How Renewable Energy Financing Costs Could Drop by 40 Percent
Allowing renewable energy technologies to be eligible for master limited partnerships (MLPs) would expand the investor base and lower the cost of financing projects by 40 percent or more, according to a new analysis prepared for the Union of Concerned Scientists by Meister Consulting Inc.
The analysis also shows that lower financing costs would in turn reduce the all-in cost of generating electricity from wind projects by at least 17 percent (1.2 cents per kilowatt-hour), or about 40 percent of the value of the production tax credit (PTC).
When combined with the PTC and other state and federal renewables policies, MLPs could be an important policy for the U.S. to achieve a clean, low-carbon, energy future.
What are MLPs?
MLPs are a corporate structure that can raise capital by issuing shares of ownership in the stock market, but at the same time enjoy tax benefits not available to typical corporations. While profits from publicly traded corporations are taxed at both the corporate and shareholder levels, income from MLPs is taxed only at the shareholder level because it is treated as a partnership for tax purposes.
Established by Congress in 1980, MLPs have been used extensively by the oil, natural gas and coal industries. See my blog from April 2013 for more background on MLPs and proposals in Congress that would allow renewables to be eligible, such as the Master Limited Partnerships (MLP) Parity Act.
How big is the MLP market?
MLPs have grown dramatically over the past six years primarily to fund natural gas and oil pipelines due to the boom in hydraulic fracturing (fracking) of shale deposits in the U.S. The capital flowing into MLPs has exceeded $60 billion per year over the past two years, while the total MLP market capitalization has grown from $96 billion in 2008 to $440 billion in 2013. In stark contrast, tax equity financing for renewable projects has been limited to $3-6 billion per year from a relatively small number of large investment banks and insurance companies.
How much capital is needed to fund renewable energy investments?
In 2012, the renewable energy industry invested more than $40 billion in the U.S. economy, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. This included a record-breaking $25 billion to install more than 13,000 MW of wind and $11.5 billion to install more than 3,300 MW of solar (which increased to $13.7 billion and 4,750 MW in 2013).
A 2012 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) estimates that $50-70 billion per year in capital investment would be required to increase non-hydro renewables to about 30 percent of U.S. electricity generation by 2025, and growing to $85 billion to $125 billion per year after 2030 to reach 80 percent renewables (including hydro) by 2050.
While the PTC and other federal climate and energy policies will be needed to achieve this renewable energy future, MLPs could help expand the investor base and unleash a large fraction of low-cost capital required to fund this transition.
Where would the capital come from?
The Meister analysis identified two segments of potential investors in renewable energy MLPs (RE-MLPs)—the $15 trillion U.S. mutual fund market and the $11 trillion U.S. defined-benefit pension market. They found that these investors are drawn to MLPs by the prospects of high income generation compared to very low rates in bonds and disappointing returns in alternative asset classes.
The analysis found that using MLPs to finance renewables at $50-70 billion per year over the next five years would only require a shift of 0.7 to 1 percent of the total portfolio of these asset classes. Under this scenario, RE-MLPs would represent less than 20 percent of the total MLP market. While other sources of financing would also be available, it clearly demonstrates that the MLP market could provide a significant share and the pool of potential investors is enormous.
How does this affect the cost of capital?
Tax equity investors currently target an average return of about 11 percent for renewable energy projects. For MLP pricing, the Meister analysis identified three asset types with similar characteristics and varying credit quality, and found that the best proxy for RE-MLPs would be lower quality investment grade (BBB-) natural gas pipeline deals, which currently trade at about 4.9 percent.
Based on this, they found that RE-MLPs may reasonably be expected to converge from the current level of 11 percent equity, or an 8 percent weighted average cost of capital based on a mix of equity and debt financing, to something approaching 4.9 percent over five years.
Using NREL’s Cost of Renewable Energy Spreadsheet (CREST) Tool, UCS analysis found that by lowering the cost of capital by just 3 percent, MLPs could lower the 20-year levelized cost of electricity for a typical wind project by 17 percent (1.2 cents/kWh) compared to traditional financing without the PTC. This finding is consistent with a recent NREL analysis. At this level, MLPs would be worth 41 percent of the value of the PTC, as shown in the chart.
MLPs are an important complement to other renewable energy policies
By giving renewable energy projects access to a much larger pool of investors and lower cost financing, MLPs help address a specific market barrier that’s currently inhibiting development. In this way, they provide an important complement to other policies such as federal tax credits and state renewable electricity standards, which have been the primary drivers of renewable energy development in the U.S.
