Meet 3 More Climate Deniers Who Want to Be Your President
It's a new week so that means we get a new crop of Republican presidential hopefuls. With Senators Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio having officially launched their campaigns and at least a dozen more potential candidates popping up in early-primary states, it's time this week for the long shots to get on the playing field.
Monday former Hewlett-Packard CEO and failed California Senate candidate Carly Fiorina and retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson announced their runs. Today former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee joins them. Each of these fringe candidates brings primarily oppositional assets to the field. Fiorina and Carson allow the GOP to claim they are neither sexist nor racist by pointing to their token woman and African-American. Huckabee has boasted about his ability to go after Hillary Clinton given his shared status with Bill Clinton as a former Arkansas governor. Although it's unlikely any of these candidates will be on the ticket—or even in the race by the end of the year—they're doing their best to conform to the attitudes of the increasingly rightwing GOP primary voters on many issues, including climate change. In fact, the positions of these three candidates on climate are so muddled it's hard to figure out where they stand. And perhaps that's intentional.
Photo credit: Shutterstock
Fiorina has never held elected office and her high-profile tenure as CEO of Hewlett-Packard was contentious. She ran against California Sen. Barbara Boxer in 2010 and lost by 10 points in a campaign she self-funded. And she's a sort-of climate denier who sees environmental activists as America's enemy.
In an editorial in the Washington Post last year, "Companies shouldn't cave in to the demands of climate change activists," Fiorina portrayed rightwing lobby group the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which is lavishly funded by deep-pockets fossil fuel interests such as the Koch brothers, as the poor, defenseless victim of environmental bullies. ALEC, she said "has been under siege by an army of professional activists." She attacked the public pressure campaigns that caused Google to drop its membership in ALEC and LEGO to end its relationship with Shell, claiming these were attacks on "protected speech."
She went on to say, "When discussing climate, scientists may agree that some policy change is warranted, but they also agree that action by a single state or nation will make little difference. At a time when American families are still recovering from joblessness and the recession, should the United States commit to an energy policy that puts U.S. jobs, and the economy, at risk?"
She promoted the idea that global temperature increase projections were overstated and that the idea of switching from "traditional" energy sources to renewable ones was "simplistic."
"Energy sources generate power in very different ways, and unlike traditional coal-burning power plants that reliably generate power, wind energy is volatile and unpredictable," she said.
Fiorina doubled down on her climate denial last month as she inched closer to announcing her presidential run. In an MSNBC interview, she restated her idea that there's no point in doing anything because it will make no difference and expressed opposition to California's climate regulations, saying, "California can be the most onerous regulatory regime in the world, which they are, and it won’t make a bit of difference in climate change."
She also blamed the drought in California on "liberal environmentalists," saying they "prevented the building of a single new reservoir or a single new water conveyance system over decades during a period in which California’s population has doubled." She called it a "classic case of liberals being willing to sacrifice other people’s lives and livelihoods at the altar of their ideology." She didn't explain where the water for the reservoirs or conveyance systems was going to come from.
Photo credit: Shutterstock
While his record shows that Ben Carson was a brilliant, widely respected doctor, he's expressed some of the most radical and reality-defying positions on issues of any candidate—virtually a requirement for an African-American in the Republican party. He doesn't believe in evolution, thinks being gay is a choice and has called the Affordable Care Act "the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery."
On climate, Carson has mostly dodged the issue. "We may be warming, we may be cooling," he said. "There's always going to be warming or cooling going on." But he's also said, "Our Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should be told to work in conjunction with business, industry and universities to find the most eco-friendly ways of developing our energy resources." That separates him from some Republicans who think the EPA should be rendered entirely impotent or even eliminated. On the other hand, he says the Keystone XL pipeline "is perfectly safe, so I can't really see a good reason not to do it."
Photo credit: Shutterstock
Mike Huckabee, an evangelical pastor, was the most religiously radical candidate during his first presidential run in 2008, although eight years later, his views barely distinguish him from the rest of the field. He declared his candidacy today in Bill Clinton's hometown of Hope, Arkansas, highlighting his claim that he is best equipped to fight what he calls the "Clinton machine."
In a speech in January, Huckabee belittled the idea that climate change was a threat, saying that middle eastern radicals ISIS pose a greater threat to Americans, although they pose no threat on U.S. soil at all. He referred to President Obama's remark in his State of the Union Address that the greatest threat the U.S. faces in climate change," saying, "Not to diminish anything about the climate at all, but Mr. President, I believe that most of us would think that a beheading is a far greater threat to an American than a sunburn." In other words, he diminished climate change to a triviality.
