NukeSpeak at the Devil’s Door
The abject failure of the global nuke power industry has never been more obvious. From Fukushima to Davis-Besse, from Siemens to Wall Street, the atomic scam is in collapse. Yet reactor backers continue to push for more of them. The reason is obvious—corporate greed.
But the No Nukes movement now phasing out this madness has never been stronger. After four decades of intense activism, it may be on the brink of becoming history’s most successful non-violent campaign.
In the heat of the battle, Gary Null’s new film, KNOCKING ON THE DEVIL’S DOOR, does an amazingly comprehensive job of exploring this satanic technology and how to stop it.
NUKESPEAK, a reborn version of the 1970s classic text by Rory O’Connor and Richard Bell, exposes the Orwellian corruption of language itself by an industry whose only tangible “products” are supremely expensive and ultimately superfluous electricity, plus atomic radiation and death by cancer.
Null’s film gives a great historic overview of the issue and how we got to where we are.
Back in the 1950s, atomic energy was sold as “too cheap to meter,” the ultimate Big NukeSpeak Lie. In fact, nuke power has proven to be the most expensive way of generating electricity ever invented.
As underscored in Null’s film by expert reporters like Greg Palast and Karl Grossman, no nuclear reactors would ever have been built if the Eisenhower Administration had not forced taxpayers to take on the burden of liability for major accidents.
With the 1957 Price-Anderson Act, the feds gave the “Peaceful Atom” (another NukeSpeak gem) its most critical pre-bail-out—the right to force the costs of a Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and/or Fukushima onto the American public.
Today the Price-Anderson fund is less than $13 billion, a pathetic whisp of what the true cost of a major reactor disaster could be. Watch what happens now in Japan, as the utility, government and public try to sort out who will pay for Fukushima. It is an ugly, poisonous war for economic survival, with the ultimate real costs in the trillions.
In the U.S., cancellation of Price-Anderson would force all commercial reactors to shut overnight. Certainly no utility would consider building a new one. Yet the industry is supported by “free market advocates” who somehow think solar power is a deadbeat while nukes are wonderful.
In fact, green energy is now attracting huge waves of private investment while no one will fund new reactors. Solartopian renewables like wind, solar, tidal, geothermal, ocean thermal, wave energy, sustainable bio-fuels, increased efficiency, conservation, mass transit and the like are far cheaper than nukes and are having far less trouble attracting private investment.
The recent over-hyped failure of federal loans to the Solyndra solar company, for example, had nothing to do with the value of solar technology. Instead it was about the fact that the Chinese have massively subsidized their own solar industries. They have taken the lead in wind, solar and other Solartopian growth centers and are now underselling the rest of the world—often at less than cost—so they can monopolize what will certainly be a multi-trillion-dollar green-power industry. At this point Chinese solar panels are selling at 30-40 percent less than comparable American product.
The core victory of the American No Nukes movement has been to prevent even further federal subsidization of atomic power. France’s 60-odd reactors—the poster children for industry backers---are all built with federal taxpayer money. They are also extremely dangerous, expensive and will not be repeated.
New French reactor projects in Finland, China and France itself, are proving extremely problematic, with massive delays and cost overruns. French public opinion has turned dramatically against new construction, with heavy favorables for green Solartopian technology.
In Germany, the government is shutting old reactors and will not build new ones. The German mega-corporation Siemens, once a bulwark of the reactor industry, has abandoned the business to focus on renewables. This is an Earth-shattering event for a technology the Germans had once hoped to dominate. That they are now putting their marks in the solar basket is the surest indicator that a green-powered Earth is on its way. Germany is the largest economy in Europe, the fourth-largest in the world (though it’s likely to pass the Fukushima-ruined Japan). With Switzerland, Italy, Spain and others joining the Solartopian procession, the economic noose is tightening on the nuclear neck.
But here in the U.S., we have work yet to do. The warning signs of impending disaster certainly abound. At Davis-Besse, the constant stream of terrifying news has been augmented by reports of a 30-foot containment crack. Details are vague.