MLPs have played a similar role in the oil, gas, and coal industries over the past 30 years by supplementing dozens of other federal and state tax incentives available to those industries. For example, shale gas developers have received approximately $10 billion in tax credits, and millions in research and development funding, that have helped fuel the shale gas revolution.
In early April, I had the chance to hear Senator Wyden (D-OR)—Chair of the Senate Finance Committee—speak at the Bloomberg New Energy Finance summit in New York City about the need to revise the U.S. tax code to provide “parity and predictability” for energy investments. He highlighted extending the PTC and allowing renewables to be eligible for MLPs as two important policies that meet these goals.
YOU ALSO MIGHT LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
The Washington Redskins will retire their controversial name and logo, the National Football League (NFL) team announced Monday.
By Alyssa Murdoch, Chrystal Mantyka-Pringle and Sapna Sharma
Summer has finally arrived in the northern reaches of Canada and Alaska, liberating hundreds of thousands of northern stream fish from their wintering habitats.
A Good News Story?<p>On the surface, the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13569" target="_blank">results from our study</a> appear to provide a "good news" story. Warming temperatures were linked to higher numbers of fish, more species overall and, therefore, potentially more fishing opportunities for northerners.</p><p>Initially, we were surprised to learn that warming was increasing the distribution of cold-adapted fish. We reasoned that modest amounts of warming could lead to benefits such as increased food and winter habitat availability without reaching stressful levels for many species.</p>
Photo of Arctic grayling (left) and Dolly Varden trout (right). Alyssa Murdoch / Lilian Tran / Nunavik Research Centre and Tracey Loewen / Fisheries and Oceans Canada<p>Yet, not all fish species fared equally well. Ecologically unique northern species — those that have evolved in colder, more nutrient-poor environments, such as Arctic grayling and Dolly Varden trout — were showing declines with warming.</p>
Fish Strandings and Buried Eggs<p>Recent news headlines run the gamut for Pacific salmon — from their increased escapades <a href="https://nunatsiaq.com/stories/article/more-pacific-salmon-showing-up-in-western-arctic-waters/" target="_blank">into the Arctic</a> to <a href="https://www.juneauempire.com/news/warm-waters-across-alaska-cause-salmon-die-offs/" target="_blank">massive pre-spawning die-offs</a> in central Alaska. Similarly, results from our study revealed different outcomes for fish depending on local climatic conditions, including Pacific salmon.</p><p>We found that warmer spring and fall temperatures may be helping juvenile salmon by providing a longer and more plentiful growing season, and by supporting early egg development in northern regions that were previously too cold for survival.</p><p>In contrast, salmon declined in regions that were experiencing wetter fall conditions, pointing to an increased risk of flooding and sedimentation that could bury or dislodge incubating eggs.</p>
Headwaters of the Wind River within the largely intact Peel River watershed in northern Canada. Don Reid / Wildlife Conservation Society Canada / Author provided<p>Interestingly, we found that certain climatic combinations, such as warmer summer water temperatures with decreased summer rainfall, were important in determining where Pacific salmon could survive. Summer warming in drier watersheds led to declines, suggesting that lowered streamflows may have increased the risk of fish becoming stranded in subpar habitats that were too warm and crowded.</p>
The Fate of Northern Fisheries<p>The promise of a warmer and more accessible Arctic has attracted mounting interest in new economic opportunities, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103637" target="_blank">including fisheries</a>. As warming rates at higher latitudes are already <a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/" target="_blank">two to three times global levels</a>, it seems probable that northern biodiversity will experience dramatic shifts in the coming decades.</p><p>Despite the many unknowns surrounding the future of Pacific salmon, many fisheries are currently <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2017.1374251" target="_blank">thriving following warmer and more productive northern oceans</a>, and some <a href="https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic68876" target="_blank">Arctic Indigenous communities are developing new salmon fisheries</a>.</p><p>As warming continues, the commercial salmon fishing industry is poised to expand northwards, but its success will largely depend on extenuating factors such as <a href="https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060023067" target="_blank">changes to marine habitat and food sources</a> and <a href="https://www.yukon-news.com/news/promising-chinook-salmon-run-failed-to-materialize-in-the-yukon-river-panel-hears/" target="_blank">how many fish are caught during the freshwater stages of their journey</a>.</p><p>Even with the potential for increased northern biodiversity, it is important to recognize that some northern communities may be unable to adapt or may <a href="https://thenarwhal.ca/searching-for-the-yukon-rivers-missing-chinook/" target="_blank">lose individual species that are associated with important cultural values</a>.</p>
- New England Fishing Communities Being Destroyed by 'Climate ... ›
- Shrimp Fishing Banned in Gulf of Maine Due to Ocean Warming ... ›
- Atlantic Salmon Is All But Extinct as a Genetically Eroded Version of ... ›
A heat wave that set in over the South and Southwest left much of the U.S. blanketed in record-breaking triple digit temperatures over the weekend. The widespread and intense heat wave will last for weeks, making the magnitude and duration of its heat impressive, according to The Washington Post.
