Meet Waterkeeper Alliance's Asia Regional Coordinator
Imagine getting drinking water from a stream filled with chemicals from nearby factories or having to grow crops that are irrigated with polluted water—this is the kind of life that many villagers in China and beyond are dealing with and many villages have turned into ghost towns as younger generations want to avoid the cancerous fates that their grandparents and parents have been cursed with. With rivers, streams, lakes and other water bodies being turned into dumping grounds for untreated effluents, the issue of water pollution has been and continues to plague communities in China and other Asian countries. We talked to Charles Depman, Asia Regional Coordinator at Waterkeeper Alliance about the issues and solutions for waterway protection in Asian regions.
Ecozine: How did you get involved in the environmental movement?
Charles: I first decided to join the environmental movement during a year I spent living and working in Mainland China before going to university. At the time, I was teaching English in Guangzhou and went to stay in the home villages of several of my students during the Spring Festival. What I saw made me quit my job as a teacher and go to work at an environmental NGO in Beijing. I witnessed horrifying environmental degradation in these villages—streams that had once been used for swimming, fishing and drinking by local communities had literally turned black and could be smelled from dozen of meters away. The older generation in these villages lamented the fact that even though the government had given them new apartment buildings in exchange for their land, the next generations had been robbed of their right to a clean environment. Later in my life, I saw and lived with similar communities in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Bangladesh that had been adversely affected by both government and industry actions.
Ecozine: Please share more about the Waterkeeper Alliance—what are its mission and goals?
Charles: Waterkeeper Alliance is a network of clean-water advocates on six continents who are fighting on the front lines of the global water crisis. We work primarily with grassroots organizations that hold a stake in their local water body. These organizations are composed of concerned citizens who know that it is unfair for corporations and governments to abuse publicly-owned and used rivers, estuaries, bays, coasts and lakes. They know that such pollution has dire consequences for the health of humans and the world’s ecosystems. Our goal is to bring solidarity, knowledge, training and legal tools to these organizations so that they can fight more effectively for environmental justice.
With regard to China, local and provincial Environmental Protection Bureaus often have insufficient capacity to monitor and control pollution. Because of this, an emphasis remains on promotion of regulation rather than enforcement of regulation. Thus it becomes the task of concerned citizens to try to collect data and affect change. At Waterkeeper Alliance, we help empower those concerned citizens. So far, we are partnered with six Chinese NGOs and are looking to expand.
Ecozine: What are the most severe problems China and Asian countries face today when it comes to waterway protection?
Charles: The lack of enforcement of environmental laws is a huge issue in Asia concerning waterway protection. Even though there might exist relatively comprehensive environmental frameworks, such as the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, which was enacted in 1984 and most recently revised in 2008, you only need to cross the border into Shenzhen and Guangzhou to realize that the implementation and enforcement of such regulations is an entirely different matter.
Besides industrial pollution, China’s continuing reliance on coal as a primary energy source has dire consequences for the health of its waterways. From mining to burning to ash disposal, coal consumption releases staggering amounts of toxins such as mercury, lead, arsenic and radium into China’s air and water every year. And that consumption is growing—China became a net importer of coal in 2009 and the world’s largest importer in 2011.
And of course all these chemicals and harmful metals end up in the foods and drinking water of millions of people.
Ecozine: “Cancer villages” and “widow villages” are plaguing many industrial areas of China. Is Waterkeeper Alliance involved in any of these cases?
Charles: Yes. For example, our Upper Yellow River Waterkeeper in Gansu helped the village of Liangjiawan get access to clean drinking water after years of living with and getting sick from contaminated water from the Yellow River. A study from 2003 to 2008 showed that cancer rates in Liangjiawan had risen dramatically. Waterkeeper Alliance held countless negotiations with the local government and a nearby hydroelectric plant to resolve the issue.
Our Middle Han River Waterkeeper in Hubei has worked with local villages on tributaries of the Han River where there are high incidences of cancer by petitioning local Environmental Protection Bureaus and holding education sessions. Indeed, water is a key factor in “cancer villages”—their drinking water, bathing water and food is contaminated with toxins and cancer-causing carcinogens.
Unfortunately, public-interest litigation against polluters is very difficult because victims in China often don’t have the resources to collect and provide proper evidence to a judge. To make things worse, polluting firms are often protected by local governments because of their significant tax contributions. Another barrier exists: it is difficult to even bring an environmental case to court—judges can only hear a limited amount of cases and are often reluctant to take on complex environmental issues. Our Chinese Waterkeepers are helping to collect water-quality data and legal knowledge that might help in such cases.
Ecozine: What are the short-term and long-term policies/intervention measures needed to target the problem of pollution into waterways?
Charles: In Asia, many of the policies are already in place, but enforcement is lacking. The same is the case in the U.S.: even with our Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972, government organizations such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have failed to effectively protect our waterways. That is exactly why the grassroots Waterkeeper movement became so popular in the U.S. and is now expanding around the world—because concerned citizens had to take enforcement into their own hands to protect their livelihoods and the health of their communities. Waterkeepers in the U.S., with the backing of Waterkeeper Alliance, have been key in filing lawsuits against polluters and even the EPA itself. In the short-term, we will continue to litigate and fight against polluters, but hopefully the long-term outcome is a fundamental change towards tighter laws and more robust government enforcement.
