Ohio House of Representatives Votes against a Clean Lake Erie
The Ohio House of Representatives repeated history today and once again passed an unbalanced bill that repeatedly puts the interests of industrial mining companies and other large industrial interests ahead of the health of streams and their wildlife and the rights of recreational users to the inland lakes and streams that drain to Lake Erie in Ohio.
The House voted 59-38 along party lines today on a bill (House Bill 473) to implement the Great Lakes Compact, a binding agreement among the eight Great Lakes States to guide the sustainable management of water use in all of the Great Lakes and the tributaries and groundwater that flow into the Lakes.
Despite improvements over an even more imbalanced bill that Gov. John Kasich vetoed last summer, the House continued to give short shrift to the Compact’s requirement to protect not only the quantity and quality of Lake Erie lake water, but also the inland waterways when considering industry permit applications to withdraw and use water in the Lake Erie drainage basin.
“It’s Groundhog Day all over again at the Statehouse,” said Kristy Meyer, director of Agricultural and Clean Water Programs at the Ohio Environmental Council.
“The Ohio House has chosen to elevate mining and other industrial interests over the public interest, putting at risk the health and wildlife of our Great Lake. Mining companies, bottlers, and industrial feedlots are the big winners. The big losers are the millions of sportsmen and boaters and countless wildlife that depend on healthy tributaries. So much for Earth Day in Ohio.”
The vote follows months of negotiation and weeks of House committee hearings during which sportsmen, scientists, charter boat captains, boaters, travel and tourism business owners, and environmental-conservation groups warned that the bill:
- Will lock the courthouse door on the right of anglers, hunters, trappers, boaters and other recreational users to challenge how many millions of gallons of water an industrial mineral mining company or other industrial facility may withdraw from Lake Erie or inland waterway, by limiting appeal rights only to persons with a clear economic or property interest;
- May put spawning areas for walleye and steelhead trout at risk for degradation, by ignoring adverse impacts to inland streams and only considering such impacts to all of Lake Erie, and;
- May result in reduced stream flows and concentrated nutrients and pollutants from farm field runoff and city sewer overflows, fueling toxic algae in Lake Erie’s western basin by setting water use limits based on 90-day averages, not actual daily withdrawals.
The Kasich administration and the bill’s supporters did agree to several improvements over the previous bill that Kasich vetoed. The bill that passed the House today would allow power plants, manufacturers, golf courses, agriculture, water companies and other users to take up to 2.5 million gallons of water per day directly from the lake and 1 million from most groundwater, rivers, streams and other inland sources before having to get a state permit. Those thresholds are more in line with those set by other Great Lakes states.
For high-quality rivers and streams with watersheds draining over 100 square miles, users would not need to seek a permit unless they were withdrawing 100,000 gallons of water a day averaged over 90 days. For high-quality rivers and streams between 50 and 100 square miles, users could take up to 100,000 gallons a day, as averaged over 45 days, before seeking a permit. The threshold for smaller high-quality waterways would also be 100,000 gallons a day, but there would be no averaging. A withdrawal of 100,000 gallons in a single day would trigger the permitting requirement.
As reported by the Toledo Blade, roughly 153.9 million gallons of water flow into Lake Erie every day from the Detroit River, other tributaries, and rainfall, according to a 2009 report by the International Upper Great Lakes Study Board. That compares to 154.9 million gallons that flow out over Niagara Falls, is lost to evaporation, and is diverted to New York canals.
Despite these good improvements won by the Kasich administration, the bill remains tilted in business’ interest. The industrial minerals mining industry along with industrial feedlots and other industrial interests stalwartly support the bill. Meanwhile, sportsmen, charter boat captains, and environmental-conservation groups vigorously oppose it.
Former Ohio Govs. Bob Taft and George Voinovich wrote to lawmakers, urging them to address these concerns. Former Ohio DNR Director Sam Speck, who negotiated the Compact agreement amongst the Great Lakes states, testified Tuesday about the importance of striking a fair balance between industry’s access to water and maintaining sustainable water supplies in the Lake Erie drainage basin. He predicted that a court would strike down the limitation on the right of recreational users to appeal water use permits.