But the news follows on an earthquake that exceeded design specifications at North Anna, Virginia; a flood the threatened two reactors in Nebraska; hurricane and tornado warnings at other reactors, and much much more.
Fierce movements in Vermont, New York and New Jersey are focused with new levels of spontaneous grassroots power on shutting reactors there. With the anti-corporate fervor of a global Occupy movement gaining serious strength, a focus on stopping federal loan guarantees could doom new reactor construction in the U.S. forever.
If all this is truly “Knocking on the Devil’s Door,” the corporate language has morphed into a whole new level of NukeSpeak. We are now told that reactors are “carbon free.” (They aren’t).
We are told (by companies that doubt global warming) that nuclear power can fight global warming (it makes it worse).
We hear that reactor containments such as the cracked one at Davis-Besse are “robust” (like caffeinated coffee?).
And that a “nuclear renaissance” is a time when the industry spends more than $60 million per year over the course of a decade renting and buying Congresspeople and presidents to get themselves loan guarantees for new reactors, only to be repeatedly defeated by No Nukers with no budgets.
The tipping point has been reached. Solartopian technologies are now significantly cheaper than new nukes, and getting moreso. The U.S. now gets more power from renewables than from fission. We will shut those old reactors, one-by-one, leading to a game-over cascade.
Our deepest prayer is that we make this happen before another Fukushima poisons us all.
- New Clues Help Monarch Butterfly Conservation Efforts - EcoWatch ›
- Monarch Butterflies Will Be Protected Under Historic Deal - EcoWatch ›
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
California faces another "critically dry year" according to state officials, and a destructive wildfire season looms on its horizon. But in a state that welcomes innovation, water efficacy approaches and drought management could replenish California, increasingly threatened by the climate's new extremes.
- Remarkable Drop in Colorado River Water Use Sign of Climate ... ›
- California Faces a Future of Extreme Weather - EcoWatch ›
Wisdom the mōlī, or Laysan albatross, is the oldest wild bird known to science at the age of at least 70. She is also, as of February 1, a new mother.
<div id="dadb2" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="aa2ad8cb566c9b4b6d2df2693669f6f9"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1357796504740761602" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">🚨Cute baby alert! Wisdom's chick has hatched!!! 🐣😍 Wisdom, a mōlī (Laysan albatross) and world’s oldest known, ban… https://t.co/Nco050ztBA</div> — USFWS Pacific Region (@USFWS Pacific Region)<a href="https://twitter.com/USFWSPacific/statuses/1357796504740761602">1612558888.0</a></blockquote></div>
By Hui Hu
Winter is supposed to be the best season for wind power – the winds are stronger, and since air density increases as the temperature drops, more force is pushing on the blades. But winter also comes with a problem: freezing weather.
Comparing rime ice and glaze ice shows how each changes the texture of the blade. Gao, Liu and Hu, 2021, CC BY-ND
Ice buildup changes air flow around the turbine blade, which can slow it down. The top photos show ice forming after 10 minutes at different temperatures in the Wind Research Tunnel. The lower measurements show airflow separation as ice accumulates. Icing Research Tunnel of Iowa State University, CC BY-ND
While traditional investment in the ocean technology sector has been tentative, growth in Israeli maritime innovations has been exponential in the last few years, and environmental concern has come to the forefront.
