eliminate fluorocarbon from their apparel for some time. In a blog post, the company said it's currently phasing out a long-chain C8 fluorocarbon-based treatment to a shorter-chain C6 treatment that's also fluorocarbon-based, but with by-products that break down faster in the environment and with less potential toxicity over time to humans, wildlife and fish.
This temporary solution, however, "is not good enough, but it’s the best option we have found so far," the post continued. That's why Patagonia is seeking out companies (such as BST) that are "inventing or innovating new ways to make our garments waterproof using safe, fluorocarbon-free chemicals without compromising performance and durability."
Listen to this segment on Marketplace where reporter Jeff Tyler visits Patagonia to learn more about their new investment:
In another sustainability initiative from the clothing brand, Patagonia kicked off its Worn Wear Mobile Tour, a cross-country mission to encourage customers to make their clothes last a lifetime.
During the tour, Patagonia staff will mend rips and tears, and repair broken zippers, buttons and more, all for free. They will also teach people how to fix their own clothing. (FYI: Items can be from any brand, not just Patagonia.) There will also be local food, drinks as well as worn Patagonia items for sale.
The mobile repair shop left Ventura, Calif. on April 2 and will park in several locations around the country before its last stop in Boston on May 12. Click here to see the entire tour schedule and check out the video below to learn more about Patagonia's new country-wide tour.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Tracy L. Barnett
Sources reviewed this article for accuracy.
For Sicangu Lakota water protector Cheryl Angel, Standing Rock helped her define what she stands against: an economy rooted in extraction of resources and exploitation of people and planet. It wasn't until she'd had some distance that the vision of what she stands for came into focus.
Last week, the Peruvian Palm Oil Producers' Association (JUNPALMA) promised to enter into an agreement for sustainable and deforestation-free palm oil production. The promise was secured by the U.S. based National Wildlife Federation (NWF) in collaboration with the local government, growers and the independent conservation organization Sociedad Peruana de Ecodesarrollo.
The rallying cry to build it again and to build it better than before is inspiring after a natural disaster, but it may not be the best course of action, according to new research published in the journal Science.
"Faced with global warming, rising sea levels, and the climate-related extremes they intensify, the question is no longer whether some communities will retreat—moving people and assets out of harm's way—but why, where, when, and how they will retreat," the study begins.
The researchers suggest that it is time to rethink retreat, which is often seen as a last resort and a sign of weakness. Instead, it should be seen as the smart option and an opportunity to build new communities.
"We propose a reconceptualization of retreat as a suite of adaptation options that are both strategic and managed," the paper states. "Strategy integrates retreat into long-term development goals and identifies why retreat should occur and, in doing so, influences where and when."
The billions of dollars spent to rebuild the Jersey Shore and to create dunes to protect from future storms after Superstorm Sandy in 2012 may be a waste if sea level rise inundates the entire coastline.
"There's a definite rhetoric of, 'We're going to build it back better. We're going to win. We're going to beat this. Something technological is going to come and it's going to save us,'" said A.R. Siders, an assistant professor with the disaster research center at the University of Delaware and lead author of the paper, to the New York Times. "It's like, let's step back and think for a minute. You're in a fight with the ocean. You're fighting to hold the ocean in place. Maybe that's not the battle we want to pick."
Rethinking retreat could make it a strategic, efficient, and equitable way to adapt to the climate crisis, the study says.
Dr. Siders pointed out that it has happened before. She noted that in the 1970s, the small town of Soldiers Grove, Wisconsin moved itself out of the flood plain after one too many floods. The community found and reoriented the business district to take advantage of highway traffic and powered it entirely with solar energy, as the New York Times reported.
That's an important lesson now that rising sea levels pose a catastrophic risk around the world. Nearly 75 percent of the world's cities are along shorelines. In the U.S. alone coastline communities make up nearly 40 percent of the population— more than 123 million people, which is why Siders and her research team are so forthright about the urgency and the complexities of their findings, according to Harvard Magazine.
Some of those complexities include, coordinating moves across city, state or even international lines; cultural and social considerations like the importance of burial grounds or ancestral lands; reparations for losses or damage to historic practices; long-term social and psychological consequences; financial incentives that often contradict environmental imperatives; and the critical importance of managing retreat in a way that protects vulnerable and poor populations and that doesn't exacerbate past injustices, as Harvard Magazine reported.
If communities could practice strategic retreats, the study says, doing so would not only reduce the need for people to choose among bad options, but also improve their circumstances.
"It's a lot to think about," said Siders to Harvard Magazine. "And there are going to be hard choices. It will hurt—I mean, we have to get from here to some new future state, and that transition is going to be hard.…But the longer we put off making these decisions, the worse it will get, and the harder the decisions will become."
To help the transition, the paper recommends improved access to climate-hazard maps so communities can make informed choices about risk. And, the maps need to be improved and updated regularly, the paper said as the New York Times reported.
"It's not that everywhere should retreat," said Dr. Siders to the New York Times. "It's that retreat should be an option. It should be a real viable option on the table that some places will need to use."
Leaked documents show that Jair Bolsonaro's government intends to use the Brazilian president's hate speech to isolate minorities living in the Amazon region. The PowerPoint slides, which democraciaAbierta has seen, also reveal plans to implement predatory projects that could have a devastating environmental impact.