Quantcast

Montanans Stage Multi-Day Sit-in to Oppose Arch Coal Export Mine

Energy

Coal Export Action

Climate, health and social justice groups are calling for a summer mobilization to protect Montana from coal export mining.

Groups including the Blue Skies Campaign, 350.org and Occupy Missoula invite Montanans to join a multi-day sit-in beginning Aug. 13 at the State Capitol to pressure State Land Board members to reject Arch Coal’s Otter Creek export mine.

“We are not going to sacrifice our health, our land and water, our private property and our pride to become a coal colony for Asia,” said Lowell Chandler of the Blue Skies Campaign. “It is time to protect the last best place from the horrific effects of coal exports.”

With U.S. coal demand declining, companies like Arch Coal are looking to develop new mines in eastern Montana, with an eye toward exporting abroad. In 2010, the State Land Board granted Arch a lease to the Otter Creek coal tracts, but the board still needs to sign off on a mining plan before coal mining can start.

Currently, at least six coal port proposals are being considered in Washington and Oregon, which together would be capable of sending 150 million tons or more annually to Asian markets. In addition to the devastating local impacts of projects such as the proposed Arch Coal mine, new mines will only exacerbate existing coal exports, creating a trail of pollution through the U.S. and overseas. A recent analysis of Appalachian coal mine data shows that coal exports have exploded over the last few years, with some mines exporting 100 percent of their coal abroad.

“Over the last few years, countless Montanans have submitted comments, turned out to hearings and done whatever we could to get the land board to stand up to Big Coal,” said Chandler. “Now it’s time to take the next step.”

The Coal Export Action sit-in will take place at the Montana State Capitol.

The sit-in, called the Coal Export Action, is supported by the Blue Skies Campaign, Rising Tide, Montana Women For, 350.org and other groups, and was initially supposed to take place around the time Arch was expected to submit its mining application on Aug. 20.

The land board must have got wind of the mass peaceful protests, because on July 30, with only four days’ advance notice, the board announced its August meeting was being rescheduled from Aug. 20 to Aug. 3. It looks an awful lot like the board moved its meeting to avoid holding it during the Coal Export Action, when they know their actions related to coal mining will be subject to heightened public scrutiny.

This isn’t in keeping with good governance. Montana’s state code requires “adequate notice” be given to “assist public participation before a final agency action is taken that is of significant interest to the public.” The land board hasn’t violated the letter of the law—the code doesn’t specify what “adequate notice” means—but rescheduling a meeting date posted months in advance, with only four days’ notice, is hardly in keeping with a spirit of encouraging public input.

The Coal Export Action is now more important than ever. When a public process is rigged against the public, we must turn to massive, peaceful protest to get the attention of decision-makers. Fortunately, it’s just this type of large-scale direct action that’s planned for the Coal Export Action later this month.

In the past, land board members ignored hundreds of Montanans who submitted comments turned out to hearings and signed petitions opposing the Otter Creek Mine. Now they appear to be trying to minimize the opportunity for public input. But starting Aug. 13, our sit-in at the Capitol rotunda, between the offices of land board members Gov. Brian Schweitzer and Secretary of State Linda McCulloch, will make our demand for a clean energy future free of coal impossible to ignore any longer.

Since the land board moved its meeting date to Aug. 3, the Aug. 20 meeting—which would have fallen right at the end of the Coal Export Action—will no longer take place. That won’t stop Arch Coal from moving forward with plans to submit its mining application, which it’s expected to do late this summer. Once submitted, Arch’s application will be reviewed by the Department of Environmental Quality, and then needs a stamp of approval from the land board. The board, currently composed of Gov. Brian Schweitzer, Secretary of State Linda McCulloch, Attorney General Steve Bullock, State Auditor Monica Lindeen and Superintendent of Instruction Denise Juneau, is expected to make its decision later this year, or in early 2013.

This isn’t just about coal anymore: it’s about holding government bodies accountable when they fail to practice good government. You can help us succeed.

If the mine is approved, coal train traffic through rail line towns will increase severalfold. This has many residents worried.

“Pollutants from coal trains will cause emergency room visits to go up,” said Dr. Amy Haynes, a naturopathic physician who has practiced in Missoula for the last 28years. “Everybody who breaths will basically be at risk.”

“Think of all the children who live along the rail line,” said Becca Titus, a member of Occupy Missoula. “The health of all of them will be affected by this proposal.”

Corey Bressler, from the grassroots climate group 350.org, said increased coal mining and burning will also make climate change worse. “A warming, drying climate has already lengthened the western fire season by 78 days,” Bressler said. “Dryer, hotter summers will seriously damage Montana’s recreational, tourism and agricultural industries.”

Groups involved in the Coal Export Action hope hundreds of Montanans will participate in the peaceful sit-in, and that it will be among the largest actions of its kind in recent Montana history. Those interested can sign up and learn more by clicking here.

Visit EcoWatch's COAL page for more related news on this topic.

 

EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

On the Solomon Islands, rats and poachers are the two major threats to critically endangered sea turtles. A group of local women have joined forces to help save the animals from extinction.

Read More
Whale watching (here, off Húsavík, Iceland) may be better for the local economy than whale hunting. Davide Cantelli / Wikimedia / CC BY

By Joe Roman

One of the most important global conservation events of the past year was something that didn't happen. For the first time since 2002, Iceland — one of just three countries that still allow commercial whaling — didn't hunt any whales, even though its government had approved whaling permits in early 2019.

Read More
Sponsored
People participate in a national mile-long march to highlight the push for clean water in Flint Feb. 19, 2016 in Flint, Michigan. Bill Pugliano / Stringer / Getty Images

The Supreme Court made a decision Tuesday that means Flint residents can sue state and local officials over the water crisis that leached lead into their water and resulted in at least 12 deaths.

Read More
One species of walking shark. Mark Erdmann, California Academy of Sciences

Scientists have identified four new species of walking shark in the waters off Australia and New Guinea.

Read More
A new study shows that half of all Arctic warming and corresponding sea-loss during the late 20th century was caused by ozone-depleting substances. Here, icebergs discharged from Greenland's Jakobshavn Glacier. Kevin Krajick / Earth Institute / EurekAlert!

The world awakened to the hole in the ozone layer in 1985, which scientists attributed it to ozone-depleting substances. Two years later, in Montreal, the world agreed to ban the halogen compounds causing the massive hole over Antarctica. Research now shows that those chemicals didn't just cut a hole in the ozone layer, they also warmed up the Arctic.

Read More