During Tuesday’s committee testimony, sportsmen groups vigorously opposed the bill’s repeal of recreational users’ common law right to appeal an industrial water use permit in Lake Eire and its tributaries. The bill narrows those rights to persons or businesses who have a direct economic or property interest in a water use permit.
The League of Ohio Sportsmen, the Greater Cleveland Boating Association and the Izaak Walton League of America urged the House committee to preserve, not eliminate, recreational users’ rights, as Ohio has for decades. Like its Committee, the full House rejected attempts by minority Democrats to protect the sportsmen’s rights.
Anthony Caruso, Rear Commander of the Greater Cleveland Boating Association, which represents more than 15,000 boat owners across the Ohio Lake Erie basin, told the Committee “We strongly resent that HB 473 narrows the definition of “Aggrieved Person” and by doing so eliminates our rights, and other recreational users’ rights, to access and enjoy Ohio’s waters.”
The bill also dismisses the numerous small and medium-sized businesses that rely on Lake Erie and the importance of Lake Erie’s $10 billion tourism economy.
The Lake Erie Charter Boat Association, representing more than 225 members, testified that a healthy Lake Erie and its tributaries are vital to the charter boat business. Without strong walleye, steelhead, and other prized sport fish populations, charter boat captains will have fewer fish for customers to catch and with toxic algal blooms customers won’t return to spend their day on a lake covered in green slime. A healthy Lake Erie is vital to the charter boat business and many other businesses along Lake Eire.
Opposition to the bill centers around four continuing concerns:
Rolling back current Ohio law that protects Lake Erie’s tributaries. A healthy Lake Erie is only as healthy as the tributaries that flow into it. By not protecting the tributaries, HB 473 violates Ohio’s binding agreement with the other Great Lakes states and risks worsening toxic algal blooms, deteriorating critical spawning and nursery habitat, and decreasing Lake Erie’s prized sport-fish population.
Averaging water withdrawals over a 90 day average. By measuring withdrawals on a 90 day average instead of a “per day” measure, facilities could withdraw 10 million gallons of water in a single day and still not be required to seek a permit. Fish and other wildlife do not live in an average amount of water. Fish cannot survive hours let alone days without sufficient water and oxygen.
Eliminating recreational users’ right to appeal a water withdrawal permit. In an unprecedented move, HB 473 outright abandon’s Ohio’s public trust responsibility to care for all Ohio’s waters and eliminates the right of anglers, boaters and other recreational users to appeal a water withdrawal or water use decision that negatively impacts their ability to enjoy Ohio’s natural resources.
Experimental permit loopholes that allow a facility to skirt the Compact. Under the bill, an industrial water user could apply for an experimental permit that, under the bill, enabling it to evade the Compact’s restriction on any “significant adverse impact” to Lake Erie basin waters. The bill also would enable industrial water users to apply for an experimental permit an unlimited number of times.
Opposition to the bill was led by Reps. Teresa Fedor (D-Toledo), Dennis Murray (D-Sandusky), Kathleen Clyde (D-Kent, and Sean O’Brian (D-Brookfield). The Democrats offered amendments that would address the concerns of witnesses. Majority Republicans summarily voted not to consider the amendments.
The only proponent witnesses to testify in support of HB 473 were the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and the Coalition for Sustainable Water Management, representing industry interests.
Opposing the bill were:
- The Ohio Environmental Council
- The Nature Conservancy—Ohio Chapter
- Lake Erie Charter Boat Association
- Greater Cleveland Boating Association
- League of Ohio Sportsmen
- Natural Resources Defense Council
- National Wildlife Federation
- Lake Erie Waterkeeper
- Black Swamp Conservancy
- Izaak Walton League of America–Ohio Division
- Lake Erie Improvement Association
- Grand River Sailing Club
Interested Party testimony summarizing concerns about the bill and about how a healthy lake ecosystem is vital to the tourism industry within the Lake Erie basin was offered by:
- Former Ohio DNR Director Sam Speck
- Larry Fletcher, Lake Erie Shores & Islands Visitors Bureau
- Dr. Jeffrey Reutter, Director, Ohio Sea Grant College Program, Stone Laboratory, Center for Lake Erie Area Research, and Great Lakes Aquatic Ecosystem Research Consortium, The Ohio State University
- Dr. Bob Heath, Emeritus Professor, Kent State University
- Dick Bartz, U.S. Geological Survey
- John Stark, Freshwater Director, The Nature Conservancy, Ohio Chapter
The bill now heads to the Ohio Senate, which is expected to pass the bill, with or without any amendments.
