Quantcast
Environmental News for a Healthier Planet and Life

NC Senate Overrides Gov. Perdue's Fracking Veto

Energy

EcoWatch

Soon after we posted the news that North Carolina Gov. Bev Perdue announced yesterday that she vetoed a controversial, Republican-backed proposal to legalize fracking throughout the state, the state Senate voted to override the governor's veto. Gov. Perdue vetoed the fracking bill saying it lacked sufficient protections for the public and the environment.

The Senate voted 29 to 13 today after a brief discussion. A three-fifths majority is required to override a gubernatorial veto.

According to Dustin Chicurel-Bayard, communications director for the North Carolina Sierra Club, the House just adjourned but will be back this evening at 9 p.m. and they could vote tonight or tomorrow. "If the house does not override the veto by a three-fifths majority then the fracking bill will not become law," said Chicurel-Bayard.

According to the Charlotte Observer, the vote in the House will be much closer than in the Senate and could hang on a single vote. When the House passed the bill earlier this month, support would not have been enough to override a veto.

Three senators, all Democrats, spoke in favor of sustaining veto—Ellie Kinnaird of Orange, Floyd McKissick Jr. of Durham and Martin Nesbitt of Buncombe.

They sited concerns about exploitation of landowners, potential risks to drinking water, proximity of the Shearon Harris nuclear plant, and the lack of rules and regulations in place.

“For all these reasons we need to be exceedingly cautious and deliberative,” said McKissick. “We don’t need to go out there and do test drilling until we know the implications.”

Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.

 

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

Migrating barn swallows rest on electricity cables in Heraklion, Crete, Greece. Patricia Fenn Gallery / Moment / Getty images

Thousands of swallows and other migratory birds have died in Greece trying to cross from Africa to Europe this spring.

Read More Show Less
A ringed seal swims in a water tank at the Osaka Aquarium Kaiyukan on July 26, 2013. Kazuhiro Nogi / AFP / Getty Images

Ringed seals spend most of the year hidden in icy Arctic waters, breathing through holes they create in the thick sea ice.

But when seal pups are born each spring, they don't have a blubber layer, which is their protection from cold.

Read More Show Less
Sponsored
A volunteer sets up beds in what will be a field hospital in the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine on April 8, 2020 in New York City. The cathedral has partnered with Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital and is expected to have more than 400 beds when opened. Spencer Platt / Getty Images

New York state now has more confirmed coronavirus cases than any single country save the U.S. as a whole.

Read More Show Less
Moroccan patients who recovered from the novel coronavirus disease celebrate with medical staff as they leave the hospital in Sale, Morocco, on April 3, 2020. AFP / Getty Images

By Tom Duszynski

The coronavirus is certainly scary, but despite the constant reporting on total cases and a climbing death toll, the reality is that the vast majority of people who come down with COVID-19 survive it. Just as the number of cases grows, so does another number: those who have recovered.

In mid-March, the number of patients in the U.S. who had officially recovered from the virus was close to zero. That number is now in the tens of thousands and is climbing every day. But recovering from COVID-19 is more complicated than simply feeling better. Recovery involves biology, epidemiology and a little bit of bureaucracy too.

Read More Show Less

Trending

Reef scene with crinoid and fish in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Reinhard Dirscherl / ullstein bild / Getty Images

By Elizabeth Claire Alberts

The future for the world's oceans often looks grim. Fisheries are set to collapse by 2048, according to one study, and 8 million tons of plastic pollute the ocean every year, causing considerable damage to delicate marine ecosystems. Yet a new study in Nature offers an alternative, and more optimistic view on the ocean's future: it asserts that the entire marine environment could be substantially rebuilt by 2050, if humanity is able to step up to the challenge.

Read More Show Less