theDOCK aims to innovate the Israeli maritime sector. Pexels<p>The UN hopes that new investments in ocean science and technology will help turn the tide for the oceans. As such, this year kicked off the <a href="https://www.oceandecade.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030)</a> to galvanize massive support for the blue economy.</p><p>According to the World Bank, the blue economy is the "sustainable use of ocean resources for economic growth, improved livelihoods, and jobs while preserving the health of ocean ecosystem," <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412019338255#b0245" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Science Direct</a> reported. It represents this new sector for investments and innovations that work in tandem with the oceans rather than in exploitation of them.</p><p>As recently as Aug. 2020, <a href="https://www.reutersevents.com/sustainability/esg-investors-slow-make-waves-25tn-ocean-economy" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reuters</a> noted that ESG Investors, those looking to invest in opportunities that have a positive impact in environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, have been interested in "blue finance" but slow to invest.</p><p>"It is a hugely under-invested economic opportunity that is crucial to the way we have to address living on one planet," Simon Dent, director of blue investments at Mirova Natural Capital, told Reuters.</p><p>Even with slow investment, the blue economy is still expected to expand at twice the rate of the mainstream economy by 2030, Reuters reported. It already contributes $2.5tn a year in economic output, the report noted.</p><p>Current, upward <a href="https://www.ecowatch.com/-innovation-blue-economy-2646147405.html" target="_self">shifts in blue economy investments are being driven by innovation</a>, a trend the UN hopes will continue globally for the benefit of all oceans and people.</p><p>In Israel, this push has successfully translated into investment in and innovation of global ports, shipping, logistics and offshore sectors. The "Startup Nation," as Israel is often called, has seen its maritime tech ecosystem grow "significantly" in recent years and expects that growth to "accelerate dramatically," <a href="https://itrade.gov.il/belgium-english/how-israel-is-becoming-a-port-of-call-for-maritime-innovation/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">iTrade</a> reported.</p><p>Driving this wave of momentum has been rising Israeli venture capital hub <a href="https://www.thedockinnovation.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">theDOCK</a>. Founded by Israeli Navy veterans in 2017, theDOCK works with early-stage companies in the maritime space to bring their solutions to market. The hub's pioneering efforts ignited Israel's maritime technology sector, and now, with their new fund, theDOCK is motivating these high-tech solutions to also address ESG criteria.</p><p>"While ESG has always been on theDOCK's agenda, this theme has become even more of a priority," Nir Gartzman, theDOCK's managing partner, told EcoWatch. "80 percent of the startups in our portfolio (for theDOCK's Navigator II fund) will have a primary or secondary contribution to environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria."</p><p>In a company presentation, theDOCK called contribution to the ESG agenda a "hot discussion topic" for traditional players in the space and their boards, many of whom are looking to adopt new technologies with a positive impact on the planet. The focus is on reducing carbon emissions and protecting the environment, the presentation outlines. As such, theDOCK also explicitly screens candidate investments by ESG criteria as well.</p><p>Within the maritime space, environmental innovations could include measures like increased fuel and energy efficiency, better monitoring of potential pollution sources, improved waste and air emissions management and processing of marine debris/trash into reusable materials, theDOCK's presentation noted.</p>
theDOCK team includes (left to right) Michal Hendel-Sufa, Head of Alliances, Noa Schuman, CMO, Nir Gartzman, Co-Founder & Managing Partner, and Hannan Carmeli, Co-Founder & Managing Partner. Dudu Koren<p>theDOCK's own portfolio includes companies like Orca AI, which uses an intelligent collision avoidance system to reduce the probability of oil or fuel spills, AiDock, which eliminates the use of paper by automating the customs clearance process, and DockTech, which uses depth "crowdsourcing" data to map riverbeds in real-time and optimize cargo loading, thereby reducing trips and fuel usage while also avoiding groundings.</p><p>"Oceans are a big opportunity primarily because they are just that – big!" theDOCK's Chief Marketing Officer Noa Schuman summarized. "As such, the magnitude of their criticality to the global ecosystem, the magnitude of pollution risk and the steps needed to overcome those challenges – are all huge."</p><p>There is hope that this wave of interest and investment in environmentally-positive maritime technologies will accelerate the blue economy and ESG investing even further, in Israel and beyond.</p>
- 14 Countries Commit to Ocean Sustainability Initiative - EcoWatch ›
- These 11 Innovations Are Protecting Ocean Life - EcoWatch ›
- How Innovation Is Driving the Blue Economy - EcoWatch ›