“Our last hope is the Ohio Senate. We hope that our Senators can accomplish what our Representatives did not: consider the interests of the many recreational and small business users of Lake Erie, not just the industrial interests,” said Meyer.
For more information, click here.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
As protests are taking place across our nation in response to the killing of George Floyd, we want to acknowledge the importance of this protest and the Black Lives Matter movement. Over the years, we've aimed to be sensitive and prioritize stories that highlight the intersection between racial and environmental injustice. From our years of covering the environment, we know that too often marginalized communities around the world are disproportionately affected by environmental crises.
- Lead Poisoning Reveals Environmental Racism in the US - EcoWatch ›
- First-of-Its-Kind Study Finds Racial Gap Between Who Causes Air ... ›
- Pollution, Race and the Search for Justice - EcoWatch ›
By Peter Beech
Using waste food to farm insects as fish food and high-tech real-time water quality monitoring: innovations that could help change global aquaculture, were showcased at the World Economic Forum's Virtual Ocean Dialogues 2020.
Fly fishing. nextProtein
BiOceanOr's AquaREAL system. BiOceanOr
- Environmental Innovation Will Transform Business as Usual ... ›
- How an Army of Ocean Farmers Is Starting an Economic Revolution ... ›
The big three broadcast channels failed to cover the disproportionate impacts of extreme weather on low-income communities or communities of color during their primetime coverage of seven hurricanes and one tropical storm over three years, a Media Matters for America analysis revealed.
Researchers at the pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly announced yesterday that it will start a trial on a new drug designed specifically for COVID-19, a milestone in the race to stop the infectious disease, according to STAT News.
- Dogs Can Smell COVID-19 - EcoWatch ›
- Drugs Touted by Trump for COVID-19 Increase Heart Risks, Studies ... ›
- Coronavirus Vaccine Candidate Shows Promise in Mice - EcoWatch ›
The sixth mass extinction is here, and it's speeding up.
Terrestrial vertebrates on the brink (i.e., with 1,000 or fewer individuals) include species such as (A) Sumatran rhino (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis; image credit: Rhett A. Butler [photographer]), (B) Clarion island wren (Troglodytes tanneri; image credit: Claudio Contreras Koob [photographer]), (C) Española Giant Tortoise (Chelonoidis hoodensis; image credit: G.C.), and (D) Harlequin frog (Atelopus varius; the population size of the species is unknown but it is estimated at less than 1,000; image credit: G.C.).
- Humanity 'Sleepwalking Towards the Edge of a Cliff': 60% of Earth's ... ›
- New Border Wall Construction Threatens 8 Species With Extinction ... ›
- The Insect Apocalypse Is Coming: Here Are 5 Lessons We Must Learn ›
By Cathy Cassata
With more than 1.7 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the United States and more than 100,000 deaths from the virus, physicians face unprecedented challenges in their efforts to keep Americans safe.
They also encounter what some call an "infodemic," an outbreak of misinformation that's making it more difficult to treat patients.
