EcoWatch
Facebook 573k Twitter 238k Instagram 37k Subscribe Subscribe
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Renewables
  • Culture
  • Science
  • Go Solar Today
      • Top Companies By State
        • California Solar Companies
        • Texas Solar Companies
        • New York Solar Companies
        • Florida Solar Companies
        • See All States
      • Top Incentives By State
        • California Solar Incentives
        • Texas Solar Incentives
        • New York Solar Incentives
        • Florida Solar Incentives
        • See All States
      • Solar Panel Costs By State
        • Solar Panel Costs in California
        • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
        • Solar Panel Costs in New York
        • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
        • See All States
      • Value of Solar by State
        • Is Solar Worth It In California?
        • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
        • Is Solar Worth It New York?
        • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
        • See All States
      • Company Reviews
        • Tesla Solar Review
        • Sunrun Solar Review
        • SunPower Solar Review
        • Vivint Solar Review
        • See All Companies
      • Common Solar Questions
        • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
        • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
        • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
        • Can You Finance Solar?
        • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
        • Payback On Solar Panels?
      • Solar Resources
        • Interactive Solar Calculator
        • Federal Solar Tax Credit 2023
        • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
        • Tesla Solar Roof Review
        • Cheapest Solar Panels
      • Companies Compared
        • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
        • SunRun vs SunPower
        • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
        • SunPower vs ADT Solar
EcoWatch
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Policy
  • Renewables
  • Culture
  • Science
  • Go Solar Today
    • Go Solar Today
    • Top Companies By State
      • California Solar Companies
      • Texas Solar Companies
      • New York Solar Companies
      • Florida Solar Companies
      • See All States
    • Top Incentives By State
      • California Solar Incentives
      • Texas Solar Incentives
      • New York Solar Incentives
      • Florida Solar Incentives
      • See All States
    • Solar Panel Costs By State
      • Solar Panel Costs in California
      • Solar Panel Costs in Texas
      • Solar Panel Costs in New York
      • Solar Panel Costs in Florida
      • See All States
    • Value of Solar by State
      • Is Solar Worth It In California?
      • Is Solar Worth It in Texas?
      • Is Solar Worth It New York?
      • Is Solar Worth It In Florida?
      • See All States
    • Company Reviews
      • Tesla Solar Review
      • Sunrun Solar Review
      • SunPower Solar Review
      • Vivint Solar Review
      • See All Companies
    • Common Solar Questions
      • Can You Get Free Solar Panels?
      • Does Solar Increase Home Value?
      • What’re The Best Solar Batteries?
      • Can You Finance Solar?
      • Where To Buy Solar Panels?
      • Payback On Solar Panels?
    • Solar Resources
      • Interactive Solar Calculator
      • Federal Solar Tax Credit 2023
      • Best Solar Panels For Most Homes
      • Tesla Solar Roof Review
      • Cheapest Solar Panels
    • Companies Compared
      • SunPower vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs Tesla Solar
      • SunRun vs SunPower
      • SunPower vs Momentum Solar
      • SunPower vs ADT Solar

The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 573k Twitter 238k Instagram 37k
    EcoWatch
    • About EcoWatch
    • Contact EcoWatch
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Learn About Solar Energy
    Facebook 573k Twitter 238k Instagram 37k
    Home Business

    Investors Worth $8 Trillion Want Chemical Companies to Phase Out PFAS

    By: Olivia Rosane
    Updated: January 7, 2023
    Edited by Irma Omerhodzic
    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon
    Maplewood, Minnesota, 3M company global headquarters. 3M produces the N95 respirator masks for the coronavirus.
    3M recently said it would phase out PFAS. Michael Siluk / Education Images / Getty Images
    Why you can trust us

    Founded in 2005 as an Ohio-based environmental newspaper, EcoWatch is a digital platform dedicated to publishing quality, science-based content on environmental issues, causes, and solutions.

    Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

    Major investors want chemical companies to move away from toxic forever chemicals. 

    In a letter circulated late last year, 47 asset managers worth a total of $8 trillion urged companies to phase out the production of the environmental toxins known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), citing concerns over increased lawsuits and regulations as consumers and policymakers learn more about the dangers of these chemicals. 

    “We encourage you to lead, not be led, by phasing out and substituting these chemicals,” the letter read, as chemical industry watchdog nonprofit ChemSec reported at the time. “In addition to the financial risks associated with litigation, producers of persistent chemicals face the risk of increased costs associated with reformulating products and modifying processes, which can have significant implications for company performance.”

    More From EcoWatch
    • How to Save Energy
    • Who Are the Leading Solar Companies?
    • Best Direction and Angle for Solar Panels

    PFAS are a group of around 12,000 compounds that are commonly used in stain-, heat- and water-resistant products, according to The Guardian. They have been found everywhere from rainwater to umbilical cord blood and have been linked to serious health impacts including cancer, immunosuppression and reproductive issues.

