The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Healthy Food and California Get Short Shrift in Farm Bill
An Environmental Working Group (EWG) analysis highlights the skewed priorities and gross inequities in federal spending under the nation’s most far-reaching food and farm legislation.
The data show that from 2008 to 2010, spending on commodity crops under the federal farm bill totaled $39.6 billion, more than eight times as much as on specialty crops such as fruits, vegetables and nuts. During that time the market value of the commodity crops (primarily corn, wheat, soybeans, rice and cotton) was $320 billion, only twice as much as the specialty crops’ market value. Farm bill spending on specialty crops amounted to just $4.7 billion even though their market value was estimated at $170 billion.
The analysis shows that public investment has been meager on programs to support fruit and vegetable production and organic agriculture and on smart initiatives to build dynamic food economies that support agricultural diversification and link small and mid-sized family farms to local and regional markets.
“Fruit and vegetable growers have historically been left out of agriculture policy even though they provide foods that are vital for improving America’s nutrition and reducing the costly toll of diet-related diseases,” said Kari Hamerschlag, food policy senior analyst at EWG.
EWG’s data also show that California, home to 12 percent of the population and producer of 12 percent of the country’s agricultural output, receives less than 5 percent of farm bill expenditures. That puts the state’s specialty crop growers, who produce half of California’s agricultural bounty and 40 percent of the nation’s fruits and vegetables, at a major disadvantage.
These following links detail farm bill funding allocations for conservation and nutrition in California and in the nation as a whole. Funding for both of these vital programs is at risk in the next farm bill.
More than 30 Democratic House members from California sent a letter this week urging the House Agriculture Committee’s leaders to expand funding for programs that promote local and regional food systems and organic farming and that support beginning and disadvantaged farmers, agricultural research and marketing.
For more information, click here.
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
By Sabrina Kessler
Far-reaching allegations about how a climate-sinning American multinational could shamelessly lie to the public about its wrongdoing mobilized a small group of New York students on a cold November morning. They stood in front of New York's Supreme Court last week to follow the unprecedented lawsuit against ExxonMobil.
By Alex Robinson
Leah Garcés used to hate poultry farmers.
The animal rights activist, who opposes factory farming, had an adversarial relationship with chicken farmers until around five years ago, when she sat down to listen to one. She met a poultry farmer called Craig Watts in rural North Carolina and learned that the problems stemming from factory farming extended beyond animal cruelty.
Temperatures plunged rapidly across the U.S. this week and around 70 percent of the population is expected to experience temperatures around freezing Wednesday.
In April, he claimed they caused cancer, and he sued to stop an offshore wind farm that was scheduled to go up near land he had purchased for a golf course in Aberdeenshire in Scotland. He lost that fight, and now the Trump Organization has agreed to pay the Scottish government $290,000 to cover its legal fees, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.
By Paul Brown
When countries run short of food, they need to find solutions fast, and one answer can be urban farming.
By Lakshmi Magon
This year, three studies showed that humor is useful for engaging the public about climate change. The studies, published in The Journal of Science Communication, Comedy Studies and Science Communication, added to the growing wave of scientists, entertainers and politicians who agree.