Ecozine: Please highlight any achievements you’re especially proud of at Waterkeeper Alliance in Hong Kong/China/Asia.
Charles: In China, our Waterkeepers have been great defenders and advocates for the waters they’re working to protect. Our Qiantang River Waterkeeper created an online mapping system where the public can now go to report pollution sites and upload pictures. This is a great tool for indentifying polluters, and also a great tool for spreading public awareness of water-issues. Recently, the Qiantang River Waterkeeper team was featured on Zhejiang Satellite TV in a three-part miniseries.
In greater Asia, our Buriganga Waterkeeper in Bangladesh has been pressuring government officials to better demarcate river boundaries so that factories and structures cannot be built directly on the water. This year also marked the acquisition and launch of the Buriganga Riverkeeper patrol boat.
In India, our Mid Upper Yamuna Waterkeeper has been doing wonderful work with youth activists through a program called Youth for Yamuna.
Ecozine: What are some of the key challenges you face when starting and implementing grassroots, local movements to protect waterways?
Charles: Funding is a large issue, especially in Asia. Many of our Waterkeepers find that people don’t take their work seriously—for instance, in some parts of China, people still view this type of environmentalism as work for slackers or has-beens. That is until they start getting sick or truly start seeing the degradation that has been allowed to happen to their waterways.
Another challenge is that the work is extremely difficult. It takes people who are not willing to settle for the status quo, people who aren’t afraid to fight against corrupt officials and big businesses, many of which can avoid dealing with local water issues by importing bottled spring water and foods from abroad. Armed with passion, information and the law, Waterkeepers are the last line of defence for clean water. They are the voice of their waterway, the advocate for the health of their community, and they must be loud.
Ecozine: Is there anything else you’d like to share?
Charles: Yes, while there isn’t a Waterkeeper in Hong Kong yet, we are always searching for partnerships. I believe there is a need and a place for a Waterkeeper in Hong Kong—maybe a Victoria Harbour Waterkeeper or a Ma Wan Channel Waterkeeper. They could help enforce Hong Kong’s Water Pollution Control Ordinance while also informing people about the pollutants in their water, the effects of dirty water on the food they eat, and on their health.
Visit EcoWatch’s WATER page for more related news on this topic.
This interview originally ran on EcoZine.com.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Yellowstone Grizzlies Win Reprieve From Trophy Hunt as Court Restores Endangered Species Protections
- Wyoming Votes to Allow First Grizzly Bear Hunt in 40 Years ... ›
- British Columbia Bans Grizzly Bear Trophy Hunting - EcoWatch ›
- Good News for Yellowstone Grizzlies? U.S. to Review 'Flawed ... ›
- Judge Blocks First Yellowstone-Area Grizzly Hunt in 40 Years ... ›
By Alexandra Rowles
Oregano is a fragrant herb that's best known as an ingredient in Italian food.
However, it can also be concentrated into an essential oil that's loaded with antioxidants and powerful compounds that have proven health benefits.
- Essential Oils: 7 Common Questions Answered - EcoWatch ›
- 9 Ways to Boost Your Immune System - EcoWatch ›
- 15 Impressive Herbs with Antiviral Activity - EcoWatch ›
- Brazil Using Pandemic as Smokescreen for New Attacks on the ... ›
- In 'Totalitarian' Move, Brazil's Bolsonaro Removes Death and Case ... ›
- Brazil Passes 50,000 Coronavirus Deaths as Global Cases Top 9 ... ›
By Emily Grubert
Natural gas is a versatile fossil fuel that accounts for about a third of U.S. energy use. Although it produces fewer greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants than coal or oil, natural gas is a major contributor to climate change, an urgent global problem. Reducing emissions from the natural gas system is especially challenging because natural gas is used roughly equally for electricity, heating, and industrial applications.
