Quantcast
Environmental News for a Healthier Planet and Life

Momentous Pressure on World Leaders as Climate Talks Begin in Lima

Climate
Momentous Pressure on World Leaders as Climate Talks Begin in Lima

The pressure is on for leaders to move forward on climate change as delegates descend into Peru for the two-week UN climate conference in Lima today.

The UN climate conference in Lima, Peru starts today. Diplomats are calling these negotiations “the best chance in a generation of striking a deal on global warming."

Diplomats are calling these negotiations “the best chance in a generation of striking a deal on global warming” according to the Guardian, with the U.S. and China’s commitment to work together on carbon pollution bringing fresh momentum.

There is some cautious optimism,” said Leo Hickman, World Wildlife Fund’s (WWF) chief advisor on climate change. “Things feel different than they did six months ago, one year ago, so we don’t want to puncture that.”

COP20 will be vital in setting the scene for next year’s talks. At the end of these two weeks in Lima, it’s hoped a draft deal will be produced that can be finalized in Paris.

But what exactly should we look out for and what can we expect from British delegates?

Climate Finance

According to a report by Bloomberg New Energy Finance “the issue of climate finance is central to the post-2020 talks.”

This month has seen a slew of countries pledge contributions to the Green Climate Fund (GCF), including the UK which committed £720m.

While the fund is technically separate to the negotiations, many are pushing for wealthy nations to set a higher contribution target.

Both Greenpeace and WWF in their policy expectation briefing papers call for developed countries to make pledges to the GCF totaling at least USD$15bn and to “scale up financing flows through the GCF significantly in subsequent years.”

However, the UK might not be keen on this for two reasons. As mentioned, Britain has very recently pledged money to the Green Climate Fund, so some will argue it has already done its part.

Secondly, there is an election coming up in May. Without knowing what the next government will look like, politicians might argue they cannot commit a new government to new finance commitments. The same goes for the U.S. whose 2016 election is a year after the Paris talks.

And as the Financial Times reports this morning, China and Brazil have already started criticising the amount of money wealthy countries have pledged to help poorer nations deal with global warming “in a sign that sealing a climate treaty next year still faces serious snags.”

Loss and Damage

The loss and damage mechanism was created at COP19 in Warsaw last year with the aim to provide financial support for vulnerable countries affected by climate change.

It is a particularly contentious issue within the climate finance debate because wealthier countries—and historic emitters—see it as a compensation mechanism.

According Bloomberg New Energy Finance, “developing countries such as those facing existential threats from sea-level rise believe they are due significant compensation, but developed countries are cautious, saying that they are ‘not willing to sign a blank cheque.'”

This will be a closely-watched space during negotiations. Many hope the red line drawn by countries such as the UK and U.S. will begin to soften.

Review Mechanisms

It is expected that the 2015 Paris deal will most likely be a hodgepodge of individual national post-2020 targets. These targets will come out of the Lima discussions and are expected to be announced next March.

Crucial to the lead up to Paris then, is assessing the targets set by each country. This means that any draft deal reached now must include a monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) framework.

A robust and transparent MRV framework is crucial to evaluating the ambition and progress towards each country’s target under a new agreement,” explains the BNEF report.

When it comes to setting national targets, “we need more detail and clarity rather than big statements,” said Hickman.

Understanding how the national targets collectively fit together is key to securing a meaningful deal next year—where on the path to 2°C of warming, or how far off from it, do the targets put us?

As both Greenpeace and WWF argue, countries must not be allowed to set too many different timelines for their commitments. The timelines should be focused around five-year commitment periods—targets for 2025 not just 2030—with a ratcheting-up mechanism so that countries cannot slip back on their pledges.

We really want to see a proper, decent draft for Paris,” said Hickman. “So a framework or foundation of what that’ll look like and what will its legal status be? It would really help progress to come out with a draft deal.”

Maintaining momentum on climate action in Peru is critical. As energy secretary, Ed Davey told the Telegraph: “These are the last major annual talks before we hit our deadline in Paris next year. We need a deal in Paris–there is no alternative that will protect our national security, our economy and the way of life we take for granted.”

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Extreme Weather Will Be ‘New Climate Normal’ Without Immediate Action, Warns World Bank

Hottest October on Record Puts Planet on Track for Hottest Year Ever

Stunning NASA Video Illustrates a Year’s Worth of Global Carbon Emissions

The Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn, New York, a polluted nearly 2 mile-long waterway that is an EPA Superfund site. Jonathan Macagba / Moment / Getty Images

Thousands of Superfund sites exist around the U.S., with toxic substances left open, mismanaged and dumped. Despite the high levels of toxicity at these sites, nearly 21 million people live within a mile of one of them, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Read More Show Less
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
The National Weather Service station in Chatham, Massachusetts, near the edge of a cliff at the Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge. Bryce Williams / National Weather Service in Boston / Norton

A weather research station on a bluff overlooking the sea is closing down because of the climate crisis.

Read More Show Less
Trending
Amsterdam is one of the Netherlands' cities which already has "milieuzones," where some types of vehicles are banned. Unsplash / jennieramida

By Douglas Broom

  • If online deliveries continue with fossil-fuel trucks, emissions will increase by a third.
  • So cities in the Netherlands will allow only emission-free delivery vehicles after 2025.
  • The government is giving delivery firms cash help to buy or lease electric vehicles.
  • The bans will save 1 megaton of CO2 every year by 2030.

Cities in the Netherlands want to make their air cleaner by banning fossil fuel delivery vehicles from urban areas from 2025.

Read More Show Less
Protestors stage a demonstration against fracking in California on May 30, 2013 in San Francisco, California. Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

A bill that would have banned fracking in California died in committee Tuesday.

Read More Show Less
EXTREME-PHOTOGRAPHER / E+ / Getty Images

By Brett Wilkins

As world leaders prepare for this November's United Nations Climate Conference in Scotland, a new report from the Cambridge Sustainability Commission reveals that the world's wealthiest 5% were responsible for well over a third of all global emissions growth between 1990 and 2015.

Read More Show Less