The best of EcoWatch, right in your inbox. Sign up for our email newsletter!
Health Scare Led This Woman to Launch an Organic Tampon Company
According to Stuff.co.nz, it all began when Ames-Durey was rushed into surgery due to crippling abdominal cramps. Scans later revealed two 7 centimeter cysts growing in her ovaries, including one that had "twisted and split, leaking toxins into her body." Fortunately, there were no complications during surgery and her ovaries were saved.
During her recovery, health professionals suggested to Ames-Durey that she switch to organic menstrual products to reduce any stress on her system, the report claimed. She soon realized, however, there weren't any viable options in New Zealand. That's when she and her business partner, Rhys Clareburt, decided to launch the company.
"Regular tampons are filled with chemicals, pesticides, fragrances, bleaches and dyes," she told Stuff.co.nz. "That's going into the most absorbent part of a woman's body."
BON says their tampons are 100 percent certified organic cotton with no dyes, fragrances, chemicals or toxins. The product, which also comes in a biodegradable tube, can be shipped worldwide.
It's clear from stories like these that many people are starting to consider the health effects of traditional feminine care products. EcoWatch previously covered a study from researchers at the University of La Plata in Argentina which revealed that glyphosate—a widely popular herbicide that has been linked to cancer by the World Health Organization’s cancer research arm—was detected in 85 percent of cotton hygiene products tested.
The Organic Consumers Association has said that conventional cotton is the most toxic crop in the world, using more than 25 percent of all the insecticides in the world and 12 percent of all the pesticides. Additionally, a landmark report published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Sciences Europe last week revealed that Monsanto’s flagship product Roundup, is now the “most widely applied pesticide worldwide.” Globally, glyphosate use has risen almost 15-fold since “Roundup Ready” crops, including cotton, were introduced in 1996.
Most tampons currently sold in the U.S. are made of non-organic cotton, rayon or blends of both, Mother Jones reported. Additionally, synthetic fibers like viscose rayon are added to increase absorbency.
Super-absorbent tampons have been linked to Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS), a rare and potentially life-threatening complication resulting from toxins produced by Staphylococcus aureus (staph) bacteria or A streptococcus (strep) bacteria.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) denies allegations that tampons with rayon fibers promotes TSS. The agency also disagrees that rayon, which is made from cellulose fibers derived from wood pulp that has been bleached, causes TSS or other conditions such as dryness or ulcerations of vaginal tissues.
However the agency admitted that "at one time, bleaching the wood pulp was a potential source of trace amounts of dioxin in tampons, but that bleaching method is no longer used."
The FDA noted the raw rayon material used in U.S. tampons are now produced using elemental chlorine-free or totally chlorine free bleaching processes.
Although the number of reported TSS cases have decreased significantly in recent years compared to its hey-day in the 1980s, a few notable cases have made headlines. Recently, a 15-year-old Michigan teen was put on life support due to TSS. Lauren Wasser, a 24-year-old model and aspiring athlete, lost her leg a few years ago to TSS. She claims that "go-to" brand of tampons, Kotex Natural Balance, caused her complication and is now suing the company that manufactures the product, Vice News reported last June.
"Most major tampon manufacturers make tampons with either mixes of viscose rayon and cotton, or pure viscose rayon, and in either case those tampons provide optimal physical-chemical conditions necessary to cause the production of the TSST-1 toxin if a toxigenic strain of Staphylococcus aureus is part of the normal vaginal flora in a woman," Dr. Philip M. Tierno, a professor of microbiology and pathology at the NYU School of Medicine, told Vice.
Dr. Tierno added that 100 percent cotton tampons are safer to use. "Toxic shock syndrome may result if a woman has no antibody to the toxin or low antibody," he said. "Therefore the synthetic ingredients of a tampon are a problem, whereas 100 percent cotton tampons provide the lowest risk, if any risk at all."
Not only is this cocktail of synthetic ingredients being used by women around the world, these same products are also building up in our landfills and oceans.
A growing concern for health and the health of the environment has led to the gradual rise in popularity of menstruation cups such as Softcup and the Diva Cup. The Diva Cup, for instance, has reported double-digit growth in sales in both the U.S. and Canada for the last 12 years, Racked reported. Not only that, these cups are also cheaper for women over a lifetime. According to TIME, a 2011 survey found that the cost of buying tampons for a year was approximately $37, which is equal to the price of a single menstrual cup, which can last for a decade.
"It really is about giving people healthier and safer options, to live the best life they can," the actress and entrepreneur told Cosmopolitan last July. "This is one category that's very sensitive. The products are going in and around the most vulnerable part of a woman's body."
Doctors and experts have stressed that there isn't anything wrong with the products currently on the market. “There’s no medical data that would support the use of organic tampons or pads,” Dr. Taraneh Shirazian, an ob-gyn at NYU Langone Medical Center, told the New York Daily News.
“We don’t think (regular) pads and tampons are putting women at an increased risk for vaginal infection, irritation or anything like that.”
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
EcoWatch Daily Newsletter
Colorado senator and 2020 hopeful Michael Bennet introduced his plan to combat climate change Monday, in the first major policy rollout of his campaign. Bennet's plan calls for the establishment of a "Climate Bank," using $1 trillion in federal spending to "catalyze" $10 trillion in private spending for the U.S. to transition entirely to net-zero emissions by 2050.
When Trump's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its replacement for the Obama-era Clean Power Plan in August 2018, its own estimates said the reduced regulations could lead to 1,400 early deaths a year from air pollution by 2030.
Now, the EPA wants to change the way it calculates the risks posed by particulate matter pollution, using a model that would lower the death toll from the new plan, The New York Times reported Monday. Five current or former EPA officials familiar with the plan told The Times that the new method would assume there is no significant health gain by lowering air pollution levels below the legal limit. However, many public health experts say that there is no safe level of particulate matter exposure, which has long been linked to heart and lung disease.
By Andrea Germanos
Animal welfare advocates are praising soon-to-be introduced legislation in the U.S. that would ban the use of wild animals in traveling circuses.
By Tara Lohan
It's been the wettest 12 months on record in the continental United States. Parts of the High Plains and Midwest are still reeling from deadly, destructive and expensive spring floods — some of which have lasted for three months.
Mounting bills from natural disasters like these have prompted renewed calls to reform the National Flood Insurance Program, which is managed by Federal Emergency Management Agency and is now $20 billion in debt.