- Hot Weather and COVID-19: Added Threats of Reopening States in ... ›
- 50 Million Americans Are Currently Living Under Some Type of Heat ... ›
- Second Major Heat Wave This Summer Smashes Records Across ... ›
By Joni Sweet
If you get a call from a number you don't recognize, don't hit decline — it might be a contact tracer calling to let you know that someone you've been near has tested positive for the coronavirus.
Interviews With Contact Tracers<p>Contact tracing is a public health strategy that involves identifying everyone who may have been in contact with a person who has the coronavirus. Contact tracers collect information and provide guidance to help contain the transmission of disease.</p><p>It's been used during outbreaks of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), Ebola, measles, and now the coronavirus that causes COVID-19.</p><p>It starts when the local department of health gets a report of a confirmed case of the coronavirus in its community and gives that person a call. The contact tracer usually provides information on how to isolate and when to get treatment, then tries to figure out who else the person may have exposed.</p><p>"We ask who they've been in contact with in the 48 hours prior to symptom onset, or 2 days before the date of their positive test if they don't have symptoms," said <a href="https://case.edu/medicine/healthintegration/people/heidi-gullett" target="_blank">Dr. Heidi Gullett</a>, associate director of the Center for Community Health Integration at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and medical director of the Cuyahoga County Board of Health in Ohio.</p>
“You’ve Been Exposed”<p>After the case interview, contact tracers will get to work calling the folks who may have been exposed to the coronavirus by the person who tested positive.</p><p>"We give them recommendations about quarantining or isolating, getting tested, and what to do if they become sick. If they're not already sick, we still want them to self-quarantine so that they don't spread the disease to anyone else if they were to become sick," said Labus.</p><p>Generally, the contact tracer won't ask for additional contacts unless they happen to call someone who is sick or has a confirmed case of the virus. They will help ensure the contact has the resources they need to isolate themselves, if necessary. The contact tracer may continue to stay in touch with that person over the next 14 days.</p><p>"We follow the percentage of people that were contacts, then converted into being actual cases of the virus. It's an important marker to help us understand what kind of transmission happens in our community and how to control the virus," said Gullett.</p>
Why You Should Participate (and What Happens If You Don’t)<p>A <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30457-6/fulltext" target="_blank">Lancet study</a> from June 16, which looked at data from more than 40,000 people, found that COVID-19 transmission could be reduced by 64 percent through isolating those who have the coronavirus, quarantining their household, and contacting the people they may have exposed.</p><p>The combination strategy was significantly more effective than mass random testing or just isolating the sick person and members of their household.</p><p>However, contact tracing is only as effective as people's willingness to participate, and a small number of people who've contracted the coronavirus or were potentially exposed are reluctant to talk.</p><p>"Contact tracers have all been hung up on, cussed at, yelled at," said Gullet.</p><p>The hesitation to talk to contact tracers often stems from concerns over privacy — a serious issue in healthcare.</p>
- Anti-Racism Protests Are Not Driving Coronavirus Spikes, Data ... ›
- Cell Phone Tracking Analysis Shows Where Florida Springbreakers ... ›
NASA scientists say that warmer than average surface sea temperatures in the North Atlantic raise the concern for a more active hurricane season, as well as for wildfires in the Amazon thousands of miles away, according to Newsweek.
By Andrea Germanos
Oxfam International warned Thursday that up to 12,000 people could die each day by the end of the year as a result of hunger linked to the coronavirus pandemic—a daily death toll surpassing the daily mortality rate from Covid-19 itself.
- These 6 Men Have as Much Wealth as Half the World's Population ... ›
- Climate Change Forces 20 Million People to Flee Each Year, Oxfam ... ›
By Jun N. Aguirre
An oil spill on July 3 threatens a mangrove forest on the Philippine island of Guimaras, an area only just recovering from the country's largest spill in 2006.
- 15,000 Gallon Oil Spill Threatens River and Drinking Water in Native ... ›
- Mysterious Oil Spill on Massachusetts' Charles River Spurs Major ... ›
- Disastrous Russian Oil Spill Reaches Pristine Arctic Lake - EcoWatch ›