But Huckabee's wavering positions on climate change are interesting in that they track the Republican Party's rightward move in the last decade. At a conference in 2007, Huckabee said, "One thing that all of us have a responsibility to do is recognize that climate change is here, it's real. That what we have to do is quit pointing fingers as to who's at fault and recognize that it's all our fault and it's all our responsibility to fix it. I also support cap and trade of carbon emissions. And I was disappointed that the Senate rejected a carbon counting system to measure the sources of emissions, because that would have been the first and the most important step toward implementing true cap and trade."
That wasn't his position just a few years later. In 2010, he denied he had ever supported cap and trade, even though it's on video. According to NPR, Huckabee wrote a Facebook post in 2013 claiming that climate change predictions had proved inaccurate. That post has now disappeared.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
- 29 Wildfires Blaze Across the West, Fueled by Drought and Wind ... ›
- Large Wildfires Scorch Forests in Drought-Stricken Southwest ... ›
Accessibility to quality health care has dropped for millions of Americans who lost their health insurance due to unemployment. mixetto / E+ / Getty Images
Accessibility to quality health care has dropped for millions of Americans who lost their health insurance due to unemployment. New research has found that 5.4 million Americans were dropped from their insurance between February and May of this year. In that three-month stretch more Americans lost their coverage than have lost coverage in any entire year, according to The New York Times.
- Trump Plans to End Federal Funding for COVID-19 Testing Sites ... ›
- 'Unfathomable Cruelty': Trump Admin Asks Supreme Court to ... ›
On hot days in New York City, residents swelter when they're outside and in their homes. The heat is not just uncomfortable. It can be fatal.
- Extreme Heat-Stressed Locations Could Increase by 80% - EcoWatch ›
- African Americans Are Disproportionately Exposed to Extreme Heat ... ›
- Extreme Heat Is Killing Americans While Government Neglect ... ›
Fracking companies are going bankrupt at a rapid pace, often with taxpayer-funded bonuses for executives, leaving harm for communities, taxpayers, and workers, the New York Time reports.
- Plunging Oil Prices Trigger Economic Downturn in Fracking Boom ... ›
- Fracking Boom Bursts in Face of Low Oil Prices - EcoWatch ›
- As Fracking Companies Face Bankruptcy, U.S. Regulators Enable ... ›
A report scheduled for release later Tuesday by Congress' non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) finds that the Trump administration undervalues the costs of the climate crisis in order to push deregulation and rollbacks of environmental protections, according to The New York Times.
- Under Trump, EPA Workers Seek Bill of Rights to Allow Them to ... ›
- Trump Adds 'Tasteless Insult to Injury' by Pushing Fossil Fuel ... ›
By Kristen Fischer
It's going to be back-to-school time soon, but will children go into the classrooms?
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) thinks so, but only as long as safety measures are in place.
Keeping Schools Safe<p>What will safer schools look like?</p><p>In a <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2766822" target="_blank">JAMA article</a> published last month, <a href="https://www.jhsph.edu/faculty/directory/profile/1781/joshua-m-sharfstein" target="_blank">Dr. Joshua Sharfstein</a>, a pediatrician and professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, outlined suggestions — many of which are similar to AAP's.</p><p>Remote learning protocols must stay in place, especially as some schools stagger home and in-building learning. If another shutdown needs to occur, children will rely on distance learning completely, so it must be easy to switch to, he said.</p><p>He suggested giving parents a daily checklist to document their child's health. Kids should be screened quickly on arrival and be given hygiene supplies. Maintenance staff should use appropriate PPE and have regular cleaning schedules. A notification system should be in place if a case is identified, Sharfstein recommended.</p><p><a href="https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/erika-martin" target="_blank">Erika Martin</a>, PhD, an associate professor of public administration and policy at University at Albany, said nutrition assistance and health services should be included. She called for tutoring programs with virtual options as well as technology access.</p>
Supporting Staff<p>Teachers and staff will be affected by safeguarding measures, noted <a href="https://directory.sph.umn.edu/bio/sph-a-z/rachel-widome" target="_blank">Rachel Widome</a>, PhD, an associate professor of epidemiology and community health at University of Minnesota.</p><p>"In order for all of the in-school precautions to work well, we'll be asking a lot of teachers and staff," Widome told Healthline. In addition to their usual workload, they'll now be asked to monitor mask-wearing, ensure children are keeping distance, and be aware of any symptoms.</p><p>Along with Sharfstein, Widome called for an increase in financial support. More employees will likely be required so teachers and staff members can keep up with the added demands.</p>
