Health Professionals Denounce Cuomo's Health Reveiw on Fracking


University at Albany School of Public Health

A fracking rig and operation stands among forests and fields in Bradford County, Penn. The state has been a hotbed of fracking activity and controversy over the exact impact of fracking on groundwater. Photo by Bob Warhover.

Led by Dr. David O. Carpenter, director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany's School of Public Health, a number of health experts—on behalf of the broad medical and scientific community in New York State—declared concerns with the health review on fracking undertaken by New York Gov. Cuomo’s Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) that is now being reviewed by the Department of Health (DOH). The health experts released a letter to Cuomo in which they explained their concerns and the need for Cuomo to commission a full, comprehensive Health Impact Assessment.
To date, no one in the public or medical community has seen the DEC’s review of health impacts, nor has the Cuomo Administration shared details regarding who was involved in its development and execution. Now as Department of Health Commissioner Dr. Nirav Shah examines the DEC’s findings about the impacts of fracking on public health, the public and the medical and scientific community are still in the dark and no one knows what the process or opportunity for input will be.
At their press conference and in their letter to Cuomo, the public health experts declared that a DOH review of work already prepared by the DEC on health impacts is insufficient to determine the health impacts of fracking. A hasty review conducted in secret, they emphasized, is not a thorough study. Only a full, comprehensive Health Impact Assessment, which is a specific process endorsed by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control, would be sufficient. Among other recognized requirements, such a health study must be transparent, inclusive of all stakeholders, follow a certain recognized process that is conducted by an entity with public health expertise, and must include public participation throughout the process.
“As we begin to examine the potential health impacts of fracking, the people of New York State need to know that the highest standards of science and rigorous independence are guiding the investigation. The Department of Health,which has refused to call for a comprehensive Health Impact Assessment, cannot provide this assurance. The DOH is not the appropriate agency to carry the torch," said Carpenter.
What the DEC and the DOH is undertaking, the health experts declared, cannot fulfill the necessary task of identifying, in advance, any serious and possibly unresolvable public health problems caused by fracking. These include impacts on child development and mental health. The health experts noted that on Sept. 20, DEC Commissioner Martens wrote that, "Only after this evaluation is completed will a decision be made about whether to permit high volume hydraulic fracturing in New York. Obviously if there was a public health concern that could not be addressed we would not proceed."  
The health experts' letter to Cuomo states that, "A DOH review  of work already prepared by DEC on this topic is not enough to answer the question of whether there is a public health concern that cannot be addressed. New York must commission a full Health Impact Assessment to better understand the impacts of fracking (meaning the whole process of gas extraction, from site development to delivery) on public health and the measures needed to protect our communities.”
Larysa Dyrszka, MD, a retired pediatrician and children's health advocate, said, "In calling for a Health Impact Assessment we are asking the Governor to join us in advocating for the most vulnerable, in assuring that social justice is not compromised and that all stakeholders are heard in a comprehensive, transparent and independent process called the Health Impact Assessment."
Kathleen Nolan, MD, regional director for the High Peaks office of Catskill Mountainkeeper, an independent bioethicist who advises multiple local and regional health initiatives in the Catskills, said, "What does it mean for any of us—or for the State—to 'sign off' on the health impacts of fracking, especially as evidence mounts of its multiple threats to human health? We cannot simply go forward based on the assurances of a small panel of consultants. As scientists and health professionals, we are morally required to gather the best information we can in order to answer this question. With so much at stake, we are morally obligated to insist on a rigorous, comprehensive, transparent, and participatory process of decision making: in short, an independent HIA.”
In their letter to Cuomo, the health experts also brought attention to the risk to New York State's credibility and the potential consequences if a proper review that creates public trust is not undertaken. The letter states that, "We suggest that you consider, in the face of the overwhelming recommendation of the medical communities of New York State that a Health Impact Assessment be undertaken, what the consequences would be if a credible one is not undertaken and fracking proves to be a health disaster. It will be impossible to contain the damage to the State’s credibility and authority in this area. Your Administration seems to have recognized that fact in responding to the demand for some health review, but to do so in this halfhearted and questionable way is to once again ensure your well-meaning efforts will be counterproductive."

Visit EcoWatch’s FRACKING page for more related news on this topic.


EcoWatch Daily Newsletter

New pine trees grow from the forest floor along the North Fork of the Flathead River on the western boundary of Glacier National Park on Sept. 16, 2019 near West Glacier, Montana. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

By Alex Kirby

New forests are an apparently promising way to tackle global heating: the trees absorb carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas from human activities. But there's a snag, because permanently lower river flows can be an unintended consequence.

Read More
Household actions lead to changes in collective behavior and are an essential part of social movements. Pixabay / Pexels

By Greg McDermid, Joule A Bergerson, Sheri Madigan

Hidden among all of the troubling environmental headlines from 2019 — and let's face it, there were plenty — was one encouraging sign: the world is waking up to the reality of climate change.

So now what?

Read More
Logging state in the U.S. is seen representing some of the consequences humans will face in the absence of concrete action to stop deforestation, pollution and the climate crisis. Mark Newman / Lonely Planet Images / Getty Images

Talk is cheap, says the acting executive secretary of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, who begged governments around the world to make sure that 2020 is not another year of conferences and empty promises, but instead is the year to take decisive action to stop the mass extinction of wildlife and the destruction of habitat-sustaining ecosystems, as The Guardian reported.

Read More
The people of Kiribati have been under pressure to relocate due to sea level rise. A young woman wades through the salty sea water that flooded her way home on Sept. 29, 2015. Jonas Gratzer / LightRocket via Getty Images

Refugees fleeing the impending effects of the climate crisis cannot be forced to return home, according to a new decision by the United Nations Human Rights Committee, as CNN reported. The new decision could open up a massive wave of legal claims by displaced people around the world.

Read More
The first day of the Strike WEF march on Davos on Jan. 18, 2020 near Davos, Switzerland. The activists want climate justice and think the WEF is for the world's richest and political elite only. Kristian Buus / In Pictures via Getty Images

By Ashutosh Pandey

Teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg is returning to the Swiss ski resort of Davos for the 2020 World Economic Forum with a strong and clear message: put an end to the fossil fuel "madness."

Read More