<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="6bd9fda1316965a9ba24dd60fd9cc34d"><iframe lazy-loadable="true" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3KaMnkmf0tc?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
What RNG Is and Why it Matters<p>Most equipment that uses energy can only use a single kind of fuel, but the fuel might come from different resources. For example, you can't charge your computer with gasoline, but it can run on electricity generated from coal, natural gas or solar power.</p><p>Natural gas is almost pure methane, <a href="https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/" target="_blank">currently sourced</a> from raw, fossil natural gas produced from <a href="https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/where-our-natural-gas-comes-from.php" target="_blank">deposits deep underground</a>. But methane could come from renewable resources, too.</p><p><span></span>Two main methane sources could be used to make RNG. First is <a href="https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks" target="_blank">biogenic methane</a>, produced by bacteria that digest organic materials in manure, landfills and wastewater. Wastewater treatment plants, landfills and dairy farms have captured and used biogenic methane as an energy resource for <a href="http://emilygrubert.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/eia_860_2017_map.html" target="_blank">decades</a>, in a form usually called <a href="https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/biomass/landfill-gas-and-biogas.php" target="_blank">biogas</a>.</p><p>Some biogenic methane is generated naturally when organic materials break down without oxygen. Burning it for energy can be beneficial for the climate if doing so prevents methane from escaping to the atmosphere.</p>
Renewable Isn’t Always Sustainable<p>If RNG could be a renewable replacement for fossil natural gas, why not move ahead? Consumers have shown that they are <a href="https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/green-power.html" target="_blank">willing to buy renewable electricity</a>, so we might expect similar enthusiasm for RNG.</p><p>The key issue is that methane isn't just a fuel – it's also a <a href="https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/ghg_report/ghg_overview.php" target="_blank">potent greenhouse gas</a> that contributes to climate change. Any methane that is manufactured intentionally, whether from biogenic or other sources, will contribute to climate change if it enters the atmosphere.</p><p>And <a href="http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7204" target="_blank">releases</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.029" target="_blank">will happen</a>, from newly built production systems and <a href="https://theconversation.com/why-methane-emissions-matter-to-climate-change-5-questions-answered-122684" target="_blank">existing, leaky transportation and user infrastructure</a>. For example, the moment you smell gas before the pilot light on a stove lights the ring? That's methane leakage, and it contributes to climate change.</p><p>To be clear, RNG is almost certainly better for the climate than fossil natural gas because byproducts of burning RNG won't contribute to climate change. But doing somewhat better than existing systems is no longer enough to respond to the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2923" target="_blank">urgency</a> of climate change. The world's <a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/" target="_blank">primary international body on climate change</a> suggests we need to decarbonize by 2030 to mitigate the worst effects of climate change.</p>
Scant Climate Benefits<p><a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9335/meta" target="_blank">My recent research</a> suggests that for a system large enough to displace a lot of fossil natural gas, RNG is probably not as good for the climate as <a href="https://investor.southerncompany.com/information-for-investors/latest-news/latest-news-releases/press-release-details/2020/Southern-Company-Gas-grows-leadership-team-to-focus-on-climate-action-innovation-and-renewable-natural-gas-strategy/default.aspx" target="_blank">is publicly claimed</a>. Although RNG has lower climate impact than its fossil counterpart, likely high demand and methane leakage mean that it probably will contribute to climate change. In contrast, renewable sources such as wind and solar energy do not <a href="https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/carbon/" target="_blank">emit climate pollution directly</a>.</p><p>What's more, creating a large RNG system would require building mostly new production infrastructure, since RNG comes from different sources than fossil natural gas. Such investments are both long-term commitments and opportunity costs. They would devote money, political will and infrastructure investments to RNG instead of alternatives that could achieve a zero greenhouse gas emission goal.</p><p>When climate change first <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/24/us/global-warming-has-begun-expert-tells-senate.html" target="_blank">broke into the political conversation</a> in the late 1980s, investing in long-lived systems with low but non-zero greenhouse gas emissions was still compatible with aggressive climate goals. Now, zero greenhouse gas emissions is the target, and my research suggests that large deployments of RNG likely won't meet that goal.</p>
- Solar Employs More Workers Than Coal, Oil and Natural Gas ... ›
- The Truth About Natural Gas: A 'Green' Bridge to Hell - EcoWatch ›
- Why Natural Gas Is a Bridge Fuel to Nowhere - EcoWatch ›
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently issued a list of 431 products that are effective at killing viruses when they are on surfaces. Now, a good year for Lysol manufacturer Reckitt Benckiser just got better when the EPA said that two Lysol products are among the products that can kill the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19.
- Here's How to Clean Your Groceries During the COVID-19 Outbreak ... ›
- EPA Warns Against Fake Coronavirus Cleaners - EcoWatch ›
- What to Do if There's a Disinfectant Shortage in Your Area - EcoWatch ›
For all its posturing on climate change, the Democratic Party has long been weak on the actual policies we need to save us from extinction. President Barack Obama promised his presidency would mark "the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow," and then embraced natural gas, a major driver of global temperature rise, as a "bridge fuel." Climate legislation passed in the House in 2009 would have allowed industries to buy credits to pollute, a practice known to concentrate toxic air in black and brown neighborhoods while doing little to cut emissions.
- Trump Neglects Climate Change in State of the Union While ... ›
- House Democrats Hold First Climate Change Hearings in More ... ›
- If the Democratic Party Is Serious About Climate Change, They Must ... ›
Bayer's $10 billion settlement to put an end to roughly 125,000 lawsuits against its popular weed killer Roundup, which contains glyphosate, hit a snag this week when a federal judge in San Francisco expressed skepticism over what rights future plaintiffs would have, as the San Francisco Chronicle reported.
- Judge Blocks California From Putting Cancer Warning on Roundup ... ›
- Bayer Settles Roundup Cancer Suits for Over $10 Billion - EcoWatch ›