Quantcast
Environmental News for a Healthier Planet and Life

Help Support EcoWatch

How the Paris Climate Agreement Will Change Your Life

Popular

By Chris Hope

It should be a momentous occasion for the environment. On Oct. 5, 55 countries with 55 percent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions ratified the Paris climate change agreement. Today, it comes into force.

The main long-term goal is to keep the increase in global average temperature to well below 2 C above pre-industrial levels. But what does meeting the Paris aims look like in the short-term, within our lifetimes?

The most obvious point is that it requires countries to rapidly reduce their emissions. It's not clear by precisely how much or precisely when, this needs to happen—we just don't know enough about the climate sensitivity for that. But it is clear that to have a fighting chance of meeting the Paris target will require large and sustained emissions reductions, starting very, very soon.

Crystal-K / Shutterstock

This is not remotely close to the path we are on at present. The 2016 BP Energy Outlook, published after the Paris agreement was signed, sees emissions from fossil fuels continuing to grow substantially at least until the end of its time horizon in 2035.

As CarbonBrief notes, Paris did little to shift BP's view.Carbon Brief

So the world says warming of 2 degrees is unacceptable. But people aren't acting like it is. Something big is missing: a massive effort to cut emissions. If countries truly are going to meet the Paris goals, this has to change.

This effort could come in the form of lots of centralized regulations and subsidies for low-carbon energy sources. But many experts think strong, comprehensive prices on CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions will be considerably cheaper.

Given the scale of the effort required and the problems that typically occur when governments are asked to spend money on social goods, if we don't do it as cheaply as we can, we probably won't do it all.

The "polluter pays principle" is a basic tenet of environmental policy. It says simply that anyone who causes harm should have to pay for it. This calls for prices on CO2 emissions in the range of US$150 to $250 per ton, according to an economic model of the harm caused by climate change which I devised to guide policymakers—recent work by scientists at Stanford broadly agrees.

The price should be much higher per ton for methane released into the atmosphere by agriculture and fracking as this is a much more potent greenhouse gas.

To get the emission reductions needed, which could be 3 to 5 percent per year for more than 50 years, we need these prices in the form of strong, comprehensive taxes on greenhouse gases, paid by firms, farms and final consumers. And we need them now.

It's fair to ask what such taxes would do to energy prices. At $150 per ton of CO2, they would add 25 percent to petrol prices in the UK, 30 percent to the price of gas-fired electricity, 50 percent to gas prices, 75 percent to the price of coal-fired electricity. They would probably add nearly £100 to the price of a return air ticket from London to southern Europe (and just think what that does to the case for a third runway at Heathrow).

But remember that these measures are still the cheapest way of meeting the Paris target, if that is truly what we intend to do. Strict technical regulations and generous subsidies for solar power or electric cars are likely to cost far more.

Climate taxes also have an upside. At $150 per ton of CO2, they would bring in about £75 billion per year in tax revenue in the UK from year one—that's about 15 percent of all UK tax revenue.

If the government chooses, it could use this revenue to reduce VAT by two thirds, once out of the EU, making almost all products at least 10 percent cheaper at a stroke. Or it could reduce the basic rate of income tax from 20 percent down to 5 percent. Or, most likely, it could do some sensible combination, reducing income, sales and payroll taxes, while using a small part of the revenue for information campaigns, basic R&D and measures to avoid hardship, such as the winter fuel allowance for pensioners. There is some evidence that directing about 10 percent of the climate tax revenue towards the poorest two deciles would stop it being regressive. Given the Paris targets will require people to live much cleaner lives anyway, these seem like pretty good side-effects.

So how will the Paris agreement change your life? In all the obvious ways, like encouraging more energy efficiency, more windmills, more electric train travel, possibly more nuclear power. But also in the less obvious ones, like the extra pay in your bank account at the end of each month, the lower cost of a meal out at your favorite restaurant or the new job opportunities created by lower payroll taxes.

The alternative is to say that cutting emissions as far as this is just too much trouble. In which case we need to be prepared for a radically different world with temperatures rising by 4-6 C or more. That would see ice sheets melt, sea levels rise, new deserts form and many tropical locations become essentially uninhabitable.

The world would have to pay a lot to adapt to this new climate reality and to become resilient to the ever-worsening impacts of climate change.

I know which world I prefer.

Reposted with permission from our media associate The Conversation.

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

Hurricane Florence on Sept. 12, 2018. ESA / A.Gerst / CC BY-SA 2.0

The 2020 hurricane season is now expected to be the most active since at least the early 1980s, meteorologists at Colorado State University, a standard bearer for seasonal hurricane predictions, announced Wednesday.

Read More Show Less
The Qamutik cargo ship on July 28, 2020 in Canada's Nunavut province, where two ice caps have disappeared completely. Fiona Paton / Flickr

Three years ago, scientists predicted it would happen. Now, new NASA satellite imagery confirms it's true: two ice caps in Canada's Nunavut province have disappeared completely, providing more visual evidence of the rapid warming happening near the poles, as CTV News in Canada reported.

Read More Show Less
The European Commission launched a new Farm to Fork strategy in an effort to reduce the social and environmental impact of the European food system. European Environmental Agency / Flickr / CC by 2.0

By Katell Ané

The European Commission launched a new Farm to Fork strategy in an effort to reduce the social and environmental impact of the European food system. It is the newest strategy under the European Green Deal, setting sustainability targets for farmers, consumers, and policymakers.

Read More Show Less
President Trump signs an executive order regulating social media on May 28, 2020 in Washington, DC. Doug Mills-Pool / Getty Images

Facebook and Twitter removed posts by President Donald Trump and his campaign Wednesday for violating their policies against spreading false information about COVID-19.

Read More Show Less
Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute staff and volunteers try to help a stranded bottlenose dolphin in Cockroach Bay near Ruskin, Florida on Sept. 17, 2015. FWC Fish and Wildlife Research Institute

A new study gives a first look at the presence and potential effects of plastics and new forms of synthetic chemicals in stranded dolphins and whales along the coast of the southeastern U.S.

Read More Show Less
Smoke rises above wrecked buildings following a deadly explosion on Aug. 4, 2020 in Beirut, Lebanon. Marwan Tahtah / Getty Images

By Alexander Freund

Lebanese Prime Minister Hassan Diab says he believes Tuesday's explosion in Beirut could have been caused by large quantities of ammonium nitrate stored in the port.

Read More Show Less

Trending

Black Americans are dying from Covid-19 at more than twice the rate of white Americans, and at younger ages, partly due to poor diets that make bodies less resistant to the coronavirus. Mireya Acierto / Getty Images

By Michelle D. Holmes

Most Americans know about the Dietary Guidelines for Americans primarily through their colorful representations: the original food pyramid, which a few years ago morphed into MyPlate. The guidelines represent the government mothering us to choose the healthiest vegetables, grains, sources of protein, and desserts, and to eat them in the healthiest portions.

As innocuous as the food pyramid and MyPlate seem, they are actually a matter of life and death.

Read More Show Less