When Leaders and Doctors Spread Misinformation<p>When people in charge of towns, cities, states, and countries spread misinformation, the potential for belief in misinformation to result in policies can have harmful effects.</p><p><a href="https://www.northwell.edu/find-care/find-a-doctor?q=Bruce+E.+Hirsch%2C+MD&insurance=&location=&query_type=provider&physician_partners=false&default_view=list&gender=&language=&sort=relevancy" target="_blank">Dr. Bruce E. Hirsch</a>, attending physician and assistant professor in the infectious disease division of Northwell Health in Manhasset, New York, says an example of this is when President Trump informed the public he was taking hydroxychloroquine as a preventive measure.</p><p>"To approach this enormous challenge, we need some intellectual honesty and clarity, and to disregard expertise and to make decisions and model decisions based on hunches is inviting us to handle challenges on the basis of rumor and uninformed opinion. The magnitude of that error is epic," Hirsch told Healthline.</p><p>Stukus agrees, noting that the harm of this proclamation is documented.</p><p>"Early on when the president touted the benefits of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, people started to hoard this medicine, and state boards had to shut it down because they were getting so many prescriptions for this unproven therapy that it was not available for those who truly needed it, such as those who have lupus and autoimmune conditions," Stukus said.</p><p>He adds that calls to poison control centers increased after the president suggested using disinfectant to prevent contracting the new coronavirus.</p>
Listen to Science, Even When it Changes<p>When recommendations change or evidence flip-flops, skepticism may arise. However, Stukus says change is the beauty of science.</p><p>"That shows us that we can evolve, and if the evidence shows that our prior thoughts were incorrect, we need to be able to change our recommendations and advice based upon the best quality of evidence at the time," he said.</p><p>Pierre agrees.</p><p>"Science is an iterative process, whereby we arrive at facts and truth through repeated and controlled observations. That means that it's inherently self-correcting as we revise conclusions based on ongoing research. Scientific facts aren't immutable dogma chiseled on a tablet. They change based on the best available evidence we have at a given point in time," he said.</p><p>Because research of COVID-19 has only been underway for 6 months, information is evolving rapidly, and new information may contradict old.</p><p>"There's still much we don't know about exactly how [COVID-19] spreads, what effects it has on the body, or how to best treat it. That means that the best available evidence is preliminary, but that doesn't mean that we should ignore it or turn to other sources of information or opinion as if they're just as valid," Pierre said.</p><p>He explains that conspiracy theories based on mistrust lead to vulnerability to misinformation.</p><p>If people mistrust science because it sometimes "changes its mind," Pierre said, "that shouldn't be used to embrace other opinions based on no evidence at all, which are typically selected based on confirmation bias: what we want to believe rather than what the objective evidence supports."</p>
Where to Find the Best Information<p>Stukus says to start with the <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nCoV/index.html" target="_blank">CDC</a> and <a href="https://www.nih.gov/health-information/coronavirus" target="_blank">NIH</a>. Then check with your local health officials, because COVID-19 guidelines may vary depending on where you live.</p><p>If you can't find information you need or have questions specifically related to you, call your primary care doctor.</p><p>"Your personal doctor should always be a resource for individual specific questions because they know best how to apply all the nuances retaining to your health, and how to incorporate all the other general [COVID-19] recommendations," Stukus said.</p><p><a href="https://www.eehealth.org/find-a-doctor/b/boyd-laura-b/" target="_blank">Dr. Laura Boyd</a>, primary care physician at Edward-Elmhurst Health Center in Elmhurst, Illinois, says her clinic receives a lot of calls about COVID-19.</p><p>"Most doctors' offices are receiving calls and answering questions, and doing phone or video visits to help clarify and/or order testing over the phone based on patients' symptoms. It is always best to call your doctor's office first instead of worrying about symptoms and waiting too long to seek treatment," she told Healthline.</p><p>If your primary care doctor has limited testing, she suggests looking on your state's public health website for available testing sites.</p><p>With a lot of unknowns related to this virus and disease, Boyd says many patients are feeling overwhelmed and anxious for a treatment.</p><p>"Unfortunately, there is no specific medication recommended for COVID for outpatient. There are a lot of ongoing studies with various drugs going on within the hospital setting. Patients should always contact their doctors about their specific symptoms as they can treat the symptoms that go along with COVID, but there is no cure," Boyd said.</p><p>While we wait for treatment and a vaccine, Hirsch, who treats patients hospitalized for COVID-19 complications on a daily basis, says everyone can do their part by washing hands, wearing a mask, and staying 6 feet apart.</p><p>"As an infectious disease doctor working in the hospital, I see the damage of the pandemic and the worst cases of what's happening. We are trying to get the best possible outcome and confronting this overwhelming biologic reality of this terrible epidemic the best we can," Hirsch said.</p><p>Everyone at home can help in the fight too, he adds.</p><p>"Follow information that is science- and evidence-based, and avoid that which is not," he said.</p>
- WHO Declares Global Health Emergency as Coronavirus Cases ... ›
- Here's What We Know About Ibuprofen and COVID-19 - EcoWatch ›
- Trump's Budget Plan: A Push for Even Greater Environmental ... ›
- Trump Pushed for Mining Project That Could Destroy Alaska Salmon ... ›