Should Kids Go Back?<p>While these guidelines may help get some schools to reopen, many people don't think children should go back to school over fears they could contract the disease and spread it to other vulnerable family members like grandparents, infant siblings, or their parents.</p><p>In a <a href="https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2020/07/08/peds.2020-004879" target="_blank">Pediatrics</a> commentary, <a href="https://www.md.com/doctor/william-raszka-md" target="_blank">Dr. William V. Raszka, Jr.</a>, an infectious disease specialist at The University of Vermont Medical Center, argued that schools should open because school-aged children are far less important drivers of COVID-19 than adults.</p><p>But he says the risk and benefit is not equal among all students ages 5 to 18.</p><p>"Elementary schools are arguably higher priority for face-to-face schooling, since younger children are at lower risk for infection and transmission, and since parental supervision of younger children's distance learning may be particularly challenging," added Sorensen, who penned a <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/channels/health-forum/fullarticle/2767411" target="_blank">June article in JAMA</a> with reopening tips. "That means middle and high schools are more likely to emphasize distance learning."</p><p>Specific student populations, such as special education students and students with disabilities, would also benefit greatly from more time spent in face-to-face environments, Sorensen said.</p>
What Parents Can Do<p>Parents should ask for and receive frequent updates from schools about plans for the fall. They should also be informed about plans if and when COVID infections are identified, Sharfstein said.</p><p>"I'd like to see parents investing now, during the summer, in doing things that can slow and stop the spread of the virus in their communities," Widome said.</p><p>"Now is a good time for kids to practice wearing masks and get used to them as they may be wearing them for longer stretches if school starts up in person," Widome suggested.</p><p>She recommends parents try different mask designs and materials to see what children are more comfortable wearing.</p><p>"If you are using cloth face coverings, it's good to have extras on hand," Widome added.</p><p>Parents should model healthy behavior at home and while out in public — another thing that could affect how well children adapt to reopening practices, Sorensen said.</p><p>"Children may want to know more about face coverings," added <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/leescott/" target="_blank">Lee Scott</a>, chairwoman of the Educational Advisory Board at <a href="https://www.goddardschool.com/" target="_blank">The Goddard School</a>. "Dramatic play, such as creating or wearing a face covering, may help some children adjust to this concept." Schools can also show children photos of what faculty members look like in their masks so the students are familiar with that appearance.</p><p>Johns Hopkins University recently released its eSchool+ Initiative, a slew of resources surrounding education during the pandemic. These include a <a href="https://equityschoolplus.jhu.edu/reopening-checklist/" target="_blank">checklist for administrators</a>, report on <a href="https://equityschoolplus.jhu.edu/ethics-of-reopening/" target="_blank">ethical considerations</a>, and a tracker of <a href="https://equityschoolplus.jhu.edu/reopening-policy-tracker/" target="_blank">state and local reopening plans</a>.</p>
- Trump Admin Rejects CDC Reopening Guidelines - EcoWatch ›
- How Do You Stay Safe Now That States Are Reopening? - EcoWatch ›
- Florida Breaks U.S. Daily Record With Over 15,000 New ... ›
By Eoin Higgins
Over 300 groups on Monday urged Senate leadership to reject a bill currently under consideration that would incentivize communities to sell off their public water supplies to private companies for pennies on the dollar.
<div id="fea63" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="9a6f211c2bc5aedd34837944cb8eeedf"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet twitter-custom-tweet" data-twitter-tweet-id="1281000111481294849" data-partner="rebelmouse"><div style="margin:1em 0">Water in Illinois is overwhelmingly public. Why is Tammy Duckworth sponsoring a bill that aims to change that? https://t.co/1V36Kkd99s</div> — The American Prospect (@The American Prospect)<a href="https://twitter.com/TheProspect/statuses/1281000111481294849">1594249201.0</a></blockquote></div>
- DNC Ignores Progressive Climate Activists - EcoWatch ›
- Who's a Climate Champion and Who's a Climate Disaster? - EcoWatch ›