The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
House Denies Clean Water Act Protections for America’s Waterways
Today, 237 members of Congress voted against better protections for places like the Chesapeake Bay, the Great Lakes, and many smaller streams, lakes and wetlands across the country. By opposing an amendment to the House “Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act” (H.R. 5325), introduced by Congressmen Jim Moran (VA) and John Dingell (MI), the majority of the House voted to block efforts by President Obama, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers to ensure America’s waterways are better protected by the Clean Water Act.
“Despite the many activities Americans love to do on their local waterways—from fishing in the Great Lakes to kayaking in Puget Sound to sailing in the Chesapeake Bay, 237 members of Congress have decided to join the “Dirty Water Gang” and vote against more protections,” said Shelley Vinyard, Clean Water Advocate for Environment America. “We applaud the members of Congress who supported these protections by voting for this amendment. However, we’re outraged that the “Dirty Water Gang” voted for less protection for our waterways, 58 percent of our streams and 117 million Americans’ drinking water,” she concluded.
The vote happened as President Obama is about to sign off on the final guidelines for these protections, signifying one of the biggest steps forward for protecting America’s waterways in years.
Nationwide, 439 local elected officials—from city councilmembers to state senators—have spoken out in favor of these proposed protections and urged the President to finalize them. In addition, these protections have garnered massive public support across the country, from more than 200,000 concerned citizens, hundreds of sportsmen organizations, more than 140 local farmers and many more.
Furthermore, a new poll commissioned by Environment America and other national environmental and sportsmen organizations found that in key Great Lakes and Rocky Mountain states the public overwhelmingly supports this Obama administration proposal. The poll confirmed that—across party lines and in all age groups – voters demand clean water for safe drinking water and oppose the pollution of places where their families fish and swim.
“We can’t allow Congress to pull the rug out from under us. In order to protect our water, our health, and our environment, we urge our Senators to block these attacks, and President Obama to move quickly to finalize these proposed protections,” concluded Ms. Vinyard.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Sabrina Kessler
Far-reaching allegations about how a climate-sinning American multinational could shamelessly lie to the public about its wrongdoing mobilized a small group of New York students on a cold November morning. They stood in front of New York's Supreme Court last week to follow the unprecedented lawsuit against ExxonMobil.
By Alex Robinson
Leah Garcés used to hate poultry farmers.
The animal rights activist, who opposes factory farming, had an adversarial relationship with chicken farmers until around five years ago, when she sat down to listen to one. She met a poultry farmer called Craig Watts in rural North Carolina and learned that the problems stemming from factory farming extended beyond animal cruelty.
Temperatures plunged rapidly across the U.S. this week and around 70 percent of the population is expected to experience temperatures around freezing Wednesday.
In April, he claimed they caused cancer, and he sued to stop an offshore wind farm that was scheduled to go up near land he had purchased for a golf course in Aberdeenshire in Scotland. He lost that fight, and now the Trump Organization has agreed to pay the Scottish government $290,000 to cover its legal fees, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.
By Paul Brown
When countries run short of food, they need to find solutions fast, and one answer can be urban farming.
By Lakshmi Magon
This year, three studies showed that humor is useful for engaging the public about climate change. The studies, published in The Journal of Science Communication, Comedy Studies and Science Communication, added to the growing wave of scientists, entertainers and politicians who agree.