    As awareness of PFAS’ prevalence and potential dangers grows, so too has the momentum against them. In 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposed two important regulations of two of the most prominent PFAS: setting their safety level in drinking water to near zero and considering them as hazardous substances under the Superfund law.

    The corporate backlash against these chemicals follows the tightening regulations. Shortly after the letter from the investors was made public, the U.S.-based company 3M announced it would stop using and making PFAS by 2025.

    In addition, the letter, which was signed by investors including Aviva Investors and Storebrand Asset Management, represents growing opposition to the chemicals, as Reuters reported. A previous effort in 2021 had only around half the backing, with 23 investors representing $4.4 trillion standing behind it. 

    “There has got to be concern in boardrooms and among knowledgable and savvy shareholders that continuing to manufacture these chemicals that are creating the Superfund sites of tomorrow is really risky for them financially,” Natural Resources Defense Council senior strategic director Erik Olson said, as The Guardian reported, “If people getting sick and dying of exposure to these chemicals wasn’t enough, the liability should be.”

    The letter was sent to 54 chemical companies in September, according to Reuters. Other signatories included AXA IM, Credit Suisse Asset Management (Switzerland) AG, Resona Asset Management and Robeco, according to ChemSec. Many of the investors behind the letter were from the European Union, The Guardian noted. 

    The signatories called on the companies to both phase out the chemicals and share their plans and production data with ChemSec, which assigns companies a ChemScore based on their policies towards the environment and hazardous chemicals, according to ChemSec.

    While 3M’s decision shows hope for the corporate turn against PFAS, this isn’t reflected in last year’s ChemScore rankings. Of the 54 companies addressed in the letter, only four had a plan to stop using dangerous chemicals. 

    “The global chemical industry is turning a blind eye to the unfolding chemical pollution crisis,” ChemSec Senior Business and Investor Advisor Sonja Haider said. “Most companies are taking little or no action to phase out hazardous chemicals despite the risks to public health, the environment and shareholder value.”

    Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

      By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy & to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

      Olivia Rosane

      Olivia Rosane is a freelance writer and reporter with a decade’s worth of experience. She has been contributing to EcoWatch daily since 2018 and has also covered environmental themes for Treehugger, The Trouble, YES! Magazine and Real Life. She holds a Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Cambridge and a master’s in Art and Politics from Goldsmiths, University of London.
      Facebook icon Twitter icon Pinterest icon Email icon

      Read More

      Pennsylvania Becomes Eighth State to Set PFAS Drinking Water Limits 
      As awareness grows of the spread and health impacts of
      By Olivia Rosane
      Largest Fossil Fuel Plant in New York City Could Become Nation's First to Covert to Renewable Energy
      Could New York City’s largest fossil fuel powered generator be
      By Olivia Rosane
      Is Tree Pollen More Allergic in Polluted Areas?
      If you live in a polluted neighborhood, allergy season could
      By Olivia Rosane

      Subscribe to get exclusive updates in our daily newsletter!

        By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy & to receive electronic communications from EcoWatch Media Group, which may include marketing promotions, advertisements and sponsored content.

        Latest Articles

        • Emirates Successfully Tests Flying Boeing 777 Plane on Sustainable Jet Fuel
          by Paige Bennett
          January 31, 2023
        • U.S. Lawmakers Want Climate Envoy Kerry to Push Back on Naming Oil CEO as Head of COP28
          by Olivia Rosane
          January 31, 2023
        • BP Says Ukraine War and IRA Could Spur Energy Transition
          by Olivia Rosane
          January 31, 2023
        • 99% of U.S. Coal Plants Cost More to Run Than Replace With New Renewables, Study Finds
          by Climate Nexus
          January 31, 2023
        • Rare Earth Minerals Are Abundant Enough to Fuel Green Energy Shift, Study Says
          by Cristen Hemingway Jaynes
          January 30, 2023
        • Scientists Create Biodegradable Plastic Using Solar Energy
          by Paige Bennett
          January 30, 2023
        • Google Ads Helped Daily Wire Spread Climate Denial, Report Finds
          by Climate Nexus
          January 30, 2023
        • Plant-Based Eating 101: Everything You Need to Know
          by Linnea Harris
          January 29, 2023
        EcoWatch

        The best of EcoWatch right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!

          • Climate Climate
          • Animals Animals
          • Health + Wellness Health + Wellness
          • Insights + Opinion Insights + Opinion
          • Adventure Adventure
          • Oceans Oceans
          • Business Business
          • Solar Solar
          • About EcoWatch
          • Contact EcoWatch
          • EcoWatch Reviews
          • Terms of Use
          • Privacy Policy
          • Learn About Solar Energy
          • Learn About Deregulated Energy
          • EcoWatch UK
          Follow Us
          Facebook 573k
          Twitter 238k
          Instagram 37k
          Subscribe Subscribe

          Experts for a healthier planet and life.

          Mentioned by:
          Learn more